scholarly journals JUDICAL REVIEW OF THE CRIME OF NARCOTICS ABUSE CATEGORY I (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalagunaan Narkotika Golongan I)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andi Yusdianti
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The City

AbstractThis study describes the basis for the application of material criminal law to criminal acts of drug abuse.This research was conducted in the city of Namlea, namely in the Namlea District Court using primary andsecondary data methods. Data (interview) directly with the parties concerned. Meanwhile, secondary datacollection techniques are carried out by reading documents or regulations and literature books related to thematerial to be presented in the thesis. After all the data is collected, the data is processed and analyzedqualitatively and then presented descriptively, that is, searching for and collecting data related to the object andthe problem under study. Based on the results of research and discussion, it shows that: 1) in Decision No. 5 /Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Nla, the Public Prosecutor uses the second indictment, namely Article 127 paragraph (1)letter a of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics the elements in the indictmenthave been deemed proven by the Public Prosecutor. that is, the acts and elements of the article match eachother, and according to the author, the application of material criminal law in this case is not in accordancewith the applicable criminal law in Indonesia. 2) in Decree No. 5 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Nla, the author does notagree with the Panel of Judges in implementing Article 127 because the elements are not proven and do notmatch each other, the Panel of Judges is wrong in making decisions without looking at Articles 54, 55 and 103of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution No.35 Years 2009 About Narcotics.Keywords: judicial review, criminal, narcotics abuse

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) BAGI WARGA NEGARA ASING (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Nyoman Sri Candra Purnami
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Immigration ◽  
Legal Consequences

The high flow of globalization and the easiness of obtaining visas for foreign citizens can increase the income of a country engaged in tourism. This phenomenon does not always have a positive impact for the country of Indonesia because many foreigners were found residing in the territory of Indonesia without having a valid and legal immigration stay permit. Many of these foreign citizens were convicted legal cases in Indonesia, it is therefore necessary to study the legal consequences of the free judgment for the foreign citizens. This study was conducted to examine the legal basis for the imposition of free judgment against foreign citizens and the implementation of the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS on the free judgment against a foreign citizen. This study is an empirical juridical study that examines the legal consequences caused after the abolition of free judgment on foreigner (Case study of Denpasar District Court No. 748/ Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN DPS). Based on the result of this study, was found that according to Law Number 8 Year 1981 regarding Criminal Procedure Law and law of the republic of Indonesia Number 6 Year 2011 on Immigration, foreigners who live in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia who do not have a valid and legal immigration stay permit can be given immigration administrative action in the form of detention. Whereas foreign citizens who are secured and still hold immigration stay permit until the completion of the judicial process and  given free judgment, the foreigners may remain in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia until the validity period of their stay permit expires. Meanwhile, for foreign citizens who have been subjected to free judgment and still hold immigration permit, the Public Prosecutor may request the Immigration Civil Service Investigator to perform the act of detention to those foreign citizens. Tingginya arus globalisasi dan kemudahan memperoleh visa bagi warga negara asing dapat meningkatkan pendapatan suatu negara yang bergerak dalam bidang kepariwisataan. Fenomena ini tidak selalu berdampak positif bagi negara Indonesia karena banyak ditemukan orang asing yang berada di wilayah Indonesia tidak memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian yang sah dan masih berlaku. Banyak  diantara warga negara asing tersebut tersandung kasus hukum di Negara Indonesia, sehingga perlu dikaji akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan atas Putusan Bebas bagi warga negara asing tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji dasar hukum penjatuhan putusan bebas terhadap warga negara asing dan pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS atas putusan bebas terhadap seorang warganegara asing. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris yang mengkaji akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan setelah dijatuhkannya Putusan Bebas terhadap orang asing (Studi kasus terhadap Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian, orang asing yang tinggal di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia yang tidak memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian yang sah dan berlaku dapat dilakukan Tindakan Administratif Keimigrasian berupa pendetensian.  Sedangkan warga negara asing yang saat diamankan dan hingga proses peradilan selesai masih memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian dan dijatuhi putusan bebas, maka orang asing tersebut dapat tetap tinggal di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia hingga masa berlaku izin tinggalnya habis. Sementara bagi orang warga negara asing yang telah dijatuhi putusan bebas dan masih memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian namun oleh Penuntut Umum dilakukan upaya hukum kasasi, Penuntut Umum dapat meminta kepada Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Keimigrasian untuk melakukan tindakan pendetensian atas warga negara asing tersebut.

scholarly journals Overmacht Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Korban Meninggal Dunia Perspektif Fiqh JinÂyah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-335
Author(s):  
Muhammad Riza Fahmi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Conditional Sentence

Abstract: The Judge’s ruling in the legal decition of the Lamongan District Court No. 164/Pid.B/2013/PN.LMG on the crime of persecution that causes the death of the victim is regarded true since it has been fulfilled all elements as required by Article 351 Paragraph (3) of Criminal Code as indicted by the public prosecutor. In deciding this case, the judge also considered the testimony of witnesses, the information from the defendant, the facts revealed at the hearing as well as the things that burdensome and relieve the defendant. Therefore, the defendant shall be sentenced for 5 months in prison and does not have to go through due to the imposed conditional sentence. In Islamic criminal law, the case is equated with a semi-deliberate murder and sanctioned by diyât and kafârat in the form of ta’zîr. In this case, the defendant can not be punished because of his self-defense. So that the defendant is free from a criminal liability in Islam.Keywords: Persecution, victim died, Islamic law. Abstrak: Putusan hukum hakim Nomor: 164/Pid.B/2013/PN.LMG tentang tindak pidana penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan korban meninggal dunia berdasarkan telah terpenuhinya semua unsur-unsur dari pasal 351 ayat (3) KUHP seperti yang didakwakan oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Dalam memutuskan perkara ini hakim juga mempertimbangkan keterangan saksi, keterangan terdakwa, fakta-fakta yang terungkap di persidangan, serta hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan terdakwa. Oleh karena itu, terdakwa dipidana dengan 5 bulan penjara dan tidak perlu menjalaninya dikarenakan dikenakan hukuman bersyarat. Dalam fiqh jinâyah, perkara ini disamakan dengan pembunuhan semi sengaja. Untuk sanksinya yaitu membayar diyat dan kafârat, sedangkan untuk hukuman penggantinya berupa hukuman ta’zîr. Dalam kasus ini, para terdakwa meskipun telah melakukan perbuatan tersebut, namun tidak bisa dikenakan hukuman tersebut, karena adanya unsur pembelaan diri, sehingga terbebas dari pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam Islam.Kata Kunci: Penganiayaan,  meninggal dunia, Hukum Islam. 

scholarly journals YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGANCAMAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-134
Author(s):  
Al Furqon
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
State Court ◽  
Criminal Offence ◽  
The Public ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
Using Data

This research was carried out at the Makassar District Court in Makassar, with research methods using data collection techniques by means of research library and field research. The results of this research indicate that all the elements of a criminal offence committed by the pengancaman the second defendant had sesuasi with the elements contained in article 335 of the PENAL CODE with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. This is apparent from satisfy all the elements in accordance with the article didakwakan on the defendant. Article didakwakan, namely Article 335 paragraph (1) of the CRIMINAL CODE. With satisfy the elements and look at the application of the criminal law against the crime pengancaman, then the defendant must account for his actions in accordance with the ruling of the District Court Judges deposed by the Makassar imprisonment of three (3) months and pay the fees. In deciding the matter State Court judge Makassar has pretty much consideration, starting from the demands of the public prosecutor, the accused, description of witnesses, as well as satisfy the elements pursuant to article didakwakan, as well as the things that are incriminating and relieve. So defendants are convicted with imprisonment for 3 (three) months and pay the fees, not fully contain the benefit law. Considering the act committed by the two defendants, then according to the author, the criminal who dropped by the Tribunal of judges rated very lightly.  

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS LEX SPECIALIS DEROGAT LEGI GENERALIS TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN TOGEL SECARA ONLINE STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA UTARA NOMOR 599/PID.B/2018/PN.JKT UTR

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 497
Author(s):  
Franky Satrio Darmawan ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Online Gambling ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
The North ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Lottery Gambling

Gambling is a crime and can be punished for its actions. However, along with the development of the gambling era it was played with electronic media, namely online gambling. The State of the Republic of Indonesia has overcome gambling crimes with evidence such as the existence of laws contained in criminal law and if carried out online there is an Electronic Information and Transaction law. The research entitled The implementation of principle lex specialis derogat legi generalist concerning information and electronic transaction laws in online lottery gambling crimes Case Study Decision of North Jakarta Districts Courted Number 599 / PID.B / 2018 / PN.Jkt Utr, having a problem statement is why the public prosecutor did not apply the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalist in the online lottery gambling crime Case Study of the Decision of the North Jakarta District Court Number 599 / PID.B / 2018 / PN.Jkt Utr. The purposed paper for the law enforcement officials to appllied the principled of Lex Specialise Derogat Legi Generalits in the case of prosecution of court decisions.

scholarly journals Role Of Prosecutor General Prosecution Of Actors In The Implementation Of Abuse Of Narcotics Crime (Case Study in Magelang District Attorney)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 445
Author(s):  
Arif Hidayat ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Drug Abusers ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Case File ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic

Prosecutor as one of the law enforcement agencies in Indonesia have a role in the prosecution, it is stipulated in Article 2 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia. Prosecution is the act of the General Prosecutor for criminal matters delegated authority to the District Court in the case and in the manner set forth in the criminal procedure law to demand that tried and sentenced by the judge at the hearing. Drug abusers are people who use narcotics without authority or unlawfully. This study uses empirical juridical approach with descriptive analytical research specifications, types and sources of data are the primary data by conducting interviews and secondary data by performing a literature study, data analysis method logically and systematically. The results showed that the procedure includes the step prapenuntutan prosecution, prosecution and execution. The role of the public prosecutor in the criminal case handling drug abuse is a public prosecutor. Factors inhibiting the role of the public prosecutor in the prosecution that the case file is not yet complete, the type of drug is not on the list of narcotics, modus operandi vary and calling witnesses when the examination before the court, while the effort to overcome that by making the sharing of information between law enforcement, conduct legal counseling, attended a special training program narcotic crime and Attorney for School.Keywords: Role; Prosecution; Narcotics Abusers.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PUTUSAN BEBAS TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI MAKASSAR

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Andi Ilham Anwar ◽  
Marwan Mas ◽  
Abdul Salam Siku
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Trial Process ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Subjective Element ◽  
Judicial Authority

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui proses penerapan hukum pidana materiil dalam tindak pidana narkotika, mengetahui pertimbangan hakim tentang hal – hal yang memberikan penjatuhan Putusan Bebas Pasal 191 KUHP Ayat (1) terhadap terdakwa tindak pidana narkotika, menganalis dan mengamati fakta – fakta pada persidangan. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Kantor Pengadilan Negeri di Kota Makassar. Hasil Putusan 1434/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Mks. Jaksa Penuntut umum menggunakan dakwaan alternative Pasal 114 ayat (2) Jo Pasal 132 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika atau pasal 112 ayat (2) Jo Pasal 132 ayat (1), dimana unsur dan pasal saling berkesesuaian, namun berdasarkan fakta persidangan dan pengakuan saksi-saksi khususnya saksi a de charger dimana pasal yang didakwakan memuat unsur subjektif yaitu setiap orang, namun fakta antara apa yang didakwakan unsur setiap orang (terdakwa) tidak memiliki hubungan dari pengembangan atas kasus narkotika, sehingga atas keterangan tersebut majelis berkesimpulan bahwa unsur setiap orang pada pasal ini tidak terbukti, oleh sebab itu sudah sepatutnya terdakwa dibebaskan dari dakwaan, mengingat ketentuan pasal 191 KUHP ayat (1) dan ketentuan Hukum lainnya yang saling berkaitan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan Proses persidangan berjalan tanpa mengesampingkan penyelenggaraan kekuasaan kehakiman pada kasus tindak pidana narkotika. This study aims to determine the process of applying the material criminal law in narcotics crime, to know the judge's considerations on matters that provide the ruling on Article 191 of the Criminal Code Free Verdict Paragraph (1) against narcotics criminal defendants, to analyze and observe facts at the trial. This research was conducted in the District Court Office in Makassar City. From this study, the authors get the verdict of 1434 / Pid.Sus / 2018 / PN Mks. The Public Prosecutor uses the alternative indictment of Article 114 paragraph (2) Jo Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 Year 2009 concerning Narcotics or Article 112 paragraph (2) Jo Article 132 paragraph (1), where the elements and articles are compatible, but based on the facts of the trial and the testimony of witnesses especially witness a de charger where the article charged contains a subjective element that is each person, but the fact between what is charged by the element of each person (the defendant) has no relationship with the development of narcotics cases, so based on the information the panel of judges concluded that the element of each person in this article was not proven, therefore the defendant should have been acquitted of the indictment, bearing in mind the provisions of article 191 of the Criminal Code paragraph (1) and other interrelated legal provisions. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of the Trial Process proceeded without prejudice to the implementation of judicial authority in narcotics crime cases.

scholarly journals The Prosecution in Trial In Absentia Of Money Laundering Case Resulted from Conventional Case

2019 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 297-319
Author(s):  
Rudi Sudirdja
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Analytical Description ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Single Form ◽  
Due Process Of Law ◽  
The One ◽  
Principle Of Legality

In Indonesia, the provision of in absentia in the Money Laundering Crime Law raises problems if the crime act is originally conventional crime act. Conventional crime act should be handled based on the provisions of the Indonesian Criminal Law Procedures Code. On the one hand, the Money Laundering Crime Law regulates the provisions of the court in absentia and, on the other hand, the Indonesian Criminal Law Procedures Code does not recognize trial in absentia. This study covers the issue. To be precise, it reveals the possibility of a conventional crime act that is charged with the Money Laundering Crime Law to be tried in absentia based on the principle of formal legality. In addition, it discusses the strategy of prosecution of money laundering crime act in trial in absentia for cases that are originally conventional crime act based on the principle of due process of law. This study used analytical description research specifications and the normative juridical method. The data was collected through a document study. In accordance with the approaches, the data were analyzed in qualitative-juridical manners. This study concludes several points. The first, based on the principle of legality of formal law, the implementation of trial in absentia against general criminal acts cannot be carried out. The second, based on the principle of due process of law, the prosecution strategy in trial in absentia fur such cases are that (1) the prosecution of money laundering crime and original crime must be done separately; (2) the public prosecutor must delay the transfer of original criminal acts to the court until the accused is found and presented; (3) the indictment must be prepared in a single form; (4) the indictment must draw legal facts about the original crime; and (5) the public prosecutor can prove the legal facts about the original crime in the element of ‘assets resulting from the crime’ in the money laundering offense.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

scholarly journals Disparitas Penuntutan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-78
Author(s):  
Benny Leonard Saragih ◽  
Ediwarman Ediwarman ◽  
Muaz Zul
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Internal Factors ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Substantive Law

Difference in punishment or sentencing disparity is basically a natural thing because it can be said almost no case that is really the same. Disparity becomes a problem when the range of the sentence imposed differences between similar cases so large, giving rise to injustice and can give rise to suspicions in the community. Disparities in the Criminal (disparity of sentencing) is not the same as the application of criminal offenses against the same (same offense) or the criminal acts that are dangerous to be compared (offenses of comparable seriousness) without clear justification. Based on Law No. 16 of 2004 which replaced Law No. 5 of 1991 About the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia is an institution in the field of prosecution of the main authority of the public prosecutor act prosecution about what is meant by the prosecution as well as the reference to the provisions of Article 1 point 7 and Article 137 Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code). Research Methods in writing this thesis carried out by the method of normative law, namely analyzing and searching for answers to the problems raised by the substantive law / legal norms contained in the rules of law, the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA), the Supreme Court Circular, and etc. Factors that cause the disparity criminal offense namely Legislation Provisions factors, internal factors and external factors.

scholarly journals Gugurnya Hak Menuntut Terhadap Korporasi Akibat Pailit

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Audaraziq Ismail ◽  
Eva Achjani Zulfa ◽  
Yutcesyam Yutcesyam ◽  
Fatiatulo Lazira
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Ne Bis In Idem ◽  
Bankruptcy Code

Prosecution is basically an action by the public prosecutor to delegate a criminal case to the competent District Court so that it is examined and decided by a judge in a court session. With regard to prosecution, Article 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that there are 3 reasons for stopping prosecution, namely that an event is not a criminal act, there is not enough evidence collected by investigators to prove the fulfillment of the elements in a criminal act and for the sake of law. The Criminal Code, First, with regard to the application of the principle of ne bis in idem. Second, if the Defendant dies, Third, Expires, Fourth, Settlement outside the court, Article 82 of the Criminal Code has described if an offense is threatened with a fine only, then prosecution can be avoided by paying the maximum fine directly. Against corporations, prosecution is limited by a number of provisions, in this case also including when the corporation is bankrupt. That as a result, if the entire corporate assets are included in the bankruptcy code, there will be a transfer of corporate licenses and an impact on the liquidation process. Thus, based on the provisions of Article 142 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, the corporation is dissolved. Thus, the prosecution of the bankrupt corporation can be dropped.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document