scholarly journals Low acceptance of intimate partner violence by pregnant women in Uganda predicts higher uptake of HIV self-testing among their male partners

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-296
Author(s):  
Caroline J Vrana-Diaz ◽  
Jeffrey E Korte ◽  
Mulugeta Gebregziabher ◽  
Lauren Richey ◽  
Anbesaw Selassie ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oche Mansur Oche ◽  
Habibullah Adamu ◽  
Aisha Abubakar ◽  
Munira Sahabi Aliyu ◽  
Abubakar Shehu Dogondaji

Background. Violence against women perpetrated by an intimate partner is an important public health issue. In recent years, attention has focused also on intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy due to its prevalence, adverse health consequences, and intervention potentials. Aim. To determine the knowledge, experiences, and factors influencing IPV, including the controlling behaviors of male partners of pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic (ANC) of a tertiary health facility in Sokoto. Materials and method. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 260 pregnant women attending ANC in a tertiary health facility in the Sokoto metropolis. They were selected using a systematic sampling technique, and a set of pretested questionnaire items was used for data collection. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 20. Results. The respondents’ ages ranged from 19 to 40 years with a mean of 29.09±4.99 years, and up to 83.5% of them were in a monogamous setting. Three-quarters of them were Muslims mostly from urban areas (72.1%), and 36.4% had a university or HND degree. Majority of them responded correctly to questions on IPV; overall, up to 99.2% of them had good knowledge of IPV. About 33% of the respondents have experienced IPV while pregnant and up to 61.7% of them said they did nothing because of fear. Some of the controlling behaviors of male partners included always asking for permission before seeing friends and family members and also controlling their finances. Factors associated with IPV include tribe, place of residence, and partner consuming alcohol. Conclusion. Majority of the respondents had good knowledge of IPV with about one-third of them ever experiencing it. Respondent’s partners were mostly jealous and exhibited some form of controlling behaviors. Physical violence was the most prevalent form, and most of the victims did nothing about it. Government and women’s right groups should push for the implementation of tougher punitive measures against perpetrators of IPV.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e0190856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibeke Rasch ◽  
Toan Ngo Van ◽  
Hanh Thi Thuy Nguyen ◽  
Rachel Manongi ◽  
Declare Mushi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bizu Gelaye ◽  
Ngan Do ◽  
Samantha Avila ◽  
Juan Carlos Velez ◽  
Qiu-Yue Zhong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 132-137
Author(s):  
ANITA NATH ◽  
SHUBHASHREE VENKATESH ◽  
J. VINDHYA ◽  
SHEEBA BALAN ◽  
CHANDRA S. METGUD

Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is recognized as an important public health problem globally as well as in India. It may result in adverse physical and mental health consequences for the victim or unfavourable pregnancy outcomes if it happens during pregnancy. The possible risk factors for IPV can be explained by four levels of ecological factors: individual, partner, household and community. We estimated the prevalence of IPV and its association with selected ecological risk factors among pregnant women availing of antenatal care at a public sector hospital in Bengaluru, southern India. Methods We included 350 women above the age of 18 years with a confirmed pregnancy of less than 24 weeks and having no obstetric complication. We used the Conflict Tactics Scale to determine the presence of IPV. The risk factors measured were—individual level: respondent’s age, education, occupation, gravidity, planned or unplanned pregnancy, substance abuse, presence of depression and anxiety; partner-related: spouse’s education, occupation and marital discord; household/community-related: socioeconomic status, social support, religion and consanguinity. Results The prevalence of IPV was 3.7%. Factors that were significantly associated on multivariate analysis were higher age (above 20 years) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.82 [1.12–2.97], p=0.016) and presence of depression (AOR 6.84 [1.76–26.61], p=0.005). Conclusion The prevalence of IPV was less in our study population compared to figures reported from other Indian study settings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simukai Shamu ◽  
Naeemah Abrahams ◽  
Marleen Temmerman ◽  
Christina Zarowsky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document