scholarly journals Technical Note: A Computerized System for Monitoring Feeding Behavior and Individual Feed Intake of Dairy Cattle

2004 ◽  
Vol 87 (12) ◽  
pp. 4207-4209 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bach ◽  
C. Iglesias ◽  
I. Busto
2015 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 3438-3442 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Chizzotti ◽  
F.S. Machado ◽  
E.E.L. Valente ◽  
L.G.R. Pereira ◽  
M.M. Campos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 162-162
Author(s):  
Nayan Bhowmik ◽  
Kris A Ringwall ◽  
Carl R Dahlen ◽  
Kendall C Swanson ◽  
Jeffrey A Clapper ◽  
...  

Abstract Leptin is a 16-kDa-peptide hormone product of the leptin gene (LEP) that is predominantly synthesized by adipose tissues and has known involvement in regulation of feed intake, energy expenditure, reproduction, and immune functions. The objective was to determine the association of leptin genotype (LEP c.73C >T), leptin diplotype (LEPD) and plasma leptin hormone (LEPH) concentration with growth, feed intake, feed efficiency, and behavior characteristics in developing beef heifers. A total of 336 commercial beef heifers were genotyped for the LEP c.73C >T marker. Four single nucleotide polymorphism markers including LEP c.73C >T, ARS-BFGL-NGS-59298 (intron 1), BovineHD0400026029 (upstream) and BovineHD0400026063 (downstream) of LEP were considered for haplotype analysis. Eleven LEPD were identified for this study using parsimony-based analyses. Circulating levels of LEPH were measured on 333 heifers prior to their first breeding season and used to assign low or high concentration group based on population median. Data were analyzed using the mixed procedure of SAS for repeated measures, fixed effects of ancestral breed group (n = 4), dam age category (n = 4), frame size group (n = 4), project cycle nested within birth year (n = 6), week of feed trial × year, LEP (n = 3) or LEPD (n = 11) or LEPH (n = 2), as well as week × LEPH (only for LEPH). There were no significant differences between LEP genotypes (P ≥ 0.11) or LEPD (P ≥ 0.33) for any of the studied traits. Heifers with low LEPH ate fewer meals per day (P = 0.02) and had more DMI per meal (P = 0.04) compared to those with high plasma leptin. Further research is needed to better understand plasma LEPH concentration and its role in feeding behavior attributes. However, circulatory LEPH before the breeding season may serve as a predictor for feeding behavior.


2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (11) ◽  
pp. 2831-2842 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sangsritavong ◽  
D.K. Combs ◽  
R. Sartori ◽  
L.E. Armentano ◽  
M.C. Wiltbank

2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 4110-4114 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Wolfger ◽  
A.V. Mang ◽  
N. Cook ◽  
K. Orsel ◽  
E. Timsit

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Assan ◽  
Yanlin Huang ◽  
Umar Farouk Mustapha ◽  
Mercy Nabila Addah ◽  
Guangli Li ◽  
...  

Feed is one of the most important external signals in fish that stimulates its feeding behavior and growth. The intake of feed is the main factor determining efficiency and cost, maximizing production efficiency in a fish farming firm. The physiological mechanism regulating food intake lies between an intricate connection linking central and peripheral signals that are unified in the hypothalamus consequently responding to the release of appetite-regulating genes that eventually induce or hinder appetite, such as apelin; a recently discovered peptide produced by several tissues with diverse physiological actions mediated by its receptor, such as feed regulation. Extrinsic factors have a great influence on food intake and feeding behavior in fish. Under these factors, feeding in fish is decontrolled and the appetite indicators in the brain do not function appropriately thus, in controlling conditions which result in the fluctuations in the expression of these appetite-relating genes, which in turn decrease food consumption. Here, we examine the research advancements in fish feeding behavior regarding dietary selection and preference and identify some key external influences on feed intake and feeding behavior. Also, we present summaries of the results of research findings on apelin as an appetite-regulating hormone in fish. We also identified gaps in knowledge and directions for future research to fully ascertain the functional importance of apelin in fish.


1971 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1518-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.O. Richardson ◽  
J.R. Owen ◽  
R.D. Plowman ◽  
J.T. Miles
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document