Effects of Internet-based ERITA Added to TAU in Young People With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (TEENS) Feasibility Trial

Author(s):  
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e045235
Author(s):  
Felicity Waite ◽  
Thomas Kabir ◽  
Louise Johns ◽  
Jill Mollison ◽  
Apostolos Tsiachristas ◽  
...  

BackgroundEffective interventions, targeting key contributory causal factors, are needed to prevent the emergence of severe mental health problems in young people. Insomnia is a common clinical issue that is problematic in its own right but that also leads to the development and persistence of psychotic experiences. The implication is that treating sleep problems may prevent the onset of psychosis. We collected initial case series data with 12 young people at ultra-high-risk of psychosis. Post-intervention, there were improvements in sleep, depression and psychotic experiences. Now we test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial, with a clinical aim to treat sleep problems and hence reduce depression, psychotic experiences, and prevent transition to psychosis.Methods and analysisA randomised controlled feasibility trial will be conducted. Forty patients aged 14 to 25 years who are at ultra-high-risk of psychosis and have sleep disturbance will be recruited from National Health Service (NHS) mental health services. Participants will be randomised to receive either a novel, targeted, youth-focussed sleep intervention in addition to usual care or usual care alone. Assessor-blinded assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months (post-intervention) and 9 months (follow-up). The eight-session psychological intervention will target the key mechanisms which disrupt sleep: circadian rhythm irregularities, low sleep pressure, and hyperarousal. To gain an in-depth understanding of participants’ views on the acceptability of the intervention and study procedures, 16 participants (n=10 intervention, n=6 control) will take part in qualitative interviews. Analyses will focus on feasibility outcomes (recruitment, retention, and treatment uptake rates) and provide initial CI estimates of intervention effects. Thematic analysis of the qualitative interviews will assess the acceptability of the intervention and trial procedures.Ethics and disseminationThe trial has received ethical approval from the NHS Health Research Authority. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and lay networks.Trial registration numberISRCTN85601537.


Author(s):  
Anja Čuš ◽  
Julian Edbrooke-Childs ◽  
Susanne Ohmann ◽  
Paul L. Plener ◽  
Türkan Akkaya-Kalayci

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major mental health problem associated with negative psychosocial outcomes and it most often starts in early adolescence. Despite this, adolescents are rarely involved in informing the development of interventions designed to address their mental health problems. This study aimed to (1) assess adolescents’ needs and preferences about future interventions that are delivered through smartphones and (2) develop a framework with implications for designing engaging digital mental health interventions. Fifteen adolescent girls, aged 12–18 years, who met diagnostic criteria for a current NSSI disorder and were in contact with mental health services, participated in semi-structured interviews. Following a reflexive thematic analysis approach, this study identified two main themes: (1) Experiences of NSSI (depicts the needs of young people related to their everyday experiences of managing NSSI) and (2) App in Context (portrays preferences of young people about smartphone interventions and reflects adolescents’ views on how technology itself can improve or hinder engaging with these interventions). Adolescent patients expressed interest in using smartphone mental health interventions if they recognize them as helpful, relevant for their life situation and easy to use. The developed framework suggests that digital mental health interventions are embedded in three contexts (i.e., person using the intervention, mental health condition, and technology-related factors) which together need to inform the development of engaging digital resources. To achieve this, the cooperation among people with lived experience, mental health experts, and human computer interaction professionals is vital.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 724-740
Author(s):  
Martina Di Simplicio ◽  
Elizabeth Appiah‐Kusi ◽  
Paul Wilkinson ◽  
Peter Watson ◽  
Caroline Meiser‐Stedman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Berger ◽  
Penelope Hasking ◽  
Graham Martin

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is of increasing concern, yet many adolescents who self-injure are reluctant to seek professional help. Instead, they turn to friends for support, although it is unclear what these friends can offer. This study aimed to identify adolescents’ views of how peers and online friends can help young people who self-injure, and examine differences according to age, gender, and exposure to NSSI. Students ( n = 2,637; aged 12-18 years) from 41 schools completed questions asking them to describe what peers and online friends could do to help young people who self-injure. Thematic analysis identified seven strategies, including communication about NSSI with peers and online friends, referral to adults and health professionals, greater public awareness of NSSI, and reduced peer stigma and bullying. Endorsement of themes varied by age, gender, and experience with NSSI. Findings have implications for school prevention of NSSI.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maree L Inder ◽  
Marie T Crowe ◽  
Suzanne E Luty ◽  
Janet D Carter ◽  
Stephanie Moor ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviane Barbosa ◽  
Maria Cristina Di Lollo ◽  
Sônia Regina Zerbetto ◽  
Priscilla Hortense
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina E Mann ◽  
Amelia Taylor ◽  
Bernadette Wren ◽  
Nastasja de Graaf

International literature suggests that gender-diverse people are at increased risk of thoughts and acts of self-injury compared to their cisgender peers. The current review aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITBs) among children and young people (CYP) in the United Kingdom identifying as a gender not typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth and, further, to examine relevant prevalence rates of SITBs reported both in academic and grey literature. In total, seven studies were included in the review and indicated an increased prevalence of SITBs among gender-diverse CYP compared to the general population. However, methodological limitations and significant heterogeneity in the rates of SITBs reported require that the available literature be interpreted with some caution. Important factors to consider when interpreting SITB rates, as well as recommendations for future research, are discussed.


Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon R. Stones ◽  
Heather Bagley ◽  
Michael W. Beresford ◽  
Ashley Jones ◽  
Flora McErlane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term for seven relapsing-remitting inflammatory conditions in children and young people (CYP). Early, intensive treatment can prevent long-term damage; however, established drugs exhibit a delayed response, prompting the need for rapid-onset treatment in the form of corticosteroids. Given a lack of consensus as to which corticosteroid induction regimen should be used for CYP with JIA, a feasibility trial of different regimens is needed. The aim was to achieve consensus among CYP, families, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) about the primary outcome measures and protocol components to include in a prospective feasibility study. Methods A modified Nominal Group Technique was used to achieve consensus on the most appropriate primary outcome measure to be included in a prospective feasibility study, in addition to other protocol components such as inclusion/exclusion criteria. Fifteen participants participated in the process, including a combination of CYP with JIA, families (n = 9) and HCPs (n = 6). Results In the first vote, participants agreed that Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) and Physician Global Assessment Score were most meaningful. During sub-group discussions, the need for a composite score which captured the voice of CYP and families was emphasised. In the second vote, JADAS and the JIA Core Set were identified as the most important. Further discussions led to the results of the third vote, agreeing JADAS as the primary outcome measure of choice being measured at 6 weeks after commencement of treatment. The majority of HCPs, CYP and families voted for all JIA sub-types to be included in a prospective feasibility study, with some queries about the inclusion of systemic JIA given its unique presentation. Participants also identified the need for more frequent data collection time points to capture the rapid onset of corticosteroid action, while CYP and families opted for accessible mechanisms for participation, such as digital follow-up strategies. Conclusion It is feasible to include CYP, families and HCPs in synthesising complex concepts to agree by consensus the design components of clinical research. The primary outcome measure for inclusion in a prospective feasibility study of corticosteroid regimens in CYP with JIA was co-prioritised, with CYP and families taking a leading role in the ultimate selection of an appropriate outcome measure and other study protocol components. Using consensus methods with CYP, families and HCPs is a systematic and rigorous way in which to select outcome measures that are both meaningful and relevant to everyone involved in the care and treatment of CYP with JIA. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Howlett ◽  
L. Bottoms ◽  
A. Chater ◽  
A. B. Clark ◽  
T. Clarke ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prevalence of depression is increasing in young people, and there is a need to develop and evaluate behavioural interventions which may provide benefits equal to or greater than talking therapies or pharmacological alternatives. Exercise could be beneficial for young people living with depression, but robust, large-scale trials of effectiveness and the impact of exercise intensity are lacking. This study aims to test whether a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention targeting young people living with depression is feasible by determining whether it is possible to recruit and retain young people, develop and deliver the intervention as planned, and evaluate training and delivery. Methods The design is a three-arm cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded process evaluation. Participants will be help-seeking young people, aged 13–17 years experiencing mild to moderate low mood or depression, referred from three counties in England. The intervention will be delivered by registered exercise professionals, supported by mental health support workers, twice a week for 12 weeks. The three arms will be high-intensity exercise, low-intensity exercise, and a social activity control. All arms will receive a ‘healthy living’ behaviour change session prior to each exercise session and the two exercise groups are energy matched. The outcomes are referral, recruitment, and retention rates; attendance at exercise sessions; adherence to and ability to reach intensity during exercise sessions; proportions of missing data; adverse events, all measured at baseline, 3, and 6 months; resource use; and reach and representativeness. Discussion UK National Health Service (NHS) policy is to provide young people with advice about using exercise to help depression but there is no evidence-based exercise intervention to either complement or as an alternative to medication or talking therapies. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that exercise can be an effective treatment, but the evidence base is relatively weak. This feasibility trial will provide evidence about whether it is feasible to recruit and retain young people to a full RCT to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exercise intervention for depression. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN66452702. Registered 9 April 2020.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document