Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Glutaral

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-139 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Blood Chemistry ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Carcinogenicity Study ◽  
Animal Skin

The dialdehyde Glutaral (also commonly called glutaraldehyde) is used in a wide variety of cosmetics as a preservative. In vitro dermal penetration studies of Glutaral indicate low penetration through animal skin and even less through human skin. The oral LD50 of Glutaral for rats ranged from 66 mg/kg up to 733 mg/kg. A 28-day dermal toxicity study of Glutaral produced skin irritation and slight effects on weight and blood chemistry with concentrations as low as 50 mg/kg/day. Animal skin irritation was dose-dependant, with a no-effect concentration of 1%. Ocular exposure to Glutaral caused severe irritation in rabbits at concentrations 1%, with a no-effect level of 0.1%. Glutaral was not embryotoxic, fetotoxic, or teratogenic at concentrations that did not cause severe maternal toxicity. The no observable adverse effects level for reproduction toxicity was > 1,000 ppm. Bacterial mutagenesis tests produced mixed results, as would be expected for a preservative. In most mammalian system mutagenesis tests, Glutaral was not genotoxic. In a 2-year drinking water study in rats, there was an increase in large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL), but only in females administered 50–1,000 ppm Glutaral. The response was not dose dependent. Clinical studies report some evidence of dermal irritation and sensitization, but no photosensitization. Occupational data and animal studies indicate that inhalation of Glutaral can cause respiratory irritation, in addition to skin effects. Evaluation of the increased incidence of LGLL in the 2-year drinking water study indicated that the incidence was within the historical control levels for this spontaneously occurring neoplasm. These data, however, were not considered sufficient to base a finding of safety of Glutaral in products intended for prolonged use. It was concluded that a 2-year dermal carcinogenicity study following National Toxicology Program (NTP) procedures was needed to complete the safety assessment of Glutaral for use in leave-on products. For rinse-off products, it was concluded that the ocular and dermal irritancy of Glutaral could be substantially avoided if the concentration did not exceed 0.5% and exposure was only brief and discontinuous. Because it can cause respiratory irritation, it was concluded that Glutaral should not be used in aerosolized cosmetic products.

5 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Propylene Glycol Stearate and Propylene Glycol Stearate Self-Emulsifying

1983 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 101-124 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Propylene Glycol ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Dermal Toxicity ◽  
Cosmetic Ingredients ◽  
Available Information

Propylene Glycol Stearates (PGS) are a mixture of the mono- and diesters of triple-pressed stearic acid and propylene glycol and are used in a wide variety of cosmetic products. Studies with 14C-labeled PGS show that it is readily metabolized following ingestion. In rats, the acute oral LD50 has been shown to be approximately 25.8 g/kg. The raw ingredient produced no significant dermal toxicity, skin irritation, or eye irritation in acute tests with rabbits. Subchronic animal studies produced no evidence of oral or dermal toxicity. Propylene glycol monostea-rate was negative in in vitro microbial assays for mutagenicity. In clinical studies, PGS produced no significant skin irritation at concentrations up to 55% nor skin sensitization on formulations containing 2.5%. Photo-contact allergenicity tests on product formulations containing 1.5% PGS were negative. From the available information, it is concluded that Propylene Glycol Stearates are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use.

4: Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Toluene

1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-120 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Skin ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Skin Exposure

Toluene has a wide variety of noncosmetic applications. However, the cosmetic use is limited to nail products at concentrations up to 50%. Toluene was practically nontoxic when given orally to rats; acute oral LD50 values ranged from 2.6 g/kg to 7.5 g/kg. Results of animal studies indicated that undiluted Toluene is a skin irritant. No skin irritation or sensitization was observed in subjects treated with cosmetic products containing 31-33% Toluene. No phototoxic or photoallergic reactions were noted in subjects treated with 25% or 30% Toluene. The sole cosmetic use of Toluene is in products intended to be applied directly to the nail; therefore, human skin exposure to this ingredient will be minimal under conditions of cosmetic use. On the basis of the available data and the limited user skin exposure from cosmetic products containing Toluene, it is concluded that this ingredient is safe for cosmetic use at the present practices of use and concentration.

2 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of p-Aminophenol, m-Aminophenol, and o-Aminophenol

1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-333 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Topical Application ◽  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Mutagenic Activity ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Hair Dyes ◽  
Hair Dye ◽  
Mutagenicity Tests

p-Aminophenol (PAP), m-Aminophenol (MAP), and o-Aminophenol (OAP) are used in permanent (oxidative) hair dyes at concentrations from 0.1 to 5%. In vivo and in vitro skin absorption studies indicated that 11% of the dermally applied 14C-PAP was detected in the excreta, viscera, and skin of the test animals. The oral LD50s of PAP, MAP, and OAP in rats ranged from 600 to 1300 mg/kg. Topical application of PAP at concentrations up to 8.00 g/kg to the skin of New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits produced no skin irritation and no mortality. PAP, MAP, and OAP were irritating to eyes of NZW rabbits at a concentration of 2.5%. MAP at 3% was nonsensitizing in guinea pigs; PAP at 2% sensitized 9 of 10 guinea pigs. Neither PAP nor MAP produced photosensitization in guinea pigs. No treatment-related toxicity was found in three separate four-generation chronic dermal toxicity and reproduction studies of hair dye formulations containing the three Aminophenols. Additional studies on the pure ingredients were also nonteratogenic; embryotoxicity was reported. A range of results was obtained from studies assessing the mutagenic activity of the Aminophenols. PAP tested positive in six of eight mutagenicity tests. MAP and OAP gave positive results in two of eight and five of seven mutagenicity tests, respectively. Oxidative hair dye formulations containing PAP, MAP, and OAP did not produce gross or microscopic alterations or have carcinogenic effects after chronic topical application to mice. Feeding of OAP-HCl and PAP to rats at a dose of 8 mmol/kg produced neither hepatic cirrhosis nor neoplastic lesions. A 3% solution of MAP in an aqueous vehicle was neither a significant irritant nor sensitizer in two clinical studies. A variety of epidemiological studies have not indicated that occupational exposure to, and personal use of, hair dyes containing the Aminophenols presented a carcinogenic risk. A discussion of the significance of the mutagenic data in the safety assessment and the potential for human effects is presented. On the basis of the available animal and clinical data presented in this report it is concluded that p-, m-, and o-Aminophenols are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use and concentrations.

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Carbomers-934, -910, -934P, -940, -941, and -962

1990 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-141 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Acrylic Acid ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Pathological Changes ◽  
Cosmetic Ingredients ◽  
Body Weights ◽  
Available Information

The Carbomers are synthetic, high molecular weight, nonlinear polymers of acrylic acid, cross-linked with a polyalkenyl polyether. The Carbomer polymers are used in cosmetics and emulsifying agents at concentrations up to 50%. Acute oral animal studies showed that Carbomers-910, -934, -934P, -940, and -941 have low toxicities when ingested. Rabbits showed minimal skin irritation and zero to moderate eye irritation when tested with Carbomers-910 and -934. Subchronic feeding of rats and dogs with Carbomer-934 in the diet resulted in lower than normal body weights, but no pathological changes were observed. Dogs chronically fed Carbomer-934P manifested gastrointestinal irritation and marked pigment deposition within Kupffer cells of the liver. Clinical studies with Carbomers showed that these polymers have low potential for skin irritation and sensitization at concentrations up to 100%. Carbomer-934 demonstrated low potential for phototoxicity and photo-contact allergenicity. On the basis of the available information presented and as qualified in the report, it is concluded that the Carbomers are safe as cosmetic ingredients.

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of 6-Amino-m-Cresol, 6-Amino-o-Cresol, 4-Amino-m-Cresol, 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol, 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol, and 4-Chloro-2-Aminophenol1

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Percutaneous Penetration ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Toxicity Data ◽  
Hair Dyes ◽  
Animal Skin

Each of these ingredients function as hair colorants. 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol and 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol are identified as oxidative hair dyes, that is, they are combined with an oxidizing agent before being applied to the hair. 6-Amino-m-Cresol, 6-Amino-o-Cresol, 4-Amino-m-Cresol, and 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol are used in oxidative hair dyes, but it is not known if they are also used in nonoxidative (semipermanent) hair dyes. No toxicologically significant impurities are present with these two ingredients. To supplement the safety test data on these ingredients, available data on related ingredients (4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene and p-, m-, and o-aminophenol) previously found safe as used by the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel were summarized. 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol and 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol do not absorb significant ultraviolet radiation in the UVB region and none in the UVA region, although 4-Amino-m-Cresol had a symmetrical UV absorption peak at 300 nm. Percutaneous penetration of 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol and 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol alone was significant, but when combined with oxidative developer, skin absorption was extremely low. Both of these dyes are excreted rapidly via the urine. Repeated exposure of animal skin to 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol and 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol failed to produce any cumulative irritation and single exposures up to 10% were not irritating to animal skin. 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol and 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol combined with oxidizer were not sensitizers in guinea pig maximization tests. Ocular irritation resulted from exposure of animals to undiluted 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol, but not to a 5% solution. Only minor irritation was observed with 5% 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol. Subchronic toxicity testing in animals using 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol, 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol, and 4-Amino-m-Cresol did not yield any adverse reactions. 6-Amino-m-Cresol and 4-Amino-m-Cresol were generally not mutagenic in in vitro and in vivo tests. Exposure to 5-Amino-4-Chloro-o-Cresol, 5-Amino-6-Chloro-o-Cresol, 6-Amino-m-Cresol and 4-Amino-m-Cresol from cosmetics were several orders of magnitude below developmental toxicity no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs). Although irritation data on several ingredients are absent, products containing these ingredients must include a caution statement and patch test instructions for determining whether the product causes skin irritation. The Expert Panel expects that following this procedure would identify individuals who would have an adverse reaction and allow them to avoid significant exposures. These compounds, when tested alone, are moderate skin sensitizers, but when combined with the developer, these ingredients are not sensitizers in animal tests. This information, coupled with the available animal test data, supports the safety of these ingredients in oxidative hair dyes. In the absence of systemic toxicity data, however, the available data are insufficient to support the safety of 6-Amino-o-Cresol and 4-Chloro-2-Aminophenol in semipermanent hair dyes. The types of data required for these two ingredients for this use include (1) physical and chemical properties, including the octanol/water partition coefficient; (2) impurities data, especially regarding the presence of m-cresol, other organic molecules, and heavy metals; (3) data demonstrating that the metabolism is similar to that of 4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene and/or p-, m-, and o-aminophenol, or 28-day dermal toxicity with histopathology, dermal reproductive toxicity data, and an in vitro genotoxicity study for 6-Amino-o-Cresol and one genotoxicity study in a mammalian system; if positive, a 2-year dermal carcinogenicity study using National Toxicology Program methods may be needed.

Final Report of the Amended Safety Assessment of Glyceryl Lau rate, Glyceryl Lau rate SE, Glyceryl Laurate/Oleate, Glyceryl Adipate, Glyceryl Alginate, Glyceryl Arachidate, Glyceryl Arachidonate, Glyceryl Behenate, Glyceryl Caprate, Glyceryl Caprylate, Glyceryl Caprylate/Caprate, Glyceryl Citrate/Lactate/Linoleate/Oleate, Glyceryl Cocoate, Glyceryl Collagenate, Glyceryl Erucate, Glyceryl Hydrogenated Rosinate, Glyceryl Hydrogenated Soyate, Glyceryl Hydroxystearate, Glyceryl Isopalmitate, Glyceryl Isostearate, Glyceryl Isostearate/Myristate, Glyceryl Isostearates, Glyceryl Lanolate, Glyceryl Linoleate, Glyceryl Linolenate, Glyceryl Montanate, Glyceryl Myristate, Glyceryl Isotridecanoate/Stearate/Adipate, Glyceryl Oleate SE, Glyceryl Oleate/Elaidate, Glyceryl Palmitate, Glyceryl Palmitate/Stearate, Glyceryl Palmitoleate, Glyceryl Pentadecanoate, Glyceryl Polyacrylate, Glyceryl Rosinate, Glyceryl Sesquioleate, Glyceryl/Sorbitol Oleate/Hydroxystearate, Glyceryl Stearate/Acetate, Glyceryl Stearate/Maleate, Glyceryl Tallowate, Glyceryl Thiopropionate, and Glyceryl Undecylenate1

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 55-94 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Test System ◽  
Dermal Absorption ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Vitro Assay ◽  
Cosmetic Ingredients ◽  
Glyceryl Behenate

The safety of 43 glyceryl monoesters listed as cosmetic ingredients was reviewed in a safety assessment completed in 2000. Additional safety test data pertaining to Glyceryl Rosinate and Glyceryl Hydrogenated Rosinate were received and served as the basis for this amended report. Glyceryl monoesters are used mostly as skin-conditioning agents—emollients and/or surfactant—emulsifying agents in cosmetics. The following 20 glyceryl monoesters are currently reported to be used in cosmetics: Glyceryl Laurate, Glyceryl Alginate, Glyceryl Arachidonate, Glyceryl Behenate, Glyceryl Caprylate, Glyceryl Caprylate/Caprate, Glyceryl Cocoate, Glyceryl Erucate, Glyceryl Hydroxystearate, Glyceryl Isostearate, Glyceryl Lanolate, Glyceryl Linoleate, Glyceryl Linolenate, Glyceryl Myristate, Glyceryl Oleate/Elaidate, Glyceryl Palmitate, Glyceryl Polyacrylate, Glyceryl Rosinate, Glyceryl Stearate/Acetate, and Glyceryl Undecylenate. Concentration of use data received from the cosmetics industry in 1999 indicate that Glyceryl Monoesters are used at concentrations up to 12 % in cosmetic products. Glyceryl Monoesters are not pure monoesters, but are mostly mixtures with mono-, di-, and tri-esters. The purity of commercial and conventional Monoglyceride (Glyceryl Monoester) is a minimum of 90%. Glyceryl Monoesters (monoglycerides) are metabolized to free fatty acids and glycerol, both of which are available for the resynthesis of triglycerides. Glyceryl Laurate enhanced the penetration of drugs through cadaverous skin and hairless rat skin in vitro and has been described as having a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity. A low-grade irritant response was observed following inhalation of an aerosol containing 10% Glyceryl Laurate by test animals. Glyceryl monoesters have little acute or short-term toxicity in animals, and no toxicity was noted following chronic administration of a mixture consisting mostly of glyceryl di- and mono- esters. Glyceryl Laurate did have strong hemolytic activity in an in vitro assay using sheep erythrocytes. Glyceryl Laurate, Glyceryl Isostearate, or Glyceryl Citrate/Lactate/Linoleate/Oleate were not classified as ocular irritants in rabbits. Undiluted glyceryl monoesters may produce minor skin irritation, especially in abraded skin, but in general these ingredients are not irritating at concentrations used in cosmetics. Glyceryl monoesters are not sensitizers, except that Glyceryl Rosinate and Hydrogenated Glyceryl Rosinate may contain residual rosin, which can cause allergic reactions. These ingredients are not photosensitizers. Glyceryl Citrate/Lactate/Linoleate/Oleate was not mutagenic in the Ames test system. Glyceryl Laurate exhibited antitumor activity and Glyceryl Stearate was negative in a tumor promotion assay. At concentrations higher than used in cosmetics, Glyceryl Laurate did cause moderate erythema in human repeat-insult patch test (RIPT) studies, but the other glyceryl monoesters tested failed to produce any significant positive reactions. Glyceryl Rosinate was irritating to animal skin at 50%, but did not produce sensitization in clinical tests at concentrations up to 10% and covered with semioccluded patches. There is reported use of Glyceryl Rosinate at 12% in mascara, which is somewhat higher than the concentration in the clinical testing. It was reasoned that the available data do support the safety of this use because there would be minimal contact with the skin and no occlusion. The safety of Arachidonic Acid was not documented and substantiated for cosmetic product use in an earlier safety assessment and those same safety questions apply to Glyceryl Arachidonate. Based on these data, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel found that these glyceryl monoesters are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the present practices of use and concentration: except that the available data are insufficient to support the safety of Glyceryl Arachidonate. Additional data needed to support the safety of Glyceryl Arachidonate include (1) dermal absorption data; and, based on the results of the absorption studies, there may be a need for (2) immunomodula-tory data; (3) carcinogenicity and photocarcinogenicity data; and (4) human irritation, sensitization, and photosensitization data.

scholarly journals Amended Final Report On the Safety Assessment of Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate

1998 ◽  
Vol 17 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Alan Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Prolonged Contact ◽  
Cosmetic Formulations ◽  
Sodium Sulfosuccinate ◽  
Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate ◽  
Animal Skin ◽  
Dioctyl Sodium

Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate is an anionic surfactant used in a wide variety of cosmetic formulations. In September 1994, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel evaluated the ingredient to be safe up to 0.42% in cosmetic formulations. Since that time, CIR received a petition to re-open the safety assessment based on new clinical data. This amendment is a compilation of data contained in the original plus the data received in the petition; the latter appear at the end of this document. Studies conducted in the 1940's indicate that the oral LD50 in rats can be as low as 1.9 g/kg. Short-term subchronic and chronic animal studies of the same vintage found little toxicity at levels around 1% of the LD50 level. Inhalation studies likewise had few findings. Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate was minimally irritating to intact animal skin, but moderate to severely irritating to abraded skin. A concentration of 25% was a severe ocular irritant, but 10% produced little or no irritation. Mutagenesis tests were negative. A repeated insult patch test (RIPT) in 110 individuals produced no sensitization at a concentration of 5%. Erythema was noted during induction in a number of subjects at concentrations ≤5%. The CIR Expert Panel recognized that surfactants such as Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate would likely produce irritation under the conditions of a RIPT. The Panel cautioned that as the ingredient is a cumulative irritant, care should be taken to avoid irritancy in formulations intended for prolonged contact with the skin. The Panel concluded that Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate is safe for use in cosmetics.

Final Report of the Safety Assessment of Methylisothiazolinone

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 187S-213S ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina L. Burnett ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
James G. Marks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Dermal Penetration ◽  
The Many ◽  
Threshold Dose Response

Methylisothiazolinone (MIT) is a heterocyclic organic compound used as a preservative in cosmetics and personal care products in concentrations up to 0.01%. MIT is a colorless, clear liquid with a mild odor that is completely soluble in water; mostly soluble in acetonitrile, methanol, and hexane; and slightly soluble in xylene. Consistent with its solubility, dermal penetration is low. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel noted the in vitro evidence of neurotoxicity but concluded that the absence of any neurotoxicity findings in the many in vivo studies, including subchronic, chronic, and reproductive and developmental animal studies, suggests that MIT would not be neurotoxic as used in cosmetics. Although recognizing that MIT was a sensitizer in both animal and human studies, the panel concluded that there is a threshold dose response and that cosmetic products formulated to contain concentrations of MIT at 100 ppm (0.01%) or less would not be expected to pose a sensitization risk. Accordingly, MIT may be safely used as a preservative in cosmetics up to that concentration.

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Methenamine

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-558 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Drinking Water ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Intestinal Tract ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Formaldehyde Concentration ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Teratogenic Effects ◽  
Carcinogenic Activity

Methenamine is a biocide that is used in cosmetic eye make-up preparations at concentrations of less than 1%. Methenamine, following oral administration, undergoes hydrolysis and generates formaldehyde. Methenamine is rapidly absorbed from the intestinal tract and excreted mostly unchanged in the urine. A single oral dose of 20 g/kg Methenamine did not cause mortality in rats. No untoward signs of toxicity were observed in either subchronic or chronic studies. Methenamine was slightly irritating to the skin of rabbits. In ocular studies it was mildy irritating. In animal assays, Methenamine was a sensitizer when tested at a concentration of 25%, but not at 0.2%. It was neither an irritant nor a sensitizer to humans at 0.1%. In a number of teratologic and reproductive studies, no teratogenic effects attributable to Methenamine were observed. Methenamine was a mutagen in Drosophila melanogaster but not in other in vitro mutagenicity assays. Methenamine did not show any carcinogenic activity, either alone or when nitrite was included in the drinking water of the test animals. Methenamine is judged to be safe for non-aerosolized cosmetic products at a concentration not to exceed 0.16%. At this concentration, the released formaldehyde concentration will not exceed 0.2%.

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of TEA-Lauryl Sulfate

1982 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 143-167 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sulfuric Acid ◽  
Human Skin ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Final Concentration ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Lauryl Sulfate ◽  
Skin Sensitization ◽  
Skin Reactions

TEA-Lauryl Sulfate is the triethanolamine salt of lauryl sulfuric acid. It is used in cosmetics as a detergent, a stabilizer and a solubilizer. The ingredient was moderately to slightly toxic in acute oral studies with rats; reported LD50s ranged from 0.27 to > 1.95 g/kg. Animal studies showed that the surfactant is a significant skin and eye irritant. In clinical studies, shampoos containing 10.5% TEA-Lauryl Sulfate caused no irritation under semioccluded conditions. Diluted shampoos containing 0.15-7.5% of the surfactant caused human skin reactions ranging from no irritation to moderate irritation. This skin irritation phenomenon is observed with most detergents. Undiluted shampoos containing 10.5% TEA-Lauryl Sulfate showed low potential for eliciting human skin sensitization. No evidence of photosensitization was observed in subjects exposed to solutions containing up to 0.42% TEA-Lauryl Sulfate. On the basis of the available animal and human data, the Panel concludes that TEA-Lauryl Sulfate can be used without significant irritation at a final concentration not exceeding 10.5%. Greater concentrations may cause irritation, especially if allowed to contact the skin for significant periods of time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document