scholarly journals Factors Affecting Survival Outcome After Percutaneous Nephrostomy as Palliative Urinary Diversion in Obstructive Uropathy due to Advance Cervical Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1211-1216
Author(s):  
Bambang Sasongko Noegroho ◽  
Andri Kurniawan ◽  
Zola Wijayanti ◽  
Akhmad Mustafa
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Cordeiro ◽  
Rafael Coelho ◽  
Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa ◽  
Daher Cesar Chade ◽  
Giuliano Betuni Guglielmetti ◽  
...  

102 Background: To determine prognostic factors and create a model for risk stratification in patients with malignant obstructive uropathy. Methods: We prospectively collected clinical and laboratory variables of 208 patients who underwent palliative urinary diversion by ureteral stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy between January 2009 and November 2011 in two tertiary care university hospitals, with minimum 6 months follow-up. Inclusion criteria were age>18yr and malignant urinary obstruction confirmed by computed tomography, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Median survival after urinary diversion was 144 days. At the end of the study 164 patients died, 44 (21.2%) during the urinary diversion hospitalization. There was no difference in overall survival between the 2 types of diversion (p=0.216). The number of events related to malignant dissemination (≥4) and ECOG index≥2 were associated with shorter survival in multivariable analysis. Using these 2 risk factors (RF), patients were divided into 3 groups: favorable(no RF), intermediate(1RF) and unfavorable(2RF). The median survival at 1, 6, and 12 months was 94.4%, 57.3% and 44.9% in the favorable group, 78.0%, 36.3%, and 15.5% in the intermediate, and 46.4%, 14.3%, and 7.1% in the unfavorable. There were differences in survival profiles of the 3 groups (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our stratification model may be useful tool to determine whether urinary diversion procedures are indicated in patients with malignant urinary obstruction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Mulherkar ◽  
Akanksha Bansal ◽  
Poulami Das ◽  
Sadhana Kannan ◽  
Umesh Mahantshetty

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. e14848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Chuan Kau ◽  
Fu-Chao Liu ◽  
Chang-Fu Kuo ◽  
Huei-Jean Huang ◽  
Allen H. Li ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilios Pergialiotis ◽  
Ioannis Bellos ◽  
Nikolaos Thomakos ◽  
Dimitrios Haidopoulos ◽  
Despina N. Perrea ◽  
...  

Hydronephrosis is a sign of advanced stage disease in patients with cervical cancer. Its presence is believed to negatively affect the survival of patients. To date, however, consensus in this field is still lacking. The purpose of the present systematic review is to gather the available data and to provide directions for future research in the field. We systematically searched Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRA and Google Scholar databases from inception till June 2018. Overall, 22 studies were included in the present systematic review that evaluated outcomes from 8521 patients with cervical cancer. The findings of our systematic review support that hydronephrosis negatively affects the overall survival of cervical cancer patients. Specifically, the reported 5-year OS hazards ratio for hydronephrosis ranged between 1.34 and 3.74. Outcomes concerning the disease-free survival of these patients were, however, less discrete. None of the included studies reported whether the decreased survival of patients with hydronephrosis was attributed to complications of obstructive uropathy such as uremia and sepsis. Thus, it remains, to date, unclear whether placement of ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomy may actually benefit these patients. More studies are needed to evaluate the actual impact of hydronephrosis on survival rates at the various stages of cervical cancer and to help establish consensus regarding the optimal mode of management of these patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
ManjuLata Verma ◽  
Uma Singh ◽  
Zakia Rahman ◽  
Sabuhi Qureshi ◽  
Kirti Srivastava

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document