scholarly journals The diagnostic value of a new formula combining age and prostate volume in prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Linear Model ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Log Linear

Background and objective: This study combined two clinical indicators (age and prostate volume (PV)) to generate age to PV (AVR) ratio, whose diagnostic value for prostate cancer (PCa) was examined based on prostate specific antigen (PSA) in the range of 4--20.0 ng/mL. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2019 were examined retrospectively. According to the pathological results of the biopsy, the patients were divided into the PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for TPSA, PSAD, PV, (F/T)PSA, AVR, and PSA-AV were plotted with SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 5.0, and areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were determined and compared by Delong test. A log-linear model was used to compare AVR and other parameters with similar high sensitivities, for specificity. Results: The AUROC for AVR was significantly different from those of TPSA (p < 0.001), PV (p = 0.004),(F/T)PSA (p < 0.001), and PSA-AV (p = 0.006), and similar to that of PSAD (p = 0.064). With the same high sensitivity (90.0%), log-linear model analysis showed that the specificity of AVR was significantly higher than those of TPSA and (F/T)PSA (p < 0.01), while there were no significant differences among AVR and PSAD, PV and PSA-AV. Conclusion: With PSA in the range of 4--20.0 ng/mL, AVR may be useful in sparing an invasive intervention for a number of patients.

Comparison of PHI and PHI Density for Prostate Cancer Detection in a Large Retrospective Caucasian Cohort

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Robert Peters ◽  
Carsten Stephan ◽  
Klaus Jung ◽  
Michael Lein ◽  
Frank Friedersdorff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Threshold Probability ◽  
Free Psa ◽  
Prostate Health Index ◽  
Caucasian Cohort ◽  
Prostate Health

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Beyond prostate-specific antigen (PSA), other biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) detection are available and need to be evaluated for clinical routine. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to evaluate the Prostate Health Index (PHI) density (PHID) in comparison with PHI in a large Caucasian group &#x3e;1,000 men. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> PHID values were used from available patient data with PSA, free PSA, and [−2]pro­PSA and prostate volume from 3 former surveys from 2002 to 2014. Those 1,446 patients from a single-center cohort included 701 men with PCa and 745 with no PCa. All patients received initial or repeat biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing area under the ROC curves (AUCs), precision-recall approach, and decision curve analysis (DCA). <b><i>Results:</i></b> PHID medians differed almost 2-fold between PCa (1.12) and no PCa (0.62) in comparison to PHI (48.6 vs. 33; <i>p</i> always &#x3c;0.0001). However, PHID and PHI were equal regarding the AUC (0.737 vs. 0.749; <i>p</i> = 0.226), and the curves of the precision-recall analysis also overlapped in the sensitivity range between 70 and 100%. DCA had a maximum net benefit of only ∼5% for PHID versus PHI between 45 and 55% threshold probability. Contrary, in the 689 men with a prostate volume ≤40 cm<sup>3</sup>, PHI (AUC 0.732) showed a significant larger AUC than PHID (AUC 0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.014). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Based on DCA, PHID had only a small advantage in comparison with PHI alone, while ROC analysis and precision-recall analysis showed similar results. In smaller prostates, PHI even outperformed PHID. The increment for PHID in this large Caucasian cohort is too small to justify a routine clinical use.

scholarly journals Integrated predictive model for prostatic cancer using clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-437
Author(s):  
GUSTAVO DAVID LUDWIG ◽  
HENRIQUE PERES ROCHA ◽  
LÚCIO JOSÉ BOTELHO ◽  
MAIARA BRUSCO FREITAS
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Psa Density

ABSTRACT Objective: to develop a predictive model to estimate the probability of prostate cancer prior to biopsy. Methods: from September 2009 to January 2014, 445 men underwent prostate biopsy in a radiology service. We excluded from the study patients with diseases that could compromise the data analysis, who had undergone prostatic resection or used 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Thus, we selected 412 patients. Variables included in the model were age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, prostate volume and abnormal sonographic findings. We constructed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curve, as well as the model's Positive Predictive Value (PPV) . Results: of the 412 men, 155 (37.62%) had prostate cancer (PC). The mean age was 63.8 years and the median PSA was 7.22ng/ml. In addition, 21.6% and 20.6% of patients had abnormalities on digital rectal examination and image suggestive of cancer by ultrasound, respectively. The median prostate volume and PSA density were 45.15cm3 and 0.15ng/ml/cm3, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only five studied risk factors are predictors of PC in the study (p<0.05). The PSA density was excluded from the model (p=0.314). The area under the ROC curve for PC prediction was 0.86. The PPV was 48.08% for 95%sensitivity and 52.37% for 90% sensitivity. Conclusion: the results indicate that clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data, besides easily obtained, can better stratify the risk of patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano Basso Dias ◽  
Ciara O’Brien ◽  
Jean-Michel Correas ◽  
Sangeet Ghai
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cognitive Fusion ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Multiparametric Ultrasound ◽  
Targeted Biopsies

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous cancer diagnosed in males. Traditional tools for screening and diagnosis, such as prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), present low accuracy for PCa detection. Multiparametric MRI has become a game changer in the PCa diagnosis pathway and MRI-targeted biopsies are currently recommended for males at risk of clinically significant PCa, even in biopsy-naïve patients. Recent advances in ultrasound have also emerged with the goal to provide a readily accessible and cost-effective tool for detection of PCa. These newer techniques include elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as well as improved B-mode and Doppler techniques. These modalities can be combined to define a novel ultrasound approach, multiparametric ultrasound. High frequency Micro-ultrasound has emerged as a promising imaging technology for PCa diagnosis. Initial results have shown high sensitivity of Micro-ultrasound in detecting PCa in addition to its potential in improving the accuracy of targeted biopsies, based on targeting under real-time visualization, rather than relying on cognitive/fusion software MRI-transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.

scholarly journals Tumor-Derived Exosomal Long Noncoding RNAs as Promising Diagnostic Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 532-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Hui Wang ◽  
Jia Ji ◽  
Bi-Cheng Wang ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Zhong-Hua Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Tumor Invasion ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarkers ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Coding Rnas

Background/Aims: Exosomal circulating long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in blood are emerging as clinically useful and non-invasive biomarkers for tumor diagnosis. However, normal cells can also secrete exosomes, so it is a prerequisite to obtain tumor-derived exosomes for better understanding of their diagnostic impacts in cancer. In this study, a dual-antibody-functionalized immunoaffinity system was established to isolate exosomes and investigate their lncRNAs expression pattern and clinical significance in prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: A commercially available kit was used to isolate total exosomes, which were then purified by a dual-antibody-functionalized immunoaffinity system. RT-qPCR was performed to detect the expression of exosomal lncRNAs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the diagnostic value. Results: Expression levels of two lncRNAs in tumor-derived exosomes were significantly higher than those in total exosomes. The levels of SAP30L-AS1 were upregulated in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and SChLAP1 levels were significantly higher in PCa than in BPH and healthy individuals. The area under the ROC curve indicated that SAP30L-AS1 and SChLAP1 had adequate diagnostic value to distinguish PCa from controls. Two lncRNAs separately combined with prostate specific antigen (PSA) possessed a moderate ability for discrimination. SAP30L-AS1 expression level was related to PSA values and tumor invasion. SChLAP1 expression was significantly higher in patients with higher Gleason scores, and was also effective in differentiating between BPH and PCa when the concentration of PSA was in the gray zone. Conclusion: The isolation of tumor-derived exosomes by dual-antibody-functionalized immunoaffinity systems and detection of their lncRNAs in plasma may lead to the identification of suitable biomarkers, with potential diagnostic utility.

Transrectal Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma: Our Study on 365 Patients

1994 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-276
Author(s):  
M. Calò ◽  
I. Malavolti ◽  
G. Cuscianna ◽  
F. Baldari ◽  
C.A. Pollastri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Prostatic Carcinoma ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasonography ◽  
Prostatic Specific Antigen ◽  
Clinical Exam

To evaluate the usefulness of transrectal ultrasound associated with needle biopsy of the prostate, 365 patients, with age ranging between 50 and 80 years, were studied for a total of 412 biopsies; the ultrasound exam was performed when the clinical or the prostate specific antigen findings were pathological. Our experience confirms the high sensitivity and specificity of transrectal ultrasonography in detecting prostate cancer. It is our opinion that all the patients with positive or negative digital rectal examination but altered prostatic specific antigen or clinical exam should undergo transrectal ultrasonography associated with needle biopsy. The elevated operability of the studied patients shows the capability of ultrasound to detect the pathology in the early stages and its value in screening diagnosis should therefore be considered.

scholarly journals Multicenter Evaluation of an Artificial Neural Network to Increase the Prostate Cancer Detection Rate and Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1279-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten Stephan ◽  
Henning Cammann ◽  
Axel Semjonow ◽  
Eleftherios P Diamandis ◽  
Leon FA Wymenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Artificial Neural Network ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Artificial Neural

Abstract Background: The percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA) has been shown to improve specificity for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) over total PSA (tPSA). A multicenter study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of a %fPSA-based artificial neural network (ANN) in men with tPSA concentrations between 2 and 20 μg/L for detecting patients with increased risk of a positive prostate biopsy for cancer. Methods: We enrolled 1188 men from six different hospitals with PCa or benign prostates between 1996 and 2001. We used a newly developed ANN with input data of tPSA, %fPSA, patient age, prostate volume, and digital rectal examination (DRE) status to calculate the risk for the presence of PCa within different tPSA ranges (2–4, 4.1–10, 2–10, 10.1–20, and 2–20 μg/L) at the 90% and 95% specificity or sensitivity cutoffs, depending on the tPSA concentration. ROC analysis and cutoff calculations were used to estimate the diagnostic improvement of the ANN compared with %fPSA alone. Results: In the low tPSA range (2–4 μg/L), the ANN detected 72% and 65% of cancers at specificities of 90% or 95%, respectively. At 4–10 μg/L tPSA, the ANN detected 90% and 95% of cancers with specificities of 62% and 41%, respectively. Use of the ANN with 2–10 μg/L tPSA enhanced the specificity of %fPSA by 20–22%, thus reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. Conclusions: Enhanced accuracy of PCa detection over that obtained using %fPSA alone can be achieved with a %fPSA-based ANN that also includes clinical information from DRE and prostate volume measurements.

scholarly journals Effect on prostatic specific antigen by a short time treatment with a Curcuma extract: A real life experience and implications for prostate biopsy

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Fabiani ◽  
Carolina Morosetti ◽  
Alessandra Filosa ◽  
Emanuele Principi ◽  
Luca Lepri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Prostatic Biopsy ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Total Psa ◽  
Total Ratio

Introduction and objectives: PSA elevation is associated with prostate cancer and it is used in screening programs for its diagnosis. It is one of the most common indications for referral to an urologist. There’s no consensus about what to do in PSA elevation management. Antibiotics, nutraceuticals or anti-inflammatories are commonly prescribed in daily practice. Our objective was to verify the effect on the PSA value of a short 30-day trial of a curcuma extract, than to discuss the implications in terms of reducing the number of prostate biopsies performed. Patients and methods: We enrolled 50 consecutive patients admitted at our attention for a first PSA over the level of 4 ng/ml or for a suspected PSA rising defined as PSA velocity (PSAv) > 0.75 ng/ml/years. They received treatment with curcuma extract, 2 tablets per day for 30 day. All patients received a second PSA measurement and TRUS within 6 days from the end of the therapy. In case of PSA reduction below 4 ng/ml, patients were reassured and invited to repeat a PSA control over the time. When PSA level were persistently high over 4 ng/ml or in case of any rising, patients underwent a transrectal ultrasound guided 12-core prostatic biopsy (TRUSbx). Results: Mean age of the patients was 64.56 ± 8.88 (range, 42- 81 years). Prostate volume was 48.34 ± 15,77 ml (range, 18-80 ml). At visit 1, PSA value was in mean 6,84 ± 3.79 ng/ml (range 2.93-21ng/ml). Consequently, mean PSA density value was 0.16 ± 0.16 (range 0.05-1.11). PSA free and PSA total ratio at baseline was 16.85 ± 3.9% (range 8-26%). At visit 2, the prostate volume did not change. Total PSA was 4.65 ± 2,67 ng/ml (range 1-16.82 ng/ml). PSA free and PSA total ratio (PSAF/T) after treatment was 19.68 ± 5.35 % (range 7.8-29%). The differences of total PSA and PSAF/T between visit 1 and visit 2 were < 0.0001 and p < 0.0036, respectively. We performed 26 TRUSbx. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 6 cases, PIN HG in 2 cases and non neoplastic findings in the remnants 18 patients. Conclusions: Use of the Curcuma extract is able to lower the PSA value after a 30-day intake period. We are not able to state that the reduction of PSA after intake of this Curcuma extract may exclude a prostate cancer. We need further studies to evaluate that.

Diagnostic Value of Different Systematic Prostate Biopsy Methods in the Detection of Prostate Cancer with Ultrasonographic Hypoechoic Lesions - A Comparative Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Xu ◽  
Minghua Yao ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Lehang Guo ◽  
Lijing Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Lesion Core ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Hypoechoic Lesion ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: To assess if a less extended biopsy in the transperineal approach is sufficient for detection of prostate cancer (PC) in patients with hypoechoic lesions. Methods: This was a prospective study of 167 consecutive patients with prostate hypoechoic lesion and who underwent transperineal ultrasound (TPUS)-guided 12-core and hypoechoic lesion core biopsy between January 2012 and February 2013. Results: PC was detected in 64.1% (107/167) of patients. The PC detection rate of the 12-core prostate biopsy scheme was the highest, but when including the hypoechoic lesion core, there was no difference between the 6- and 12-core schemes (all p > 0.05), irrespective of prostate volume or prostate-specific antigen levels (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: A more limited biopsy scheme could be sufficient for the detection of PC if the hypoechoic lesion is sampled.

scholarly journals The Prostate Gland and PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen)

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Serfa Faja ◽  
Amir Shoshi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Quantitative Measurement ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Psa Test ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
Very High

The PSA test is used primarily to screen for prostate cancer. A PSA test measures the amount of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in your blood. PSA is a protein produced in the prostate, a small gland that sits below a man's bladder. PSA is mostly found in semen, which also is produced in the prostate. Small amounts of PSA ordinarily circulate in the blood. The PSA test can detect high levels of PSA that may indicate the presence of prostate cancer. However, many other conditions, such as an enlarged or inflamed prostate, can also increase PSA levels. We use ImmunoAssay for Quantitative Measurement of PSA in Human Blood / Serum / Plasma with i-CHROMA TM Reader System with high sensitivity and specifity. We have analysed 120 patients and only 2 of them had very high value of PSA so we can determine for a prostate cancer. Additional factors increase the accuracy of PSA testing and it is not sufficient only the PSA to determine a prostate cancer so we need a rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound.

scholarly journals Performance of a Single Assay for Both Type III and Type VI TMPRSS2:ERG Fusions in Noninvasive Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Outcome

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2007-2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarrod P Clark ◽  
Kristofer W Munson ◽  
Jessie W Gu ◽  
Katarzyna Lamparska-Kupsik ◽  
Kevin G Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Standard Curve ◽  
Institutional Review

Abstract Background: TMPRSS2:ERG fusions are promising prostate cancer biomarkers. Because they can occur in multiple forms in a single cancer specimen, we developed a quantitative PCR test that detects both type III and type VI TMPRSS2:ERG fusions. The assay is quantified from a standard curve determined with a plasmid-cloned type III TMPRSS2:ERG fusion target. Methods: We collected expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) under an institutional review board-approved, blinded, prospective study from 74 patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy for prostate cancer. We compared the characteristic performance of the test for type III and type VI TMPRSS2:ERG fusions in predicting biopsy outcome and distinguishing between high and low Gleason scores with similar tests for the expression of PCA3 and DNA methylation levels of the APC, RARB, RASSF1, and GSTP1 genes. We used logistic regression to analyze the effects of multiple biomarkers in linear combinations. Results: Each test provided a significant improvement in characteristic performance over baseline digital rectal examination (DRE) plus serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA); however, the test for type III and type VI TMPRSS2:ERG fusions yielded the best performance in predicting biopsy outcome [area under the curve (AUC) 0.823, 95% CI 0.728–0.919, P &lt; 0.001] and Gleason grade &gt;7 (AUC 0.844, 95% CI 0.740–0.948, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Although each test appears to have diagnostic value, PSA plus DRE plus type III and type VI TMPRSS2:ERG provided the best diagnostic performance in EPS specimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document