Developing a safety audit checklist for in-operation administrative buildings

Work ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hiro Kaleh ◽  
Farough Mohammadian ◽  
Mostafa Pouyakian
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Audit Tool ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Building Safety ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Early Warnings

BACKGROUND: The structure of buildings is in degradation over time, monitoring their safety status and providing timely warnings is crucial. Therefore, an efficient visual inspection of the building’s safety has intrinsic value to give early warnings to owners and managers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide an audit tool for evaluation of the administrative in-operation buildings’ safety status. METHODS: Factors affecting the administrative buildings’ safety status was determined based on the National Building Regulations of Iran (NBRI) and other studies. checklist items and their guidelines were prepared. Face validity (quantitative and qualitative), content validity ratio (CVR), and content validity index (CVI) were calculated for the checklist. The Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) used for inter-rater reliability and Cronbach’s α was used to evaluate internal consistency of the checklist. RESULTS: Forty-seven items related to in-operation building safety were extracted from literature review. Based on the results of the psychometric analysis, 5 items were removed and 42 items remained. The values of different psychometric indices for the other items indicated their acceptable validity. (α= 0.82, ICC≥0.75). CONCLUSION: The designed checklist had a good level of validity and reliability for inspecting architectural, technical services, and managerial safety aspects of administrative in-operation buildings. Stakeholders can use it for quick and comprehensive assessment of building safety. Use of this checklist are expected to give early warnings about the safety of buildings to the stakeholders.

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Scale, Role Taking in Caregivers of People with Chronic Disease, ROL

10.3823/2575 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Arias ◽  
Sonia Carreño ◽  
Lorena Chaparro
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Role Taking ◽  
Phase Study

Objective: To determine face, content, and construct validity, and internal consistency of ROL scale. Methods and Findings: A three-phase study was conducted. First, content analysis of the scale was carried out consulting 10 professional experts. Then, face validity was analyzed with 60 caregivers. Finally, construct validity was evaluated by performing an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with 110 participants. Internal consistency of ROL scale was also assessed. Face validity of ROL scale reached a high acceptance index in three dimensions: role performance (0.97), role organization (0.98), and response to the role (0.98). Content validity showed coherence, clarity, and relevance of the scale. From factor analysis, three components emerged and were grouped in the same manner for varimax, quartimax, and equimax rotations. Cronbach's alpha was 0.816, which is an acceptable overall value. Conclusion: ROL scale makes objective the concept of role taking in family caregivers of people with chronic disease. It demonstrated to have acceptable reliability, and construct, face, and content validity to be used in the Colombian context. Keywords: Validation Study, Caregivers, Health Transitions, Chronic Disease.

Validity and Reliability of Mathematical Visual Literacy Skills Based on Avgerinou’s Vilual Literacy Index

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1102-1121
Author(s):  
Raja Lailatul Zuraida Et.al
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Visual Literacy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Principal Component Axis ◽  
Bartlett’S Test

There is much literature on visual literacy across different fields of knowledge. Even so, generally there is a gap of literature that deals with measuring mathematical visual literacy skills. The objective of this paper is to produce empirical data on reliability and validity of mathematical visual literacy skills instrument. The development of items was based on the skills outlined Avgerinou’s VL Index (2007. The early stage in validating the instrument required researchers to seek face validity and content validity from panels of experts. Face validity was based on subjective judgements of the items. Meanwhile, content validity was determined by Content Validity Index (CVI) which is computed using Item-CVI (I-CVI) and Scale-CVI (S-CVI). Each mathematical visual literacy skills had accepted S-CVI values ranging from 0.86 to 1.00 but items with low I-CVI values were deleted. Next, construct validity and reliability was determined by using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Cronbach’s alpha respectively. The instrument, consisting of 43 items was assessed on 428 pre-university students. Students’ responses were scored using analytical rubric developed by researchers. Using Principal Component Axis (PCA) and varimax rotation, EFA was carried out where 40 retaining items were extracted to 7 factors, representing each visual literacy skills. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) of 0.721, significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (BTS), communalities anti images ranging between 0.308-0.721 and 0.503-0.835 respectively, 7 extracted factors explaining 53.685% of the total variance, factor loadings of ±0.520 and more, and overall Cronbach’s alphas of instrument recorded at 0.82, explained the complete validity and reliability of the instrument.

Validity and Reliability of Socio-Cognitive Determinants of Water Intake Questionnaire in Kidney Stones Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh ◽  
Farzad Jalilian ◽  
Halimeh Fatahi ◽  
Laleh Solaimanizadeh ◽  
Abdollah Saadatfar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Water Intake ◽  
Kidney Stones ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Theoretical Assumptions ◽  
Cognitive Determinants ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract Background Developing a valid and reliable questionnaire is an important step in field studies. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric propertiesof the socio-cognitive determinants of water intake questionnaire behaviors among patients with kidney stones in the west of Iran.Methods Construct items were elicited from interviews with kidney stones patients, experts and socio-cognitive items pool-related similar questionnaires. Internal consistency, face, content, and construct validity were evaluated. Data were analyzed by SPSS (ver. 20.0).Results Based on Eigenvalues of ≥ 1.00 and factor loadings of ≥ 0.40, five determinants were extracted. The calculated Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value was 0.697. The socio-cognitive determinants of water intake questionnaires were found to have acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha of determinants between 0.65-0.85) and the theoretical assumptions for face, content, and construct validities were confirmed. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of socio-cognitive determinants was high (ICC between 0.810 - 0.911). Overall, the five studied socio-cognitive determinants explained 73.83% of the variance in the proposed model.Conclusions The socio-cognitive determinants of water intake questionnaire were revealed to have an acceptable psychometric evaluation. The questionnaire could be used to predict or explain water intake behavior in order to develop programs to increase water intake behavior among kidney stones patients.

scholarly journals Adaptação transcultural e validação do questionário “Measure of older adults sedentary time” em idosos brasileiros

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-503
Author(s):  
Fernanda Aparecida Lopes Magno ◽  
Jairo Hélio Júnior ◽  
Camilo Luis Monteiro Lourenço ◽  
Kariny Rodrigues Pereira ◽  
Joilson Meneguci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Sedentary Time ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Accelerometer Data ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Brazilian Version ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Modern lifestyle is associated with prolonged exposure to sedentary behavior (SB), especially in older adults; however, there is a lack of validated questionnaires to measure SB in Brazilian older adults. The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Brazilian version of the “Measure of Older Adults Sedentary Time” (MOST) questionnaire in Brazilian older adults. Content validity, clarity and concurrent validity of the adapted MOST were examined. Fifty-seven participants (68.7 ± 3.47 years) answered the adapted version of the MOST questionnaire and wore an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer for seven days. After this period, participants answered the adapted MOST again and the accelerometer was collected. MOST answers were summed over for calculating self-reported time spent in SB. A cutoff point of < 100 counts/min was applied to accelerometer data for estimating time spent in SB. The relationship between SB estimates from MOST and accelerometer was verified by Pearson correlation, reproducibility was verified by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha (α) and concordance by Bland Altman. Significance was set at P <0.05. Content validity index and clarity index were 100% and 98%, respectively. ICC was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82) for total time in SB assessed with the MOST questionnaire. The correlation between SB estimates from MOST and accelerometer data was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.130.58). The adapted MOST systematically underestimated SB compared to accelerometer (measurement bias: -732.8 min/week [2087.6; -3553.2 min/wk]). The adapted MOST questionnaire presents adequate validity for assessing SB in the Brazilian older adults.

scholarly journals Ophthalmic simulated surgical competency assessment rubric (Sim-OSSCAR) for trabeculectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000313 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H Dean ◽  
John Buchan ◽  
Fisseha Admassu ◽  
Min J Kim ◽  
Karl C Golnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Glaucoma Surgery ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Competency Assessment ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Assessment Rubric

Background/aimsTo develop, test and determine whether a surgical-competency assessment tool for simulated glaucoma surgery is valid.MethodsThe trabeculectomy ophthalmic simulated surgical competency assessment rubric (Sim-OSSCAR) was assessed for face and content validity with a large international group of expert eye surgeons. Cohorts of novice and competent surgeons were invited to perform anonymised simulation trabeculectomy surgery, which was marked using the Sim-OSSCAR in a masked fashion by a panel of four expert surgeons. Construct validity was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Krippendorff’s alpha was calculated for interobserver reliability.ResultsFor the Sim-OSSCAR for trabeculectomy, 58 of 67 surgeons (86.6%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the Sim-OSSCAR is an appropriate way to assess trainees’ surgical skill. Face validity was rated as 4.04 (out of 5.00). Fifty-seven of 71 surgeons (80.3%) either agreed or strongly agreed that the Sim-OSSCAR contents represented the surgical technique of surgical trabeculectomy. Content validity was rated as 4.00. Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed that competent surgeons perform better than novices (p=0.02). Interobserver reliability was rated >0.60 (Krippendorff’s alpha) in 19 of 20 steps of the Sim-OSSCAR.ConclusionThe Sim-OSSCAR for trabeculectomy, a newly developed and validated assessment tool for simulation glaucoma surgery, has validity and reliability. It has the potential to play a useful role in ophthalmic surgical education.

scholarly journals Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Esquivel Garzón ◽  
Luz Patricia Díaz Heredia
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Spanish Version ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Validity Index ◽  
Content Validity Index ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha

Objective. To determine the validity and reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension (TAQPH), Spanish version, designed by Chunhua Ma et al.Methods. This study was carried out in the city of Ibagué (Colombia)  and the test validation determined validity (face, content, and construct) and reliability. Face and content validity were conducted through expert judgment, using Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient statistical tests and modified Lawshe’s content validity index. The construct validity and the reliability test had the participation of 220 people with diagnosis of primary hypertension. Reliability was calculated through Cronbach’s alpha statistical test.Results. In the face validity, the instrument reported a Fleiss’ Kappa index was 0.68 in comprehension, 0.76 in clarity, and 0.64 in accuracy, interpreted as a substantial agreement. The content validity index was satisfactory with 0.91; el exploratory factor analysis reported six factors with a total variance explained of 54%. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.74.Conclusion. The Spanish version of the TAQPH is a valid and reliable scale to evaluate adherence to treatment in patients with primary hypertension.Descriptors: essential hypertension; treatment adherence and compliance; surveys and questionnaires; psychometrics; validation studies.How to cite this article: Esquivel N, Díaz LP. Validity and Reliability of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire for Patients with Hypertension. Invest. Educ. Enferm. 2019; 37(3):e09.

scholarly journals The adaption and evaluation of a Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1861-1869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristaps Jurjāns ◽  
Iļja Noviks ◽  
Diāna Volčeka ◽  
Linda Zandersone ◽  
Kristīne Meilerte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Rater Agreement ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Scale Validity ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Objectives To determine the validity and reliability of a Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (LV-NIHSS) for evaluating Latvian stroke patients. Methods The adaption of the LV-NIHSS followed standard methods used for the adaption and validation of clinical assessment tools. The scale validity was tested by comparison with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the modified Rankin scale (mRs). The reliability of the LV-NIHSS was evaluated by intra-rater and inter-rater agreement using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Results A total of 296 stroke patients and 101 control subjects were evaluated. The mean age of the overall study population was 73.6 years (range, 37 – 94 years; 227 [57.2%] were female). The mean LV-NIHSS score of the patients with stroke was 8.4 ± 6.2. In terms of construct validity of the LV-NIHSS, it correlated with the GCS ( r = −0.571) and mRs ( r = 0.755). In terms of the reliability of the LV-NIHSS, the inter-rater agreement had an ICC of 0.99 and the intra-rater agreement had an ICC of 0.99. Conclusion The adaption of LV-NIHSS was successful and the evaluation showed that the scale was valid and reliable for evaluating Latvian stroke patients.

scholarly journals Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Interpersonal Problem Solving Skills Assessment Tool in Schizophrenia

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-131
Author(s):  
Milad Abolhasani ◽  
◽  
Ashraf Karbalaee Nouri ◽  
Enayatollah Bakhshi ◽  
Milad Abolhasani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Alpha Coefficient ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Persian Version ◽  
Interpersonal Problem Solving ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective: This study aimed to translate the Assessment of Interpersonal Problem-Solving Skills (AIPSS) into Persian and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of AIPSS to use for adults with schizophrenia. Materials & Methods: In this methodological study, the translation process was performed according to the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) protocol. The face validity of the translated AIPSS was determined based on the opinions of experts and The Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were also calculated for each item. The Persian version of the test was performed on 52 patients with schizophrenia disorders at Tehran’s Razi Mental Hospital; they were selected using a convenience sampling method. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to evaluate internal consistency. Inter-rater reliability was determined by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). A retest was complete on 15 patients with 2 weeks interval and ICC was used to determine the test-retest reliability. Results: Face validity was confirmed by the experts’ opinions. The Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and the Content Validity Index (CVI) were equal to one for all scenes. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all scales was ranged between 0.511 and 0.821. The ICC in all scales were more than 0.98 for inter-rater reliability. In calculating test-retest reliability, the ICC for all scales ranged 0.733-0.893. Conclusion: Results show that the Persian version of AIPSS has acceptable face validity, content validity, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability test-retest reliability. Therefore, this instrument can be used in clinical fields and research studies to assess the social skills of Iranian patients with schizophrenia.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese versions of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in Singapore

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Long ◽  
Yin Bun Cheung ◽  
Debra Qu ◽  
Katherine Lim ◽  
Guozhang Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract Context: Measurement of patient-centred outcomes enables clinicians to focus on patient and family priorities and enables quality of palliative care to be assessed.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese IPOS among advanced cancer patients in Singapore.Methods: IPOS was forward and backward translated from English into Chinese. Structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis; known-group validity by comparing inpatients and community patients; construct validity by correlating IPOS with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G); internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha; inter-rater reliability between patient and staff responses; test-retest reliability of patient responses between two timepoints.Results: 111 English-responding and 109 Chinese-responding patients participated. The three-factor structure (Physical Symptoms, Emotional Symptoms and Communication and Practical Issues) was confirmed with Comparative Fit Index and Tucker-Lewis-Index > 0.9 and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation < 0.08. Inpatients scored higher than outpatients as hypothesised. Construct validity (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r≥|0.608|) was shown between the related subscales of IPOS and FACT-G and ESAS-r. Internal consistency was confirmed for total and subscale scores (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.84), except for the Communication and Practical Issues subscale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.29–0.65). Inter-rater reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≤ 0.43) between patient and staff responses was insufficient. Test-retest reliability was confirmed with Intra-class correlation coefficient ICC = 0.80 (English) and 0.88 (Chinese) for IPOS Total.Conclusion: IPOS in English and Chinese showed good validity, good internal consistency, and good test-retest reliability, except for the Communication and Practical Issues subscale. There was poor inter-rater reliability between patients and staff.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Italian Validation of a Questionnaire on Nurses’ Personal and Professional Use, Knowledge, and Attitudes

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giada Belletti ◽  
Seyed Afshin Shorofi ◽  
Paul Arbon ◽  
Alberto Dal Molin
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Complementary And Alternative Medicine ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Nursing Practice ◽  
Face Validity ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Complementary And Alternative

Background: Patients are showing an increasing interest in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Most nurses are open to the adoption of CAM into clinical nursing practice, but they may experience a lack of knowledge about the safe and effective use of these therapies. Several studies concerning nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward CAM have been published, but only in one, the authors (Shorofi and Arbon) used a validated questionnaire. In Italy, there are no validated questionnaires to investigate this aspect of nursing practice. Purpose: To test the psychometric properties of the Italian Shorofi and Arbon questionnaire for use with Italian nurses. Methods: A forward–backward translation method was used to translate the questionnaire from English to Italian. Content validity, face validity and reliability were established. Results and Conclusions: This study examined the potential usefulness of the Shorofi and Arbon questionnaire for the evaluation of CAM knowledge of Italian speaking nurses, which showed good content validity and good reliability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document