scholarly journals Monotherapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Luiz Tanajura ◽  
Áurea Chaves ◽  
Andrea Abizaid ◽  
José Costa Júnior

Since the mid-1990s, the dual antiplatelet therapy, consisting of the association between acetylsalicylic acid and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the core of thrombosis prevention after coronary stent implantation, regardless of the models used. It is also used to prevent the occurrence of atherothrombotic events in the late phase after the intervention. The clinical presentation of coronary artery disease influences the duration of dual therapy, which tends to be longer in treated cases of acute coronary syndrome (usually for one year), when compared to cases of chronic coronary disease (often for up to 6 months). After this period, the P2Y12 inhibitor is usually discontinued, and monotherapy with aspirin is maintained. However, in the last two decades, it has been observed that prolonged use of two associated antiplatelet agents predisposes treated cases to bleeding complications, with potentially severe consequences – including increased mortality. Thus, alternatives that minimize this risk have been considered and evaluated, such as early discontinuation of acetylsalicylic acid (between 1 and 3 months after discharge), or the so-called monotherapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, aiming to reduce bleeding without compromising prevention of ischemic events. In the last decade, a series of randomized clinical trials evaluated this hypothesis, generally resulting in reduced bleeding complications, although not necessarily of those classified as major, with no significant increase in the most relevant cardiovascular events. This review discusses the main results of these clinical trials and their potential clinical implications for routine cardiology practice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (14) ◽  
pp. 978-986
Author(s):  
Harald Darius

AbstractThe number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing due to the aging of the population. In addition, the number of patients with AF and an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) for the prevention of strokes increases, who are in need for a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) plus a P2Y12-Inhibitor because of an acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary stent implantation. These patients did receive a triple therapy (TT) for 3–12 months in the past. Triple therapy never has been studied for efficacy or safety, however, the rate of bleeding complications in comparison to OAC or DAPT is significantly higher.Registries and smaller trials showed that dual therapy with an OAC plus a single platelet inhibitor may be sufficient to prevent strokes and stent thromboses/myocardial infarctions. Four prospective randomized trials involving all four NOACs (Non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulants) approved for stroke prevention in AF have been undertaken. The NOACs plus one antiplatelet agent were tested versus vitamin K-antagonists plus DAPT. In the meantime, the trials involving rivaroxaban (PIONEER AF-PCI), dabigatran (RE-DUAL PCI), apixaban (AUGUSTUS), and edoxaban (ENTRUST-AF-PCI) have been published. The current status is that a NOAC plus a single antiplatelet agent, mostly clopidogrel, is superior to TT with respect to the bleeding complications, without any obvious and statistically significant disadvantage for stroke rates or cardiac ischemic events. The international guidelines already recommend to treat with a NOAC and one antiplatelet agent instead of TT in case the patients bleeding risk is prevailing. Thus, TT seems not to be indicated anymore for most patients with AF and ACS or PCI.


The Clinician ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16
Author(s):  
E. V. Konstantinova ◽  
М. Yu. Gilyarov ◽  
N. А. Shostak ◽  
D. A. Anichkov

Dual antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist) is a standard component of treatment of any type of acute coronary syndrome, independently of perfusion and the chosen treatment strategy. Due to certain limitations of clopidogrel as the 2nd component of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention, the possibility of using prasugrel or ticagrelor should be considered first. Their effectiveness is higher than clopidogrel’s, as was demonstrated in large clinical trials. As a result, prasugrel and ticagrelor were included in all major international and Russian guidelines on treatment of this category of patients with the same class and level of evidence. Currently, there’re no data from any finished large randomized clinical trials of sufficient statistical power directly comparing the effectiveness and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor. Therefore, careful analysis of the accumulated data on the safety and effectiveness of each drug including meta-analyses and registries is necessary for providing the best care for every individual patient.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Verdoia ◽  
Cyril Camaro ◽  
Elvin Kedhi ◽  
Marco Marcolongo ◽  
Harry Suryapranata ◽  
...  

Conflicting results have been reported so far in pooled analyses and studies evaluating the optimum duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. However, randomized clinical trials dedicated to this specific setting of higher thrombotic risk patients have only recently been completed, pointing at the noninferiority of a shorter strategy as compared to the traditional 12-month DAPT, furthermore allowing to reduce the risk of major bleeding complications. Therefore, a reconsideration of current clinical practice and guidelines should be certainly be advocated in light of the most recent updates, especially among ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and modern drug-eluting stents (DES). Our aim was to provide a comprehensive review of the available evidence on the optimal DAPT duration in ACS patients.


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Babikir Kheiri ◽  
Mohammed Osman ◽  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Sahar Ahmed ◽  
Khansa Osman ◽  
...  

Introduction: Potent P2Y 12 -receptor inhibitors are recommended in the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). As the risk of thrombotic complications from an ACS event is highest in the early “ischemic phase,” the greatest benefit of potent P2Y 12 blockade occurs early. However, the risk of bleeding from such therapy tends to occur with chronic treatment during the “maintenance phase.” Therefore, a stage-adapted strategy with the early use of potent P2Y 12 blockade in acute treatment, followed by de-escalation to clopidogrel during the maintenance phase is common. Nevertheless, clinical outcomes supporting this strategy are lacking. Hypothesis: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet de-escalation compared with continuation in patients with ACS treated with PCI. Methods: Electronic databases search were conducted for all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet de-escalation compared with continuation in patients with ACS treated with PCI. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled summary estimates. Results: We included 3 RCTs with 3,391 total patients (median follow-up 12 months). The net clinical outcome (composite of thrombotic or bleeding events) was significantly reduced in the switched group compared with the continued group (8.7% vs 12.1%; risk ratio (RR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.97; P=0.03). However, there were no significant differences between groups in major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55-1.11; P=0.17), all BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) types bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.33-1.11; P=0.10), or BARC types ≥2 bleeding (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.19-1.26; P=0.14). Conclusions: Our results suggest a net clinical benefit of de-escalation therapy shortly after PCI in ACS patients, without increased risk of MACE or bleeding, though further adequately powered trials are needed to confirm this finding.


2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (01) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Komócsi ◽  
András Vorobcsuk ◽  
Victor L. Serebruany ◽  
Dániel Aradi

SummaryAdministration of a P2Y12-receptor antagonist in addition to aspirin is mandatory in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce the occurrence of thrombotic events; however, their impact on mortality and stroke is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the influence of moderate (clopidogrel) or potent (prasugrel/ticagrelor) P2Y12-receptor inhibition on major cardiovascular outcomes among patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Systematic literature search was performed to find randomised, controlled clinical trials comparing the clinical impact of clopidogrel with placebo or prasugrel/ticagrelor versus clopidogrel. Outcome measures included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), total stroke and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Random-effects model with Mantel-Heanszel weighting was used to pool outcomes into a meta-analysis. Four studies comparing clopidogrel with placebo and five trials comparing clopidogrel with new P2Y12-receptor inhibitors were identified including a total of 107,473 patients. Compared to placebo, clopidogrel reduced the risk of cardiovascular death (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.99, p=0.02), MI (OR 0.80; 95%CI 0.74–0.88, p<0.00001) and stroke (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.72–0.97, p=0.02), without influencing risk for ICH (OR 0.96;& 95%CI 0.69–1.33, p=0.79). Treatment with prasugrel/ticagrelor provided additional benefit over clopidogrel regarding cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78–0.94, p=0.002) and MI (OR: 0.83; 95%CI 0.74–0.93, p<0.001), but no advantage in stroke (OR: 1.06; 95%CI 0.88–1.26, p=0.55) and in ICH (OR: 1.16; 95%CI 0.75–1.81; p=0.49) was observed. Increased potency of P2Y12-receptor inhibition is associated with decreased risk in cardiovascular death and MI; however, this association is not true in case of stroke, where potent P2Y12-receptor antagonists have no incremental benefit over clopidogrel.


Author(s):  
Ranjan Modi ◽  
Sunil Modi ◽  
Ranjan Modi

Current guidelines for acute coronary syndrome are derived from the data in randomized clinical trials and metanalysis conducted in patients. These patients are generally of younger age. The data of acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians is mainly derived from registries. This mid and long-term data regarding medical therapy or interventions in octogenarians is low in number with smaller subsets of patients. Most of the physicians are reluctant to use the same guidelines in these elderly patients due to increased chances of complications. This article reviews the available data and literature in acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians and provides management perspectives for these elderly patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Yi Xu ◽  
Yimin Shen ◽  
Delong Chen ◽  
Pengfei Zhao ◽  
Jun Jiang

Introduction. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPTs) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing longer-term (>12 months) DAPT (L-DAPT), 12-month DAPT (DAPT 12Mo), 6-month DAPT (DAPT 6Mo), 3-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy (DAPT 3Mo + ASA), 3-month DAPT followed by a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy (DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12), or 1-month DAPT with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy (DAPT 1Mo + P2Y12) were searched. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), major bleeding, any bleeding, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), and net adverse clinical events (NACE). This Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed with the random-effects model. Results. Twenty-four RCTs (n = 81339) were included. In comparison with L-DAPT, DAPT 6Mo (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29–0.83), DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.18–0.82), DAPT 3Mo + ASA (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17–0.98), and DAPT 1Mo + P2Y12 (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.14–0.93) were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding. DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38–0.88) reduced the risk of any bleeding when compared with DAPT 12Mo. L-DAPT decreased the risk of MI and definite or probable stent ST when compared with DAPT 6Mo. DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 decreased the risk of NACE in comparison with DAPT 6Mo and DAPT 12Mo. No significant difference in all-cause mortality and cardiac death was observed. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, DAPT 6Mo was comparable to DAPT 12Mo. Conclusion. Short-term (1–3 months) DAPT is noninferior to DAPT 6Mo after DESs implantation, while L-DAPT reduces MI and definite or probable ST rates. DAPT 3Mo + P2Y12 might be a reasonable trade-off in patients with high risk of bleeding accompanied by ischemia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document