Recent improvement in survival of patients with multiple myeloma: variation by ethnicity

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1083-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Pulte ◽  
Maria Theresa Redaniel ◽  
Hermann Brenner ◽  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Mona Jeffreys
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. i31-i49
Author(s):  
D Samonakis ◽  
M Koulentaki ◽  
A Augoustaki ◽  
E Theodoraki ◽  
E Orfanoudaki ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 98-98
Author(s):  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Anupam B. Jena ◽  
Desi Peneva ◽  
Zoe Clancy

98 Background: Survival probabilities for patients with multiple myeloma have increased considerably over the past several decades, and a conservative estimate of 5-year survival today is approximately 50%, perhaps higher with optimal treatment. Treatment options for multiple myeloma have grown significantly beginning in 2003 with the approval of bortezomib, followed by approvals for lenalidomide and thalidomide in 2006. The second wave of novel agent approvals began in 2012 with carfilzomib, followed by pomalidomide in 2013. The aim of this study was to estimate the survival gains associated with multiple myeloma therapies after the introduction of novel therapies beginning in 2003 in the United States. Methods: We estimated survival gains for multiple myeloma patients diagnosed in the 5-year period from 2010-2014—who had access to newer therapies like lenalidomide, bortezomib, pomalidomide, and carfilzomib—compared with patients diagnosed in the 5 years prior to the approval of bortezomib (1998–2002). We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program cancer registry and a generalized gamma regression survival model. The sample from SEER included patients aged > 18 years who had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma between 1983 and 2014. Results: Of 88,462 patients identified in the full sample, 14,446 patients were diagnosed in 1998–2002 and 25,948 patients were diagnosed in 2010–2014. Overall survival was 51% longer ( P< 0.001) in multiple myeloma patients diagnosed in 2010–2014 than in patients diagnosed in 1998–2002. Patients diagnosed in 2010–2014 had median and mean survival of 1.32 and 2.27 years longer, respectively, than patients diagnosed in 1998–2002. Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma during 2010–2014 had significant improvement in survival relative to patients diagnosed in 1998–2002. This study found continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma patients in the most recent 5-years of survival data available, demonstrating the considerable progress made since the wave of multiple myeloma innovation began in 2003.


2017 ◽  
pp. 94-102
Author(s):  
V. V. Ryzhko ◽  
M. L. Kanaeva

The use of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs in the clinical practice has contributed to the significant improvement in survival for patients with multiple myeloma over the past decades. Alongside this, due to the recurrent course of the disease, there is a need to introduce new classes of drugs to clinical practice. In 2015,  the FDA (USA) approved two monoclonal  antibodies  for use  in  patients  with  relapsed  multiple  myeloma,  and  immunotherapy has  rapidly become indispensable  in the management of such patients. The article presents an analysis of the published data regarding the mechanism of action, safety and clinical efficacy of daratumumab, a human monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 tumor protein, for the  treatment  of patients  with multiple  myeloma. In Russia, daratumumab is registered  (RU LP-004367  of 07.07.2017) and is indicated as monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, who have received prior therapies, incuding proteasome  inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. Daratumumab demonstrated  an excellent safety profile. In the context of daratumumab therapy, the moderate-grade infusion-related reactions occurring mostly during the  first infusion  are the  main adverse  events.  Daratumumab-based combination  therapies  are currently under active evaluation in patients with relapsed and newly diagnosed myeloma.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1510-1510
Author(s):  
Dianne Pulte ◽  
Adam Gondos ◽  
Hermann Brenner

Abstract Abstract 1510 Background: Treatment options for multiple myeloma have changed significantly over the past decade with new treatment options demonstrating improved survival in multiple clinical trials. We have previously published data demonstrating that survival has improved on the population level (Brenner et al Blood 2008) and projections of survival expectations for patients recently diagnosed with multiple myeloma which predicted continued improvement in survival for patients diagnosed in the years 2006-10 (Brenner et al Haematologica 2009). Here, we provide updated estimates of survival in myeloma and compare the results to projected survival. Methods: Period analysis was used to calculate 5- and 10-year relative survival for patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma from 1997-01 and 2002-06, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Survival estimates for single years were calculated as well to determine whether changes in survival were ongoing throughout the 2002-06 period. Results: Five and 10-year relative survival in 2002-06 was significantly higher than in earlier time periods and was similar to survival predicted for patients diagnosed 2006–2010 (see table). When individual years between 2002 and 2006 were evaluated, survival was higher in 2005 and 2006 as compared to 2002-4. Survival was higher for all age groups as compared to survival previously calculated by period analysis for 1997–2001 (see table). Conclusions: Survival for patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma is improving for all age groups at a rate faster than predicted by previous models of survival. This implies a greater than linear increase in survival over the early part of the 21st century. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Leukemia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1122-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
S K Kumar ◽  
A Dispenzieri ◽  
M Q Lacy ◽  
M A Gertz ◽  
F K Buadi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung‐Nam Koh ◽  
Jung‐Man Namgoong ◽  
Hee Mang Yoon ◽  
Young Ah Cho ◽  
Se Hoon Choi ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
María-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Borja Puertas Martínez ◽  
Verónica González-Calle

Abstract Patients with multiple myeloma have experienced a great improvement in survival over the past century because of the introduction of novel therapeutic strategies. However, a subgroup of patients with poorer outcomes than expected is considered high risk and identified by the presence of patient- and disease-based factors such as frailty, extramedullary disease, cytogenetic abnormalities, or even relapses occurring earlier than expected according to the baseline factors. Although the management of patients with high-risk features is not well established because of the lack of specific trials in this subgroup of patients and because of their underrepresentation in the clinical trials, treatment should be planned on 2 pillars: (1) poor prognosis with the presence of high-risk features can be at least improved or even abrogated by achieving a deep and sustained response over time, and (2) this can most likely be obtained through using the best therapeutic options and in a response-adapted way. Some clinical trials that have been planned or are ongoing include only patients with high-risk features, using the most effective therapies (proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies) as well as chimeric antigen receptor T cells and T-cell engagers that will unravel what the best therapeutic approach will be to overcome the poor prognosis of the presence of high-risk features.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5242-5242
Author(s):  
Francis Buadi ◽  
Brian McClune ◽  
Yoriann Moore ◽  
Robin Womeodu ◽  
Furhan Yunus ◽  
...  

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is more common in African Americans (AA) compared to White Americans (WA) with an incidence ratio of 2:1. The incidence of MM as well as mortality from MM has been on the rise in AA. SEER data shows a higher death rate in AA than WA diagnosed with multiple myeloma. The benefit of autologous stem cell trasnplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma has been clearly demonstrated in randomized trials. However the influence of race on survival in patients receiving ASCT for multiple myeloma has not been well studied. Between January 1996 and December 2003, 60 patients with multiple myeloma underwent ASCT in our program. We evaluated the influence of race on survival and also compared the survival of all transplanted patients to 74 myeloma patients from the hospital tumor registry who were diagnosed with multiple myeloma in the same time period, who received standard chemotherapy without ASCT, and who are in the same age range at diagnosis as the transplant patients. The transplant group included 32 AA and 28 WA, while the registry group had 42 AA and 32 WA. There was no difference between groups in the distribution by gender, but the transplant patients were significantly younger (median age 56.5 years, range 37–72 years) than the registry patients (median age 65 years, range 39–72 years). At analysis, median time from diagnosis was 4.6 years (range 1.2–10.3 years) for the transplant group and 7.7 years (range 3.7–10.6 years) for the registry group. For AA patients, median survival was 2.1 years in the registry group and 5.9 years in the transplant group (p=0.003). For WA patients, median survival was 2.0 years in the registry group and 5.8 years in the transplant group (p<0.0001). Median survivals did not differ in the transplant group when compared by race (5.9 years vs 5.8 years). The benefit of ASCT was seen in all age groups, so the difference in survival was not due to the younger age of the transplant patients. In a multivariate analysis of all 134 patients, ASCT was predictive of improved survival, but gender, race and quartile of age at diagnosis had no significant association with survival. We conclude that the improvement in survival with ASCT is independent of race.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3594-3594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Recent advances in the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) have greatly increased the treatment options for this uniformly fatal plasma cell malignancy. It is not clear if introduction of novel therapies and the increased use of high dose therapy (HDT) in the past decade have translated into better outcome for patients (pts) with MM. Methods: We examined the outcome of two cohorts of pts seen at our institution. The first cohort consisted of 387 pts who relapsed after HDT and was examined for potential improvement in survival following relapse after HDT. These pts were divided into two groups; those who relapsed before or after December 31, 2000. The second cohort consisted of 2981 patients with newly diagnosed MM seen between January 1971 and December 2006 and was used to examine the trends in overall survival (OS). Results: Among those relapsing after HDT, there were 245 males (63%); median (range) age at HDT was 57 years (32.8–75.4) and the median time to HDT was 8.1 months (1–90 months) from diagnosis. The median time to relapse was 13.2 months (1.1 months-10.3 years) from HDT. In this cohort, a clear improvement in OS from time of relapse was seen over the past decade, with those relapsing after 2000 having a median OS of 23.9 months (95% CI; 19.8, 27.6) compared to 11.8 months (95% CI; 8.7, 14.9) for the rest (P &lt; 0.001) (Figure 1). In a multivariate analysis, the effect of the date of relapse on survival was independent of other prognostic factors such as relapse &lt;12 months after HDT, abnormal cytogenetics, and B2M &gt; 5.5 mg/dL. Pts who were treated with one or more of the newer drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) had longer survival from relapse (30.9 months (95% CI; 23.6, 38.2) compared to 14.8 months (95% CI; 11.3, 18.4); P &lt; 0.001) for others. Among the newly diagnosed MM cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 66 years (20.2 – 97 years), and 1,770 (59.4%) were males. The median follow up for the entire group was 27.4 months (0–29.4 years); and at the time of analysis 558 patients (18.7%) were alive with a median follow up of 32.7 months (0–29.4 years). Pts diagnosed in the last decade had an improved OS (44.8 months) compared to those diagnosed before this period (29.9 months; P &lt; 0.001) (Figure 2). The improvement in survival seen in the last decade among newly diagnosed patients was predominantly among those younger than 65 years (60.3 mos vs. 33.3 mos improvement in median survival); compared to those over 65 at diagnosis (26.5 mos vs. 32 mos). Conclusion: In this study, for the first time, we demonstrate definite proof for improved outcome in patients with myeloma, both in the relapsed setting as well as at diagnosis, a change that is likely to continue with increased use of these drugs. Figure Figure Figure Figure


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document