Indirect costs and workplace productivity loss associated with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 2636-2643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin S. Yu ◽  
Ryan N. Hansen ◽  
Adriana Valderrama ◽  
Josh J. Carlson
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6541-6541
Author(s):  
W. S. Oatis ◽  
N. Nonzee ◽  
T. Markossian ◽  
V. Shankaran ◽  
J. McKoy ◽  
...  

6541 Background: Few studies have examined cancer-related out-of-pocket costs (expenses resulting from cancer morbidity and treatment that are not covered by insurance) as a function of baseline household income. We report income-adjusted out-of-pocket cost ratios for 50 patients with lymphoma and 156 patients with breast cancer. Methods: Patients with lymphoma or breast cancer provided 3-month retrospective documentation of cancer-related out-of-pocket costs. Costs were adjusted for income by dividing monthly costs by monthly household income. Direct medical costs include costs related to medications, doctor visits, and hospital stays. Direct non-medical costs are cancer-related peripheral costs, such as transportation and meals. Indirect costs are costs due to lost income. Results: Of our study patients, 83% were Caucasian, 65% were married, 53% were employed, and 65% had at least a bachelor's degree. All patients were undergoing active treatment and had insurance. Mean monthly out-of-pocket costs for patients with lymphoma were slightly greater than for those with breast cancer ($1,888 vs $1,455, respectively). Among patients with an annual income of $30,000 or less, the total monthly out-of-pocket costs were more than 3 times the monthly household income for patients with lymphoma and equal to the monthly household income for patients with breast cancer. The total mean income-adjusted cost ratio was 1.75 for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma versus 0.42 and 0.61 for those with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Hodgkin disease, respectively. Conclusions: Cancer-related out-of-pocket expenses disproportionately affect lower-income individuals with lymphoma or breast cancer and are primarily driven by the financial burden of co-payments for medical care. Future studies should evaluate out-of-pocket costs in relation to household income to determine more accurately the economic burden of cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4009-4009
Author(s):  
Keri Yang ◽  
Sizhu Liu ◽  
Debra Irwin ◽  
Elizabeth Packnett ◽  
Carolyn R. Lew ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The impact of cancer care and management beyond treatment is significantly high for cancer patients. Due to the complexities of cancer treatment, patients are heavily reliant upon ancillary support often rendered by friends and family. One significant yet unquantifiable impact of cancer on society is productivity loss of both patients and their caregivers. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is considered largely incurable with a protracted clinical course punctuated with multiple remission and relapses, warranting repeated treatment and intensive clinical testing, which necessitates significant engagement of patients and caregivers. Many patients are members of the workforce at the age of diagnosis. Both working patients and caregivers need time for medical care, which translates to indirect economic impact due to lost productivity. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the productivity loss and indirect costs in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), or Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and their caregivers. Methods: The MarketScan Commercial and Health and Productivity Management databases were used to identify patients with CLL, MCL, MZL, and WM (using ICD-9/ICD-10 codes) who were continuously enrolled for ≥6 months pre- and ≥1 month post-diagnosis (index date) from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2019. The final study cohort included patients aged 18-64 who were full-time workers with eligibility of absentee, or short-/long-term disability on index date and for ≥1 month in follow-up. Those who were pregnant during the study period were excluded. Adult, full-time employed caregivers, defined as family members covered under the same health plan as the patient, and continuously enrolled ≥6 months pre- and ≥1 month post-index, were also identified. Among those with eligibility, the percentage with a claim of absentee, short- or long-term disability (patients only), and associated productivity time loss and indirect costs during follow-up were examined. Lost wages were calculated using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics 2019 report. For short- or long-term disabilities, mean daily wages were reduced to 70% of typical wages. Productivity time loss and costs were reported per-patient-per-month (PPPM) for each lymphoma. Results: The final patient cohort included 3,450 CLL, 448 MCL, 1,052 MZL and 394 WM patients; the caregiver cohort included 1,435 CLL, 171 MCL, 437 MZL and 190 WM caregivers. Among eligible patients, there were higher proportions of patients that had absentee claims (CLL, 76%; MCL, 72%; MZL, 72%; WM, 82%), followed by short-term disability (CLL, 16%; MCL, 36%; MZL, 18%; WM, 17%) and long-term disability (CLL, 3%; MCL, 10%; MZL, 3%; WM, 3%) (Figure 1A). The proportions of caregivers with absentee claims (CLL, 78%; MCL, 90%; MZL, 69%; WM, 75%) were also higher than those with short-term disability (CLL, 7%; MCL, 10%; MZL, 4%; WM, 8%) (Figure 1B). For all 4 lymphoma types, average illness-related absentee hours were higher in patients than caregivers (CLL, 9.5 vs 6.9; MCL, 44.5 vs 3.6; MZL, 17.0 vs 5.0; WM, 18.2 vs 8.1). A similar pattern was observed for short-term disability days (CLL, 6.9 vs 4.2; MCL, 10.8 vs 3.4; MZL, 7.0 vs 2.2; WM, 6.7 vs 4.8). Average PPPM indirect costs were higher for patients with long-term disability (CLL, $1,433; MCL, $1,233; MZL, $1,302; WM, $2,056) than with short-term disability (CLL, $1,203; MCL, $1,950; MZL, $1,145; WM. $1,177) or absentee claims (CLL, $365; MCL, $1,606; MZL, $612; WM, $662), except for patients with MCL (Figure 2A). Similar trends were observed among caregivers, though the indirect costs due to absenteeism and short-term disability were higher in patients than caregivers (Figure 2B). Conclusions: This real-world evidence study uncovered patients with CLL, MCL, MZL and WM and their caregivers incur substantial disease burden as shown by their productivity loss and indirect costs. Effective treatments that can offer a cure or better remission rates and shorter duration with less toxicity may not only enhance the patients and caregivers' quality of life but also reduce work loss. The availability of oral, targeted therapies has resulted in higher remission rates, durable responses, manageable toxicities and improved quality of life in trials. Future studies are needed to understand the impact of these oral, targeted therapies on patients' and caregivers' productivity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Yang: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Liu: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Irwin: IBM Watson Health: Current Employment; BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy. Packnett: IBM Watson Health: Current Employment; BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy. Lew: BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy; IBM Watson Health: Current Employment. Noxon: BeiGene, Ltd.: Consultancy; IBM Watson Health: Current Employment. Tang: BeiGene, Ltd.: Current Employment. Chanan-Khan: BieGene, Jansen, Ascentage: Consultancy; BeiGene, Jansen, Ascentage: Honoraria; Alpha2 Pharmaceuticals: Patents & Royalties: Tabi; Cellectar: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Ascentage, Starton, Cellectar, NonoDev, Alpha2 Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alpha2 Pharmaceuticals, NonoDev, Starton: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Ascentage: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Doxa Papakonstantinou ◽  
Constantinos Tomos

PurposeMigraine consists of a chronic neurological disorder with episodic attacks. Migraine prevails in people of their most productive working age, followed by difficulties at work and social functions. This scoping review aims to analyze the economic burden on a workplace due to chronic migraine compared to episodic migraine by focusing on the indirect costs of absenteeism and presenteeism and addressing the research gaps in this field.Design/methodology/approachAccording to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, a comprehensive electronic literature search was carried out from 2010 to 2020 using the Google Scholar and Medline/PubMed databases.FindingsThe findings confirm that chronic and episodic migraine harm the workplace's productivity, escalating with the frequency of migraine attacks. Differences occur between presenteeism and absenteeism rates among chronic and episodic migraine, and higher presenteeism than absenteeism rates.Originality/valueThis review sheds new light on the indirect burden of migraine. It shows the gaps in the explored research area and the need for more targeted and extended research that could provide a deeper understanding of the workplace's hidden costs of migraine. The issues discussed are important as they can raise awareness of the interested parties, policymakers, employers and vocational rehabilitation specialists on the work disability associated with migraine.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1256-1261
Author(s):  
Anca Prica ◽  
Annette E. Hay ◽  
Michael Crump ◽  
Nicole Mittmann ◽  
Lois E. Shepherd ◽  
...  

We conducted an analysis of indirect costs alongside the LY.12 randomized trial in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Lost productivity data for Canadian patients and caregivers in the trial were collected at baseline and with each chemotherapy cycle pre-transplant, using an adapted Lost Productivity questionnaire. Mean per patient indirect costs were CAD 2999 for patients in the GDP arm and CAD 3400 in the DHAP arm. A substantial majority was not working or had to reduce their workload during this treatment time. Salvage chemotherapy for R/R aggressive NHL is associated with significant indirect costs to patients and their caregivers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. S48-S48
Author(s):  
Jing‑Hong Pei ◽  
Sai‑Qun Luo ◽  
Jiang‑Hua Chen ◽  
Hua‑Wu Xiao ◽  
Wei‑Xin Hu

MedPharmRes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Truc Phan ◽  
Tram Huynh ◽  
Tuan Q. Tran ◽  
Dung Co ◽  
Khoi M. Tran

Introduction: Little information is available on the outcomes of R-CHOP (rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) and R-CVP (rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone) in treatment of the elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), especially in Vietnam. Material and methods: All patients were newly diagnosed with CD20-positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) at Blood Transfusion and Hematology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh city (BTH) between 01/2013 and 01/2018 who were age 60 years or older at diagnosis. A retrospective analysis of these patients was perfomed. Results: Twenty-one Vietnamese patients (6 males and 15 females) were identified and the median age was 68.9 (range 60-80). Most of patients have comorbidities and intermediate-risk. The most common sign was lymphadenopathy (over 95%). The proportion of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was highest (71%). The percentage of patients reaching complete response (CR) after six cycle of chemotherapy was 76.2%. The median follow-up was 26 months, event-free survival (EFS) was 60% and overall survival (OS) was 75%. Adverse effects of rituximab were unremarkable, treatment-related mortality accounted for less than 10%. There was no difference in drug toxicity between two regimens. Conclusions: R-CHOP, R-CVP yielded a good result and acceptable toxicity in treatment of elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In patients with known cardiac history, omission of anthracyclines is reasonable and R-CVP provides a competitive complete response rate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document