RNA-seq of a lung sample from a male COVID19 deceased patient (age 74) submitted by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai does not show the anaerobic/aerobic homeostasis disruption observed in other patient samples - an artifact of post-mortem procedures?
Here, I have analyzed the RNA-seq of a lung sample from a male COVID19 deceased patient (age 74) submitted by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Accid:PRJNA615032). There are two replicates, which I have pooled into a single sample. The analysis (Table 1, SI/bact.txt) does not show the anaero- bic/aerobic homeostasis disruption observed in some patient samples [1–3]. Although not all samples show anaerobic/aerobic homeostasis disruption [4–6], they are possibly patients in the early phase of the disease. The findings in the current deceased patient (viral load is very low, SI/viralreads.fa) however does not align with the hypothesis [7], unless there are artifacts arising from obtaining the lung sample. Since obligate anaerobic bacteria cant tolerate more than 5% oxygen, and atmospheric oxygen is much higher, could these have been killed after atmospheric exposure? Note, anaerobic bacteria are present - its just that they don’t seem to have colonized the lung of the deceased patient.