scholarly journals Role of Sonographic Imaging Findings in Evaluation of Cases Presenting with History of Blunt Abdominal Trauma in UCMS-TH

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Sanju Rawal ◽  
Sadhan Mukhi
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
History Of ◽  
Contrast Exposure ◽  
One Year

INTRODUCTION Physical examination is often unreliable. Computed tomography scan is costly, time consuming, requires injection of contrast, exposure to radiation and patient transport thereby limiting its use. With the usage of sonography, it is possible to evaluate and help in the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The proposed study enables sonographic technique in assessing and accurately detecting the    presence of free fluid and to pin point the injured organ, thereby helping the clinicians and surgeons in appropriate management MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study was cross sectional conducted on UCMS-TH, Bhairahawa, Nepal. Total 150 cases with history of blunt abdominal trauma were included and scanned by GE LOGIQ6 PRO ultrasound scanner for the duration of one year. RESULTS A total of 150 patients were evaluated 121 were males and 29 were females. Free fluid was detected in total 112 cases (74.66%) out of which with most common injured solid organs were Liver and spleen in total 31 cases (20.7%) each, which were further confirmed on CT scan. CONCLUSION Ultrasonography is easy to perform, quick, cost effective and is highly sensitive in detecting free fluid and solid organ injuries however insignificant in patients with bowel or mesenteric injuries in cases of blunt abdominal trauma and demand CT scan.

Intra-abdominal Free Fluid without Solid Organ Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: An Indication for Laparotomy

2002 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1134-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. T. Ng ◽  
Richard K. Simons ◽  
William C. Torreggiani ◽  
Stephen G. F. Ho ◽  
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury

scholarly journals Lactate clearance: its relationship with the success of non-operative management in patient with blunt abdominal trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1738
Author(s):  
Reno Rudiman ◽  
Nova Saragih ◽  
Andriana Purnama
Keyword(s):  
Hemorrhagic Shock ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Lactate Clearance ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
History Of ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: Occult ongoing bleeding has become the second highest cause of death in blunt abdominal trauma. Undetected abdominal injury has caused morbidity and mortality in patients at the early phases of trauma. Non-operative Management (NOM) in solid organ trauma is safe and effective, and this strategy has become widely used. Lactate clearance (LC) has important clinical benefits in patients with acute trauma that is superior to initial lactate examination.  Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study of patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma that came to emergency room of Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung from August 2015 to July 2016. The tests were including initial blood lactate, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-resuscitation and then calculation of LC. Analysis using SPSS with chi square for the significance of relationships and Spearman correlation to determine the strength of the relationship between variables. Comparison test between LC2 and LC4 were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.Results: During one year period, from August 2015 to July 2016, there were 34 patients. Age was in the range of 15-65 years, with a range of 15-25 years were 19 (55.8%), 25-50 years were 11 (32.4%), and >50 years as many as four (11.8%). By sex, there were 28 (82.4%) male gender and 6 (17.6%) women. Based on the type of trauma, there were 11 (32.4%) single trauma patients and 23 (67.6%) multiple trauma patients. Based on the results of statistical analysis with chi square, there was a significant correlation between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) with the success of NOM (p <0.001) with the Odds Ratio (OR) are 3.750 and 6.500 respectively. Based on non-parametric test (Mann Whitney) showed that there were no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the successful of NOM (p>0.05).Conclusions: There was a significant relationship between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) in determining the success of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma. In addition, there are no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the success of the NOM, so that either LC2 or LC4 may be used in predicting the success of NOM, as LC4 is the first preference. The low level of lactate clearance may be used as one of indicators to terminate non-operative management and proceed with surgery right before all symptoms of hemorrhagic shock arise.

scholarly journals Management of solid organ injury in patient of blunt abdominal trauma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2361
Author(s):  
Aafrin S. Baldiwala ◽  
Vipul C. Lad
Keyword(s):  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Initial Resuscitation

Background: In this ongoing era of 21st century, trauma is the leading cause of death in individuals between age 1 and 44. In trauma, also road traffic accidents (RTAs) are the major cause of death. Blunt abdominal trauma is a frequent emergency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.Methods: A prospective analysis of 50 patients of blunt abdominal trauma admitted in SMIMER hospital Surat within a span of 12 months was done. Unstable patients with initial resuscitation underwent focused assessment sonography for trauma (FAST). Failed resuscitation with free fluid in abdomen confirmed by FAST immediately shifted to operation theatre for laparotomy and proceed. Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computerized tomography of abdomen.Results: Most of the patients in our study were in the age group of 21-45 years with M:F ratio of 4:1. RTAs (62%) was the most common mechanism of injury. Spleen (38%) was the commonest organ injured and the most common surgery performed was splenectomy. In total non-operative management (NOM) was done in 58% of cases and surgical management was done in 42% of cases.Conclusions: Appropriate patient selection, early diagnosis and repeated clinical examination and use of appropriate investigations forms the key in management of blunt abdominal trauma. To conclude, initial resuscitation measures and correct diagnosis forms the most vital part of blunt abdominal trauma management.

scholarly journals FAST as a predictor of clinical outcome in blunt abdominal trauma

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin M Terry ◽  
David Blehar ◽  
Romolo Gaspari ◽  
Arthur Thomas Maydell ◽  
Fourie Abraham Bezuidenhout ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Abdominal Sonography ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Trauma Triage ◽  
Operative Findings

Background. Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates increasing support for the use of focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) in the setting of blunt trauma, one study demonstrating the sensitivity and specificity of FAST for the detection of free fluid to be 0.64 - 0.98 and 0.86 - 1.00, respectively, compared with abdominal CT. Utilising ultrasound in trauma triage increases efficiency and cost-effectiveness and reduces reliance on CT, compared with using CT alone. There is little evidence to support relying solely on a negative FAST and physical examination for patient management. Method. A retrospective descriptive study of 172 adult patients who received FAST for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma between 22 July 2007 and 21 January 2008 at Tygerberg Hospital was performed. Ultrasound findings were correlated with CT scan findings, operative findings if managed surgically, clinical outcomes whether managed surgically or conservatively, as well as postmortem findings in deceased patients. Results. FAST was negative in 147 (85.5%) patients. Twenty-four (16.3%) of these patients died from all-cause mortality, none of which was due to intra-abdominal injury. Seven patients with negative FAST underwent CT scan owing to change in clinical course, and 3 patients with negative FAST underwent laparotomy owing to change in clinical course, with positive findings in 2 patients – a bowel injury requiring resection (not seen on CT) and a diaphragmatic rupture seen on CXR. A negative FAST was shown to be an excellent predictor for the absence of significant intra-abdominal trauma. The mortality rate among 25 FAST positive patients was 24% (N=6). Only one of these patients (with a splenic rupture) was suspected to have died from abdominal pathology.

Significance of Computed Tomography Finding of Intra-Abdominal Free Fluid Without Solid Organ Injury after Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Time for Laparotomy on Demand

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1411-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Mahmood ◽  
Zainab Tawfek ◽  
Yassir Abdelrahman ◽  
Tariq Siddiuqqi ◽  
Husham Abdelrahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Tomography Finding

scholarly journals Comparison of positive predictive value of computed tomography versus diagnostic peritoneal lavage for diagnosis of solid organ damage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Ghaffar ◽  
Saeed Mahmood ◽  
Muhammad Kareemullah ◽  
Saqib Uddin Khan ◽  
Ambreen Akram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage

Background: Abdominal trauma can be mysterious to some practitioners. If patients are evaluated for being stable or unstable, then abdominal trauma can be easily managed. Using a combination of physical examination, eFAST Scan, DPL and CT scans, patients can be quickly and efficiently evaluated. Objectives: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage for diagnosis of solid organ damage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) taking surgical findings as gold standard. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Department of Surgery at Lahore General Hospital, Lahore. Period: Six months i.e. from 21.5.2016 to 20.11.2016. Materials and Methods: Data Collection: CT scan was performed with oral and intravenous contrast. DPL was done with sample assessment. Only those cases were included with positive findings in CT Scan or DPL. These patients underwent laparotomy under general anesthesia by a one standard surgical team. Results of surgical findings were compared between groups with CT scan and DPL. All the information was collected on predesigned proforma. Results: The mean age of the patients was 44.48±14.83 years. There were 66 (55%) males and 54 (45%) females in our study. In this study PPV for CT-scan group was 90.1% while PPV for group with DPL was 51.3%. Conclusion: PPV for CT Scan group was higher than that of DPL group for diagnosing solid organ damage in patients with BAT. Hence, evidence shows that CT Scan should be used as an initial investigation of choice in haemo-dynamically stable patients with BAT.

scholarly journals Isolated gallbladder perforation in paediatric blunt abdominal injury: A case report and review of literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Sujoy Neogi ◽  
Arka Banerjee ◽  
Shasanka S Panda ◽  
Simmi K Ratan
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Diagnostic Laparoscopy ◽  
Road Accident ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Gallbladder Perforation ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Injury

Gallbladder injury in blunt abdominal trauma is rare, around 2% of all abdominal traumas. Vague symptoms and inconclusive imaging make it an elusive diagnosis, more so in children. Only 30 pediatric cases have been reported worldwide till date. We report a case of a 7yrs old boy presenting 2 weeks after a road accident with a gallbladder rupture which was eventually discovered on a diagnostic laparoscopy. This is the second such case being reported from India. The injury is most often identified at exploration and although cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment, there are occasions when the gallbladder may be left in situ. The classification system of Losanoff and Kjossev has merit in guiding treatment. The various presentations, mechanisms and modes of injury have been highlighted along with the clinical and imaging findings. Despite the developments in modern radiology, identifying gallbladder perforation has always been difficult because of the rarity of the condition. In a child with blunt abdominal trauma and intra-abdominal free fluid without any solid organ injury, a diagnostic peritoneal tap may be helpful. Based on the current evidence, we advocate a low threshold for performing a diagnostic laparoscopy in all such cases.

scholarly journals Correlation Between Intra-Abdominal Free Fluid and Solid Organ Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Talari ◽  
Nushin Moussavi ◽  
Masoumeh Abedzadeh Kalahroudi ◽  
Fatemeh Atoof ◽  
Arezoo Abedini
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury

Mesenteric Hematoma: Is there a Role for Selective Management?

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Corzo ◽  
Alan Murdock ◽  
Louis Alarcon ◽  
Juan C. Puyana
Keyword(s):  
Glasgow Coma Scale ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Nonoperative Management ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Coma Scale ◽  
Mesenteric Hematoma

Mesenteric hematomas may present as a radiologic finding after blunt abdominal trauma that may be associated with surgically significant mesenteric and/or bowel injury. The question of whether to operate or not to operate on patients with mesenteric hematoma remains a topic of debate, especially with the improved imaging technology. This study sought to identify clinical and radiological characteristics for patient selection for operative management (OM) of mesenteric hematoma. A retrospective review of 33 adults with blunt abdominal trauma and mesenteric hematoma on CT scan (2009–2012) was performed. Patients with other intra-abdominal injuries, penetrating trauma, isolated gastric hematoma, contrast extravasation, extraluminal air, and Glasgow Coma Scale < 14 were excluded. Patients requiring surgical treatment within 24 hours of admission were compared with those who did not using chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and t test. Parameters included age, gender, race, Glasgow Coma Scale, vital signs, pain, tenderness, ecchymosis, Injury Severity Score, length of stay, and inhospital mortality. Logistic regression was used to determine positive associations with OM. Of the 33 patients, 19 underwent OM and 14 did not. Both groups were similar at baseline. Regression analysis revealed association for pain [odds ratio (OR) = 9.6, confidence interval (CI) = 1.8–49.9, P < 0.01], tenderness (OR = 32, CI = 4.6–222.2, P < 0.01), and free fluid (OR = 10.3, CI = 1.8–60, P < 0.01) with need for operative intervention. Nonoperative management patients had 100 per cent success rate. Of the OM patients, 100 per cent underwent therapeutic laparotomies. Findings of mesenteric hematoma on CT scan in examinable patients with no abdominal pain, tenderness, or free fluid predict successful nonoperative management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document