Biomechanical studies of an artificial disc implant in the human cadaveric spine

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Kurt Eichholz ◽  
Christopher Barry ◽  
Paige Rubenbauer ◽  
Aditya Ingalhalikar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Testing ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors compared the biomechanical performance of the human cadaveric spine implanted with a metallic ball-and-cup artificial disc at L4–5 with the spine's intact state and after anterior discectomy. Methods. Seven human L2—S1 cadaveric spines were mounted on a biomechanical testing frame. Pure moments of 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 Nm were applied to the spine at L-2 in six degrees of motion (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation). The spines were tested in the intact state as well as after anterior L4–5 discectomy. The Maverick disc was implanted in the discectomy defect, and load testing was repeated. The artificial disc created greater rigidity for the spine than was present after discectomy, and the spine performed biomechanically in a manner comparable with the intact state. Conclusions. The results indicate that in an in vitro setting, this model of artificial disc stabilizes the spine after discectomy, restoring motion comparable with that of the intact state.

Effect of a prosthetic disc nucleus on the mobility and disc height of the L4–5 intervertebral disc postnucleotomy

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Joachim Wilke ◽  
Sinead Kavanagh ◽  
Sylvia Neller ◽  
Christian Haid ◽  
Lutz Eberhart Claes
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
In Vitro Test ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Current procedures for treatment of degenerative disc disease may not restore flexibility or disc height to the intervertebral disc. Recently, a prosthetic device, intended to replace the degenerated nucleus pulposus, was developed. In this biomechanical in vitro test the authors study the effect of implanting a prosthetic nucleus in cadaveric lumbar intervertebral discs postnucleotomy and determine if the flexibility and disc height of the L4–5 motion segment is restored. Methods. The prosthetic disc nucleus device consists of two hydrogel pellets, each enclosed in a woven polyethylene jacket. Six human cadaveric lumbar motion segments (obtained in individuals who, at the time of death, were a mean age of 56.7 years) were loaded with moments of ± 7.5 Nm in flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The following states were investigated: intact, postnucleotomy, and after device implantation. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) measurements were determined. Change in disc height from the intact state was measured after nucleotomy and device implantation, with and without a 200-N preload. Conclusions. Compared with the intact state (100%), the nucleotomy increased the ROM in flexion—extension to 118%, lateral bending to 112%, and axial rotation to 121%; once the device was implanted the ROM was reduced to 102%, 88%, and 90%, respectively. The NZ increased the ROM to 210%, lateral bending to 173%, and axial rotation to 107% after nucleotomy, and 146%, 149%, 44%, respectively, after device implantation. A 200-N preload reduced the intact and postnucleotomy disc heights by approximately 1 mm and 2 mm, respectively. The original intact disc height was restored after implantation of the device. The results of the cadaveric L4–5 flexibility testing indicate that the device can potentially restore ROM, NZ, and disc height to the denucleated segment.

Comparison of the biomechanics of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in a cadaveric spinal compression fracture model

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Vijay Goel ◽  
John Drake ◽  
Derek Taggard ◽  
Matthew Brenton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Weight Drop ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has long been used in the stabilization and reconstruction of traumatic and pathological fractures of the spine. Recently, hydroxyapatite (HA), an osteoconductive, biocompatible cement, has been used as an alternative to PMMA. In this study the authors compare the stabilizing effects of the HA product, BoneSource, with PMMA in an experimental compression fracture of L-1. Methods. Twenty T9—L3 cadaveric spine specimens were mounted individually on a testing frame. Light-emitting diodes were placed on the neural arches as well as the base. Motion was tracked by two video cameras in response to applied loads of 0 to 6 Nm. The weight-drop technique was used to induce a reproducible compression fracture of T-11 after partially coring out the vertebra. Load testing was performed on the intact spine, postfracture, after unilateral transpedicular vertebroplasty with 7 to 10 ml of PMMA or HA, and after flexion—extension fatiguing to 5000 cycles at ± 3 Nm. No significant difference between the HA- and PMMA cemented—fixated spines was demonstrated in flexion, extension, left lateral bending, or right and left axial rotation. The only difference between the two cements was encountered before and after fatiguing in right lateral bending (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that the same angular rigidity can be achieved using either HA or PMMA. This is of particular interest because HA is osteoconductive, undergoes remodeling, and is not exothermic.

Stabilizing effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages before and after cyclic loading

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Kettler ◽  
Hans-Joachim Wilke ◽  
Rupert Dietl ◽  
Matthias Krammer ◽  
Christianto Lumenta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Stabilizing Effect ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The function of interbody fusion cages is to stabilize spinal segments primarily by distracting them as well as by allowing bone ingrowth and fusion. An important condition for efficient formation of bone tissue is achieving adequate spinal stability. However, the initial stability may be reduced due to repeated movements of the spine during everyday activity. Therefore, in addition to immediate stability, stability after cyclic loading is of remarkable relevance; however, this has not yet been investigated. The object of this study was to investigate the immediate stabilizing effect of three different posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages and to clarify the effect of cyclic loading on the stabilization. Methods. Before and directly after implantation of a Zientek, Stryker, or Ray posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage, 24 lumbar spine segment specimens were each evaluated in a spine tester. Pure lateral bending, flexion—extension, and axial rotation moments (± 7.5 Nm) were applied continuously. The motion in each specimen was measured simultaneously. The specimens were then loaded cyclically (40,000 cycles, 5 Hz) with an axial compression force ranging from 200 to 1000 N. Finally, they were tested once again in the spine tester. Conclusions. In general, a decrease of movement in all loading directions was noted after insertion of the Zientek and Ray cages and an increase of movement after implantation of a Stryker cage. In all three cage groups greater stability was demonstrated in lateral bending and flexion than in extension and axial rotation. Reduced stability during cyclic loading was observed in all three cage groups; however, loss of stability was most pronounced when the Ray cage was used.

Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Giancarlo Vishteh ◽  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
M. Stephen Melton ◽  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Volker K. H. Sonntag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Craniovertebral Junction ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Occipital Condyle ◽  
Upper Cervical Spine ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Axial Translation ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors sought to determine the biomechanics of the occipitoatlantal (occiput [Oc]—C1) and atlantoaxial (C1–2) motion segments after unilateral gradient condylectomy. Methods. Six human cadaveric specimens (skull with attached upper cervical spine) underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing (physiological loads) during flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Axial translation from tension to compression was also studied across Oc—C2. Each specimen served as its own control and underwent baseline testing in the intact state. The specimens were then tested after progressive unilateral condylectomy (25% resection until completion), which was performed using frameless stereotactic guidance. At Oc—C1 for all motions that were tested, mobility increased significantly compared to baseline after a 50% condylectomy. Flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation increased 15.3%, 40.8%, and 28.1%, respectively. At C1–2, hypermobility during flexion—extension occurred after a 25% condylectomy, during axial rotation after 75% condylectomy, and during lateral bending after a 100% condylectomy. Conclusions. Resection of 50% or more of the occipital condyle produces statistically significant hypermobility at Oc—C1. After a 75% resection, the biomechanics of the Oc—C1 and C1–2 motion segments change considerably. Performing fusion of the craniovertebral junction should therefore be considered if half or more of one occipital condyle is resected.

Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Kettler ◽  
Hans-Joachim Wilke ◽  
Lutz Claes
Keyword(s):  
Bone Cement ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of simulated postoperative neck movements on the stabilizing effect and subsidence of four different anterior cervical interbody fusion devices. Emphasis was placed on the relation between subsidence and spinal stability. Methods. The flexibility of 24 human cervical spine specimens was tested before and directly after being stabilized with a WING, BAK/C, AcroMed I/F cage, or with bone cement in standard flexibility tests under 50 N axial preload. Thereafter, 700 pure moment loading cycles (± 2 Nm) were applied in randomized directions to simulate physiological neck movements. Additional flexibility tests in combination with measurements of the subsidence depth were conducted after 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 700 loading cycles. In all four groups, simulated postoperative neck movements caused an increase of the range of motion (ROM) ranging from 0.4 to 3.1° and of the neutral zone from 0.1 to 4.2°. This increase in flexibility was most distinct in extension followed by flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation. After cyclic loading, ROM tended to be lower in the group fitted with AcroMed cages (3.3° in right lateral bending, 3.5° in left axial rotation, 7.8° in flexion, 8.3° in extension) and in the group in which bone cement was applied (5.4°, 2.5°, 7.4°, and 8.8°, respectively) than in those fixed with the WING (6.3°, 5.4°, 9.7°, and 6.9°, respectively) and BAK cages (6.2°, 4.5°, 10.2°, and 11.6°, respectively). Conclusions. Simulated repeated neck movements not only caused an increase of the flexibility but also subsidence of the implants into the adjacent vertebrae. The relation between flexibility increase and subsidence seemed to depend on the implant design: subsiding BAK/C cages partially supported stability whereas subsiding WING cages and AcroMed cages did not.

Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt M. Eichholz ◽  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Aaron From ◽  
Paige Rubenbauer ◽  
Satoshi Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Anterior Instrumentation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Thoracolumbar burst fractures frequently require surgical intervention. Although the use of either anterior or posterior instrumentation has advantages and disadvantages, there have been few studies in which these two approaches have been compared biomechanically. Methods. Ten human cadaveric spines were subjected to subtotal L-3 corpectomy. In five spines placement of L-3 wooden strut grafts with lateral L2–4 dual rod and screw instrumentation was performed. Five other spines underwent L1–5 pedicle screw fixation. The spines were fatigued between steps of the experiment. The spines were load tested with pure moments of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 Nm in the intact state and after placement of instrumentation in six degrees of freedom (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation). In axial rotation posterior instrumentation significantly increased spinal rigidity compared with that of the intact state, whereas anterior instrumentation did not. Combined anterior—posterior instrumentation did not significantly increase the rigidity of the spine when compared with anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Posterior instrumentation alone provided a greater reduction in angular rotation compared with anterior instrumentation alone in all degrees of freedom; however, statistical significance was achieved only in extension at 6 Nm. Conclusions. The increased rigidity provided by pedicle screw instrumentation compared with the intact state or with anterior instrumentation is due to the longer construct spanning five levels and the three-column engagement of the pedicle screws. The decision to use anterior or posterior instrumentation should be based on the clinical necessity of canal decompression and correction of angulation.

Biomechanical comparison of facet-sparing laminectomy and Christmas tree laminectomy

2003 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul W. Detwiler ◽  
Christina B. Spetzler ◽  
Sara B. Taylor ◽  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
Randall W. Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Shear Loading ◽  
Angular Motion ◽  
Christmas Tree ◽  
Lumbar Stenosis ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Objective Evidence ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors compared differences in biomechanical stability between two decompressive laminectomy techniques for treating lumbar stenosis. A Christmas tree laminectomy (CTL), in which bilateral facetectomies and foraminotomies are performed, was compared with facet-sparing laminectomy (FSL), in which the facets are undercut but not resected. Spinal instability was assessed immediately postoperatively and again after discectomy to model long-term degeneration. Methods. Sixteen motion segments obtained from five human cadaveric lumbar specimens were studied in vitro by conducting nondestructive flexibility tests. Specimens were tested intact, after FSL or CTL, and again after discectomy. Nonconstraining torques (≤ 5 Nm) were applied to induce flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending; strings and pulleys were used while vertebral angles were measured. Anteroposterior translation in response to shear loading (≤ 100 N) was also measured. Angular motion, shear motion, and sagittal-plane axes of rotation were compared to evaluate stability. Compared with the intact condition, CTL-treated specimens had significantly larger increases in angular motion during flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation than their FSL-treated counterparts (p < 0.05, nonpaired Student t-tests). Subsequent discectomy caused greater increases in motion in the CTL group. Axes of rotation shifted less from their normal positions after FSL than after CTL. Conclusions. This study provides objective evidence that the treatment of lumbar stenosis with FSL induces less biomechanical instability and alters kinematics less than FSL. These findings support the use of the FSL in treating lumbar stenosis.

Initial stability of cervical spine fixation: predictive value of a finite element model

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias R. Pitzen ◽  
Dieter Matthis ◽  
Dragos D. Barbier ◽  
Wolf-Ingo Steudel
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Anterior Plate ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Loading Case ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Fine Print

✓ The purpose of this study was to generate a validated finite element (FE) model of the human cervical spine to be used to analyze new implants. Digitized data obtained from computerized tomography scanning of a human cervical spine were used to generate a three-dimensional, anisotropic, linear C5–6 FE model by using a software package (ANSYS 5.4). Based on the intact model (FE/Intact), a second was generated by simulating an anterior cervical fusion and plate (ACFP) C5–6 model in which monocortical screws (FE/ACFP) were used. Loading of each FE model was simulated using pure moments of ± 2.5 Nm in flexion/extension, axial left/right rotation, and left/right lateral bending. For validation of the models, their predicted C5–6 range of motion (ROM) was compared with the results of an earlier, corresponding in vitro study of six human spines, which were tested in the intact state and surgically altered at C5–6 with the same implants. The validated model was used to analyze the stabilizing effect of a new disc spacer, Cenius (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany), as a stand-alone implant (FE/Cenius) and in combination with an anterior plate (FE/Cenius+ACFP). In addition, compression loads at the upper surface of the spacer were investigated using both models. As calculated by FE/Intact and FE/ACFP models, the ROM was within 1 standard deviation of the mean value of the corresponding in vitro measurements for each loading case. The FE/Cenius model predicted C5–6 ROM values of 5.5° in flexion/extension, 3.1° in axial rotation (left and right), and 2.9° in lateral bending (left and right). Addition of an anterior plate resulted in a further decrease of ROM in each loading case. The FE/Cenius model predicted an increase of compression load in flexion and a decrease in extension, whereas in the FE/Cenius+ACFP model an increase of graft compression in extension and unloading of the graft in flexion were predicted. The current FE model predicted ROM values comparable with those obtained in vitro in the intact state as well as after simulation of an ACFP model. It predicted a stabilizing potential for a new cage, alone and in combination with an anterior plate system, and predicted the influence of both loading modality and additional instrumentation on the behavior of the interbody graft.

Bioabsorbable anterior lumbar plate fixation in conjunction with cage-assisted anterior interbody fusion

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis J. DiAngelo ◽  
Jeffrey L. Scifert ◽  
Scott Kitchel ◽  
G. Bryan Cornwall ◽  
Bobby J. McVay
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Local Motion ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Spine Model ◽  
Fine Print

Object. An in vitro biomechanical study was conducted to determine the effects of anterior stabilization on cage-assisted lumbar interbody fusion biomechanics in a multilevel human cadaveric lumbar spine model. Methods. Three spine conditions were compared: harvested, bilateral multilevel cages (CAGES), and CAGES with bioabsorbable anterior plates (CBAP), tested under flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Measurements included vertebral motion, applied load, and bending/rotational moments. Application of anterior fixation decreased local motion and increased stiffness of the instrumented levels. Clinically, this spinal stability may serve to promote fusion. Conclusions. Coupled with the bioabsorbability of the plating material, the bioabsorbable anterior lumbar plating system is considered biomechanically advantageous.

Spinal stability with anterior or posterior Ray threaded fusion cages

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Hitchon ◽  
Vijay Goel ◽  
Thomas Rogge ◽  
Andrew Dooris ◽  
John Drake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Base Plate ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Load Testing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors conducted a study to determine if the rigidity supplied to the spine by posterior placement of the Ray threaded fusion cage (TFC) is further enhanced by the placement of pedicle screws and, additionally, if bilateral anteriorly placed TFCs render the spine more rigid than a single anteriorly placed TFC. Methods. Ten human cadaveric spinal specimens (L2—S1) were affixed within a testing frame. Loads of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 Nm were applied to the spine in six degrees of freedom: flexion—extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Motion in an x, y, and z cartesian axis system was tracked using dual video cameras following light-emitting diodes attached to the spine and base plate. Load testing of the spines was performed in the intact mode, following which the spinal segments were randomized to receive anterior or posterior instrumentation. In five spine specimens we performed posterior discectomy, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with placment of femoral rings and pedicle screws, PLIF with bilateral TFCs, and bilateral TFCs with pedicle screws. Five other spines underwent anterior-approach discectomy, followed by implantation of a unilateral cage and bilateral cages. Load testing was performed after each step. Conclusion. Spines in which PLIF with pedicle screws and TFCs with pedicle screws were placed were more rigid than after discectomy in all directions of motion except flexion. Anterior discectomy provided significantly (p ≤ 0.05) less stability in left and right axial rotation than the intact spines and following posterior discectomy. Following anterior implantation of bilateral TFCs, spines were significantly more rigid than after discectomy in all directions except extension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document