scholarly journals PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM;

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (05) ◽  
pp. 731-735
Author(s):  
BUSHA KHAN ◽  
NUZHAT RASHEED ◽  
BUSHRA MUKHTAR
Keyword(s):  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group B ◽  
Labour Room

Objective: To compare maternal and perinatal outcome in cases of PROM at term, following induction with vaginalmisoprostol (PGE1) to shorten the duration of labour with those managed expectantly. Design: Quasi Experimental study. Setting: Thestudy was carried out in department of obstetrics and gynecology labour room unit-1, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur.Population: Term pregnancies (37-42 wks) with PROM and cephalic alive fetuses. Methods: Sixty patients with confirmed diagnosis ofPROM were randomized into two groups i.e, A&B. Group A comprising 30 patients were induced with tab. Misoprostol 25 ug at 6 hrlyinterval max of four doses and group B was managed expectantly for 24 hrs followed by induction with intravenous oxytocin. OutcomeMeasures: Total duration of labour, mode of delivery, maternal infection rates and, APGAR score at 1 and 5 min. Results: It was found thatboth groups had similar characteristics, but the misoprostol group had a significantly shorter time interval from PROM to delivery (18.9 vs27.5 hours) i.e total duration of labour. Caesarean section rates were 20% in the misoprostol group and 30.7% in the other. There were nodifferences between them regarding fetal well being, complications during labour and delivery and neonatal or postpartum maternalmorbidity. Within 24 hours, 44% of women had delivered in the expectant group against 73.3% in the misoprostol group. Conclusion:Immediate labour induction with misoprostol in cases of term PROM shortens the total duration of labour, and the time of maternalhospitalization without any maternal and perinatal outcomes disadvantages.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FOLEY CATHETER AND DINOPROSTONE GEL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND INDUCTION OF LABOUR IN PATIENTS AT TERM WITH UNFAVOURABLE CERVIX (BISHOP'S SCORE<4)

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Shrikant Warade ◽  
Anshul Pahwa ◽  
Savita Dhongade
Keyword(s):  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Group B ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies

BACKGROUND- Since ancient times, labour inducton is a well established obstetric concept. In the past few decades, rate of labour induction has increased dramatically. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efcacy of transcervical foley catheter with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and labour induction in term singleton pregnancies with unfavourable cervix. METHODS- Term singleton pregnancies fullling inclusion criteria were randomized by chit box system to receive intracervical dinoprostone or transcervical foley catheter. Progress of labour was monitored with the help of partogram. Labour augmentation was done by oxytocin. RESULTS- 110 patients in each group were enrolled. Group A was induced with transcervical Foley catheter and group B with dinoprostone gel. Baseline characteristics like maternal age, parity, gestational age were comparable in each group. There was a signicant difference in the Bishop's score (<.0.05) at the end of 12 hours, Group B showing a greater improvement than A. A signicant difference was also observed in the requirement of augmentation with Pitocin, 77.27% in foley group and 63.63% in dinoprostone group . Although, there was no signicant difference observed in the mode of delivery (p>0.05) and induction to delivery time interval (p>0.05) , maternal and neonatal morbidity between the groups. CONCLUSION- To conclude, Dinoprostone is associated with rapid cervical ripening . Although, mean induction to delivery interval and number of vaginal deliveries were comparable between the groups. Moreover, cost and safety prole of foley catheter makes it comparable or even superior to dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and induction of labour, especially in developing countries.

Oxytocin administration for induction and augmentation of labour in Polish maternity units– an observational study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Baranowska ◽  
Anna Kajdy ◽  
Iwona Kiersnowska ◽  
Dorota Sys ◽  
Urszula Tataj-Puzyna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Healthcare Personnel ◽  
National Guidelines

Abstract BackgroundThere is not enough data regarding practices and protocols that healthcare personnel follow and the amount of oxytocin that women receive during labour. Empirical evidence indicates that compliance with the guidelines improves the quality of healthcare and reduces adverse effects. The aim of the study was to evaluate oxytocin supply practices of oxytocin for labour induction and augmentation in Polish maternity units.MethodsThe article presents a prospective observational study. Data collection took place in two selected maternity units between January 15 and July 31, 2019 (n=545). Inclusion criteria were women in term pregnancies, undergoing oxytocin induction or augmentation of labour. Exclusion criteria were women who were in preterm labour, aged less than 18 years, and women whose baby was known to have a malformation. ResultsThe average total amount of oxytocin administrated to women before birth was 7,329µg following labour induction and 3.952µg following labour augmentation. The actual administration of oxytocin deviated both from the unit and national guidelines in 93,6% of all observed labours. We found no statistically significant correlation between the amount of oxytocin administered and mode of delivery, immediate postpartum blood loss or Apgar scores. There was no observed effect of total oxytocin on short-term perinatal outcomes. Hospitals with similar protocols did not differ significantly in terms of total oxytocin amount, induction to stimulation ratio—the only observed difference was the mode of delivery. ConclusionsThere is a need for a thorough analysis to find out the reasons for the observed discrepancies between protocols and practice.

scholarly journals A comparative study of vaginal misoprostol versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 2520
Author(s):  
Raj M. Mehta ◽  
Babulal S. Patel ◽  
Akshay C. Shah ◽  
Shashwat K. Jani ◽  
Vismay B. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Induction of labour defined as artificial initiation of uterine contractions before the onset of spontaneous labour, after the period of viability, by any methods. The successful outcome depends on the Bishop Score, maternal age and parity. Authors compared the most preferred two routes; vaginal and oral for induction and outcome, adverse events and side effects were noted.Methods: This was a prospective comparative study carried out at SVPIMSR, Ahmedabad, from January 2019 to June 2019, Gujarat, 100 patients who required induction were randomly divided in two groups- Group A received 25µg oral misoprostol, Group B - received 25µg vaginal misoprostol repeated 4 hourly up to maximum five doses in both groups. The induction to delivery interval, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome and complications were observed.Results: The mean induction to delivery interval was less in vaginal group than oral (18.7 hours in vaginal versus 22.4 hours in oral). Vaginal delivery and caesarean section rates were comparable in both groups. 60% patients in Group A required more than two doses as compared to 36% in Group B. No major complications or adverse events were observed.Conclusions: Both oral misoprostol in a dose of 25μg and vaginal misoprostol 25μg every four hours, to a maximum of five doses, have safety and efficacy for induction. With The vaginal route, delivery occurs in less time and few doses required as compared to oral.

scholarly journals A comparative study of intracervical foley’s catheter with oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3660
Author(s):  
Priyanka . ◽  
Shashi Bala Arya ◽  
Mirdu Sinha ◽  
J. K. Goel
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B

Background: Induction of labour implies stimulation of uterine contraction before spontaneous onset of labour with or without ruptured membranes. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracervical Foley’s catheter with oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.Methods: A total 100 term pregnant women were chosen with bishop score <6 and divided into two groups: Foley’s catheter with oxytocin (Group A) and vaginal misoprostol (Group B). In Group A, a 16 F Foley’s catheter introduced beyond internal os and traction applied every 4 hourly to check for expulsion with simultaneous oxytocin infusion (2 mU/min up to 32 mU/min). In Group B, 25 mcg misoprostol administered every 4 hourly (maximum 6 doses or 150 mcg). Data analysed using SPSS software 20.0. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: No statistical difference found between demographic variables between two groups. Both primigravida and multigravida had poor pre-induction bishop score in both groups. Foley’s catheter (80%) and misoprostol group (96%) had successful induction and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Foley’s catheter took more time from induction-delivery both in primigravida and post-dated pregnant women. The rate of cesarean in Foley’s catheter group was high (62.5%) including 33% cases with failed induction. Foley’s catheter had less maternal and neonatal complications, less NICU admission as compared to misoprostol (p>0.05).Conclusions: Misoprostol was found better for successful induction, decreases induction-to-delivery interval and increases vaginal delivery as compared to Foley’s catheter but it needs constant supervision in view of hyperstimulation and tachysystole.

scholarly journals CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1537-1545
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ikram ◽  
Amna Javed ◽  
Shafqat Mukhtar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Monitoring ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Labour Room

Introduction: The cardiotocography (CTG) is more commonly knows aselectronic fetal monitoring (EFM). A cardiotocography measures the fetal heart and the frequencyof uterine contractions. Using two separate disc shaped transducers. Objectives: The objectiveof this study is to co-relate the intrapartum cardiotocography monitoring with fetomaternaloutcome. Study Design: Cross sectional analytical study. Setting: Department of Obstetricsand Gynaecology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Period: From September 2012 toMarch 2013 (Six Months). Patient & Method: Total 60 patients (pregnant females) fulfilling theinclusion criteria were selected for this study, who were admitted in labour room in early andactive labour. In group A normal CTG monitoring and in Group B women with abnormal CTGmonitoring. Maternal outcomes in terms of mode of delivery and fetal outcome (APGAR Score,neonatal seizures, admission to nursery and time of neonatal discharge were seen). Result: Themean age in group A was 26.13+3.90 years and in group B was 26.53+4.17 years. The meangestational age in group A was 38.40+1.50 weeks and in group B was 36.60+1.59 weeks. Ingroup A, 25 (83.3%) woman were delivered through spontaneous vaginal birth and 4(13.4%)women, who were delivered by caesarean section (for all indication except fetal distress), 1(3.3%) woman by assisted vaginal birth (for all other indications). In group B there were 7(23.8%)women who delivered through spontaneous vaginal birth. 3(10%) women by assisted vaginalbirth (for abnormal CTG monitoring) and 20(66.7%) women by caesarean section (for abnormalCTG). In group A, there were 7(23.3%) neonates who were admitted in nursery, while in groupB, there were 19(63.3%) neonates, who were admitted in nursery. Conclusion: Intrapartumexternal fetal cardiotocography is not a single indicator of fetal distress. An increased caesareansection rate in babies with a pathological cardiotocography stresses on the need for additionaltests to differentiate hypoxic fetuses from non-hypoxic.

Perinatal outcome associated with oligohydramnios in term pregnancies

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Deepa Chudal ◽  
Keshang Diki Bista ◽  
Neelam Pradhan
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Prelabor Rupture Of Membranes

Introduction: Amniotic fluid is a complex substance essential to fetal well-beingand dynamic milieu that changes as pregnancy progresses andsurrounds developing fetus providing an ideal environment for normal fetal growth and development. Amniotic fluid volume is fetal well being which varies with gestational age and depends on a dynamic interaction between placenta, fetus and maternal components. Methods: This was a hospital based descriptive study conducted at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, from 14th April 2013 to 13th April 2014(2070) which consisted of singleton, term (37-42weeks) pregnancies admitted with ultrasonographicfinding of Amniotic Fluid Index≤ 5 with delivery within one week of ultrasonographicfinding. A prefixed questionnaire was used to fill maternal and fetal outcome parameters like age, parity, period of gestation, Amniotic Fluid Index, associated maternal conditions, mode of delivery, indication of Cesarean section, color of liquor and perinatal outcomes. Results: Total 115 cases of oligohydramnioswere noted accounting for an incidence of 2.4%. 92 women were term, giving incidence of term oligohydramnios to be 2%. Out of 92 cases, 77(83.6%) underwent emergency caesarean section and 15 (16.3%) were delivered vaginally. Low birth weight of < 2.5 kg was noted in 14 (15.2%) babies and meconium stained liquor was present in 12 (13%) of oligohydramnios cases. APGAR score of < 7 at 1 minute and 5 minute was seen in 13 (14.13%) and 3 (3.26%) cases respectively. . Among 92 cases, 44 (47.8%) were associated with Prelabor Rupture of Membranes followed by post dated pregnancies and Intrauterine Growth Retardation accounting for 12 (13.1%) cases in each group Conclusion: Prelabor Rupture of Membranes was  most common cause of term oligohydramnios resulting in high risk of caesarean delivery in oligohydramnios cases. Cesarean Section for oligohydramnios has been associated with good perinatal outcome.

scholarly journals Oxytocin versus Misoprostol used as an induction of labour in term in early rupture of Amniotic membranes

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1023
Author(s):  
Jaydeep J. Bhatu ◽  
Ankita B. Chaudhari ◽  
Nilesh R. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Room Temperature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Induction Agent ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Amniotic Membranes ◽  
Rule Out

Background: Pre labor Rupture of membranes is a common obstetrical problem, significant event as it transforms an ordinary pregnancy into a high risk one. Majority of cases of PROM - of about 60% occur after 37 completed weeks Induction of labour is artificial. Misoprostol is receiving attention as a cervical modifier and labour induction agent. This study compares the safety and efficacy of Misoprostol with Oxytocin in labour induction in term pre labour rupture of membranes. Objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Misoprostol with that of Oxytocin in labour induction in PROM. The effects were compared between primipara and multipara in a selected sample.Methods: General condition is assessed by pulse rate, blood pressure, height, weight with particular attention to pedal odema, anemia. Cardiovascular and respiratory systems were examined, rule out cephalo pelvic disproportion and for Bishop’s scoring. USG for foetal maturity, Liquor status and for foetal well-being. Admission CTG.Results: There is no significant difference was observed between two groups either in vaginal delivery or in incidence of LSCS. Mean induction delivery interval in misoprostol group for nullipara is 8.5 hours. For multipara it is 6.6 hours. And in oxytocin group for nullipara is 10:4 hours. In multipara it is 6.5 for primipara it was significantly reduced in misoprostol group compared to syntocinon group.Conclusions: Misoprostol is an effective, cheap, safe, stable at room temperature and easy to use if it is used in appropriate dosage for induction of labour in pre-labour rupture of membranes at term.

scholarly journals The association between isolated oligohydramnios at term and pregnancy outcome and perinatal outcome in case of isolated oligohydramnosis: a retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Vijay M. Kansara ◽  
Kunal D. Kadakar ◽  
Akash S. Chikani ◽  
Pinal A. Pateliya
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Adverse Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Background: Current study was carried out to assess the impact of isolated oligohydramnios on perinatal outcomes and mode of delivery.Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at term pregnancy with sonographic finding of isolated oligohydramnios (AFI <5 cm) were recruited for the study. Uterine anomaly and high risk pregnancies were excluded from the study. The mode of delivery and perinatal outcome were compared with control group of pregnancy with normal amniotic fluid (AFI >5-25 cm).Results: When compared to the normal AFI, women with oligohydramnios had significantly lower birth weight babies and were delivered at a significantly earlier gestational age. However there was no difference in the APGAR scores at birth and NICU admissions between the two groups. Reactive NST had more chances of good APGAR score at 1 and 5 minute and that lower the AFI more the probability of nonreactive NST and abnormal Doppler. The number of inductions and caesareans done for foetal reasons were significantly higher in the exposed group.Conclusions: Obstetric and perinatal outcome remains similar in both isolated oligohydramnios with reactive NST as well as in patients with normal amniotic fluid index. Isolated oligohydramnios is not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. However, it increases the risk for labour induction and caesarean section.

scholarly journals EPIDURAL ANALGESIA DURING VAGINAL DELIVERY AT THE WOMEN WITH THE UTERINE SCAR. IS IT RISKY? POSSIBLE? NECESSARY?

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
K. A Bozhenkov ◽  
T. A Gustovarova ◽  
A. N Ivanyan ◽  
V. L Vinogradov ◽  
E. M Shifman
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Uterine Scar ◽  
Group B

This paper will be concerned with the results of a prospective controlled longitudinal study which has involved 132 secundiparae (among them 69 patients are with the uterine scar after cesarean section). The parturient women have been divided into 3 groups. Group “A” includes 38 women with the uterine scar after cesarean section, in this group epidural analgesia was administered during vaginal delivery. Group “B” includes 32 secundiparae without uterine scar, in this group epidural analgesia was administered during vaginal delivery. Group “C” - 31 women with the uterine scar, no epidural analgesia was administered during vaginal delivery. Based on a comparative assessment of the pain syndrome intensity in labor according to the visual analogue scale, the research has proved that delivery at the women with the uterine scar is accompanied by statistically more significant pain than at the women without uterine scar. The necessity of analgesia during vaginal delivery at the women with the uterine scar has been proved. The effectiveness and safety of epidural analgesia at patients with the uterine scar have been analyzed. It has been proved that epidural analgesia provides anesthesia during vaginal delivery at the women with the uterine scar, while it does not affect the total duration and course of labor, maternal and perinatal outcomes, and does not mask the clinical picture of the uterine rupture threat.

scholarly journals LABOUR INDUCTION;

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (05) ◽  
pp. 1070-1074
Author(s):  
Samar Ameen
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oxytocin Infusion ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Lactated Ringer's Solution

Objective: To compare the efficacy of misoprostol 50ug (sublingual) incomparison with oxytocin infusion than for induction of labour in cases of PROM (prematurerupture of membrane at term). Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: Mujahid TrustHospital, Faisalabad. Duration: Conducted from Dec 2006 to April 2008. Methods: Womenwere randomized to receive either 50 microgram of sublingual misoprostol every 4 hours withRinger’s lactate solution or oxytocin infusion 10 lU in one litre of Lactated Ringer’s solution witha sublingual placebo. Main outcome measures: The number of women delivering vaginallywithin 24 hours of labour induction. Results: Fifty two women (83%) in misoprostol group and48 (77 %>) in oxytocin group delivered vaginally within 24 hours [relative risk (RR)1.1. However,the induction to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group 15+3.7 hourscompared with the oxytocin group 18+4.1. The incidence of tachysystole was more than threefolds higher in misoprostol than in the oxytocin group (14%) versus 4.3%) RR3.3) but this wasnot statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertonusor hyperstimulation syndrome, mode of delivery intervention for fetal distress or neonataloutcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: The group of women received misoprostolfor labour induction were found more successful in achieving vaginal delivery in comparativelyshorter time and more acceptable to patients. Further studies on safety with large numbers ofwomen need to be conducted before routine use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document