Associated Factors that Hinder Early Detection of Breast Cancer among Women at Oncology Center of AL-Najaf city

Author(s):  
Asmaa Tarek KadhimAl-Hakak ◽  
Fatema Wanas Khudair
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Temesgen Abiso Lera ◽  
Aman Beyene ◽  
Befekadu Bekele ◽  
Solomon Abreha

Abstract Background: Early detection of breast cancer plays an important role in decreasing morbidity and mortality associated with breast cancer. Breast self-examination (BSE) is one of the screening methods for early detection of breast cancer. BSE involves the woman herself looking at and feeling each breast for possible lumps, distortions or swelling. BSE is a simple exercise which can potentially save the life of a woman but it is not well focused yet. So, this study was aimed to assess breast Self-Examination and associated factors among women in Wolaita Sodo city, Ethiopia. Methods: Community based cross-sectional study design was employed. Systematic random sampling technique was used to select 626 women aged 20-65 years old. The data were collected using pre-tested and structured questionnaire. The data was entered using Epi data version 3.5.1 and exported to SPSS version 21 software for statistical analysis. Bivariable and multiple logistic regression analysis were done.Variables with P-value less than 0.05 were considered as statically significant. Results: A total of 629 women were included in the study. More than half (60.9%) of the participants were in the age range of 20-29 years. Women who had mentioned BSE as method for early detection of breast problem were 6.36 times (AOR: 6.36, 95% CI :( 3.72, 10.71) more likely to perform BSE than those who say that they don’t know any method. Women breast feed 13-24 months were 2.43 times AOR: 2.43, 95% CI :( 1.28, 4.59) more likely to examine their breast than those who breast feed different duration. Employed women were 3.13 times more likely AOR: 3.13 95% CI :( 1.14, 8.58) to practice BSE than women not employed. Likewise being student was 3.73 times AOR: 3.73, 95% CI (1.19, 11.73) more likely to perform BSE than others. Conclusion: The finding of this study showed that women’s practice of breast self-examination is relatively low. Knowledge of BSE, breast feeding 13-24 months, being employed and being student were factors affecting performing breast self-examination. Therefore, educating girls and increasing awareness on electronics media is important.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Meshkani ◽  
Ali Aboutorabi ◽  
Najmeh Moradi ◽  
Mostafa Langarizadeh ◽  
Ali Ghanbari Motlagh

Abstract Background: Despite the genetic test’s benefits in early detection of disease, many people do not have the test performed. This study aimed to systematically review the associated factors with a preference for the gene tests regarding breast cancer. Methods: It was a systematic review study. Data were collected from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), ProQuest, and Embase databases. All full-text English language studies up to 2020 that addressed the preference for the gene screening tests for early detection of breast cancer were included. Data extracted and assessed for quality by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a consensus meeting with a third reviewer. The vote counting was determined for identifying the associated factors with the preference.Results: From 1269 initially retrieved citations, 25 studies were included. According to vote counting analysis, age was identified as strongly negative factor while being married, income, family history of breast cancer, personal history or presence of breast cancer, BRCA-related knowledge were identified as strongly positive factors with preference of genetic tests for breast cancer. About 96% of articles were in high quality.Conclusion: There was low evidence in associated factors with a preference on gene tests, especially for psychological factors. So, further research is needed to help policymakers to develop early detection strategies and increase people's participation that leads to the success of the strategies and avoiding the high cost of treatment as well.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2020 (ID: CRD42020190811).


Author(s):  
Saad Alhumaidi ◽  
Abdullah Alshehri ◽  
Abdullah Altowairqi ◽  
Ahmad Alharthy ◽  
Bader Malki

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick P. Li ◽  
Anne-Renee Hartman ◽  
Alexander Miron

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document