scholarly journals Classroom Interaction Analysis in the EFL Speaking Class: A Study at English Department of IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
Elismawati Elismawati
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Language ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Department ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Class A ◽  
Student Talk

The success of teaching depends to a large extent on the way teachers talk and interactions that occur between teachersand students. The happening of interaction is affected directly by ways of teacher talk. This study entitles “Classroom InteractionAnalysis in the EFL Speaking Class” aimed at analyzing the categories of teacher talk, student talk and classroom interaction typesused during EFL speaking class. The research employed a qualitative design and applied a case study. Subjects of the research werean English teacher and 35 students at the second semester at English Department of IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang. The data weregained through naturalistic observation and document analysis. The data were analyzed by using Foreign Language Interaction(FLINT) system. The findings revealed that both teacher and students applied all categories of talk as mentioned in FLINT systemand classroom interaction types.

scholarly journals CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN THE ENGLISH SUBJECT FOR THE TENTH GRADE OF SMA N 1 SALAK PAKPAK BHARAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirgahayu Tumangger ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Muhammad Natsir
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Category System ◽  
Student Talk ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Analysis Category ◽  
English Subject

This study aimed at finding out the categories of teacher and students talk and the percentage of teacher and students talk during classroom interaction. This study was conducted by using descriptive qualitativedesign. The subjects of this study were the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Salak and the English teacher who taught at that class in 2017/2018 academic year. The data were the utterances of both teacher and students during the classroom interaction process which were collected by using observation and recorded by using smartphone and recorded it about three meetings.The data collected were analyzed by using Flanders Analysis formulate. The findings of the study showed  Analysis showed, there are ten categories of students and teachers talk that could be found during the classroom interaction and the percentage of each of category was: 2,05% for accepting feeling, 5.88% for praising and encouraging, 5,29% for accepting students’ ideas, 11,17% for asking question, 11,76% for lecturing, 8,52% for giving direction, 14,41% for criticizing, 32,35% for students talk response,6,17% student talk initiation and2,35% for silence and confusion.so the teacher talk percentage was about 60,3% and 38,52% for student. Keywords: classroom interaction, Flanders interaction analysis category system

scholarly journals VERBAL INTERACTION IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM USING FLANDERS INTERACTION ANALYSIS CATEGORIES SYSTEM (FIACS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitri Mardiana ◽  
Zainuddin Zainuddin ◽  
Johannes Jefria Gultom
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Verbal Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
The Other ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Student Talk ◽  
English Classroom

The thesis deals with the dominant category used by teacher and the students during English classroom interaction, and the percentage of teacher’s talk and students’ talk during English classroom interaction using Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories System (FIACS). Moreover, this study used descriptive qualitative design .The data of this study were utterances between English teacher and students during English classroom in XI-2 IPA of SMA Negeri 11 Medan.The instruments for data collection were observation tally sheet and video recording. The result showed all of the categories used in the teaching and learning process. It found from the percentage of all categories , the dominant category used by the teacher was Giving Direction (40.41% ). In the other hand the dominant category used by students was Student Talk-Response (57.60%). In addition, the percentage of Teacher Talk was 59.76%, and the percentage of Student Talk  was 36.72% during classroom interaction in English lessons .It showed, the teacher more active and dominant talking than the students during verbal classroom interaction.Key words: Verbal Classroom Interaction, Teacher Talk, Student Talk, Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories System

scholarly journals CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN THE ENGLISH SUBJECT FOR THE TENTH GRADE OF SMA N 1 SALAK PAKPAK BHARAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirgahayu Tumangger ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Muhammad Natsir
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Category System ◽  
Student Talk ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Analysis Category ◽  
English Subject

This study aimed at finding out the categories of teacher and students talk and the percentage of teacher and students talk during classroom interaction. This study was conducted by using descriptive qualitativedesign. The subjects of this study were the tenth grade students of SMAN 1 Salak and the English teacher who taught at that class in 2017/2018 academic year. The data were the utterances of both teacher and students during the classroom interaction process which were collected by using observation and recorded by using smartphone and recorded it about three meetings.The data collected were analyzed by using Flanders Analysis formulate. The findings of the study showed  Analysis showed, there are ten categories of students and teachers talk that could be found during the classroom interaction and the percentage of each of category was: 2,05% for accepting feeling, 5.88% for praising and encouraging, 5,29% for accepting students’ ideas, 11,17% for asking question, 11,76% for lecturing, 8,52% for giving direction, 14,41% for criticizing, 32,35% for students talk response,6,17% student talk initiation and2,35% for silence and confusion.so the teacher talk percentage was about 60,3% and 38,52% for student. Keywords: classroom interaction, Flanders interaction analysis category system

scholarly journals Teacher Talk in Classroom Interaction: A Study at an English Department in Indonesia

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Ryan Rayhana Sofyan ◽  
Murni Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Department ◽  
State University ◽  
Student Talk ◽  
Language And Literature ◽  
Asking Questions ◽  
Academic Year

The research aims at analyzing teacher talk in classroom interaction based on Foreign Language Interaction Analysis (FLINT) system in speaking classroom of English department of Language and Literature Faculty of State University of Makassar. The method used in this research was a descriptive method. The instruments were FLINT system. The participants of the research were the lecturer and students of a speaking class during the second semester of academic year 2011/2012 at English Department of Language and Literature Faculty of State University of Makassar. The results of the research are: teacher talk of giving praises and encouragement is approximately less, the asking questions category dominate the teacher talk category, which means it is in the beneficial function. The lecturer asked the questions to the students and the students responded it well by speaking eagerly. The utterances of giving direction occurred in relatively short times. While in student talk, there are students’ problems and difficulties in speaking. The extracts of student talk in classroom interaction revealed the students problems such as the lack of vocabulary, anxiety, inability to form ideas in English language form, and grammar error. The teacher talk frequency was still excessive, but the lecturer made group and pair discussions to balance the effective talk for students in student-student interaction. Keywords: Classroom, interaction, FLINT, Speaking

scholarly journals CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH SUBJECT AT SMP NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Karta Ginting ◽  
Sumarsih Sumarsih ◽  
Busmin Gurning
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Characteristics ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Teacher Control ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Analysis Category ◽  
English Subject

This study was aimed to find out the teacher and students talk percentage, teacher characteristics and the roles of the teacher during classroom interaction classroom interaction at SMPN 1 Berastagi in 2016/2017 academic year. This study used descriptive design. The subjects of this study were 38 students Grade VIII and an English teacher. The data were analyzed by using Flander’s formulates and interaction observation tally sheet. The instrument of collecting data ware observation tally sheet and video recording. The analysis showed that teacher talk percentage was 71,90 %  and  28, 09% for students. It was found that teacher was dominant in talking than student. The teacher highest characteristics found were teacher control means dominated by commands or direction and content cross which were dominated by lecturing and questioning. For the roles of teacher, the two highest were teacher as controller and teacher as resource. From the result the writer concludes that the students were passive in the classroom interaction, on the other hand teacher hold almost the whole activities in the classroom.     Key words: Classroom interaction, Flanders interaction analysis category system

scholarly journals An Analysis of English Teacher and Learner Talk in the Classroom Interaction

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-71
Author(s):  
Shofiyatul Huriyah ◽  
Merie Agustiani
Keyword(s):  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Response Category ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Question Category

The objectives of the research were to find out the kinds of teacher talk and learner talk used by English teacherand learners during the classroom  interaction  and  to know the language mostly used in the classroom. The participants of this study were 35 students and 1 English teacher that were taken using purposive sampling technique. This descriptive study used recording and interview in colecting the data. The results of clasroom interaction recording was then analyzed using Flander’s Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC). It was obtained that teacher talk (75,5%)  dominated the interaction during the classroom. In the interaction, the teacher mostly used ask question category (30,2%) meanwhile the learners mostly used pupil talk response category (9,1%). Furthermore, Indonesian language (57,2%) was dominantly used, while English was only 28,1%. From the research result, it can be concluded that the English teacher dominated the class by asking so many questions and mostly used Indonesian language during the classroom was taking place. It gave the students less chance to explore and practice their English. Keyword: Teacher Talk, Learner Talk, Classroom Interaction.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Self Evaluation Teacher Talk (SETT) in Teaching English: A Case Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-227
Author(s):  
Raden Panji Hartono ◽  
Slamet Setiawan ◽  
Maria Mintowati
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
Target Language ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Classroom Context ◽  
Teaching English ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
System Mode

Abstract. This study analyzed the implementation of SETT (Self Evaluation Teacher Talk) (Walsh, 2011) by an English teacher in a senior high school in Surabaya. A descriptive analysis was conducted towards the talk used by teacher in delivering the material. As the law, the teacher regulated the students to speak the target language anyhow. On the other hand, the teacher applied a classroom interaction in English. There are four modes available based on the SETT criteria; managerial mode, material mode, skill and system mode, classroom context mode. The result shown that the teacher mostly applied two mode, namely managerial mode and skill and system mode, and was followed by classroom context mode, then material mode.

scholarly journals AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHER AND STUDENT TALK IN THE CLASSROOM INTERACTION OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 18 PURWOREJO

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Semi Sukarni ◽  
Siti Ulfah
Keyword(s):  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
Eighth Grade ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Student Talk ◽  
Teacher Student ◽  
Teacher Students ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Academic Year

The aims of this research are fi rstly, to describe the interaction<br />used by the teacher and studentsconducted in the classroomof the<br />eighth grade of SMP Negeri 18 Purworejo in the Academic Year<br />2012/2013; secondly, to know what type of interaction characteris-<br />tics of the teacher-student talk in the classroom interaction; thirdly,<br />to identify languages used in the classroom interaction used during<br />teaching-learning process.<br />This thesis is a descriptive qualitative study on teacher and stu-<br />dent talk in the classroom interaction, particularly on the partici-<br />pants’ interaction in SMP N 18 Purworejo. The data of this study<br />are the interaction between the teacher and the students in the class-<br />room. In order to analyze the data, some steps are conducted. The<br />data was taken by recording the classroom interaction. The subject<br />in this research wasthe grade VIIIG of SMP Negeri 18 Purworejo,<br />there were 40 students and one English teacher. The researcher used<br />observation and recording for collecting the data. Flanders’ Interac-<br />tion Analysis was used to identify and analyze teacher-student talk<br />in the classroom interaction.<br />The result of this study shows that the teacher was more ac-<br />tive in the interaction. Meanwhile, the student was less active than the teacher. Based on the fi nding, the researcher concludes that the<br />teacher was dominant in the classroom interaction. The percentage<br />of the teacher talk was 78.15%,whereas the students’ participation<br />was 21.16%.<br />the students<br />not balance between Indonesian<br />and English. Indonesian is 62% while English is only 38%. It<br />shows that teacher used more Indonesian than English when she<br />explains the material. The interaction was in three ways communi-<br />cation: interaction between teacher-students, students-teacher, and<br />students-students.

scholarly journals Teacher Talk and Learner Talk in The Classroom Interaction (An Interaction Analysis to an English Language Class at SMP N 2 Sindang)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-106
Author(s):  
Ivon Sagita
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Direct Influence ◽  
Class Time ◽  
Language Class ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Analysis Category

The purpose of this research was to know what teacher talk constitute in classroom interaction, what learner talk constitute in classroom interaction and what percentages of the teacher and learner talk in classroom interaction. The methodology of research used in this research is interaction analysis. An English teacher and whole learners of VII A grade class at SMP N 2 Sindang were chosen as the sample in this research. The class is in the second semester in academic year 2009-2010. In this research the writer applied interview questions for teacher and learners and FIAC (Flanders Interaction Analysis Category). The result of this research showed that teacher more active than learner in the interaction. The teacher generally did most of talking during the lesson. In the available data showed that the teacher used more in indirect influence of FIAC category, they are; accepting feeling, encouragement, accepting or using idea of the learner, and asking question) rather than direct influence (lecturing, giving direction, and criticizing). It is about 49.6% / 16.4 %. Thus the total of teacher talk is 56.4% of the class time. Meanwhile the learners did more response rather than initiation with percentage 30.4% / 12.4% from the total learner talk is 42.8%

scholarly journals CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ENGLISH LESSON BASED ON FLANDER’S INTERACTION CATEGORIES (FIAC)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elfridayani Purba ◽  
Amrin Saragih ◽  
Siti Aisyah Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Classroom Interaction ◽  
Interaction Process ◽  
Teacher Talk ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
English Class ◽  
Total Percentage ◽  
Analysis Category

This study focuces on analyzing the process of classroom interaction through Flanders Interaction Analysis Category (FIAC) model. The objective was to describe how the teacher and students use the categories of classroom interaction in English class by using Flanders Interaction Analysis Category (FIAC) model. The data was found based on the data transcription. The source of the data was the utterances between English teacher and 7th grade students at SMP N 1 SEIBAMBAN. The instruments for data collection were observation, video recording, and note talking. The data analysis applied descriptive qualitative research. It was found that the total percentage each categories classroom interaction were accepts feelings (0.57%), praise and encourages (1.34%), accepts or uses the ideas of the students (0.19%), asks questions (13.74%), lecturing (7.06%), giving directions (30.9%), criticizing or justifying authority (3.91%), students talk-response (28.81%), students talk-initiation (0.29%), and silence or confusion (13.17%). It showed that students participated in the interaction process. Keywords: Teacher Talk, Students Talk, Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC) model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document