Spinal stability with anterior or posterior Ray threaded fusion cages

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Vijay Goel ◽  
Thomas Rogge ◽  
Andrew Dooris ◽  
John Drake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Base Plate ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors conducted a study to determine if the rigidity supplied to the spine by posterior placement of the Ray threaded fusion cage (TFC) is further enhanced by the placement of pedicle screws and, additionally, if bilateral anteriorly placed TFCs render the spine more rigid than a single anteriorly placed TFC. Methods. Ten human cadaveric spinal specimens (L2—S1) were affixed within a testing frame. Loads of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 Nm were applied to the spine in six degrees of freedom: flexion—extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Motion in an x, y, and z cartesian axis system was tracked using dual video cameras following light-emitting diodes attached to the spine and base plate. Load testing of the spines was performed in the intact mode, following which the spinal segments were randomized to receive anterior or posterior instrumentation. In five spine specimens we performed posterior discectomy, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with placment of femoral rings and pedicle screws, PLIF with bilateral TFCs, and bilateral TFCs with pedicle screws. Five other spines underwent anterior-approach discectomy, followed by implantation of a unilateral cage and bilateral cages. Load testing was performed after each step. Conclusion. Spines in which PLIF with pedicle screws and TFCs with pedicle screws were placed were more rigid than after discectomy in all directions of motion except flexion. Anterior discectomy provided significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less stability in left and right axial rotation than the intact spines and following posterior discectomy. Following anterior implantation of bilateral TFCs, spines were significantly more rigid than after discectomy in all directions except extension.

Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt M. Eichholz ◽  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Aaron From ◽  
Paige Rubenbauer ◽  
Satoshi Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Anterior Instrumentation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Thoracolumbar burst fractures frequently require surgical intervention. Although the use of either anterior or posterior instrumentation has advantages and disadvantages, there have been few studies in which these two approaches have been compared biomechanically. Methods. Ten human cadaveric spines were subjected to subtotal L-3 corpectomy. In five spines placement of L-3 wooden strut grafts with lateral L2–4 dual rod and screw instrumentation was performed. Five other spines underwent L1–5 pedicle screw fixation. The spines were fatigued between steps of the experiment. The spines were load tested with pure moments of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 Nm in the intact state and after placement of instrumentation in six degrees of freedom (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation). In axial rotation posterior instrumentation significantly increased spinal rigidity compared with that of the intact state, whereas anterior instrumentation did not. Combined anterior—posterior instrumentation did not significantly increase the rigidity of the spine when compared with anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Posterior instrumentation alone provided a greater reduction in angular rotation compared with anterior instrumentation alone in all degrees of freedom; however, statistical significance was achieved only in extension at 6 Nm. Conclusions. The increased rigidity provided by pedicle screw instrumentation compared with the intact state or with anterior instrumentation is due to the longer construct spanning five levels and the three-column engagement of the pedicle screws. The decision to use anterior or posterior instrumentation should be based on the clinical necessity of canal decompression and correction of angulation.

Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Kettler ◽  
Hans-Joachim Wilke ◽  
Rupert Dietl ◽  
Matthias Krammer ◽  
Christianto Lumenta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Stabilizing Effect ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The function of interbody fusion cages is to stabilize spinal segments primarily by distracting them as well as by allowing bone ingrowth and fusion. An important condition for efficient formation of bone tissue is achieving adequate spinal stability. However, the initial stability may be reduced due to repeated movements of the spine during everyday activity. Therefore, in addition to immediate stability, stability after cyclic loading is of remarkable relevance; however, this has not yet been investigated. The object of this study was to investigate the immediate stabilizing effect of three different posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages and to clarify the effect of cyclic loading on the stabilization. Methods. Before and directly after implantation of a Zientek, Stryker, or Ray posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage, 24 lumbar spine segment specimens were each evaluated in a spine tester. Pure lateral bending, flexion—extension, and axial rotation moments (± 7.5 Nm) were applied continuously. The motion in each specimen was measured simultaneously. The specimens were then loaded cyclically (40,000 cycles, 5 Hz) with an axial compression force ranging from 200 to 1000 N. Finally, they were tested once again in the spine tester. Conclusions. In general, a decrease of movement in all loading directions was noted after insertion of the Zientek and Ray cages and an increase of movement after implantation of a Stryker cage. In all three cage groups greater stability was demonstrated in lateral bending and flexion than in extension and axial rotation. Reduced stability during cyclic loading was observed in all three cage groups; however, loss of stability was most pronounced when the Ray cage was used.

Biomechanical studies of an artificial disc implant in the human cadaveric spine

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Kurt Eichholz ◽  
Christopher Barry ◽  
Paige Rubenbauer ◽  
Aditya Ingalhalikar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Testing ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors compared the biomechanical performance of the human cadaveric spine implanted with a metallic ball-and-cup artificial disc at L4–5 with the spine's intact state and after anterior discectomy. Methods. Seven human L2—S1 cadaveric spines were mounted on a biomechanical testing frame. Pure moments of 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 Nm were applied to the spine at L-2 in six degrees of motion (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation). The spines were tested in the intact state as well as after anterior L4–5 discectomy. The Maverick disc was implanted in the discectomy defect, and load testing was repeated. The artificial disc created greater rigidity for the spine than was present after discectomy, and the spine performed biomechanically in a manner comparable with the intact state. Conclusions. The results indicate that in an in vitro setting, this model of artificial disc stabilizes the spine after discectomy, restoring motion comparable with that of the intact state.

Comparison of the biomechanics of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in a cadaveric spinal compression fracture model

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Vijay Goel ◽  
John Drake ◽  
Derek Taggard ◽  
Matthew Brenton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Weight Drop ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has long been used in the stabilization and reconstruction of traumatic and pathological fractures of the spine. Recently, hydroxyapatite (HA), an osteoconductive, biocompatible cement, has been used as an alternative to PMMA. In this study the authors compare the stabilizing effects of the HA product, BoneSource, with PMMA in an experimental compression fracture of L-1. Methods. Twenty T9—L3 cadaveric spine specimens were mounted individually on a testing frame. Light-emitting diodes were placed on the neural arches as well as the base. Motion was tracked by two video cameras in response to applied loads of 0 to 6 Nm. The weight-drop technique was used to induce a reproducible compression fracture of T-11 after partially coring out the vertebra. Load testing was performed on the intact spine, postfracture, after unilateral transpedicular vertebroplasty with 7 to 10 ml of PMMA or HA, and after flexion—extension fatiguing to 5000 cycles at ± 3 Nm. No significant difference between the HA- and PMMA cemented—fixated spines was demonstrated in flexion, extension, left lateral bending, or right and left axial rotation. The only difference between the two cements was encountered before and after fatiguing in right lateral bending (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that the same angular rigidity can be achieved using either HA or PMMA. This is of particular interest because HA is osteoconductive, undergoes remodeling, and is not exothermic.

Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Giancarlo Vishteh ◽  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
M. Stephen Melton ◽  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Volker K. H. Sonntag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Craniovertebral Junction ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Occipital Condyle ◽  
Upper Cervical Spine ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Axial Translation ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors sought to determine the biomechanics of the occipitoatlantal (occiput [Oc]—C1) and atlantoaxial (C1–2) motion segments after unilateral gradient condylectomy. Methods. Six human cadaveric specimens (skull with attached upper cervical spine) underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing (physiological loads) during flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Axial translation from tension to compression was also studied across Oc—C2. Each specimen served as its own control and underwent baseline testing in the intact state. The specimens were then tested after progressive unilateral condylectomy (25% resection until completion), which was performed using frameless stereotactic guidance. At Oc—C1 for all motions that were tested, mobility increased significantly compared to baseline after a 50% condylectomy. Flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation increased 15.3%, 40.8%, and 28.1%, respectively. At C1–2, hypermobility during flexion—extension occurred after a 25% condylectomy, during axial rotation after 75% condylectomy, and during lateral bending after a 100% condylectomy. Conclusions. Resection of 50% or more of the occipital condyle produces statistically significant hypermobility at Oc—C1. After a 75% resection, the biomechanics of the Oc—C1 and C1–2 motion segments change considerably. Performing fusion of the craniovertebral junction should therefore be considered if half or more of one occipital condyle is resected.

A biomechanical comparison of the Rogers interspinous and the Lovely—Carl tension band wiring techniques for fixation of the cervical spine

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Albert V. B. Brasil ◽  
Danilo G. Coelho ◽  
Tarcísio Eloy P. B. Filho ◽  
Fernando M. Braga
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Tension Band ◽  
Tension Band Wiring ◽  
Lesion Group ◽  
Percentage Increase ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors conducted a biomechanical study in which they compared the uses of the Rogers interspinous and the Lovely-Carl tension band wiring techniques for internal fixation of the cervical spine. Method. An extensive biomechanical evaluation (stiffness in positive and negative rotations around the x, y, and z axes; range of motion in flexion—extension, bilateral axial rotation, and bilateral bending; and neutral zone in flexion—extension, bilateral axial rotation, and lateral bending to the right and to the left) was performed in two groups of intact calf cervical spines. After these initial tests, all specimens were subjected to a distractive flexion Stage 3 ligamentous lesion. Group 1 specimens then underwent surgical fixation by the Rogers technique, and Group 2 specimens underwent surgery by using the Lovely—Carl technique. After fixation, specimens were again submitted to the same biomechanical evaluation. The percentage increase or decrease between the pre- and postoperative parameters was calculated. These values were considered quantitative indicators of the efficacy of the techniques, and the efficacy of the two techniques was compared. Conclusions. Analysis of the findings demonstrated that in the spines treated with the Lovely—Carl technique less restriction of movement was produced without affecting stiffness, compared with those treated with the Rogers technique, thus making the Lovely—Carl technique clinically less useful.

Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed bioabsorbable anterior cervical plate

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
Frank L. Acosta ◽  
Robert H. Chamberlain ◽  
Adolfo Espinoza Larios ◽  
Neil R. Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Metal Plate ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Fibular Graft ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Cervical Plate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Plate ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors present a biomechanical analysis of a newly designed bioabsorbable anterior cervical plate (ACP) for the treatment of one-level cervical degenerative disc disease. They studied anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in a human cadaveric model, comparing the stability of the cervical spine after placement of the bioabsorbable fusion plate, a bioabsorbable mesh, and a more traditional metallic ACP. Methods. Seven human cadaveric specimens underwent a C6–7 fibular graft—assisted ACDF placement. A one-level resorbable ACP was then placed and secured with bioabsorbable screws. Flexibility testing was performed on both intact and instrumented specimens using a servohydraulic system to create flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motions. After data analysis, three parameters were calculated: angular range of motion, lax zone, and stiff zone. The results were compared with those obtained in a previous study of a resorbable fusion mesh and with those acquired using metallic fusion ACPs. For all parameters studied, the resorbable plate consistently conferred greater stability than the resorbable mesh. Moreover, it offered comparable stability with that of metallic fusion ACPs. Conclusions. Bioabsorbable plates provide better stability than resorbable mesh. Although the results of this study do not necessarily indicate that a resorbable plate confers equivalent stability to a metal plate, the resorbable ACP certainly yielded better results than the resorbable mesh. Bioabsorbable fusion ACPs should therefore be considered as alternatives to metal plates when a graft containment device is required.

Posterior instrumentation of the unstable cervicothoracic spine

1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens R. Chapman ◽  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Christopher Pepin ◽  
Sean Toomey ◽  
David W. Newell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Hardware Removal ◽  
Postoperative Treatment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Hardware Complications ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

✓ Fractures, tumors, and other causes of instability at the cervicothoracic junction pose diagnostic and treatment challenges. The authors report on 23 patients with instability of the cervicothoracic region, which was treated with posterior plate fixation and fusion between the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine. During operation AO reconstruction plates with 8- or 12-mm hole spacing were affixed to the spine using screws in the cervical lateral masses and the thoracic pedicles. Postoperative immobilization consisted of the patient's wearing a simple external brace for 2 months. The following parameters were analyzed during the pre- and postoperative treatment period: neurological status, spine anatomy and reconstruction, and complications. Follow up consisted of clinical and radiographic examinations (mean duration of follow up, 15.4 months; range, 6–41 months). No neurovascular or pulmonary complications arose from surgery. All patients achieved a solid arthrodesis based on flexion-extension radiographs. There was no significant change in angulation during the postoperative period, but one patient had an increase in translation that was not clinically significant. There were no hardware complications that required reoperation. One patient requested hardware removal in hopes of reducing postoperative pain in the cervicothoracic region. One postoperative wound infection required debridement but not hardware removal. The authors conclude that posterior plate fixation is a satisfactory method of treatment of cervicothoracic instability.

Assessment of L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion stability in the setting of lengthening posterior instrumentation constructs: a cadaveric biomechanical study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Fusion Construct ◽  
Flexion Extension

OBJECTIVE Excessive stress and motion at the L5–S1 level can lead to degenerative changes, especially in patients with posterior instrumentation suprajacent to L5. Attention has turned to utilization of L5–S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to stabilize the lumbosacral junction. However, questions remain regarding the effectiveness of stand-alone ALIF in the setting of prior posterior instrumented fusions terminating at L5. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical stability of an L5–S1 ALIF with increasing lengths of posterior thoracolumbar constructs. METHODS Seven human cadaveric spines (T9–sacrum) were instrumented with pedicle screws from T10 to L5 and mounted to a 6 degrees-of-freedom robot. Posterior fusion construct lengths (T10–L5, T12–L5, L2–5, and L4–5) were instrumented to each specimen, and torque-fusion level relationships were determined for each construct in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. A stand-alone L5–S1 ALIF was then instrumented, and L5–S1 motion was measured as increasing pure moments (2 to 12 Nm) were applied. Motion reduction was calculated by comparing L5–S1 motion across the ALIF and non-ALIF states. RESULTS The average motion at L5–S1 in axial rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral bending was assessed for each fusion construct with and without ALIF. After adding ALIF to a posterior fusion, L5–S1 motion was significantly reduced relative to the non-ALIF state in all but one fused surgical condition (p < 0.05). Longer fusions with ALIF produced larger L5–S1 motions, and in some cases resulted in motions higher than native state motion. CONCLUSIONS Posterior fusion constructs up to L4–5 could be appropriately stabilized by a stand-alone L5–S1 ALIF when using a nominal threshold of 80% reduction in native motion as a potential positive indicator of fusion. The results of this study allow conclusions to be drawn from a biomechanical standpoint; however, the clinical implications of these data are not well defined. These findings, when taken in appropriate clinical context, can be used to better guide clinicians seeking to treat L5–S1 pathology in patients with prior posterior thoracolumbar constructs.

Effect of a prosthetic disc nucleus on the mobility and disc height of the L4–5 intervertebral disc postnucleotomy

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Joachim Wilke ◽  
Sinead Kavanagh ◽  
Sylvia Neller ◽  
Christian Haid ◽  
Lutz Eberhart Claes
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
In Vitro Test ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Current procedures for treatment of degenerative disc disease may not restore flexibility or disc height to the intervertebral disc. Recently, a prosthetic device, intended to replace the degenerated nucleus pulposus, was developed. In this biomechanical in vitro test the authors study the effect of implanting a prosthetic nucleus in cadaveric lumbar intervertebral discs postnucleotomy and determine if the flexibility and disc height of the L4–5 motion segment is restored. Methods. The prosthetic disc nucleus device consists of two hydrogel pellets, each enclosed in a woven polyethylene jacket. Six human cadaveric lumbar motion segments (obtained in individuals who, at the time of death, were a mean age of 56.7 years) were loaded with moments of ± 7.5 Nm in flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The following states were investigated: intact, postnucleotomy, and after device implantation. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) measurements were determined. Change in disc height from the intact state was measured after nucleotomy and device implantation, with and without a 200-N preload. Conclusions. Compared with the intact state (100%), the nucleotomy increased the ROM in flexion—extension to 118%, lateral bending to 112%, and axial rotation to 121%; once the device was implanted the ROM was reduced to 102%, 88%, and 90%, respectively. The NZ increased the ROM to 210%, lateral bending to 173%, and axial rotation to 107% after nucleotomy, and 146%, 149%, 44%, respectively, after device implantation. A 200-N preload reduced the intact and postnucleotomy disc heights by approximately 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The original intact disc height was restored after implantation of the device. The results of the cadaveric L4–5 flexibility testing indicate that the device can potentially restore ROM, NZ, and disc height to the denucleated segment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document