Contrasting Living-Being and Machine Metaphors: Implications for Making Meaning of Human Experiences
We delineate a framework for considering the differential implications of understanding human experience when invoking metaphors based on living, biological beings versus metaphors based on machines/technology. We consider the origins and expressions of machine metaphors as culturally dominant in the United States and Western Europe. Machine metaphorical frames differ from living-being metaphorical frames in assumptions about transformation, development, and decline; in expectations about source of motion or change; and in whether environment or season are seen as integral to experience or action. These features then carry consequences for how individuals make sense of their and others’ experiences. In particular, we highlight how understanding based on living, biological beings might result in different meanings attached to the purpose of activity, to pauses in activity or nonlinear growth, in variability across individuals, and in what discomfort signals. We close by considering the implications of these different metaphorical frames for system design, well-being, and group disparities in achievement. This review provides a framework for empirical research that examines the psychological consequences of these different frames.