scholarly journals The cohesion-based communities of symptoms of the largest component of the DSM-IV network

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Nazmul Haque ◽  
Pablo Moscato
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Network Analytics ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Data Driven Approach ◽  
New Type ◽  
Dsm Iv

Modern methods for network analytics provide an opportunity to revisit preconceived notions in the classification of diseases as "clusters of symptoms''. Curated collections which were subsequently modified, like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV and the most recent addition, DSM 5) allow us to introspect, using the solution provided by modern algorithms, if there exists a consensus between the clusters obtained via a data-driven approach, with the current classifications. In the case of mental disorders, the availability of a follow-up consensus collection (e.g. in this case the DSM 5), potentially allows to investigate if the classification of disorders has moved closer (or away) to what a data-driven analytic approach would have unveiled by objectively inferring it from the data of DSM-IV. In this contribution we present a new type of mathematical approach based on a global cohesion score which we introduce for the first time for the identification of communities of symptoms. Different from other approaches, this combinatorial optimization method is basedon the identification of "triangles'' in the network; these triads are the building block of feedback loops that can exist between groups of symptoms.We used a memetic algorithm to obtain a collection of highly connected-cohesive sets of symptoms and we compare the resulting community structure with the classification of disorders present in the DSM-IV.

scholarly journals The Cohesion-Based Communities of Symptoms of the Largest Component of the DSM-IV Network

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 1940002
Author(s):  
MOHAMMAD NAZMUL HAQUE ◽  
PABLO MOSCATO
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Network Analytics ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Data Driven Approach ◽  
New Type ◽  
Dsm Iv

Modern methods for network analytics provide an opportunity to revisit preconceived notions in the classification of diseases as “clusters of symptoms”. Curated collections which were subsequently modified, like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manuals of Mental Disorders “DSM-IV” and the most recent addition, DSM-5 allow us to introspect, using the solution provided by modern algorithms, if there exists a consensus between the clusters obtained via a data-driven approach, with the current classifications. In the case of mental disorders, the availability of a follow-up consensus collection (e.g. in this case the DSM-5), potentially allows investigating if the classification of disorders has moved closer (or away) to what a data-driven analytic approach would have unveiled by objectively inferring it from the data of DSM-IV. In this contribution, we present a new type of mathematical approach based on a global cohesion score which we introduce for the first time for the identification of communities of symptoms. Different from other approaches, this combinatorial optimization method is based on the identification of “triangles” in the network; these triads are the building block of feedback loops that can exist between groups of symptoms. We used a memetic algorithm to obtain a collection of highly connected-cohesive sets of symptoms and we compare the resulting community structure with the classification of disorders present in the DSM-IV.

Angststörungen – von der ICD-10 zur ICD-11

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Timo D. Vloet ◽  
Marcel Romanos
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Nach 12 Jahren Entwicklung wird die 11. Version der International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) im Januar 2022 in Kraft treten. Methodik: Im Rahmen eines selektiven Übersichtsartikels werden die Veränderungen im Hinblick auf die Klassifikation von Angststörungen von der ICD-10 zur ICD-11 zusammenfassend dargestellt. Ergebnis: Die diagnostischen Kriterien der generalisierten Angststörung, Agoraphobie und spezifischen Phobien werden angepasst. Die ICD-11 wird auf Basis einer Lebenszeitachse neu organisiert, sodass die kindesaltersspezifischen Kategorien der ICD-10 aufgelöst werden. Die Trennungsangststörung und der selektive Mutismus werden damit den „regulären“ Angststörungen zugeordnet und können zukünftig auch im Erwachsenenalter diagnostiziert werden. Neu ist ebenso, dass verschiedene Symptomdimensionen der Angst ohne kategoriale Diagnose verschlüsselt werden können. Diskussion: Die Veränderungen im Bereich der Angsterkrankungen umfassen verschiedene Aspekte und sind in der Gesamtschau nicht unerheblich. Positiv zu bewerten ist die Einführung einer Lebenszeitachse und Parallelisierung mit dem Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Schlussfolgerungen: Die entwicklungsbezogene Neuorganisation in der ICD-11 wird auch eine verstärkte längsschnittliche Betrachtung von Angststörungen in der Klinik sowie Forschung zur Folge haben. Damit rückt insbesondere die Präventionsforschung weiter in den Fokus.

Progress in the Development of ICD-11 and DSM-V Classifications of Mental Disorders

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sartorius
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Task Force ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
World Health ◽  
Advisory Group ◽  
Special Unit ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Health Organization

The International classification of diseases - which includes a chapter dealing with mental disorders - will be revised and its 11th Revision will be published in 2014.A special unit within the World Health Organization coordinates the process of revision and the numerous tasks that have to be undertaken to ensure full participation of the WHO member states in the process of revision as well as the consideration of evidence on which the classification is to be based.The Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Control of the WHO has created a special advisory group that should help it in considering the evidence and proposals made by scientists, governments, organizations and interested individuals and in producing the draft of the classification of mental disorders for inclusion into the 11th Revision of the ICD: This group has, in turn, developed several structures that will deal with the tasks that will arise in the revision process. At the same time the American Psychiatric Association has created a DSM 5 Task Force that should develop proposals for the 5th Revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual that will be published in 2012.The lecture will describe the processes and structures that have been put in place by the two organizations and refer to the issues that have arisen or are likely to arise in the course of work that should lead to the proposals for the ICD 11 and the DSM 5.

Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 and Beyond (ICD-11)

2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (S1) ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Zaudig
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Related Approach ◽  
Dsm Iv

“A classification is the reification of an ideological position, of an accepted stand of theory and knowledge. It means creating, defining or confirming boundaries of concepts. These in turn define ourselves, our future and our past…” (Sartorius, 1991). The 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), Chapter V on Mental and Behavioral Disorders (World Healthorganization [WHO], 1992, 1993), and the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) have been adapted to the current clinical and scientific knowledge of mental disorders. Because ICD-10 has adapted the primarily descriptive and criteria-related approach from DSM-111, the general structures of both classifications are quite similar. However, complete congruency between ICD-10 and DSM-IV has not yet been reached.

Focus II: Is there agreement between DSM-IV and ICD-10?

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 66-68
Author(s):  
M.J.A.J.M. Hoes
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Gedurende de laatste jaren zijn nieuwe edities van twee grote classificatiesystemen uitgebracht. De American Psychiatric Association heeft in 1994 de vierde editie van de Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) gepubliceerd en de Wereldgezondheids-organisatie in 1991 de tiende editie van de International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Van de laatste is hier het vijfde hoofdstuk (V of F) over psychische stoornissen van belang.Vergeleken met de DSM-III (-R) uit 1980 (1987) is de DSM-IV qua structuur niet veranderd. Vergeleken met de DSM-III-R zijn er wel quantitatieve verschillen: 105 veranderde categorieën op as-I, 3 veranderde op as-II, 9 nieuwe voorstellen voor klinische aandacht, 13 nieuwe diagnoses, terwijl 8 classificaties verwijderd zijn en as-IV anders is gestructureerd, naar type belasting in plaats van ernst van belastende factoren.

scholarly journals Zaburzenie używania alkoholu według DSM-5. Możliwości i ograniczenia wynikające ze zmiany kryterów diagnostycznych

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Modrzyński
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Alcohol Use Disorder ◽  
Statistical Classification ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
International Statistical Classification

Kolejna rewizja podręcznika DSM (ang. Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM-5) pojawiła się w 2013 roku i wprowadziła daleko idące zmiany w rozumieniu zaburzeń stosowania substancji psychoaktywnych. Najważniejszy przełom dotyczy rozumienia używania alkoholu. Odejście od dychotomicznego, zero-jedynkowego rozumieniauzależnienia od alkoholu i nadużywania pozwoliło na stworzenie nowej kategorii diagnostycznej zaburzeń używania alkoholu (alcohol use disorder – AUD). W artykule poruszono zagadnienie zmian w kryteriach diagnostycznych dotyczących zaburzenia używania alkoholu w świetle najnowszej klasyfikacji DSM-5. Zaprezentowano umiejscowieniekategorii zaburzeń używania alkoholu, jej definicję wraz z kryteriami diagnostycznymi. Dokonano również zestawienia objawów zaburzenia używania alkoholu wg DSM-5 z odpowiadającymi im kryteriami ICD-10 (ang. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems). Na zakończenie artykułu przedstawiono liczne kontrowersje wokuł nowej kategorii. Podkreślono wyzwanie dla przyszłych badań, jakim jest planowanie leczenia w zależności od stopnia cieżkości zaburzenia używania alkoholu.

Anxieties Over the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 890-890
Author(s):  
Michael Trimble
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
The United States ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Dsm Iv

Rumor has it that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) is on the way. Apart from giving the American Psychiatric Association an enormous financial boost, this should be an opportunity to improve on some of the terrible intellectual lapses of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-Revised (DSM-IV-R), to bring DSM and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) schemes closer together, and to expand on biological and other markers as diagnostic components in the classificatory process. It is hoped that more than the first of these possibilities will be realized.Since the publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, (DSM-III), the DSM manuals have brought a measure of good sense to clinical practice and have improved communication among researchers, so that at least in theory schizophrenia is similar on both sides of the Atlantic, and most probably is similar on both coasts of the United States. The slavish adherence to listed criteria has developed a sense of renewed interest in phenomenology of a practical kind, and exclusion criteria mean that not all individuals who visit a psychiatrist's office can be guaranteed a diagnosis. The distinction between Axis 1 and Axis 2 categories and the removal of any psychoanalytic taints was a stunning acceptance of Jaspers pace Freud.

scholarly journals Klassifikation von Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörungen in der ICD-11

2022 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-53
Author(s):  
Manfred Döpfner ◽  
Tobias Banaschewski
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Statistical Classification ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Störung Des Sozialverhaltens ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
International Statistical Classification

Zusammenfassung. Der Beitrag gibt eine kurze Übersicht über die Veränderungen in der Klassifikation von Hyperkinetischen Störungen und Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörungen nach ICD-11 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems). Sowohl in der Bezeichnung als auch in der Binnendifferenzierung lehnt sich ICD-11 erfreulicherweise an das DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) an. Auch die Aufgabe der ICD-10-Kombinationsdiagnose der Hyperkinetischen Störung des Sozialverhaltens zugunsten von Mehrfachdiagnosen ist zu begrüßen. Der Verzicht auf eine exakte Operationalisierung der Kriterien hilft einerseits bei der Einordung von Grenzfällen in der klinischen Praxis, macht es aber auch notwendig, für die Klärung der einzelnen Symptome auf das DSM-5 zurückzugreifen.

scholarly journals Validación de un punto de corte para la versión breve de la Escala de Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos en adultos mayores mexicanos

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aarón Salinas-Rodríguez ◽  
Betty Manrique-Espinoza ◽  
Gilberto Isaac Acosta-Castillo ◽  
Aurora Franco-Núñez ◽  
Óscar Rosas-Carrasco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Objetivo. Identificar un punto de corte válido para la Escala de Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos (CES-D) de siete reactivos, que permita clasificar a los adultos mayores según presencia/ausencia de síntomas depresivos clínicamente significativos. Material y métodos. Estudio de tamizaje con 229 adultos mayores residentes de los estados de Morelos y Tlaxcala en México, que fueron parte de la muestra de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición, 2012. Se estimó la sensibilidad y especificidad asociada con el punto de corte seleccionado usando los criterios diagnósticos del ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) y del DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition). Resultados. El punto de corte estimado fue CES-D=5. De acuerdo con el ICD-10, los valores obtenidos de sensibilidad y especificidad fueron de 83.3 y 90.2%, y un valor ROC de 87% y, según el DSM-IV, los valores fueron 85, 83.2, y 84%, respectivamente. Conclusiones. La versión abreviada del CES-D puede ser utilizada como una prueba de tamizaje para identificar casos probables de adultos mayores con síntomas depresivos clínicamente significativos.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document