scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS LEX SPECIALIS DEROGAT LEGI GENERALIS TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN TOGEL SECARA ONLINE STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA UTARA NOMOR 599/PID.B/2018/PN.JKT UTR

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 497
Author(s):  
Franky Satrio Darmawan ◽  
Dian Andriawan Daeng Tawang
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Online Gambling ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
The North ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Lottery Gambling

Gambling is a crime and can be punished for its actions. However, along with the development of the gambling era it was played with electronic media, namely online gambling. The State of the Republic of Indonesia has overcome gambling crimes with evidence such as the existence of laws contained in criminal law and if carried out online there is an Electronic Information and Transaction law. The research entitled The implementation of principle lex specialis derogat legi generalist concerning information and electronic transaction laws in online lottery gambling crimes Case Study Decision of North Jakarta Districts Courted Number 599 / PID.B / 2018 / PN.Jkt Utr, having a problem statement is why the public prosecutor did not apply the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generalist in the online lottery gambling crime Case Study of the Decision of the North Jakarta District Court Number 599 / PID.B / 2018 / PN.Jkt Utr. The purposed paper for the law enforcement officials to appllied the principled of Lex Specialise Derogat Legi Generalits in the case of prosecution of court decisions.

scholarly journals Role Of Prosecutor General Prosecution Of Actors In The Implementation Of Abuse Of Narcotics Crime (Case Study in Magelang District Attorney)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 445
Author(s):  
Arif Hidayat ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Drug Abusers ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Case File ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic

Prosecutor as one of the law enforcement agencies in Indonesia have a role in the prosecution, it is stipulated in Article 2 (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2004 on the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia. Prosecution is the act of the General Prosecutor for criminal matters delegated authority to the District Court in the case and in the manner set forth in the criminal procedure law to demand that tried and sentenced by the judge at the hearing. Drug abusers are people who use narcotics without authority or unlawfully. This study uses empirical juridical approach with descriptive analytical research specifications, types and sources of data are the primary data by conducting interviews and secondary data by performing a literature study, data analysis method logically and systematically. The results showed that the procedure includes the step prapenuntutan prosecution, prosecution and execution. The role of the public prosecutor in the criminal case handling drug abuse is a public prosecutor. Factors inhibiting the role of the public prosecutor in the prosecution that the case file is not yet complete, the type of drug is not on the list of narcotics, modus operandi vary and calling witnesses when the examination before the court, while the effort to overcome that by making the sharing of information between law enforcement, conduct legal counseling, attended a special training program narcotic crime and Attorney for School.Keywords: Role; Prosecution; Narcotics Abusers.

ANALYSIS AGAINST ARREST SUSPECT IN POLICE REGULATION NO. 14 YEAR 2012 ON THE CRIME INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT (CASE STUDY IN NORTH BOGOR POLICE)

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-92
Author(s):  
Dadang Suprijatna ◽  
Indralis Wardana ◽  
Fahrul Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Police Officers ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Arrest Warrant ◽  
The Public ◽  
The North ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Search For Information ◽  
Management Case Study

ABSTRACTThe method used in this thesis is a normative juridical research that is the approach that uses the concept of positive legality which states that the law is identical with the norms made written and enacted by institutions or authorities. In addition this concept also saw law as a normative system that is autonomous, closed and detached from public life. For the purposes of the investigation, investigators at the behest of investigators authorized to make arrests also for the sake of the investigation, the investigator and the investigator maid authorities make arrests. Arrest order made against a person who alleged a criminal offense based on sufficient preliminary evidence. Execution of tasks arrests were made by police officers of the Republic of Indonesia by taking into account the Letter of Assignment and gives an arrest warrant that lists the suspect's identity and mentions the reason for arrest and brief descriptions of crimes that presupposed and place in check, in which case caught arrests made without warrants, provided that the catcher should be immediately handed caught and existing evidence to the investigator or the investigator's closest aides, ransom arrest warrant should be given to the family immediately after the arrest is done, can be done for a maximum of one day. The conclusion of this study are 1) The arrest of the perpetrators of the process by members of the police force North Bogor Police first is the start of the search for information, arrest / raids, searches of perpetrators, confiscation of evidence to facilitate the examination of the offender. 2) Barriers experienced by members of the North Bogor Police in the execution of the arrest of a criminal offense (a) Lack of cooperation between the police (investigators) to the public; (b) Perpetrators of the crime of removing traces of the crime; (c) Limited facilities and prasarana.yang owned by North Bogor Police; (d) .Terbatasnya human resources (police) to uncover a crime. 3) Efforts by the North Bogor Police to overcome the obstacles in the process of the arrest of perpetrators of criminal acts as follows: (a) Fix yourself to socialize paradigm shift to community policing. (b) Provide an opportunity for the whole society to provide input to the North Bogor Police. (c) Guidance personnel are able to provide persuasive measures. (d) Propose to the City Police Bogor on procurement operational support facilities.

scholarly journals The Request for Postponement of the Blashphemy Case Criminal Charge Reading by Police and Prosecutors

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-191
Author(s):  
Mohd Andalusia Masri ◽  
Dahlan Ali ◽  
Darmawan Darmawan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Trust ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Police Intervention ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The North ◽  
Criminal Charge

This research aims to evaluate the police's request to postpone the criminal charge reading of the blasphemy case at the North Jakarta District Court, which was not based on Indonesia's positive law. The request to postpone a trial by the police without a legal basis could be considered a form of police intervention against the trial process, which has legal criminal consequences based on Article 3 Paragraph 2 and 3 of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Meanwhile, the request for a two-week trial postponement by the public prosecutors due to their inability to complete the criminal indictment, as well as considering the request from the police, has created an impression that the public prosecutors have complied with the request of the police. It also injured public trust that demanded a fair and transparent law enforcement process.

scholarly journals ANALISA YURIDIS PENYIMPANGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM PADA KONFLIK LAHAN DI PROVINSI JAWA TIMUR

Arena Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-66
Author(s):  
Teddy Putra ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Land Conflicts ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Administration ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Corrupt Behavior

Abstract This paper examines the deviations of law enforcement in land conflicts in East Java based on the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.38/Pra.Pe /2015.PN.Sby (case of Notary Nora Maria Lidwina, SH). This empirical or socio legal research uses a case study approach. The results show that irregularities in law enforcement in land conflicts by public service providers and law enforcement officials are generally based on corrupt behavior and violations of ethical codes, such as abuse of power, maladministration, case brokers, accepting bribes from certain parties, violence, intervening in cases, and other human rights violations. Mitigation efforts are improving the law enforcement officers isntitutions; improving the judicial administration and justice management systems; imposing strict sanctions; conducting supervision; conducting a transparent service and treatment; socializing anti-corruption movement; and creating an anti-corruption culture and excellent public services.

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) BAGI WARGA NEGARA ASING (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Nyoman Sri Candra Purnami
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Immigration ◽  
Legal Consequences

The high flow of globalization and the easiness of obtaining visas for foreign citizens can increase the income of a country engaged in tourism. This phenomenon does not always have a positive impact for the country of Indonesia because many foreigners were found residing in the territory of Indonesia without having a valid and legal immigration stay permit. Many of these foreign citizens were convicted legal cases in Indonesia, it is therefore necessary to study the legal consequences of the free judgment for the foreign citizens. This study was conducted to examine the legal basis for the imposition of free judgment against foreign citizens and the implementation of the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS on the free judgment against a foreign citizen. This study is an empirical juridical study that examines the legal consequences caused after the abolition of free judgment on foreigner (Case study of Denpasar District Court No. 748/ Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN DPS). Based on the result of this study, was found that according to Law Number 8 Year 1981 regarding Criminal Procedure Law and law of the republic of Indonesia Number 6 Year 2011 on Immigration, foreigners who live in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia who do not have a valid and legal immigration stay permit can be given immigration administrative action in the form of detention. Whereas foreign citizens who are secured and still hold immigration stay permit until the completion of the judicial process and  given free judgment, the foreigners may remain in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia until the validity period of their stay permit expires. Meanwhile, for foreign citizens who have been subjected to free judgment and still hold immigration permit, the Public Prosecutor may request the Immigration Civil Service Investigator to perform the act of detention to those foreign citizens. Tingginya arus globalisasi dan kemudahan memperoleh visa bagi warga negara asing dapat meningkatkan pendapatan suatu negara yang bergerak dalam bidang kepariwisataan. Fenomena ini tidak selalu berdampak positif bagi negara Indonesia karena banyak ditemukan orang asing yang berada di wilayah Indonesia tidak memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian yang sah dan masih berlaku. Banyak  diantara warga negara asing tersebut tersandung kasus hukum di Negara Indonesia, sehingga perlu dikaji akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan atas Putusan Bebas bagi warga negara asing tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji dasar hukum penjatuhan putusan bebas terhadap warga negara asing dan pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS atas putusan bebas terhadap seorang warganegara asing. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris yang mengkaji akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan setelah dijatuhkannya Putusan Bebas terhadap orang asing (Studi kasus terhadap Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian, orang asing yang tinggal di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia yang tidak memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian yang sah dan berlaku dapat dilakukan Tindakan Administratif Keimigrasian berupa pendetensian.  Sedangkan warga negara asing yang saat diamankan dan hingga proses peradilan selesai masih memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian dan dijatuhi putusan bebas, maka orang asing tersebut dapat tetap tinggal di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia hingga masa berlaku izin tinggalnya habis. Sementara bagi orang warga negara asing yang telah dijatuhi putusan bebas dan masih memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian namun oleh Penuntut Umum dilakukan upaya hukum kasasi, Penuntut Umum dapat meminta kepada Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Keimigrasian untuk melakukan tindakan pendetensian atas warga negara asing tersebut.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN URUSAN PEMERINTAH KONKUREN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT DI KABUPATEN KUANTAN SINGINGI

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rido Rikardo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Case Files ◽  
Victims Of Crime ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Sense Of Justice

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami bagaimana Tugas dan Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI nomor: 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam kaitannya dengan perkara tindak pidana ringan Harta Kekayaan di dalam KUHP dalam proses Pra Penuntutan (Studi Kasus Perkara Pencurian di Kejaksaan Negeri Kampar) dan Apakah kendala dan hambatan yang dihadapi Jaksa Peneliti dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor : 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan lingkup Harta Kekayaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara sosiologis yakni berdasarkan fakta fakta yang ada dilapangan. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam melaksanakan tugasnya dibidang para penuntutan dalam menerima berkas perkara Penyidikan oleh Pihak Kepolisian harus dengan seksama melihat apakah suatu perkara masuk dalam kategori Tindak Pidana Ringan yang dimaksudkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 atau tidak dengan berbagai pertimbangan yang dapat dipahami oleh Penyidik Kepolisian tentu saja hal ini akan memberikan rasa keadilan baik bagi Tersangka maupun bagi korban tindak pidana dan masyarakat pada umumnya.Kata kunci: kewenangan; penyelesaian; dendaABSTRACTThis study aims to find out and understand how the Duties and Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number: 02 of 2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in relation to cases of minor criminal offenses. (Case Study of Theft Case in the Kampar District Prosecutor's Office) and What are the obstacles and obstacles faced by the Research Prosecutor in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation No. 02/2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in Minor Crimes in the scope of Assets. this is done sociologically, based on facts in the field. The results of the study found that the Public Prosecutor in carrying out his duties in the field of prosecution in receiving case files Investigations by the Police must carefully see whether a case is included in the category of Minor Crimes as intended by Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 or not with various considerations that can understood by Police Investigators, of course this will give a sense of justice both to the Suspect and to victims of crime and the community at large.Keywords: authority; settlement; fines

scholarly journals ANALISIS ALAT BUKTI YANG SAMA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA YANG BERBEDA (STUDI KASUS SETYA NOVANTO DALAM PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA SELATAN NOMOR: 97/PID.PRAP/2017/PN.JKT.SEL)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Alnan Marchelita Pradewi ◽  
Firman Wijaya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Needs Analysis ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Public ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

Evidence is the important instrument to decide criminal cases and Its began from investigation, prosecution, until court decisions. Evidence is arrange in article 184 and explanation of KUHAP. Police investigating to determine someone be a suspect or unknown through investigation about entanglement according to evidence any goods and the evidence available. In fact many law enforcement officials such as police used power revenue and their authority to quickly resolve the cases with no accordance to the procedure. Therefore to minimize those things law enforcement need supervision as pretrial. Pretrial have authority to judge about legal or failure arrest, detention termination investigation or termination prosecution; compensation and or rehabilitation for criminal cases stopped at the investigation or prosecution. Related to the verdict of South Jakarta District Court number 97/Pid.prap/2017/Pn.Jkt.Sel, judge Cepi Iskandar said that the same evidence cannot be used as evidence in other criminal cases brought many different polemics. Generally judge decide on criminal cases based to article 183 KUHAP and in fact many criminal cases was using the same evidence especially to cases with more than one defendant or participation cases. Judge Cepi Iskandar decision have given uncertainty law in the public, so it needs analysis and further discussion about the evidence and the consideration on that judicial decisions.

PERANAN KEJAKSAAN DALAM IMPLEMENTASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI NOMOR: 02 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENYESUAIAN BATASAN TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN DAN JUMLAH DENDA DALAM KUHP TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA HARTA KEKAYAAN (DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agung Irawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Authority ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Case Files ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Sense Of Justice

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami bagaimana Tugas dan Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI nomor: 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam kaitannya dengan perkara tindak pidana ringan Harta Kekayaan di dalam KUHP dalam proses Pra Penuntutan (Studi Kasus Perkara Pencurian di Kejaksaan Negeri Kampar) dan Apakah kendala dan hambatan yang dihadapi Jaksa Peneliti dalam Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor: 02 tahun 2012 tentang penyesuaian batasan tindak pidana ringan dan jumlah denda dalam KUHP dalam Tindak Pidana Ringan lingkup Harta Kekayaan.penelitian ini dilakukan secara sosiologis yakni berdasarkan fakta fakta yang aad dilapangan. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam melaksanakan tugasnya dibidang para penuntutan dalam menerima berkas perkara Penyidikan oleh Pihak Kepolisian harus dengan seksama melihat apakah suatu perkara masuk dalam kategori Tindak Pidana Ringan yang dimaksudkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 atau tidak dengan berbagai pertimbangan yang dapat dipahami oleh Penyidik Kepolisian tentu saja hal ini akan memberikan rasa keadilan baik bagi Tersangka maupun bagi korban tindak pidana dan masyarakat pada umumnya. Kata kunci: kewenangan; penyelesaian; dendaABSTRACTThis study aims to find out and understand how the Duties and Authority of the Prosecutor's Office in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number: 02 of 2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in relation to cases of minor criminal offenses. (Case Study of Theft Case in the Kampar District Prosecutor's Office) and What are the obstacles and obstacles faced by the Research Prosecutor in Applying the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation No. 02/2012 concerning the adjustment of minor criminal offenses and the amount of fines in the Criminal Code in Minor Crimes in the scope of Assets. this is done sociologically, based on facts in the field. The results of the study found that the Public Prosecutor in carrying out his duties in the field of prosecution in receiving case files Investigations by the Police must carefully see whether a case is included in the category of Minor Crimes as intended by Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 or not with various considerations that can understood by Police Investigators, of course this will give a sense of justice both to the Suspect and to victims of crime and the community at large.Keywords: legal authority; settlement; fines

scholarly journals JUDICAL REVIEW OF THE CRIME OF NARCOTICS ABUSE CATEGORY I (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalagunaan Narkotika Golongan I)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andi Yusdianti
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The City

AbstractThis study describes the basis for the application of material criminal law to criminal acts of drug abuse.This research was conducted in the city of Namlea, namely in the Namlea District Court using primary andsecondary data methods. Data (interview) directly with the parties concerned. Meanwhile, secondary datacollection techniques are carried out by reading documents or regulations and literature books related to thematerial to be presented in the thesis. After all the data is collected, the data is processed and analyzedqualitatively and then presented descriptively, that is, searching for and collecting data related to the object andthe problem under study. Based on the results of research and discussion, it shows that: 1) in Decision No. 5 /Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Nla, the Public Prosecutor uses the second indictment, namely Article 127 paragraph (1)letter a of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics the elements in the indictmenthave been deemed proven by the Public Prosecutor. that is, the acts and elements of the article match eachother, and according to the author, the application of material criminal law in this case is not in accordancewith the applicable criminal law in Indonesia. 2) in Decree No. 5 / Pid.Sus / 2020 / PN Nla, the author does notagree with the Panel of Judges in implementing Article 127 because the elements are not proven and do notmatch each other, the Panel of Judges is wrong in making decisions without looking at Articles 54, 55 and 103of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution No.35 Years 2009 About Narcotics.Keywords: judicial review, criminal, narcotics abuse

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document