scholarly journals Accelerated method of casting for correction of clubfoot applicable?

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-966
Author(s):  
Farhad Alam ◽  
◽  
Abdul Latif Shahid ◽  
Islam Hussain ◽  
Abdul Latif Sami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoring System ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ponseti Method ◽  
Serial Casting ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Rural Parents ◽  
Financial Issues ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To see the results of accelerated method against standard Ponseti method for correction of clubfoot by using Pirani scoring system. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Children’s hospital and the institute of child’s health, Lahore. Period: June 2019 Dec 2019. Material & Method: 100 patients included in this study and divided into two groups. In group A (50 patients) correction was done by standard Ponseti method while accelerated method was applied in group B(50 patients). Weekly serial casting was done in group A while twice weekly in group B. Assessment was done by Pirani scoring system in both groups at beginning of correction, at each cast and at end of correction. Results: Average casting time for group A was 38 days while it was 20 days in group B. Correction rate was 94% in group A and 89% in group B. This difference was not found to be statistically significant (p=0.396). Conclusion: Accelerated method is applicable for correction of clubfoot because treatment time is shorter and results are similar to standard Ponseti method. Hence, this method should be adopted in Pakistan so that poor and rural parents can easily manage travel and financial issues because only 2 to 3 weeks are required for whole casting treatment.

scholarly journals LOWER URETERIC STONES EXPULSION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (09) ◽  
pp. 1331-1335
Author(s):  
Khalid Hussain ◽  
Maria Tarique ◽  
Attiq ur Rehman Khan ◽  
Asim Bukhari ◽  
Bilal Akhter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objectives: To compare Tamsulosin versus ESWL for lower ureteric stonesexpulsion. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient Department ofUrology at Services Hospital, Lahore. Period: January 2015 to December 2015. Material& Methods: Total 50 patients were enrolled in study. Patients were divided into 2 groups.In group A, 25 patients received daily oral treatment of 0.4mg Tamsulosin for 28 days, andin group B, 25 patients were treated with ESWL. A stone-free condition, was defined as thecomplete absence of any stone based on plain abdominal X-rays observed and during followupvisits at the time of treatment of stone was noted. Results: The mean age of the patientswere recorded as 33.20±9.23 years. There were 40(80%) males and 10(20%) females with maleto female ratio of 4:1. Out of 50 patients, 16(32%) presented with hematuria, 3(6%) had feverwhile 31(62%) appeared with no complication status. Out of 50 patients, 21(42%) presentedwith expulsion time 08-14 days in which 14(28%) were from tamsulosin group and 07(14%)were from ESWL group, similarly 19(38%) patients appeared with expulsion time of 15-28 daysin which 10(20%) were from tamsulosin group and 09(18%) were from ESWL group. Statisticallythere is insignificant difference between the groups i.e. p-value=0.28 Ns. Conclusion: Thisstudy suggests that the tamsulosin helps in the earlier clearance of stone fragments andreduces the complications as compared to ESWL.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (07) ◽  
pp. 1197-1202
Author(s):  
Hajra Shuja ◽  
Mehmood Ali Shah ◽  
Sadaf Bokhari
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard treatment for cholelithiasis. It is a safe and effective treatment in many cases. General anesthesia has a high incidence for PONV. But anti-emetic drugs can help in preventing PONV. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of ondansetron and metoclopramide in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: 6 months i.e. from 15-2-2017 to 15-8-2017. Material & Methods: The patients were divided into two groups. Ondansetron was given to group A patients within 15 minutes of induction, and metoclopramide to group B patients within 15 minutes of induction. Then patients were shifted to the ward after surgery and followed-up for 24 hours for assessment of PONV. All the data was entered and analyzed on SPSS version 20. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 38.40±12.07 years and in group B was 42.63±11.77 years. The efficacy achieved in 53 were from group A and 39 were from group B Statistically significant difference was found between the study groups i.e. p-value=0.003. Conclusion: Ondansetron showed significantly better efficacy than metoclopramide in preventing PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

scholarly journals COMPARISION OF CEMENTED VERSUS UNCEMENTED HEMIARTHOROPLASTY OF THE HIP.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (07) ◽  
pp. 1057-1061
Author(s):  
Dr. Hafiz Salman Saeed ◽  
Farhad Alam ◽  
Muhammad Yousaf ◽  
Iqra Fayyaz
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Orthopaedic Department ◽  
Residual Pain ◽  
Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

The objective of this study was to compare the mean residual pain after cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of hip. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Orthopaedic Department, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: September 2016 to October 2017. Materials and Methods: Total 150 patients were admitted in orthopedic Department of Allied Hospital Faisalabad according to inclusion & exclusion criteria. After taking informed written consent, all patients were divided into two groups randomly. Cementedhemiarthroplasty was done in Group A patients and uncemented hemiarthroplasty was done in group B patient. All procedures were done by surgeon who has minimum 5yrs post fellowship experience. Monthly Follow up was done and residual pain was noticed at the end of 6th month. All the data was analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0. Results: In this study, in Group-A the patients between 65-75 years of age were 57.33% (n=43) and between 76-85 of age were 42.67% (n=32). In Group B the patients between 65-75 years of age were 56%(n=42) and between 76-85 years were 44% (n=33). The mean+sd was calculated and it is 73.49+4.99 years in Group-A patients and 73.73+4.74 years in Group-B patients. In Group A, males were 61.33% (n=46) and female were 38.67% (n=29). In Group B, males were 57.33% (n=43) and female were 42.67% (n=32). When we compared the residual pain after cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip, it shows 1.69+0.35 in Group-A patients and 2.62+0.30 in Group-B patients. When we calculated p-value it was 0.0001 showing a significantdifference. Conclusion: It is concluded that residual pain in cemented hemiarthroplasty is lower than uncemented hemiarthroplasty. 

To Compare Metformin Vs Insulin in Gestational Diabetes in Terms of Neonatal Hypoglycemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 2928-2929
Author(s):  
Saadia Mir ◽  
Raisham Saleem ◽  
Fouzia Saghir ◽  
Shafia Zaib Mir ◽  
Aisha Iqbal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Regular Insulin ◽  
Neonatal Hypoglycemia ◽  
Insulin Group ◽  
Metformin Group ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Aim: To compare metformin vs insulin in Gestational Diabetes in terms of neonatal hypoglycemia. Methodology: Study design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: Obstetrics / Gynecology Unit-l, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi. Duration of study: 6 months i.e. 10-11-2017 to 10-05-2018 Data collection procedure: 240 patients were randomly allotted into two groups; A & B. Group A received metformin and group B received regular insulin. Patient was admitted at 36 wks onwards. Neonatal hypoglycemia was measured and entered in structured Performa. All the data was entered and analyzed through SPSS version 22. Results: In this study, the mean ± sd ages of patients were 28.7±5.05 years in insulin group while 28.01±4.37years in metformin group. Mean neonatal blood sugar level was 51.58±11.77mg/dl in insulin group while 57.37±10.61mg/dl in metformin group. The difference was significant (p<0.05). In this study, neonatal hypoglycemia was noted in 28 (23.3%) cases with insulin while in 1 (0.8%) case with metformin. The difference was significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Metformin has better outcome than insulin in terms of less number of neonatal hypoglycemia. Key words: Gestational Diabetes, Metformin, Insulin, Neonatal Hypoglycemia

Efficacy of probiotics to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in low birth weight preterm neonates.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (03) ◽  
pp. 328-332
Author(s):  
Shagufta Niazi ◽  
Farrukh Saeed ◽  
Shahla Tariq ◽  
Muhammad Azhar Farooq ◽  
Sanaullah Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Necrotizing Enterocolitis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the efficacy of probiotics in prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) among low birth weight (LBW) preterm neonates. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Pediatric Medicine, Unit-II, Services Hospital, Lahore. Period: September 2019 to February 2020. Material and Methods: A total of 260 LBW preterm neonates were enrolled. All the neonates were allocated to 2 groups with equal number of cases (130 in each group). Group-A was given probiotics whereas placebo was administered in Group-B. All the cases were admitted and follow ups were made up until 7th day. Occurrence of NEC was recorded among both groups. Results: Out of a total of 260 LBW preterm neonates, 142 (54.6%) were male and118 (45.4%) female. Overall, mean age was noted to be 1.48+0.50 days. Table-I shows that there was no statistical difference among neonates of both study groups in terms of age, gestational age and birth weight (p>0.05). Five (3.8%) neonates in Group-A and 14 (10.8%) in Group-B were found to have NEC. Efficacy of treatment in Group-A was significantly higher in comparison to Group-B. Conclusion: Probiotics are effective in the prevention of NEC in preterm LBW neonates. Prophylactic usage of probiotics among preterm neonates is noted to be helpful in avoiding development of NEC.

scholarly journals FETO-MATERNAL OUTCOME;

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 324-327
Author(s):  
AYESHA ZAHOOR QURESHI ◽  
SHAHID RAO ◽  
SHAZIA SIDDIQUE
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Birth Asphyxia ◽  
Maternal Outcome ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Labour Room ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the effects of epidural analgesia and parenteral nalbuphine in labouring women with term pregnancieson feto-maternal outcome. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: It was carried out in the Labour Room, Nishtar Hospital, MultanPeriod: From June 2009 to December 2009. Material and methods: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided intotwo groups, having 30 patients in each group. Results: In group-A, pain control was much better and satisfactory (VAS=00-1), duration of labourwas slightly prolonged and instrumental delivery was more common. Low Apgar score and birth asphyxia were seen in group-B. No babydeveloped RDS in both groups. Conclusions: Feto-maternal outcome is much better in women having epidural analgesia with bupivacaine ascompared to women having intramascular nalbuphine.

scholarly journals Comparative study of midline versus paramedian approach of spinal block in elderly.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1664-1667
Author(s):  
Nadia Bano ◽  
Nazim Hayat ◽  
Saira Saleem ◽  
Ayesha Rehman ◽  
Farhan Javed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Method Group ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the efficacy of paramedian and midline approach for spinal block in elderly, in terms of success rate and number of attempts required by either approach. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Madina Teaching Hospital Faisalabad. Period: January 2018 to December 2019. Material & Method: 120 elderly ASA I-III patients scheduled to undergo lower abdominal or limbs; general or orthopaedic surgery were randomly divided into two equal groups A and B of sixty patients. Patients were assigned into groups by lottery method. Group A patients were supposed to receive spinal block by midline approach while group B patients were planned to receive spinal block by paramedian approach. Results: It was observed that success rate was significantly high in group B, 98.3% as compared to group A, 80%, (p value 0.001). The number of attempts were significantly less in group B in comparison to group A (p-value 0.0001). Conclusion: The paramedian approach for spinal block in elderly patient’s offers ease of administration and a higher success rate as compared to midline approach.

scholarly journals Comparison of Salbutamol and Salbutamol with ipratropium bromide in children with exacerbation of Asthma in terms of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1611-1615
Author(s):  
Sadaf Minhas ◽  
Saqib Aslam ◽  
Muhammad Azhar Farooq ◽  
Ayesha Anwar ◽  
Farhan Zahoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peak Expiratory Flow ◽  
Ipratropium Bromide ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Expiratory Flow ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the Salbutamol alone and Ipratropium Bromide supplemented Salbutamol in children with exacerbation of asthma in terms of PEFR. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Pediatrics Emergency, KRL Hospital Islamabad. Period: 1st August 2016 to 31 January 2017. Material & Methods: Group A patients were given only Salbutamol (0.15mg/kg per dose with minimum 2.5 mg, maximum 5 mg/dose). Group B was given Ipratropium Bromide supplemented Salbutamol (250 mcg/dose for <20 kg while 500 mcg/dose for >20kg of Ipratropium Bromide with same dose of Salbutamol as prescribed for Group A). Baseline spirometry was performed on each patient and after measurement of baseline peak expiratory flow. The outcome was measured by Peak flow meter and reassessed at 60 minutes. Results: Comparison of salbutamol alone and ipratropium bromide supplemented salbutamol in children with exacerbation of asthma in terms of PEFR shows that 40.5 + 4.28 in Group-A and 59.5 +4.75 in Group-B, P-value was calculated as 0.0001, showing a significant difference between the two groups while the difference in increase was recorded as 19%. Conclusion: We concluded that salbutamol alone is significantly less effective when compared with Ipratropium Bromide supplemented Salbutamol in children with exacerbation of asthma in terms of PEFR.

scholarly journals Comparision of Infection Frequency in 1-Day Vs 5-Days Post Operative Antibiotic Regimen in Open Treated Facial Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1725-1727
Author(s):  
Syed Tahir Husain ◽  
Ahsan Ullah Khan Sherani ◽  
Suneel Kumar Punjabi ◽  
Monis M. Ali ◽  
Shahzaman Memon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Infection Frequency ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the frequency of surgical site infection by using postoperative prophylactic antibiotics (1day vs. > 5 days) in patients following open surgical reduction of facial fractures. Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Setting: Department of Dental &Maxillofacial Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Studies & Health Sciences, Karachi. Duration: 06months from 23 December 2016 to 22 June 2017. Subject and Methods: A total of 368 cases according to inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Antibiotic (Inj. Augmentin 1.2g) was given to group A from admission to 24 hours postoperatively and in Group B antibiotic was continue up to 05 days postoperatively. A surgeon evaluated participants of both groups at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks postoperatively for infection according to criteria of surgical site infection published by CDC. All information was noted in the proforma. Results: - The average age of the patients was 31.10±7.39 years. Rate of surgical site infection was not significant between groups (4.9% vs. 7.1%; p=0.379). Conclusion: In this study 1-day course of antibiotics postoperatively in facial fractures is as effective in preventing infective complications as a 5-day regimen. The use of prolonged postoperative antibiotics in uncomplicated facial fractures had no significant benefit in reducing the incidence of infections. Key Words: Maxillofacial Surgeons, Surgical site infection, Prophylactic antibiotics

scholarly journals Comparative study of lactose and lactose free milk for acute diarrheal management in children upto 1 year of age.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 1631-1635
Author(s):  
Muhammad Arshad ◽  
Ahmad Hassan Khan ◽  
Masood Mazhar ◽  
Nadir Ali Rana ◽  
Shoaib Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Diarrhea ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
P Value ◽  
Formula Milk ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objectives: The objective of this particular research was to contrast mean duration of acute diarrhea in infants taking lactose free formula versus lactose-containing formula milk along with standard treatment. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Paediatric Medicine DHQ Teaching Hospital Sargodha. Period: 6 months from 29 October 2016 to 28 April 2017. Material & Methods: This study included 60 infants of both genders who were between 1month to 1 year of age and presented with acute diarrhea. These infants were separated into two groups. Infants in Group-A were given lactose-free formula milk while those in Group-B received lactose-containing formula milk. Outcome variable was mean duration of diarrhea which was compared between the two groups. Consent was taken in black and white from parents of each infant. Results: The average age of the infants was 7.2±3.1 months. Majority (n=41, 68.3%) of the infants were aged 6 months and above followed by 19 (31.7%) infants aged between 1-5 months. There were 29 (48.3%) male and 31 (51.7%) female infants with a female to male ratio of 1.1:1 the weight of infants ranged from 2.6 Kg to 11.9 Kg with a mean of 8.1±2.2 Kg. Both study groups were compared in terms of mean age (p-value=0.741), mean weight (p-value=0.932) and age (p-value=0.781), gender (p-value=0.438) and weight (p-value=0.573) groups distribution. The mean period of diarrhea was notably shorter in infants taking lactose-free milk (1.7±0.8 vs. 2.7±0.8 days; p<0.001) as compared to those receiving lactose-containing milk. Similar significant differences were observed across various subgroups based on patient’s age, gender and weight. Conclusion: Lactose-free formula milk reduces mean duration of diarrhoea significantly when compared to lactose-containing formula milk regardless of patient’s age, gender and weight which advocate its preferred use in future practice in infants presenting with acute diarrhea.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document