vote counting
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

64
(FIVE YEARS 24)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nan Hong ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
Lei Gu ◽  
Si-Yi Chen ◽  
Jian-Ping Tong

Background: Myopia (nearsightedness) is currently the most common human eye disorder worldwide. In the recent years, several studies have addressed the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathogenesis of myopia. Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the miRNA expression profiling studies in myopia to identify commonly dysregulated miRNAs in myopic tissues. Method: Seven independent studies were included in the meta-analysis. A vote-counting strategy were employed as the meta-analysis method. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis were performed to identify the pathways most strongly affected by the dysregulated mouse miRNAs. Results: According to the vote-counting method, eighteen miRNAs were reported in at least two studies with the consistent direction, of which 13 miRNAs were commonly up-regulated in myopic samples compared with control samples and five miRNAs were commonly down-regulated. Subgroup analyses divided and compared the differentially expressed miRNAs according to species (human and animal) and ocular tissue types. The KEGG analysis showed that the dysregulated mouse miRNAs were most enriched in extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction signal pathway. The most enriched GO processes regulated by the dysregulated mouse miRNAs was cellular protein modification process. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis recommends several miRNAs may provide some clues of the potential biomarkers in myopia. Further mechanistic studies are warranted to elucidate the biological role of the dysregulated miRNAs in the development of myopia.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Simon Butt ◽  
Fritz Siregar

Abstract Electoral administration in Indonesia is complex. The Electoral Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) is responsible for planning and running five-yearly elections for one national and two regional legislatures, and one additional national regional representative body, as well as direct presidential, gubernatorial, mayoral and regent elections. Because candidates and parties often have significant financial stakes in their outcome, these elections are hotly contested and the results quite commonly disputed, including in Indonesia's Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi). Electoral contestants often point to mistakes in administration and vote counting, which appear to be natural consequences of the great logistical challenges these elections present. For example, on 17 April, 2019, well over 150 million citizens attended one of over 800,000 polling stations to vote for candidates to fill 19,817 legislative seats in national and subnational parliaments. Many of these elections are said to be marred by attempts by candidates and their parties to gain illegal advantage, whether through misuse of incumbency or vote buying. There is also said to be much potential for corruption amongst electoral administrators themselves in registering candidates, verifying parties, procuring equipment for polling stations, and counting and tallying votes on election day. Given the potential of mistakes and illegality to jeopardise the legitimacy of election results, lawmakers in Indonesia have created multi-layered oversight mechanisms to oversee the planning and running of the elections by the Electoral Commission, as well as to oversee the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu, Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum) itself, which is charged with supervising that Commission. This article examines the work and performance of these institutions, and the Electoral Administration Honour Council (DKPP, or Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu), which hears allegations of breaches by the Commission and the Board.


2021 ◽  
pp. 238008442110035
Author(s):  
L. Tanner ◽  
D. Craig ◽  
R. Holmes ◽  
L. Catinella ◽  
P. Moynihan

Introduction: A systematic review of the evidence on the impact of dental caries on malnutrition risk in children was conducted. Objectives: To systematically review published evidence pertaining to the effect of dental caries severity and prevalence on risk of wasting or stunting in children. Methods: Four questions relating to caries of the permanent dentition, primary dentition, early childhood caries (ECC), and severe ECC as a risk factor for undernutrition were set. The target population was children aged 0 to 18 y from any country. Data sources included MEDLINE and Embase. All human epidemiological studies were included. Quality assessment excluded lowest-quality studies. Evidence synthesis by vote counting was depicted using harvest plots. A best available evidence approach was applied to narrative synthesis. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results: Of the 2,690 studies identified, 447 were screened in duplicate; of these, 117 underwent quality assessment, resulting in 46 included studies, of which 38 were included in vote counting (3 quasi-experimental, 1 cohort, 1 case control, and 33 cross-sectional studies). For the permanent dentition, findings were mixed; the balance of data showed no association between caries prevalence (7/11 studies) or severity (8/17 studies) with wasting. For the primary dentition, the balance of data showed a positive association between caries prevalence (10/15 studies) and severity (12/15 studies) with wasting, as well as between-caries prevalence (4/5 studies) and severity (6/6 studies) with stunting. Considering ECC only did not alter this pattern of findings. Conclusion: The balance of evidence suggests that dental caries in the primary dentition is associated with undernutrition. There is a need for well-designed trials on the impact of caries rehabilitation on growth trajectories of children from low- and middle-income countries and for prospective studies of the impact of caries severity on both stunting and wasting to confirm causality. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study can be used by policy makers when considering the importance of oral health in addressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal to end all forms of malnutrition. The findings suggest that dental caries in the primary dentition may impair children’s healthy weight gain. The findings indicate that higher-quality data are required to confirm a causal relationship and thus inform funding bodies of the need for research, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to substantiate the current knowledge and inform clear and accurate policy statements.


Significance The process has been criticised for vote-counting delays and with regard to the candidates themselves, some of whom have serious allegations of wrongdoing hanging over them. Such criticisms will continue, raising awkward questions for party representatives on the campaign trail and potentially undermining faith in Honduran democracy generally. Impacts The success of Honduras’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout will affect sentiment towards the ruling PN ahead of November. The new US Biden administration may adopt a firm stance towards Hernandez, having not yet responded to the corruption allegations. A new electoral law is unlikely to advance in the short time left before elections.


2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-128
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Taylor ◽  
Elisabeth Davis ◽  
Laura E. Michaelson

In this chapter, we describe and compare the standards for evidence used by three entities that review studies of education interventions: Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development, Social Programs that Work, and the What Works Clearinghouse. Based on direct comparisons of the evidence frameworks, we identify key differences in the level at which effectiveness ratings are granted (i.e., intervention vs. outcome domain), as well as in how each entity prioritizes intervention documentation, researcher independence, and sustained versus immediate effects. Because such differences in priorities may result in contradictory intervention ratings between entities, we offer a number of recommendations for a common set of standards that would harmonize effectiveness ratings across the three entities while preserving differences that allow for variation in user priorities. These include disentangling study rigor from intervention effectiveness, ceasing vote counting procedures, adding replication criteria, adding fidelity criteria, assessing baseline equivalence for randomized studies, making quasi-experiments eligible for review, adding criteria for researcher independence, and providing effectiveness ratings at the level of the outcome domain rather than the intervention.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Meshkani ◽  
Ali Aboutorabi ◽  
Najmeh Moradi ◽  
Mostafa Langarizadeh ◽  
Ali Ghanbari Motlagh

Abstract Background: Despite the genetic test’s benefits in early detection of disease, many people do not have the test performed. This study aimed to systematically review the associated factors with a preference for the gene tests regarding breast cancer. Methods: It was a systematic review study. Data were collected from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), ProQuest, and Embase databases. All full-text English language studies up to 2020 that addressed the preference for the gene screening tests for early detection of breast cancer were included. Data extracted and assessed for quality by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a consensus meeting with a third reviewer. The vote counting was determined for identifying the associated factors with the preference.Results: From 1269 initially retrieved citations, 25 studies were included. According to vote counting analysis, age was identified as strongly negative factor while being married, income, family history of breast cancer, personal history or presence of breast cancer, BRCA-related knowledge were identified as strongly positive factors with preference of genetic tests for breast cancer. About 96% of articles were in high quality.Conclusion: There was low evidence in associated factors with a preference on gene tests, especially for psychological factors. So, further research is needed to help policymakers to develop early detection strategies and increase people's participation that leads to the success of the strategies and avoiding the high cost of treatment as well.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2020 (ID: CRD42020190811).


10.2196/23180 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. e23180
Author(s):  
Matthew Mclaughlin ◽  
Tessa Delaney ◽  
Alix Hall ◽  
Judith Byaruhanga ◽  
Paul Mackie ◽  
...  

Background The effectiveness of digital health interventions is commonly assumed to be related to the level of user engagement with the digital health intervention, including measures of both digital health intervention use and users’ subjective experience. However, little is known about the relationships between the measures of digital health intervention engagement and physical activity or sedentary behavior. Objective This study aims to describe the direction and strength of the association between engagement with digital health interventions and physical activity or sedentary behavior in adults and explore whether the direction of association of digital health intervention engagement with physical activity or sedentary behavior varies with the type of engagement with the digital health intervention (ie, subjective experience, activities completed, time, and logins). Methods Four databases were searched from inception to December 2019. Grey literature and reference lists of key systematic reviews and journals were also searched. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they examined a quantitative association between a measure of engagement with a digital health intervention targeting physical activity and a measure of physical activity or sedentary behavior in adults (aged ≥18 years). Studies that purposely sampled or recruited individuals on the basis of pre-existing health-related conditions were excluded. In addition, studies were excluded if the individual engaging with the digital health intervention was not the target of the physical activity intervention, the study had a non–digital health intervention component, or the digital health interventions targeted multiple health behaviors. A random effects meta-analysis and direction of association vote counting (for studies not included in meta-analysis) were used to address objective 1. Objective 2 used vote counting on the direction of the association. Results Overall, 10,653 unique citations were identified and 375 full texts were reviewed. Of these, 19 studies (26 associations) were included in the review, with no studies reporting a measure of sedentary behavior. A meta-analysis of 11 studies indicated a small statistically significant positive association between digital health engagement (based on all usage measures) and physical activity (0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.14, SD 0.11). Heterogeneity was high, with 77% of the variation in the point estimates explained by the between-study heterogeneity. Vote counting indicated that the relationship between physical activity and digital health intervention engagement was consistently positive for three measures: subjective experience measures (2 of 3 associations), activities completed (5 of 8 associations), and logins (6 of 10 associations). However, the direction of associations between physical activity and time-based measures of usage (time spent using the intervention) were mixed (2 of 5 associations supported the hypothesis, 2 were inconclusive, and 1 rejected the hypothesis). Conclusions The findings indicate a weak but consistent positive association between engagement with a physical activity digital health intervention and physical activity outcomes. No studies have targeted sedentary behavior outcomes. The findings were consistent across most constructs of engagement; however, the associations were weak.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Delaney ◽  
Matthew Mclaughlin ◽  
Alix Hall ◽  
Sze Lin Yoong ◽  
Alison Brown ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND There has been a proliferation of digital health interventions (DHIs) targeting dietary intake. Despite their potential, the effectiveness of such interventions are thought to be dependent, in part, on user engagement. However, the relationship between engagement and the effectiveness of dietary DHIs is not well understood. OBJECTIVE As such, the aim of this systematic review is to describe the association between DHI engagement (both usage and subjective experience) and dietary intake. METHODS A comprehensive search for peer-reviewed literature was undertaken in four electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus) from inception to December 2019. A hand search of targeted journals, grey literature searches and a search of relevant references of similar reviews was also conducted. Studies were eligible if they examined a quantitative association between objective measures of engagement with a DHI (subjective experience or usage) and measures of dietary intake in adults (aged ≥18 years). Authors single screened studies, with a pair of review authors assessing quality of studies and extracting relevant data. Narrative syntheses using vote counting was undertaken to explore to relationship between measures of engagement and dietary intake. RESULTS The search resulted in 10,653 citations, of which seven studies (from nine articles) were included in the review. The majority of studies (n=5) included usage measures of engagement rather than subjective experience (n=2). Logins were the most commonly reported usage measure (n=5 studies), and fruit and vegetable intake was the most common measure of dietary intake (n=4 studies). The heterogeneity of engagement and dietary intake measures limited the use of meta-analytic techniques, however narrative review (vote counting) found mixed evidence of an association with usage measures (5 of 12 associations indicating a positive relationship, 7 were inconclusive). No evidence regarding an association with subjective experience was found (0 of 2 associations were inconclusive). The majority of included studies (n=5) were rated poor quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. CONCLUSIONS The findings provide some evidence supporting an association between measures of usage and fruit and vegetable intake, however this was inconsistent. No evidence was found regarding an association with subjective experience. Given the limited number of studies included in the review and poor quality of available evidence further research examining the association between DHI engagement and dietary intake using consistent measures, with an additional focus on subjective experience is warranted. CLINICALTRIAL CRD42018112189


Significance However, Republican President Donald Trump is alleging that vote tallies are fraudulent and inaccurate. He is seeking recounts and undertaking lawsuits over alleged vote-counting irregularities. Impacts Two run-off elections in Georgia will determine whether the US Senate stays Republican or is tied 50-50 with the Democrats. Given the type of complaints raised by Trump’s campaign, prospects for a Supreme Court intervention look remote. Controversy over the election result will linger, perhaps until the 2024 presidential election.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document