scholarly journals Governance Mechanism, Intell ectual Capita l Disclosure, a nd Firm Value

Author(s):  
Yuliusman ◽  
◽  
Dr. H. Afrizal, S.E. ◽  
Dr. H. Mukhzarudfa ◽  
Dr. H. Tona Aurora Lubis ◽  
...  

This study entitled the influence of corporate governance mechanism on firm value with intellectual capital disclosure as an intervening variable. This study aims to examine the direct and indirect effect of board size, gender diversity, educational background, block holder ownership, and foreign ownership both simultaneously and partially on intellectual capital disclosure and firm value. This study examines the mediating effect of intellectual capital disclosure in the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and firm value. This study used the companies included in intellectual capital intensive industries in Indonesia Stock Exchange as the sample for 2017-2019. The sampling technique used in this study was purposive sampling, with 243 data from 81 companies. Analysis techniques used in this study were statistic descriptive, multiple regression, and path analysis used SPSS 23 for windows. The hypothesis testing results show that corporate governance mechanisms simultaneously influence intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) and firm value. Partially, only board size influences both ICD and substantial value, and educational background only influences strong value. The Sobel test shows that ICD doesn't mediate the effect of all variables related to corporate governance mechanism on firm value.

— Corporate social obligation has become an vital part of commercial company exercise during the last decade or so. In fact, many businesses dedicate a phase of their annual reports and company internet web sites to CSR activities, illustrating the importance they attach to such sports. On the opposite hand, Good company governance exercise has a number of observable outcomes on economic results of the company. Corporate governance recommendations are strongly associated with income quality or the quantity to which the firm’s disclosed economic basic performance reflects its right performance. This have a look at investigates in the main the mediating effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Dividend Policy on the impact of corporate governance mechanism on firm value amongst publicly listed organizations inside the Philippines. It examined forty seven publicly indexed businesses inside the Philippines for a four-yr period from 2013 to 2016. A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach changed into used for the evaluation. Results show that Corporate Social Responsibility does not act as a mediating variable with regards to company governance mechanisms to firm rate. It manner that CSR does now not act as a variable so one can give a boost to corporation governance mechanisms that during developing the charge of the commercial enterprise corporation. Also, dividend coverage does no longer act as mediating variable at the effect of enterprise governance mechanisms on company value. Finally, the end result confirmed that there is a terrible but large effect of dividend price on business enterprise value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-48
Author(s):  
Evi Rahmawati ◽  
Naufal Fadlurrahman ◽  
Firda Shofia Azzahra

Research aims: This study examines the effect of corporate governance mechanisms, such as board size, CEO duality, number of the audit committee, board gender, and family ownership, on intellectual capital disclosures.Design/Methodology/Approach: The sample study was high intellectual capital (IC)-intensive companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and Malaysia Stock during 2017-2018.Research findings: For Indonesia, the results revealed that the number of the audit committee and board size had a positive and significant effect on intellectual capital disclosures. Meanwhile, in Malaysia, the results showed that audit committees had a positive and significant effect on intellectual capital disclosures.Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study adds literature on the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on intellectual capital disclosure of high IC-intensive companies in the development of the country context.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Nastiti Rahayuni ◽  
Badingatus Solikhah ◽  
Agus Wahyudin

ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh mekanisme Corporate Governance terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual melalui kinerja keuangan sebagai variabel intervening. Populasi penelitian ini adalah 137 perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2011-2014. Metode pemilihan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive samplingdan terpilih 124 unit analisis. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis jalur (path analysis) dengan alat bantu IBM SPSS 21.Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa kepemilikan manajerial dan proporsi komisaris independen tidak berpengaruh langsung terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual, sedangkan kepemilikan institusional, ukuran komite audit, dan kinerja keuangan berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual. Hasil juga menunjukkan bahwa kinerja keuangan mampu menjembatani pengaruh tidak langsung antara kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, proporsi komisaris independen, dan ukuran komite audit terhadap pengungkapan modal intelektual.  ABSTRACTThe aim of this study to test the effect of Corporate Governance Mechanism on the Intellectual Capital Disclosure through Financial Performance as intervening variable. The population of this paper is 137banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2011 to 2014.The sampling technique used a purposive sampling and produced124unit analyses.The data was analizedusing path analysis with IBM SPSS software version 21.The result of this paper indicated that the manajerial ownership and proportion of independent commisioner does not affect the Intellectual Capital Disclosure directly, but institusional ownership, audit committee size, and financial performance have positive effecton Intellectual Capital Disclosure. On the other hand, the result show that financial performance is able to mediate the indirect effect of manajerial ownership, institusional ownership, proportion of independent commisioner, and audit committee on Intellectual Capital Disclosure. Keywords : Intellectual Capital Disclosure, Corporate Governance, Financial Performance


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 010-031
Author(s):  
Animah Animah ◽  
Lukman Effendy ◽  
Alamsyah M. Thahir ◽  
Erna Widiastuty

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanisms,  firm size of financial performance. The Population of this research is the company manufacturing  in BEI. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The analytical tool used is using partial least  square program. The independent variables in this research are corporate governance mechanism,  firm size  while the dependent variable is the performance of the financial. The result of the research shows that firm size  influence to financial performance, while other variables such as corporate governance mechanisms have no effect negative  to financial performance.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Maria Gorethi Berek ◽  
Elok Pakaryaningsih

The objective of this research is to examine the effect of corporate governance mechanism on investment decision. Using two ways of measurement, namely, board size and institutional ownership, corporate governance is hypothesized to have an effect oninvestment decision in which measured by asset growth, equity growth and debt growth.Using real estate industry listed at Jakarta Stock Exchange as the sample, the result shows that both institutional ownership and board size do not affect investment decision.Keywords: Corporate governance, investment decision, institutional ownership, board size


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Quang Linh Huynh

The existing literature has acknowledged the complicated links among external business environments, corporate governance and organisational performance. However, a large void exists in the extant research models of corporate governance, because none have discussed and empirically examined the intervenient effect of the corporate governance mechanism on the external business environments and organisational performance. A thorough review of the literature on corporate governance, external business environments and organisational performance comes to the proposed hypotheses. The indirect effect of external business environments on organisational performance via corporate governance is statistically tested. The research provides empirical evidence that organisational performance is the consequence of both corporate governance and external business environments that is, in turn, the causality of corporate governance. More importantly, it offers insight into the mediating effect of corporate governance in transforming the uncertainty of external business environments into organisational performance. The findings suggest that firms facing uncertainty in external business environments should adopt suitable corporate governance to achieve the best organisational performance.


2019 ◽  
pp. 2070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Putu Purna Yogiswari ◽  
I Dewa Nyoman Badera

Board composition is one particular issue regarding corporate governance. This study aims to find empirical evidence regarding the effect of board diversity proxied by gender diversity, nationality diversity, educational background, and the proportion of outside directors on firm value. This research was conducted in basic industrial and chemical manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with an observation period of 3 years, those of from 2015-2017. The method of determining the sample uses a purposive sampling. The sample of this study amounted to 39 companies with a total of 117 samples. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that gender diversity and the proportion of outside directors have no effect on firm value while there is a positive effect between nationality diversity and educational background on firm value. Keywords: Board diversity, corporate governance, and firm value.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Du ◽  
Siyan Chen ◽  
Huan Shao

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between corporate governance mechanism and firm value of the listed companies in China. Does the better corporate governance lead to the higher firm value? Or does the higher firm value make it easy to choose a better governance mechanism? Or they affect each other? In other words, this paper tries to answer whether the corporate governance mechanism is only decided by institutional arrangement, or by market choice according to firm value or performance or by the interaction of institutional arrangement and market choice? It tries to answer whether institutional arrangement maximizes the firm value, or an invisible hand pushes them to arrive at its maximum. Design/methodology/approach – This paper establishes an analytic framework of simultaneous equations based on causality, which includes five endogenous variables: ownership of larger shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation, debt financing and firm value. It adopts 1,644 data samples from 274 Chinese listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange during 2007- 2012 after the non-tradable shares reform. Ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation of single equation, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation of simultaneous equations are respectively done to show the differences of these three kinds of estimations. Findings – The empirical results show that differences exist among OLS, 2SLS and 3SLS estimation. Finally, 3SLS estimation should be adopted because the OLS and 2SLS estimation are biased. There are endogenous relationships between corporate governance mechanism and firm value. Through the 3SLS estimation, it is found that first, ownership concentration and firm value affect each other positively. Second, managerial ownership and firm value affect each other positively; third, director compensation and firm value affect each other negatively, while director compensation and firm performance affect each other positively. Finally, debt financing level and firm value are negatively related to each other. Practical implications – It means that ownership of large shareholders, managerial ownership, director compensation and debt financing in the Chinese listed companies are found to have a root in the interaction between institutional arrangement and market choice. It is also found that adverse selection occurs when creditors loan to the listed companies. Managerial compensation is positively related to accounting profit, but it is negatively related to firm value because managers increase profit due by earning management. This could only increase the accounting profits and obtain huge cash compensation, but not increase firm value and even harm the interests of shareholders. Originality/value – This paper not only shows the difference between OLS and 2SLS estimation but also compares the estimation of 2SLS and 3SLS in terms of empirical methods. It gives answers to the following questions: whether the relationship is one-way causality or bilateral causality between ownership concentration, managerial ownership, director compensation and firm value; whether governance mechanism affects firm value by institutional arrangement, or market drives both of them to strike a balance by an invisible hand. In other words, does it make them arrive at equilibrium through the competitive selection process when shareholders, directors, managers and creditors attempt to maximize themselves of their interests?


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Jadzil Baihaqi

This study examines the impact of intellectual capital and corporate governance mechanism on banks’ performance both directly and also moderated effect. We used banks that were listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The bank’s performance was measured by risk-based bank rating while intellectual capital was measured by the coefficient of VAICTM (Pulic, 1998). The corporate governance mechanism was measured based on the size of boards of directors, the composition of independent director, CEO remuneration, managerial ownership, the effectiveness of audit committee and ownership concentration. The result of the study shows that banks’ performance was positively influenced by intellectual capital. However, corporate governance mechanism did not influence the banks’ performance, while the moderation effect of corporate governance mechanism on the relationship between intellectual capital and banks’ performance was not confirmed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document