scholarly journals Postoperative Analgesia following Cesarean Section: Intravenous Paracetamol vs Pethidine

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 144-149
Author(s):  
Astha Shrestha ◽  
B. Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Group I ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Significant Difference

Effective analgesia is important after cesarean section. Intravenous paracetamol has been internationally accepted as a part of multimodal approach to pain management in post operative period. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous paracetamol with pethidine in postoperative pain management in cesarean section. One hundred and eight patients undergoing cesarean section were studied over six months. The patients were divided into two equal groups. Group I received 900mg / 100 ml of intravenous paracetamol at the end of surgery and every 6 hrs for 24 hrs and group II received intramuscular 50 mg pethidine every 8 hours. Intramuscular Diclofenac sodium 75 mg was used as a rescue drug to both the groups. Visual analogue score was used to assess the pain level at 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. The postoperative pain scores in both the groups were comparable. There was no significant difference in the consumption of additive analgesics. On the basis of current study we can reasonably recommend intravenous paracetamol in the postoperative pain management after cesarean section as it maintains a sustained and safe analgesic as it does not have side effects.

scholarly journals Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caglar Münevveroglu ◽  
Mehmet Gunduz
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Epidural Block ◽  
Block Group ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Caudal Epidural Block ◽  
Caudal Epidural ◽  
Penile Block

Objective: To determine the ideal method for postoperative pain management after circumcision by comparing the most frequently used different methods like; dorsal penile block, caudal epidural block, subcutaneous ring block, intravenous paracetamol and intravenous tramadol HCl. Methods: Between May 1st 2015 to May 1st 2016, 500 children between 2-10 year old were circumcised at the department of pediatric surgery of Istanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice & Research Center Sefakoy Hospital. Five groups were formed according to postoperative analgesia methods which were planned to be compared; Group-I. penile block, Group-II. Caudal epidural block, Group-III. subcutaneous ring block, Group-IV as intravenous paracetamol and Group-V as intravenous tramadol HCl. In order to evaluate the postoperative pain levels of children, Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) was filled at 30, 60, 120, 180 minutes after circumcision by a researcher who does not know which method was applied. Results: No significant difference is found between the groups (p>0.05). In the statistical analysis, no significant difference was found in the effect of analgesia methods on CHEOPS scores between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). In parallel with this result, no significant difference was found in the effect of heart beat rates and respiration rate averages between 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes (p>0.05). Conclusion: It has been shown that none of the five method has any superiority in reducing pain after circumcision and that all five methods can be used. However, we think that side effects of regional anesthesia and systemic analgesic applications should not be ignored. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505 How to cite this:Munevveroglu C, Gunduz M. Postoperative pain management for circumcision; Comparison of frequently used methods. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.505 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Comparative Study in the Management of Postoperative Pain with High Dose Intravenous Paracetamol versus Tramadol

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Tanudeep Kaur ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Emotional Experience ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Postoperative Patient ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience causing agony and several side effects in a postoperative patient. Thus effective postoperative pain management has a humanitarian role with additional medical and economic benefits Paracetamol (PCM) has been widely used as an effective analgesic and antipyretic for over a century with an established safety profile, and Tramadol is a commonly used intravenous drug for postoperative pain relief.

scholarly journals Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Laserpuncture and Meloxicam in Bitches Submitted to Ovariohysterectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Rubia M. Tomacheuski ◽  
Marilda O. Taffarel ◽  
Guilherme S. Cardoso ◽  
Ana A. P. Derussi ◽  
Marcos Ferrante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Perioperative Pain Management

Background: This prospective, randomised and blind study investigated the efficacy of laserpuncture for postoperative pain management in dogs. Method: Sixteen bitches were sedated with acepromazine and randomly treated before ovariohysterectomy with meloxicam 0.2 mg·kg−1 intramuscular or laserpuncture (wavelength 904 mm, frequency 124 Hz, potency 10 Joules, 100 s in each acupoint). Anaesthesia was performed with propofol, isoflurane/O2, and fentanyl. The Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (GCMPS) and Dynamic Interactive Visual Analog Scale (DIVAS) were used to evaluate postoperative pain before and for 24 h after surgery. Morphine was administrated as rescue analgesia when pain scores were ≥3.33 (GCMPS). Differences between treatments, time points, and amount of rescue analgesia between groups were investigated by the Mann–Whitney test and the area under the curve (AUC) for GCMPS, Friedman, and Chi-squared tests, respectively (p < 0.05). Results: Dogs treated with laserpuncture presented lower GCMPS AUC for 24 h and lower GCMPS scores at 2 and 4 h postoperatively (p = 0.04). Three dogs treated with meloxicam required postoperatively rescue analgesia against none treated with laserpuncture. Conclusions: In this preliminary study, laserpuncture mitigated postoperative pain in dogs following ovariohysterectomy, and the technique is a promising adjunct to perioperative pain management in dogs undergoing soft tissue surgery.

scholarly journals Is changing the postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty from femoral nerve block to local infiltration analgesia successful? Retrospective trial with the first and last 100 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Najfeld ◽  
Robert Hube ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Kujat ◽  
Hermann Otto Mayr ◽  
Kathi Thiele
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Femoral Nerve Block ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Local Infiltration Analgesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Purpose In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in local infiltration analgesia (LIA) as a technique to control postoperative pain. We compared this technique to the gold standard the 3 in 1 femoral nerve block (FNB) in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a large patient population. This trial analyzes in the early postoperative phase the pain, range of motion, and consumption of pain medications after TKA. Methods We conducted a retrospective trial that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA by one single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center in 2015. Patients who have secondary osteoarthritis due to rheumatoid arthritis or previous knee arthrotomy, as well as revision cases, were excluded. The included patients were divided into 2 groups according to the applied pain management (group 1 FNB, group 2 LIA). Concerning the LIA group, a modified form of composition compared to the first describer without the use of adrenaline was carried out. Post-operative additional pain medications were given on a fixed scheme to the patient. The primary outcome was pain at rest over 7 days after surgery labeled by the numeric pain rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcome measures were the total amount of opioid consumption over the hospital stay and the additional need for non-opioid medication. The conversion of the opiate medications on the morphine preparation was carried out according to the conversion data from the literature. For functional recovery, we compared the range of motion in both groups, which was recorded from the second postoperative day by the attending physiotherapist. Results In total, 202 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this clinical trial. Hundred patients were allocated to the continuous FNB group (group 1) and 102 patients to the LIA group (group 2). No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: The LIA group had a significantly lower NRS score than the continuous FNB group for the measurement in the morning on days 1, 2, and 3 after surgery (day 1, 1.5; day 2, 1.6; day 3, 1.3; p < 0.05). Secondary outcome measurements: The total volume of morphine consumption for the first six postoperative days was significantly lower in the LIA group than the FNB group (FNB 159.8 vs. LIA 96.07). There is also a significant difference between the total morphine consumption of both groups in the direct postoperative course with respect to time and group (two way ANOVA, p < 0.05) On the day of the operation and on the first postoperative day, the intake of additional non-opioids in the LIA group was also significantly reduced compared to the FNB group. No significant difference was observed on the second to sixth postoperative day concerning an additional consumption of non-opioid medications. In terms of range of motion, the LIA group showed a higher active range of motion at the operated extremity than the FNB group during the hospital stay. Conclusion The local intraarticular infiltration therapy (LIA) is a sufficient alternative to regional anesthesia avoiding the known risks of regional procedures. The results of this study reflect the efficiency of this pain management with a lower consumption of analgesics, identical to reduced postoperative pain ratings and an improved ROM in the first postoperative days. Level of evidence Retrospective trial

Postoperative pain management with tramadol after craniotomy: evaluation and cost analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Y. Rahimi ◽  
Cargill H. Alleyne ◽  
Eric Vernier ◽  
Mark R. Witcher ◽  
John R. Vender
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Pain Medications ◽  
Hospitalization Costs ◽  
Hospital Stays

Object Patients undergoing craniotomies have traditionally received opiates with acetaminophen for the management of their postoperative pain. The use of narcotic pain medications can be costly, decrease rates of early postoperative ambulation, lengthen hospital stays, and alter a patient's neurological examination. The use of alternative pain medications such as tramadol may benefit patients by resolving many of these issues. Methods The authors conducted a randomized, blinded prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of alternative pain management strategies for patients following craniotomies. Fifty patients were randomly assigned either to a control group who received narcotics and acetaminophen alone or an experimental group who received tramadol in addition to narcotic pain medications (25 patients assigned to each group). Results The control group was noted to have statistically significant higher visual analog scale pain scores, an increased length of hospital stay, and increased narcotic use compared with the tramadol group. The narcotics and acetaminophen group also had increased hospitalization costs when compared with the tramadol group. Conclusions The use of scheduled atypical analgesics such as tramadol in addition to narcotics with acetaminophen for the management of postoperative pain after craniotomy may provide better pain control, decrease the side effects associated with narcotic pain medications, encourage earlier postoperative ambulation, and reduce total hospitalization costs.

Intravenous Acetaminophen for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Living Laparoscopic Living-Donor Nephrectomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van Vu ◽  
William L. Baker ◽  
Elizabeth M. Tencza ◽  
Caroline Rochon ◽  
Patricia A. Sheiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Living Donor ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Living Donor Nephrectomy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Opioid Administration ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Control Versus

Background: Postoperative pain is a common complication of laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomies (LLDNs). Objective: To determine whether intravenous (IV) acetaminophen administration post-LLDN influenced length of stay (LOS) when used for pain management. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study compared patients undergoing LLDN who had received IV acetaminophen for pain control versus those who did not between June 1, 2011, and November 30, 2015. Patient LOS, 30-day readmissions, frequency of pain assessments, patient-reported pain scores, and opioid administration were assessed. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the analysis (IV acetaminophen, n = 48; non-IV acetaminophen, n = 42). Patients who did not receive IV acetaminophen were more often older (48.8 ± 12.1 vs 39.3 ± 12.1 years; P = 0.012) and female (71.4% vs 47.9%; P < 0.001). The average LOS was similar between the 2 groups (median = 3.0; interquartile range = [3, 4] vs 3.5 [3, 4]; P = 0.737). The 30-day readmissions were higher in the IV acetaminophen group (16.7%) compared with the group not receiving IV acetaminophen (2.4%; P = 0.033). After the first postoperative day, the frequencies of pain assessments performed were similar among the 2 groups. There was no difference in average pain scores between the groups at any time after LLDN. Conclusions: Patients receiving IV acetaminophen were found to have no improvements in hospital LOS, average pain score, or opioid requirements compared with patients not receiving IV acetaminophen. Patients who received IV acetaminophen were also found to have a higher 30-day readmission rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document