Determination of the Optimal Spontaneous Breathing Trial During Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial

scholarly journals Product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting weaning outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110100
Author(s):  
Ju Gong ◽  
Bibo Zhang ◽  
Xiaowen Huang ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Jian Huang
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Plateau Pressure ◽  
Driving Pressure ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Rapid Shallow Breathing Index ◽  
Weaning Failure ◽  
Shallow Breathing

Objective Clinicians cannot precisely determine the time for withdrawal of ventilation. We aimed to evaluate the performance of driving pressure (DP)×respiratory rate (RR) to predict the outcome of weaning. Methods Plateau pressure (Pplat) and total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot) were measured during mechanical ventilation with brief deep sedation and on volume-controlled mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and a PEEP of 0 cmH2O. Pplat and PEEPtot were measured by patients holding their breath for 2 s after inhalation and exhalation, respectively. DP was determined as Pplat minus PEEPtot. The rapid shallow breathing index was measured from the ventilator. The highest RR was recorded within 3 minutes during a spontaneous breathing trial. Patients who tolerated a spontaneous breathing trial for 1 hour were extubated. Results Among the 105 patients studied, 44 failed weaning. During ventilation withdrawal, DP×RR was 136.7±35.2 cmH2O breaths/minute in the success group and 230.2±52.2 cmH2O breaths/minute in the failure group. A DP×RR index >170.8 cmH2O breaths/minute had a sensitivity of 93.2% and specificity of 88.5% to predict failure of weaning. Conclusions Measurement of DP×RR during withdrawal of ventilation may help predict the weaning outcome. A high DP×RR increases the likelihood of weaning failure. Statement: This manuscript was previously posted as a preprint on Research Square with the following link: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-15065/v3 and DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.24506/v3

Mechanical Ventilation: Approaches and Special Considerations

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian A. Maung ◽  
Lewis J Kaplan
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Functional Unit ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial

In this chapter, we complete the discussion of mechanical ventilation by examining approaches to mechanical ventilation for different patient populations and how to assess whether a patient is ready for liberation from mechanical ventilation. Each of the three chapters is intended to build on the preceding one and therefore establishes a functional unit with regard to mechanical ventilation, whether it is provided in an invasive or a noninvasive fashion.  This review contains 1 Figure, 1 Table and 31 references Key Words: acute respiratory failure, ARDS, mechanical ventilation liberation, spontaneous breathing trial, tracheostomy 

scholarly journals Use of the product of driving pressure and respiratory rate for predicting failure of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Gong ◽  
Bibo Zhang ◽  
Xiaowen Huang ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Jian Huang
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Plateau Pressure ◽  
Driving Pressure ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Weaning Failure ◽  
Weaning Outcome

Abstract Background : Respiratory workload increment in the process of mechanical ventilation withdrawal is critical for the determination of weaning outcome. Pressure, tidal volume (Vt) and respiratory rate (RR ) are considered as patient’s respiratory power, albeit being affected by excessive respiratory load. We aimed to evaluate the performance of driving pressure (DP)×RR to predict the outcome of weaning. Methods : Plateau pressure (Pplat) and positive end-expiratory pressure tot (PEEPtot) were measured during mechanical ventilation, viz., (1) brief deep sedation, (2) on volume support ventilation of MV with Vt 6 ml/kg and a PEEP of 0 cm H 2 O, (3) Pplat and PEEPtot were measured by holding breath for 2s after inhalation and exhalation, respectively. The DP was determined as Pplat minus PEEPtot. The highest RR was recorded within 3 min during spontaneous-breathing trial (SBT). Patients that were able to tolerate SBT for 1 h were directly extubated. These measurements correlated well with weaning outcome. Notably, patients in the “failure” group failed the SBT, died, while others required reintubation or noninvasive ventilation within 48 h of extubation. Results : Out of the 61 patients studied, 22 failed weaning. During the withdrawal of ventilation, DP×RR was 134.2±33.2 cmH 2 O ·breaths/min and 238.5±61.7 cmH 2 O·breaths/min ( P =0.00), DP was 7.9±1.6 cmH 2 O and 9.7±2.3 cmH 2 O ( P =0.00), in the “success” and “failure” groups, respectively. The DP×RR index greater than 170 cmH 2 O·breaths/min had a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 89.7%, while DP index greater than 8.1 cmH 2 O had 81.8% sensitivity and 64.1% specificity to predict weaning failure. Conclusions : Measurement of DP×RR during withdrawal of ventilation may help predict weaning outcome. Noticeably, high DP×RR increased the likelihood of weaning failure.

scholarly journals Frequent tracheal suctioning is associated with extubation failure in patients with successful spontaneous breathing trial: a single-center retrospective cohort study

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junpei Haruna ◽  
Hiroomi Tatsumi ◽  
Satoshi Kazuma ◽  
Aki Sasaki ◽  
Yoshiki Masuda
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Extubation Failure ◽  
Prolonged Stay ◽  
Sputum Volume ◽  
Tracheal Suctioning ◽  
Admission Type

Abstract Background Extubation failure, i.e., reintubation in ventilated patients, is a well-known risk factor for mortality and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although sputum volume is a risk factor, the frequency of tracheal suctioning has not been validated as a predictor of reintubation. We conducted this study to examine whether frequent tracheal suctioning is a risk factor for reintubation. Patients and methods We included adult patients who were intubated for > 72 h in the ICU and extubated after completion of spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). We compared the characteristics and weaning-related variables, including the frequency of tracheal suctioning between patients who required reintubation within 24 h after extubation and those who did not, and examined the factors responsible for reintubation. Results Of the 400 patients enrolled, reintubation was required in 51 (12.8%). The most common cause of reintubation was difficulty in sputum excretion (66.7%). There were significant differences in sex, proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease, pneumonia, ICU admission type, the length of mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay between patients requiring reintubation and those who did not. Multivariate analysis showed frequent tracheal suction (> once every 2 h) and the length of mechanical ventilation were independent factors for predicting reintubation. Conclusion We should examine the frequency of tracheal suctioning > once every 2 h in addition to the length of mechanical ventilation before deciding to extubate after completion of SBT in patients intubated for > 72 h in the ICU.

scholarly journals Mechanical power normalized to lung-thorax compliance indicates weaning readiness in prolonged ventilated patients

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Ghiani ◽  
Joanna Paderewska ◽  
Swenja Walcher ◽  
Konstantinos Tsitouras ◽  
Claus Neurohr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Respiratory System ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Mechanical Power ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Weaning Failure ◽  
Ventilated Patients

AbstractSince critical respiratory muscle workload is a significant determinant of weaning failure, applied mechanical power (MP) during artificial ventilation may serve for readiness testing before proceeding on a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Secondary analysis of a prospective, observational study in 130 prolonged ventilated, tracheotomized patients. Calculated MP’s predictive SBT outcome performance was determined using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), measures derived from k-fold cross-validation (likelihood ratios, Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC]), and a multivariable binary logistic regression model. Thirty (23.1%) patients failed the SBT, with absolute MP presenting poor discriminatory ability (MCC 0.26; AUROC 0.68, 95%CI [0.59‒0.75], p = 0.002), considerably improved when normalized to lung-thorax compliance (LTCdyn-MP, MCC 0.37; AUROC 0.76, 95%CI [0.68‒0.83], p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation PaCO2 (so-called power index of the respiratory system [PIrs]: MCC 0.42; AUROC 0.81 [0.73‒0.87], p < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, PIrs (OR 1.48 per 1000 cmH2O2/min, 95%CI [1.24‒1.76], p < 0.001) and its components LTCdyn-MP (1.25 per 1000 cmH2O2/min, [1.06‒1.46], p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation PaCO2 (1.17 [1.06‒1.28], p < 0.001) were independently related to SBT failure. MP normalized to respiratory system compliance may help identify prolonged mechanically ventilated patients ready for spontaneous breathing.

Discontinuing Mechanical Ventilation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Kreit
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Laryngeal Edema ◽  
Impaired Ability ◽  
Patient Will

Discontinuing Mechanical Ventilation provides clear, step-by step instructions on how to liberate or “wean” the patient from the ventilator. It explains how to determine when the patient is ready to begin the weaning process, how to perform a spontaneous breathing trial, and how to determine if the patient is ready for extubation, including such considerations as whether the patient is at risk for post-extubation laryngeal edema; whether the patient will be able to effectively clear secretions from the airways following extubation; and determining if the patient has a “difficult airway” should the need for re-intubation arise. The chapter also provides a step-by-step approach to the difficult-to-wean patient, covering topics such as how to assess ventilatory ability and demand; determine the cause(s) of increased demand, impaired ability, or both; treat the causes of increased demand and impaired ability; and determine when to perform a tracheostomy.

scholarly journals Influence of lung aeration on diaphragmatic contractility during a spontaneous breathing trial: an ultrasound study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Xia ◽  
Chuan-Yun Qian ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Mei-Ju Li ◽  
Xiao-Xue Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing Trial ◽  
Quiet Breathing ◽  
Diaphragmatic Function ◽  
Lung Aeration ◽  
Ultrasound Study ◽  
Weaning Failure ◽  
Successful Weaning ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background A spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is a major diagnostic tool to predict successfully extubation in patients. Several factors may lead to weaning failure, including the degree of lung aeration loss and diaphragm dysfunction. The main objective was to compare the diaphragmatic contractility between patients with high lung aeration loss and low lung aeration loss during a 30-minute SBT by ultrasound. Methods This was a prospective single-center study. Lung ultrasound aeration score (LUS) and diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF) were measured during mechanical ventilation 1 h before SBT (T-1), 30 min (T1), and 120 min (T2) after the start of the SBT during quiet breathing. The right and left DTF were compared between patients with LUS ≥ 14 (high lung aeration loss), considered at high risk of post-extubation distress, and those with LUS < 14 (low lung aeration loss). The relationship between the LUS and DTF and the changes in LUS and DTF from T-1 to T2 in patients with LUS ≥ 14 were assessed. Results Forty-nine patients were analyzed; 33 had LUS ≥ 14 and 16 had LUS < 14 at T1. The DTF at T1 was significantly higher in patients with LUS ≥ 14 than in those with LUS < 14: the right median (IQR) DTF was 22.2% (17.1 to 30.9%) vs. 14.8% (10.2 to 27.0%) (p = 0.035), and the left median (IQR) DTF was 25.0% (18.4 to 35.0%) vs. 18.6% (9.7 to 24.2%) (p = 0.017), respectively. There was a moderate positive correlation between the LUS and the DTF (Rho = 0.3, p = 0.014). A significant increase in the LUS was observed from T-1 to T1, whereas no change was found between T1 and T2. The DTF remained stable from T-1 to T2. Conclusions During a SBT, diaphragmatic contraction acts differently depending on the degree of pulmonary aeration. In patients with high lung aeration loss, increased diaphragmatic contractility indicates an additional respiratory effort to compensate lung volume loss that would contribute to successful SBT. Further studies are needed to evaluate the combined evaluation of lung aeration and diaphragmatic function to predict the successful weaning of patients from mechanical ventilation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document