scholarly journals MOTIVASI MEKSIKO MELAKUKAN PENETAPAN TARIF TERHADAP DISTRIBUSI PRODUK AS KE MEKSIKO DALAM HUBUNGAN PERDAGANGAN ANTARA DUA NEGARA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fachrie
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Free Trade Zone ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us

This research discusses the analysis of Mexican motivation in determining tariffs on the distribution of US products to Mexico. In international law, Mexico and the US build a strong free trade cooperation in the North American Free Trade Zone (NAFTA) agreement. They agreed to implement the agreement that is built in that agreement, particularly for the exemption of tariff inthe distribution of products between two countries. In fact, the US could not complete the tariff exemption agreement in the distribution of Mexican products that has been agreed in NAFTA. It delays the implementation of this agreement by complicating the distribution of goods from Mexico to the US with unilateral regulations. Eventually, this research found that Mexico motivation is to respond US regulations on its products for several years. That US action, particularly the logisticsdistribution cooperation, has caused Mexico experiencing difficulties in gaining profits.

scholarly journals Motivasi Meksiko Melakukan Penetapan Tarif Terhadap Distribusi Produk As Ke Meksiko Dalam Hubungan Perdagangan Antara Dua Negara

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fachrie
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Free Trade Zone ◽  
Logistics Distribution ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us

This research discusses the analysis of Mexican motivation in determining tariffs on the distribution of US products to Mexico. In international law, Mexico and the US build a strong free trade cooperation in the North American Free Trade Zone (NAFTA) agreement. They agreed to implement the agreement that is built in that agreement, particularly for the exemption of tariff inthe distribution of products between two countries. In fact, the US could not complete the tariff exemption agreement in the distribution of Mexican products that has been agreed in NAFTA. It delays the implementation of this agreement by complicating the distribution of goods from Mexico to the US with unilateral regulations. Eventually, this research found that Mexico motivation is to respond US regulations on its products for several years. That US action, particularly the logistics distribution cooperation, has caused Mexico experiencing difficulties in gaining profits.

NAFTA and USMCA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne O. Krueger
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
Preferential Trading ◽  
Trading Arrangement

How are NAFTA and USMCA different? The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) came into force at the beginning of 1994. It was an “FTA plus” between Canada, Mexico, and the US. There had been some strenuous opposition to the preferential trading arrangement (PTA)...

Gary Gereffi, David Spener, and Jennifer Bair,Free Trade and Uneven Development: The North American Apparel Industry After Nafta. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2002. 426 pp. $27.95 paper.

2005 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 146-149
Author(s):  
Will Millberg
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Temple University ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us ◽  
Textile And Apparel ◽  
Apparel Production ◽  
Different Levels

As textile and apparel production has been at the center of almost every major episode of industrialization since the sixteenth century, so too has it been a vanguard sector in the process of deindustrialization experienced by advanced capitalist countries beginning in the twentieth century. Thus it is no surprise that this sector would play a fascinating role in the world's first postcolonial effort at economic integration between two countries at vastly different levels of economic development. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), implemented in 1994, was expected to speed the two already ongoing trends of a rising apparel sector in Mexico and a steadily declining sector in the United States. US apparel firms would be expected to be an important contributor to Ross Perot's infamous “sucking sound” of jobs moving from the US to Mexico.

International law and domestic institutions: reconciling North American “unfair” trade laws

1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Domestic Politics ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Domestic Institutions ◽  
The North

While scholars have written much about the role played by international institutions in cooperative behavior among nations, they have not examined the domestic political motives that may lie behind nations' decisions to join such organizations. Two-level games analysis provides a framework for studying domestic politics not as a constraint upon nations that enter into international agreements but as a catalyst for nations to enter into agreements. The dispute settlement procedures of the North American Free Trade Agreement and its predecessor, the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, offer an empirical illustration of this point.

scholarly journals O Congresso dos Estados Unidos e os impasses na aprovação do NAFTA | The Congress of the United States and the impasses in the approval of NAFTA

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. e57624
Author(s):  
Angelo Raphael Mattos
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Democratic Party ◽  
Free Trade Agreement ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
The United States ◽  
Bill Clinton ◽  
The North ◽  
The Us

A partir das competências constitucionais do Congresso dos Estados Unidos em política externa, das plataformas dos partidos Democrata e Republicano de 1992, bem como dos argumentos a favor e contra a implementação do North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), o artigo objetiva compreender e discutir as razões da dificuldade enfrentada por Bill Clinton para aprovar o NAFTA no Congresso dos EUA em 1993. Os resultados das análises dos diferentes grupos domésticos, incluindo os atores Executivo e Legislativo, indicam que posições ideológicas, sobretudo presentes no Partido Democrata, como questões trabalhistas e ambientais, representaram o principal fator de resistência ao NAFTA no Capitólio.Palavras-chave: Congresso; Estados Unidos; NAFTA.ABSTRACTBased on the constitutional powers of the United States Congress in foreign policy, the platforms of the Democratic and Republican parties of 1992, as well as the arguments for and against the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the article aimed to understand and discuss the reasons for Bill Clinton's difficulty in passing NAFTA to the US Congress in 1993. The results of the analyzes of different domestic groups, including the Executive and Legislative actors, indicate that ideological positions, especially present in the Democratic Party, as labor and environmental issues, represented the main factor of resistance to NAFTA in the Capitol. Keywords: Congress; United States; NAFTA. Recebido em: 08 fev. 2021 | Aceito em: 20 set. 2021.

Mexican integration into the North American free trade zone

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. M. Matiur Rahman ◽  
M. M. Moosa Khan ◽  
M. Anisul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Free Trade ◽  
North American ◽  
Free Trade Zone ◽  
The North
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document