scholarly journals Validation of PI-RADS v2 Scores at Various Non-University Radiology Practices

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Thomas Austin ◽  
◽  
Paul Kang ◽  
Chinedu Mmeje ◽  
Joseph Mashni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Subsequent Increase ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mri Guided ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
The University

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the second version of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2) scores in predicting positive in-bore MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy results across different non-university related institutions. The study focuses on PI-RADS v2 scoring because during the study period, PI-RADS v2.1 had not been released. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of 147 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the pelvis followed by in-bore MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy from December 2014 to May 2018. All lesions on mpMRI were rated according to PI-RADS v2 criteria. PI-RADS v2 scores were then compared to MR-guided biopsy results and pre-biopsy PSA values. Results: Prostate Cancer (PCa) was detected in 54% (80/147) of patients, with more prostate cancer being detected with each subsequent increase in PI-RADS scores. Specifically, biopsy results in patients with PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions resulted in PCa in 25.6% (10/39), 58.1% (33/55), and 86.0% (37/43) respectively. Clinically significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 17.9% (7/39), 52.7% (29/55), and 72% (31/43) of cases for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions respectively. When the PI-RADS scoring and biopsy results were compared across different institutions, there was no difference in the PI-RADS scoring of lesions or in the positive biopsy rates of the lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for PI-RADS 3-4 lesions were also not statistically different across the institutions for detecting Gleason 7 or greater lesions. Conclusion: Our results agree with prior studies that higher PI-RADS scores are associated with the presence of clinically significant PCa and suggest prostate lesions with PI-RADS scores 3-5 have sufficient evidence to warrant targeted biopsy. The comparison of PI-RADS score across different types of non-university practices revealed no difference in scoring and biopsy outcome, suggesting that PI-RADS v2 can be easily applied outside of the university medical center setting. Clinical Relevance: PI-RADS v2 can be applied homogeneously in the non-university setting without significant difference in outcome.

scholarly journals Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Maudy C. W. Gayet ◽  
Anouk A. M. A. van der Aa ◽  
Harrie P. Beerlage ◽  
Bart Ph Schrier ◽  
Maaike Gielens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Significant Pathology ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Control Study

Objective. To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men. Methods. An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015 and 2017 in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands. Results. Prostate cancer (PCa) was detected in 54.9% with 70.7% agreement between TB and SB. Significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 24.4%. The CDR with TB and SB was 35.4% and 48.8%, respectively (p=0.052). The CDR of significant prostate cancer with TB and SB was both 20.7%. Clinically significant pathology upgrading occurred in 7.3% by adding TB to SB and 22.0% by adding SB to TB. Conclusions. There is no statistically significant difference between CDRs of SB and TB. Both SB and TB miss significant PCas. Moreover, pathology upgrading occurred more often by adding SB to TB than vice versa. This indicates that the omission of SB in this study population might not be justified.

Utility of PCA3 urine assay in Japanese men undergoing prostate biopsy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
K. Okihara ◽  
A. Ochiai ◽  
K. Kamoi ◽  
T. Miki
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Japanese Men ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Urine Assay ◽  
Total Psa ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

50 Background: Studies have shown the high specificity of PCA3 urine assay for biopsy detection of prostate cancer in European and American. We determined the diagnostic performance of PCA3 urine test in predicting prostate cancer in Japanese men. Methods: The study group included 261 men who underwent extended prostate biopsy at our institutions. 79 men of them had repeated biopsy. In all cases, race was Asian. Urine specimens were collected after digital rectal examination. On PROGENSA PCA3 assay, PCA3 score was calculated using PCA3 mRNA copy divided by PSA mRNA copy. PCA3 score was correlated with biopsy outcome and compared with serum PSA and free-total PSA. Results: 257 urine samples collected were successfully analyzed (i.e., the informative specimen rate was 98%). Biopsy revealed prostate cancer in 104 men (40%). There was no significant relationship between serum PSA and PCA3 score. PCA3 score in prostate cancer was significantly higher than that in negative (median 54.5 vs 17.0, p<0.001). The probability of positive biopsy increased as PCA3 score increased. Using a PCA3 cutoff value of 35.0, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 65%, 75% and 71%, respectively (p<0.01). Area under the curve (AUC) for PCA3 score was 0.757 and AUC for serum PSA was 0.599 in all men. There was a significant difference in AUC between PCA3 score and serum PSA (p<0.001). In men with serum PSA 4 to 10ng/ml, AUCs of PCA3 score, free-total PSA, and serum PSA were 0.759, 0.681, and 0.542, respectively. Conclusions: The specificity of PCA3 urine assay was high for detection of prostate cancer in Japanese men. PCA3 urine assay could improve the prediction for prostate cancer and help better decision making for prostate biopsy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The urologist’s learning curve of “in-bore” magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy

BMC Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barak Rosenzweig ◽  
Tomer Drori ◽  
Orit Raz ◽  
Gil Goldinger ◽  
Gadi Shlomai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Targeted Sampling ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background The combination of multi-parametric MRI to locate and define suspected lesions together with their being targeted by an MRI-guided prostate biopsy has succeeded in increasing the detection rate of clinically significant disease and lowering the detection rate of non-significant prostate cancer. In this work we investigate the urologist’s learning curve of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy which is considered to be a superior biopsy technique. Materials and methods Following Helsinki approval by The Chaim Sheba Medical Center ethics committee in accordance with The Sheba Medical Center institutional guidelines (5366-28-SMC) we retrospectively reviewed 110 IB-MRGpBs performed from 6/2016 to 1/2019 in a single tertiary center. All patients had a prostate multi-parametric MRI finding of at least 1 target lesion (prostate imaging reporting and data system [PI-RADS] score ≥ 3). We analyzed biopsy duration and clinically significant prostate cancer detection of targeted sampling in 2 groups of 55 patients each, once by a urologist highly trained in IB-MRGpBs and again by a urologist untrained in IB-MRGpBs. These two parameters were compared according to operating urologist and chronologic order. Results The patients’ median age was 68 years (interquartile range 62–72). The mean prostate-specific antigen level and prostate size were 8.6 ± 9.1 ng/d and 53 ± 27 cc, respectively. The mean number of target lesions was 1.47 ± 0.6. Baseline parameters did not differ significantly between the 2 urologists’ cohorts. Overall detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer were 19%, 55%, and 69% for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Clinically significant cancer detection rates did not differ significantly along the timeline or between the 2 urologists. The average duration of IB-MRGpB targeted sampling was 28 ± 15.8 min, correlating with the number of target lesions (p < 0.0001), and independent of the urologist’s expertise. Eighteen cases defined the cutoff for the procedure duration learning curve (p < 0.05). Conclusions Our data suggest a very short learning curve for IB-MRGpB-targeted sampling duration, and that clinically significant cancer detection rates are not influenced by the learning curve of this technique.

33 Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e1366
Author(s):  
O. Acar ◽  
M. Vural ◽  
T. Mut ◽  
A. Onay ◽  
S. Akpek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Mri Guided ◽  
Clinically Significant

scholarly journals Computer-Aided Diagnosis Improves the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric-MRI: A Multi-Observer Performance Study Involving Inexperienced Readers

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 973
Author(s):  
Valentina Giannini ◽  
Simone Mazzetti ◽  
Giovanni Cappello ◽  
Valeria Maria Doronzio ◽  
Lorenzo Vassallo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Performance Study ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Recently, Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems have been proposed to help radiologists in detecting and characterizing Prostate Cancer (PCa). However, few studies evaluated the performances of these systems in a clinical setting, especially when used by non-experienced readers. The main aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic performance of non-experienced readers when reporting assisted by the likelihood map generated by a CAD system, and to compare the results with the unassisted interpretation. Three resident radiologists were asked to review multiparametric-MRI of patients with and without PCa, both unassisted and assisted by a CAD system. In both reading sessions, residents recorded all positive cases, and sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were computed and compared. The dataset comprised 90 patients (45 with at least one clinically significant biopsy-confirmed PCa). Sensitivity significantly increased in the CAD assisted mode for patients with at least one clinically significant lesion (GS > 6) (68.7% vs. 78.1%, p = 0.018). Overall specificity was not statistically different between unassisted and assisted sessions (94.8% vs. 89.6, p = 0.072). The use of the CAD system significantly increases the per-patient sensitivity of inexperienced readers in the detection of clinically significant PCa, without negatively affecting specificity, while significantly reducing overall reporting time.

One-year experience of government-funded magnetic resonance imaging prior to prostate biopsy: A case for omitting biopsy in men with a negative magnetic resonance imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582110043
Author(s):  
Hanna J El-Khoury ◽  
Niranjan J Sathianathen ◽  
Yuxin Jiao ◽  
Reza Farzan ◽  
Dennis Gyomber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objectives: This study aimed to characterise the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) as an adjunct to prostate biopsy, and to assess the effect of the new Australian Medicare rebate on practice at a metropolitan public hospital. Patients and methods: We identified patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy at a single institution over a two-year period. Patients were placed into two groups, depending upon whether their consent was obtained before or after the introduction of the Australian Medicare rebate for mpMRI. We extracted data on mpMRI results and TRUS-guided biopsy histopathology. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate baseline patient characteristics as well as MRI and histopathology results. Results: A total of 252 patients were included for analysis, of whom 128 underwent biopsy following the introduction of the Medicare rebate for mpMRI. There was a significant association between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 (PI-RADS) classification and the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer ( p<0.01). Only one man with PI-RADS ⩽2 was found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. Four men with a PI-RADS 3 lesion were found to have clinically significant cancer. A PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion was significantly associated with the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer on multivariable analysis. Conclusion: mpMRI is an important adjunct to biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Our findings support the safety of omitting/delaying prostate biopsy in men with negative mpMRI. Level of evidence: Level 3 retrospective case-control study.

Abstract 102: Adding Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) to the Acute Stroke Evaluation: A Single-center Experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E Ehrlich ◽  
Heather L Turner ◽  
Lillian J Currie ◽  
Max Wintermark ◽  
Bradford B Worrall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Intracranial Vessel ◽  
Vessel Imaging ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Baseline Creatinine ◽  
The University

Objective: To evaluate the safety and utility of CTA acquisition during initial acute stroke evaluation. We hypothesized CTA would not increase risk of renal injury or delay therapy. Design/Methods: We performed a pilot study of CTA acquisition in the acute stroke evaluation at the University of Virginia Medical Center in the first three quarters of 2014. We extracted data from Acute Stroke Team Leader consultations with additional chart review. We collected door-to-CT read times, door-to-needle times, baseline creatinine (Cr) values on presentation, and Cr values 24-48 hours after stroke alert evaluation. Differences in means of these variables were compared between those receiving CTA versus non-contrasted head CT (NCHCT) only. Additionally, we captured CTA results immediately relevant to treatment decisions. Results: Of 289 patients, 157 had CTA completed while 132 had only NCHCT. In the CTA group, 18 patients (11.5%) were treated with IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) compared to 11 (8.3%) in the NCHCT group, with no significant difference between groups (p=0.377). There was no difference between mean door-to-CT-read times between the NCHCT (43.07 minutes) and CTA (41.46 minutes) groups (p=0.70). Likewise, there was no significant difference in mean door-to-needle times between the NCHCT (81.36 minutes) and CTA (68.11 minutes) groups (p=0.577). There was a difference between mean Cr values on presentation (1.39mg/dL NCHCT, 1.06mg/dL CTA; p=0.004), but there was no difference between the groups at 24-48 hours (p=0.059) and no difference between the mean change in Cr values (p=0.489). No patients developed a new requirement for hemodialysis. CTA imaging revealed 14 patients with vascular anomalies, and 53 patients with severe stenosis or occlusion of a major cervical or intracranial vessel. One patient in the CTA group and none in the NCHCT group had intravascular intervention. Conclusions: Overall, CTA during acute stroke evaluations were safe and may offer clinical utility, without delaying evaluation or therapy delivery. Additional cost of acute CTA acquisition is negligible given it replaces MRA typically performed later, following admission, as standard vessel imaging. Further prospective study is required.

scholarly journals PSA Density Help to Identify Patients With Elevated PSA Due to Prostate Cancer Rather Than Intraprostatic Inflammation: A Prospective Single Center Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore M. Bruno ◽  
Ugo G. Falagario ◽  
Nicola d’Altilia ◽  
Marco Recchia ◽  
Vito Mancini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Negative Biopsy ◽  
Psa Density ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Prostatic Inflammation

The association between PSA density, prostate cancer (PCa) and BPH is well established. The aim of the present study was to establish whether PSA density can be used as a reliable parameter to predict csPCa and to determine its optimal cutoff to exclude increased PSA levels due to intraprostatic inflammation. This is a large prospective single-center, observational study evaluating the role of PSA density in the discrimination between intraprostatic inflammation and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Patients with PSA ≥ 4 ng/ml and/or positive digito-rectal examination (DRE) and scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled. Prostatic inflammation (PI) was assessed and graded using the Irani Scores. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess if PSA density was associated with clinically significant PCa (csPCa) rather than prostatic inflammation. A total of 1988 patients met the inclusion criteria. Any PCa and csPCa rates were 47% and 24% respectively. In the group without csPCa, patients with prostatic inflammation had a higher PSA (6.0 vs 5.0 ng/ml; p=0.0003), higher prostate volume (58 vs 52 cc; p&lt;0.0001), were more likely to have a previous negative biopsy (29% vs 21%; p=0.0005) and a negative DRE (70% vs 65%; p=0.023) but no difference in PSA density (0.1 vs 0.11; p=0.2). Conversely in the group with csPCa, patients with prostatic inflammation had a higher prostate volume (43 vs 40 cc; p=0.007) but no difference in the other clinical parameters. At multivariable analysis adjusting for age, biopsy history, DRE and prostate volume, PSA density emerged as a strong predictor of csPCA but was not associated with prostatic inflammation. The optimal cutoffs of PSA density to diagnose csPCa and rule out the presence of prostatic inflammation in patients with an elevated PSA (&gt;4 ng/ml) were 0.10 ng/ml2 in biopsy naïve patients and 0.15 ng/ml2 in patients with a previous negative biopsy. PSA density rather than PSA, should be used to evaluate patients at risk of prostate cancer who may need additional testing or prostate biopsy. This readily available parameter can potentially identify men who do not have PCa but have an elevated PSA secondary to benign conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document