scholarly journals Corporate Governance Mechanism on Intellectual Capital Disclosure and Firm Value

Author(s):  
Maria Goreti Kentris Indarti ◽  
Taswan Taswan ◽  
Batara Daniel Bagana ◽  
Afifatul Janah
Author(s):  
Yuliusman ◽  
◽  
Dr. H. Afrizal, S.E. ◽  
Dr. H. Mukhzarudfa ◽  
Dr. H. Tona Aurora Lubis ◽  
...  

This study entitled the influence of corporate governance mechanism on firm value with intellectual capital disclosure as an intervening variable. This study aims to examine the direct and indirect effect of board size, gender diversity, educational background, block holder ownership, and foreign ownership both simultaneously and partially on intellectual capital disclosure and firm value. This study examines the mediating effect of intellectual capital disclosure in the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and firm value. This study used the companies included in intellectual capital intensive industries in Indonesia Stock Exchange as the sample for 2017-2019. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling, with 243 data from 81 companies. Analysis techniques used in this study were statistic descriptive, multiple regression, and path analysis used SPSS 23 for windows. The hypothesis testing results show that corporate governance mechanisms simultaneously influence intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) and firm value. Partially, only board size influences both ICD and substantial value, and educational background only influences strong value. The Sobel test shows that ICD doesn't mediate the effect of all variables related to corporate governance mechanism on firm value.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Du ◽  
Siyan Chen ◽  
Huan Shao

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and firm value of the listed companies in China. Does the better corporate governance lead to the higher firm value? Or does the higher firm value make it easy to choose a better governance mechanism? Or they affect each other? In other words, this paper tries to answer whether the corporate governance mechanism is only decided by institutional arrangement, or by market choice according to firm value or performance or by the interaction of institutional arrangement and market choice? It tries to answer whether institutional arrangement maximizes the firm value, or an invisible hand pushes them to arrive at its maximum. Design/methodology/approach – This paper establishes an analytic framework of simultaneous equations based on causality, which includes five endogenous variables: ownership of larger shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation, debt financing and firm value. It adopts 1,644 data samples from 274 Chinese listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange during 2007- 2012 after the non-tradable shares reform. Ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation of single equation, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation of simultaneous equations are respectively done to show the differences of these three kinds of estimations. Findings – The empirical results show that differences exist among OLS, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation. Finally, 3SLS estimation should be adopted because the OLS and 2SLS estimation are biased. There are endogenous relationships between corporate governance mechanism and firm value. Through the 3SLS estimation, it is found that first, ownership concentration and firm value affect each other positively. Second, managerial ownership and firm value affect each other positively; third, director compensation and firm value affect each other negatively, while director compensation and firm performance affect each other positively. Finally, debt financing level and firm value are negatively related to each other. Practical implications – It means that ownership of large shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation and debt financing in the Chinese listed companies are found to have a root in the interaction between institutional arrangement and market choice. It is also found that adverse selection occurs when creditors loan to the listed companies. Managerial compensation is positively related to accounting profit, but it is negatively related to firm value because managers increase profit due by earning management. This could only increase the accounting profits and obtain huge cash compensation, but not increase firm value and even harm the interests of shareholders. Originality/value – This paper not only shows the difference between OLS and 2SLS estimation but also compares the estimation of 2SLS and 3SLS in terms of empirical methods. It gives answers to the following questions: whether the relationship is one-way causality or bilateral causality between ownership concentration, managerial ownership, director compensation and firm value; whether governance mechanism affects firm value by institutional arrangement, or market drives both of them to strike a balance by an invisible hand. In other words, does it make them arrive at equilibrium through the competitive selection process when shareholders, directors, managers and creditors attempt to maximize themselves of their interests?


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Jadzil Baihaqi

This study examines the impact of intellectual capital and corporate governance mechanism on banks’ performance both directly and also moderated effect. We used banks that were listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The bank’s performance was measured by risk-based bank rating while intellectual capital was measured by the coefficient of VAICTM (Pulic, 1998). The corporate governance mechanism was measured based on the size of boards of directors, the composition of independent director, CEO remuneration, managerial ownership, the effectiveness of audit committee and ownership concentration. The result of the study shows that banks’ performance was positively influenced by intellectual capital. However, corporate governance mechanism did not influence the banks’ performance, while the moderation effect of corporate governance mechanism on the relationship between intellectual capital and banks’ performance was not confirmed.


— Corporate social obligation has become an vital part of commercial company exercise during the last decade or so. In fact, many businesses dedicate a phase of their annual reports and company internet web sites to CSR activities, illustrating the importance they attach to such sports. On the opposite hand, Good company governance exercise has a number of observable outcomes on economic results of the company. Corporate governance recommendations are strongly associated with income quality or the quantity to which the firm’s disclosed economic basic performance reflects its right performance. This have a look at investigates in the main the mediating effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Dividend Policy on the impact of corporate governance mechanism on firm value amongst publicly listed organizations inside the Philippines. It examined forty seven publicly indexed businesses inside the Philippines for a four-yr period from 2013 to 2016. A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach changed into used for the evaluation. Results show that Corporate Social Responsibility does not act as a mediating variable with regards to company governance mechanisms to firm rate. It manner that CSR does now not act as a variable so one can give a boost to corporation governance mechanisms that during developing the charge of the commercial enterprise corporation. Also, dividend coverage does no longer act as mediating variable at the effect of enterprise governance mechanisms on company value. Finally, the end result confirmed that there is a terrible but large effect of dividend price on business enterprise value.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Afifah Novita Hardiani ◽  
Ihyaul Ulum ◽  
Siti Zubaidah

The aim of this research is to examine the affect of corporate governance mechanism on disclosure of intellectual capital on the banking sector companies. 27 companies were taken as sampleson this research. The objective of this research is to prove the affect of corporate governancemechanism on disclosure of intellectual capital on the banking sector companies. The analyticalmethods used in this research are Partial Least Square (PLS) and test directly (direct effect).Results indicated that the variable of corporate governance was positively affect the disclosureof intellectual capital on the banking sector companies which means all information in companies were disclosed.Keywords: mekanisme corporate governance, intellectual capital disclosure


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-97
Author(s):  
Nia Yuniarsih

The objective of this study is to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanism, namely managerial ownership, institutional ownership, to firm value. This study takes sample from 32 companies in the manufacturing sector at the  Indonesia Stock Exchange, which were published in financial report from 2012-2013. The method of analysis of this research used multi regression and single regression. The results of this study show that (1) managerial ownership had positive significant influence to firm value, (2) institutional ownership had not significant influence to firm value, (3) simultaneously of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, had significant influence to firm value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Rina Hartanti ◽  
Fahri Yulandani ◽  
M Rizky Riandi

The purpose of this study is to explain the effect of Profitability, Capital Structure, and the application of Good Corporate Governance to Firm Value. The population of the study includes companies registered in the LQ-45 which are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2017. The technique of determining the sample used is purposive sampling. This study uses a multiple linear regression approach. Based on the results of testing, this study proves that profitability, capital structure, and the application of the GCG mechanism together affect firm value. This study also proves that partially profitability proxied by ROA and Managerial Ownership has a positive effect on Firm Value. The results showed that capital, which is proxied by DER and GCG, which is proxied by Institutional Ownership, does not have a positive effect on Corporate Value


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1337-1349
Author(s):  
Nooraisah Katmon Et.al

Our study empirically examines the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and their interactions on the firm value. We concentrated on the banking industry in Indonesia and Malaysia given that majority of the literature are primarily focused on the non-financial industry due to stringent regulation on disclosure in the financial banking counterparts. We measure firm’s value using Tobin’s q, while corporate governance mechanisms comprised of independent directors, the presence of audit committee, the institutional ownership as well as the percentage of female directors on the board. Using 48 observations during the year 2016-2018, our result exhibit that there is a significant positive association between audit committee independence and firm value. Moreover, we also reported a negative link between board independent and the presence of female directors on the firm value. In respect to our interaction effects, we found that there is a complementary relationship between (i) audit committee independent and board independent and (ii) female directors and audit committee independent and firm value. Moreover, our regression also reported a significant substitutive relationship between (i) female directors and institutional ownership (ii) female directors and board independent as well as (iii) audit committee independent and institutional ownership and firm value. In contrary to the findings from the western counterpart, our result shows that the presence of female directors reduce firm value, thus suggesting that the role of female directors have been impaired due to the cultural aspect of the society.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document