scholarly journals Revisitando a Ricardo Palma en el centésimo aniversario de su muerte

Aula Palma ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 361-371
Author(s):  
Roland Forgues
Keyword(s):  
Mario Vargas Llosa ◽  
Country Formation ◽  
Patriarchal Power

ResumenEn este artículo se revisa el concepto de disidencia en la obra de Ricardo Palma. Utilizamos el término «disidencia» en el sentido que desarrollara Mario Vargas Llosa (1971). Revelamos aquí, brevemente, cómo la disidencia en Palma se enmascara de un aparente conformismo social y cultural destinado a cuestionar soterradamente las estructuras del poder colonial y patriarcal y su supervivencia en el Perú republicano.Palabras Clave: Tradiciones peruanas, disidencia, Mario Vargas Llosa, discurso subyacente, transgresión, formación de país. AbstractThis article reviews the concept of dissent in Ricardo Palma's work. We use the term "dissent" in the sense that Mario Vargas Llosa (1971) developed. Briefly, we reveal here how the dissent in Palma is masked by an apparent social and cultural conformism destined to subtly question the structures of colonial and patriarchal power and its survival in the Peruvian republic.Keywords: Peruvian traditions, dissent, Mario Vargas Llosa, underlying discourse, transgression, country formation.

En Las Américas, by LaGrone, McHenry and O’Connor. New York, Toronto; Luis Quinones De Benavente Y Sus Entremeses, by Hannah E. Bergman. Madrid, Editorial Castalia, 1965; Le Devoción de la Cruz, by Calderón de la Barca. Edited by Sidney F. Wexler. Salamanca, Madrid, Barcelona; Anaya, 1966; Antología de Poetas Modernistas Hispanoamericanos, by Homero Castillo. Waltham, Mass.; Toronto, London; Blaisdell Publishing Company (Ginn), 1966; Voces Hispanoamericanas, Edited by Peter G. Earle. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World (Toronto: Longmans Canada), 1966.; El Misterio De La Cueva, by J. R. Jump. London, George G. Harrap (Toronto: Clarke, Irwin), 1966; Tierra de los Incas: Primeras Lecturas, by L. Clarke Keating. New York, The Ronald Press, 1966; La Venda En Los Ojos, by José López Rubio. Edited by Marion P. Holt. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966; Ultimas tardes con Teresa, by Juan Marse. Barcelona, Editorial Seix Barrai, 1966; La Obra En Prosa De Juan Ramón Jiménez, by Michael P. Predmore. Madrid, Editorial Gredos, 1966; Política De Dios, by Francisco De Quevedo. Edited by James O. Crosby. Madrid, Editorial Castalia, 1966; Lírica Hispánica: Relaciones Entre Lo Popular Y Lo Culto, by Eduardo M. Torner. With a Prologue by Homero Serís. Madrid, Editorial Castalio, 1966; Unamuno: Sus Mejores Páginas, edited by Philip Metzidakis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1966; Unamuno: Sus Mejores Páginas, Edited by Philip Metzidakis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1966; Lengua, Literatura, Intimidad, by Alonso Zamora Vicente. Madrid, Taurus, 1966En Las Américas, by LaGrone, McHenry and O’Connor. New York, Toronto, London; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966. Pp. 314, plus appendix. $5.30.Luis Quinones de Benavente y sus Entremeses, by Hannah E. Bergman. Madrid, Editorial Castalia, 1965. (Castalia: Biblioteca de Erudición y crítica, VII.) Pp. 571.Le Devoción de la Cruz, by Calderón de la Barca. Edited by Sidney F. Wexler. Salamanca, Madrid, Barcelona; Anaya, 1966. Pp. 156.Antología de Poetas Modernistas Hispanoamericanos, by Homero Castillo. Waltham, Mass.; Toronto, London; Blaisdell Publishing Company (Ginn), 1966. Pp. xxi, 505.Voces Hispanoamericanas, edited by Peter G. Earle. New York, Harcourt, Brace and World (Toronto: Longmans Canada), 1966. Pp. ix, 303. $3.25.El Misterio de la Cueva, by J. R. Jump. London, George G. Harrap (Toronto: Clarke, Irwin), 1966. Pp. 83. $1.30.Tierra de los Incas: Primeras Lecturas, by L. Clarke Keating. New York, The Ronald Press, 1966. Pp. vi, 177. $3.75.La Venda en los Ojos, by José López Rubio. Edited by Marion P. Holt. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966. Pp. vii, 131. $1.95.Ultimas tardes con Teresa, by Juan Marse. Barcelona, Editorial Seix Barrai, 1966. Pp. 334.La Obra en Prosa de Juan Ramón Jiménez, by Michael P. Predmore. Madrid, Editorial Gredos, 1966. Pp. 274. (Biblioteca Románica Hispánica.)Política de Dios, by Francisco de Quevedo. Edited by James O. Crosby. Madrid, Editorial Castalia, 1966. Pp. 604.Lírica Hispánica: Relaciones Entre lo Popular y lo Culto, by Eduardo M. Torner. With a prologue by Homero Serís. Madrid, Editorial Castalio, 1966. Pp. 459. (La lupa y el escalpelo, 5.)Unamuno: Sus Mejores Páginas, edited by Philip Metzidakis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, 1966. Pp. x, 318. $3.95.La Casa Verde, by Mario Vargas Llosa. Barcelona, Editorial Seix Barrai, 1966. Pp. 430.Lengua, Literatura, Intimidad, by Alonso Zamora Vicente. Madrid, Taurus, 1966. Pp. 171.

1967 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-70
Author(s):  
J. H. P.
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
Mario Vargas Llosa ◽  
Publishing Company ◽  
Francisco De Quevedo ◽  
Juan Marse ◽  
Juan Ramon Jimenez ◽  
Política De Dios ◽  
Calderón De La Barca

The Dual Penal State

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus D. Dubber
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Personal Autonomy ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Liberal State ◽  
Political Issues ◽  
Penal State ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
War On Crime ◽  
History Of ◽  
Patriarchal Power

Dual Penal State: The Crisis of Criminal Law in Comparative-Historical Perspective addresses one of today’s most pressing social and political issues: the rampant, at best haphazard, and ever-expanding use of penal power by states ostensibly committed to the enlightenment-based legal-political project of Western liberal democracy. Penal regimes in these states operate in a wide field of ill-considered and little constrained violence, where radical and prolonged interference with the autonomy of the very persons upon whose autonomy the legitimacy of state power is supposed to rest has been utterly normalized. At bottom, this crisis of modern penality is a crisis of the liberal project itself; the penal paradox is merely the sharpest formulation of the general paradox of power in a liberal state: the legitimacy of state sovereignty in the name of personal autonomy. To capture the depth and range of the crisis of contemporary penality in ostensibly liberal states, Dual Penal State leaves behind customary temporal and parochial constraints, and turns to historical and comparative analysis instead. This approach reveals a fundamental distinction between two conceptions of penal power, penal law and penal police, that run through Western legal-political history, one rooted in autonomy, equality, and interpersonal respect, and the other in heteronomy, hierarchy, and patriarchal power. Dual penal state analysis illuminates how this distinction manifests itself in the history of the present of various penal systems, from the malign neglect of the American war on crime to the ahistorical self-satisfaction of German criminal law science.

Penal Law and Penal Police in the Dual Penal State

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus D. Dubber
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
The Other ◽  
Liberal Democratic ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Penal State ◽  
Penal Law ◽  
Patriarchal Power ◽  
Modes Of Governance

The first part of Dual Penal State investigated various ways in which criminal law doctrine and scholarship (or “science”) have failed to address the challenge of legitimating penal power in a modern liberal democratic state. This, second, part explores an alternative approach to criminal law discourse that puts the legitimacy challenge of modern penal law front and center: critical analysis of criminal law in a dual penal state. Dual penal state analysis differentiates between penal law and penal police, two conceptions of penal power, and state power more generally, rooted in autonomy, equality, and interpersonal respect, on one hand, and in heteronomy, hierarchy, and patriarchal power, on the other. Chapter 4 applies the distinction between law and police as fundamental modes of governance set out in Chapter 3 to the penal realm and explores the tension between penal law and penal police as constituting the dual penal state.

scholarly journals ‘Ruined’ lives: Mediated white male victimhood

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-80
Author(s):  
Sarah Banet-Weiser
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Public Perception ◽  
White Male ◽  
The Public ◽  
Multi Media ◽  
Patriarchal Power ◽  
Almost All ◽  
False Accusations

When the hashtag #metoo began to circulate in digital and social media, it challenged a familiar interpretation of those who are raped or sexually harassed as victims, positioning women as embodied agents. Yet, almost exactly a year after the #metoo movement shot to visible prominence, a different, though eerily similar, story began to circulate on the same multi-media platforms as #metoo: a story about white male victimhood. Powerful men in positions of privilege (almost always white) began to take up the mantle of victimhood as their own, often claiming to be victims of false accusations of sexual harassment and assault by women. Through the analysis of five public statements by highly visible, powerful men who have been accused of sexual violence, I argue that the discourse of victimhood is appropriated not by those who have historically suffered but by those in positions of patriarchal power. Almost all of the statements contain some sentiment about how the accusation (occasionally acknowledging the actual violence) ‘ruined their life’, and all of the statements analyzed here center the author, the accused white man, as the key subject in peril and the authors position themselves as truth-tellers about the incidents. These statements underscore certain shifts in the public perception of sexual violence; the very success of the #metoo movement in shifting the narrative has meant that men have had to defend themselves more explicitly in public. In order to wrestle back a hegemonic gender stability, these men take on the mantle of victimhood themselves.

Feminine Power in Proclus's Commentary on Plato's Timaeus

Hypatia ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Danielle A. Layne
Keyword(s):  
Power Structures ◽  
Natural Origin ◽  
The Feminine ◽  
Patriarchal Power ◽  
A Site

Abstract Notorious for advancing a strict dichotomy between the masculine “demiurgic father” and the feminine “nurse/receptacle of becoming” as the “natural” origin of the cosmos, Plato's Timaeus has become a site for feminist interrogation. Most critics easily deem the text a masculine fantasy that projects feminine impotence and obligatory heterosexuality, reinforcing patriarchal power structures that are blindly reproduced in their historical reception. Consequently, this article analyzes the Neoplatonic replication of this framework, but with special attention given to Proclus's challenges to this gendered and sexual context. In this late, sometimes forgotten figure, we find, rather surprisingly, a Platonist who neither sequesters the feminine to the domain of the passive receptacle nor charges her simply with being a bastard image of the masculine. Rather, for Proclus, the feminine becomes the site of lived, erotic power that produces and sustains the value of authentic otherness. Furthermore, Proclus offers a challenge to the naturalness of the sex binary, suggesting a radical queerness as the basis of all identity. Overall, we shall see how classical patriarchal thinkers may, despite themselves, offer subversive models that might present readers with possibilities for troubling the sexual prejudices of ancient metaphysical schemas.

Los cachorros (1967) de Mario Vargas Llosa y la reproducción normativa patriarcal en la sociedad peruana

2021 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-299
Author(s):  
GERARDO RUZ
Keyword(s):  
Mario Vargas Llosa

Los cachorros (1967) de Mario Vargas Llosa presenta la historia de un grupo de jóvenes que crecen juntos. Mientras que sus compañeros se comportan de manera muy similar, el pequeño Cuéllar, desarrolla conductas paradójicas, y este trabajo busca explicarlas examinando su comportamiento desde su llegada al colegio hasta la adultez; éste intenta adaptarse a un grupo social en el que parece no encajar. Del mismo modo, se busca analizar si en esta novela Vargas Llosa representa las posibilidades de progreso y cambio de la sociedad peruana considerando que es una historia que critica la reproducción normativa patriarcal de dicha sociedad. Por tal razón, presto atención detallada a la secuencia del hilo narrativo de la novela, porque ésta devela el posible futuro para la sociedad peruana. Si bien se han hecho numerosos análisis de la narrativa de Vargas Llosa, estudios relacionados con Los cachorros han sido casi inexistentes, por ello el interés de explorar esta novela y observar la tendencia de la reproducción patriarcal en la narrativa de este renombrado escritor

A Conversation on Vargas Llosa’s The Time of the Hero Cátedra Mario Vargas Llosa 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-303
Author(s):  
Raquel Chang-Rodríguez ◽  
Carlos Riobó ◽  
Alfred Mac Adam ◽  
Ana María Hernández ◽  
Jason Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Mario Vargas Llosa
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document