scholarly journals Evaluation of time to perform surgery in patients with breast cancer assisted at hospital federal da lagoa (hfl), in rio de janeiro, from january 2014 to january 2017

Mastology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Suppl 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Motroni de Almeida ◽  
Rafael Henrique Szymanski Machado

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the period of time elapsed between the date of biopsy and the date of surgery of patients with breast cancer (BC) assisted at the Mastology Service of HFL, from January 2014 to January 2017. We excluded from this analysis those patients with distant metastasis and the ones submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Introduction: Initial studies about the consequences on prognosis of the delay in diagnosis and treatment of BC tend to show that the longer the delay, the higher the disease staging at diagnosis; which, consequently, leads to lower survival rates. Methods: Retrospective study based on the analysis of medical records. We calculated the time elapsed between the date of biopsy of the malignant lesion and the date of the oncological surgery. The patients were divided in 3 groups regarding the time elapsed between biopsy and surgery: <60 days, 60 to 90 days and >90 days. Results: The mean waiting time for surgery was of 225.49 days. Only 2 patients (1.80%) waited less than 60 days. Seven patients (6.31%) were operated between 61 and 90 days, and the great majority of patients (102, in absolute numbers), waited for more than 90 days (90.89%). Discussion: Most studies associate the delay in diagnosis and BC treatment with lower survival rates. In a multivariate analysis, major delays to start the treatment were a significant risk factor for the reduction in survival. The delay in the surgical treatment of younger women (number of weeks between the date of diagnosis and date of definitive treatment) was assessed in a retrospective, case-control study published in 2013, which used data from the California Cancer Registry Database. In this study, the five-year survival of women treated with surgery who waited more than 6 weeks was 80%, in comparison to 90% among those whose delay was shorter than 2 weeks. Another retrospective study assessed the impact of the delay of the beginning of treatment after the biopsy confirmed BC. This analysis showed that the delay to begin the first treatment longer than or equal to 60 days was associated with worse specific survival rates. Gagliato et al showed the impact of the delay to start adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with BC in several stages, and with different tumor subtypes. The results showed worsened survival rates when the beginning of adjuvant chemotherapy was delayed in all of the study groups. Conclusion: Considering the data in this study and data from several others regarding the negative impact of delay in BC treatment, it is clear that efforts in all spheres of the government should be made so that the healing and survival rates can improve.

2008 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa Wadhwa ◽  
Nazanin Fallah-Rad ◽  
Debjani Grenier ◽  
Marianne Krahn ◽  
Tielan Fang ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. S106-S107
Author(s):  
T. Iwase ◽  
T. Sangai ◽  
E. Ishigami ◽  
J. Sakakibara ◽  
K. Fujisaki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogeshkumar Malam ◽  
Mohamed Rabie ◽  
Konstantinos Geropantas ◽  
Susanna Alexander ◽  
Simon Pain ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
M E Lippman ◽  
A S Lichter ◽  
B K Edwards ◽  
C R Gorrell ◽  
T d'Angelo ◽  
...  

The impact of primary irradiation of localized breast cancer on the ability to administer Adriamycin-cytoxan adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with stage II breast cancer was examined. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either irradiation or mastectomy as local therapy and did not differ with respect to other prognostic variables that might influence tolerance to chemotherapy. All of the patients received chemotherapy dose escalations (or reductions) until maximal tolerated drug doses were established. Patients receiving irradiation had minimally greater myelosuppression which was nearly totally explainable by lymphopenia. Irradiated patients required dose reduction nearly twice as often as mastectomy patients although commonly their dose could be reescalated. Patients managed with radiotherapy received slightly less drug than patients treated with mastectomy when treated to an identical degree of bone marrow suppression. The primary management of breast cancer by irradiation does not induce substantial changes in the ability of patients to tolerate adjuvant chemotherapy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 126-126
Author(s):  
Lindsay C. Brown ◽  
Miran J. Blanchard ◽  
Nadia N. Laack

126 Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive breast cancer variant, with 5-yr overall survival (OS) typically reported at 40-45%. We recently presented our results with once-daily radiotherapy (RT) as a component of trimodality therapy, with 5-yr OS of 64%. Herein we report patient and treatment factors associated with locoregional control (LRC). Methods: With permission of the IRB, review of medical records at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN was performed to identify patients treated with RT for IBC from 2000-2010. Patients with non-metastatic, clinically diagnosed IBC were included. OS, LRC and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. First recurrence in the chest wall or regional lymph nodes was defined as a locoregional recurrence (LRR). Results: 52 women were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 23-83). Median follow-up for the population was 3.6 years (range 0.7 – 11.9). All patients were treated with adjuvant RT to the chest wall and draining nodal basins in once-daily fractions of 1.8-2.25 Gy (median 2 Gy), to a median of 50 Gy (range 46-60 Gy). Actuarial 5-yr LRC was 85%. LRR was associated with poorer DMFS and OS (p < 0.01). Factors significantly associated with improved LRC included lack of extracapsular extension (ECE) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Factors associated with a trend towards LRC included use of bolus, absence of boost, node negativity at time of surgery and pathologic complete response (pCR). Daily bolus was employed in 90% of patients and was most commonly (68%) 1 cm in thickness. There was a trend towards improved 5-yr LRC when bolus ≥ 1 cm was employed daily (93% v. 67%, p = 0.06). Patients who received a boost to the mastectomy scar (62% of the population, median of 10 Gy, range 10-16 Gy) had poorer LRC (78% v. 100%, p = 0.08), but superior 5-yr DMFS (78% v. 34%, p = 0.035) and OS (77% v. 34%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: LRC is associated with improved OS in IBC. Lack of ECE and use of adjuvant chemotherapy are associated with improved LRC in women with IBC. Node negativity, pCR and use of daily bolus ≥1 cm in thickness are associated with a trend towards improved LRC. The impact of boost requires further analysis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1074-1074
Author(s):  
Lukas Schwentner ◽  
Reyn Van Ewijk ◽  
Isabell Hoffmann ◽  
Rolf Kreienberg ◽  
Maria Blettner ◽  
...  

1074 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed dramatically in the last decades. Anthracycline-/taxane-based and dose-dense chemotherapy regimens improved survival in node positive breast cancer. This study tries to answer the following questions: (1) Are there differences in survival dependent on chemotherapy regimens in 0/0-3/4-10/<10 positive lymph nodes? (2) Is it possible to define a cut-off of positive lymph nodes for the use of Taxane-based and dose dense chemotherapy? Methods: This German is a multi-center [17 participating hospitals all are certified as breast cancer centers] retrospective cohort study. We included CMF (1.385), FEC (1.170), FEC-DOC (1.723), and dose-dense ETC (248) into the analysis. Results: In case of 0 LN CMF/FEC/FEC-DOC did not show significant differences in DFS, but OAS was significantly impaired by the use of FEC-DOC in 0 LN [p=0.024; HR=2.02 (95% CI: 1.10-3.73)] (no ETC use in 0 LN). In case of 1-3 positive LN CMF/FEC/FEC-DOC/ETC did not differ significantly in survival parameters. But in 4-10 LN FEC-DOC [p=0.049; HR=0.67 (95% CI: 0.44-0.99)] and ETC [p=0.024; HR=0.56 (95% CI: 0.34-0.93)] demonstrated a significant benefit in DFS and a strong trend in OAS. Dose-dense ETC showed a significant improvement in DFS [p=0.003; HR=0.35 (95% CI: 0.17-0.69)] and OAS [p=0.009; HR=0.35 (95% CI: 0.16-0.77)] in patients with >10 positive LN. Conclusions: Our data confirms that Taxane-based chemotherapy does not improve DFS in LN negative breast cancer, but rather demonstrated an inferior OAS. But in LN positive breast cancer we can demonstrate a benefit by the use of Taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. Furthermore, dose-dense ETC demonstrated a significant benefit in survival in >10 positive LN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document