scholarly journals DEPRESSION IN CANCER PATIENTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 23-31
Author(s):  
Petr Otroshchenko ◽  
Natalia Otroshchenko ◽  
Iryna Otroshchenko

More than 100 million confirmed accidents and more than 2 million deaths - this is the summary of СOVID-19 in mid-2021 when the whole world is experiencing the worst twilight of the pandemic. At the same time, the WHO European Regional Office considers this period to be the tipping point of the pandemic, linking it to the beginning of mass vaccination and the accumulated experience in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 and its consequences, Despite the emergence of new mutations of the virus, the presence of prolonged forms of the disease (long-COVID, or post-COVID syndrome) (World Health Organization. Statement by Dr. Hans Henri P. Kluge, WHO Regional Director for Europe. Copenhagen, 7 January 2021). Apart from psychotic disorders of infectious origin in СOVID-19 (mental confusion, psychomotor agitation, delirious, hallucinatory, beacon-like, and affective disorders), non-productive changes in consciousness may develop, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), non-psychotic asthenic states, depression, hypochondriacally disorders, sleep disorders, autonomic manifestations, cognitive deficit disorder, secondary encephalopathy, organ disorders (Kumar S., et al., 2021; Einvik G, et al., 2021). The prevalence of infectious psychosis has a pronounced tendency to decrease, while non-psychotic and cognitive deficit disorders after COVID-19 occur more frequently (Hampshire A., et al., 2020). At this time, the rate of depression and anxiety disorders due to the influence of coronavirus infection is significantly higher than in previous years (McCracken L.M., et al., 2020; Kujawa A., et al., 2020). Among the predictors of their development under pandemic conditions are COVID-19 symptoms, history of somatic disorders, oncological diseases, interim measures, and financial losses. A major stressor effect of the COVID-19 pandemic can provoke nosocomial depression in COVID-19 postinfectious cancer patients, a complication in the course of postinfectious depression, and an exacerbation of depression in patients with an infectious disorder in their medical history (Petelin D.S, 2018; Dorozhenok I.Yu., 2021). Depression invariably attracts the attention of physicians. The main reasons for this are its widespread and widespread manifestations and variants of disorder that affect a significant number of people of different stature, age, social groups, and cultures. Women suffer from depression more often than men. According to the World Health Organization, more than 350 million people in the world suffer from depression (World Health Organization. Depression., 2018). The prevalence of depression in cancer is significantly higher than in the general population and, according to physicians, ranges from 33 to 42% (Otroshchenko N. P., et al., 2019). Symptoms of depression are diagnosed in every fourth oncologic patient and occur more frequently in the later stages of the disease. Unfortunately, these patients do not often come into the psychiatrist's field of vision, because, considering the specifics of the disease, they are under the care of oncologists, and they turn to psychiatrists only in cases of major depression or suicidal attempts. High rates of depression (23%) are diagnosed with the most common forms of gynecologic cancer, cervical cancer, and uterine cancer (Arnaboldy P., et al., 2016; Bulletin of the National Cancer Registry N 20 - Cancer in Ukraine, 2017-2018; Petelin D.S., 2018; Otroshchenko N. P., et al., 2019). Comorbidity of oncologic diseases and coronavirus disease causes the risk of serious complications of these viral infections and requires the development and implementation of medical, social, and other protection measures for cancer patients, as well as for patients who have had cancer or other diseases and diseases that impair the function of the immune system (Tian, Y., et al., 2021). Therefore, the relevance of the study of post-covid depression (Hampshire A., et al., 2020; Kumar S., et al., 2021), including in patients with cancer (Tian, Y., et al, 2021), is due to the significant number of cervical and uterine cancer patients, comorbidity, lack of early effective diagnosis, psychological and psychiatric support, late call for help, the tendency to chronicity, and risk of self-harm (Arnaboldy P., et al., 2016; Petelin D.S., 2018; Otroshchenko N. P., et al., 2019).

2021 ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Mariia Pavlushenko ◽  
Roman Liubota ◽  
Roman Vereshchako ◽  
Nikolay Anikusko ◽  
Irina Liubota

The biggest challenge for the World Health Organization today is the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. The current situation prompted major adjustments in the system of cancer care. In this review, we investigate the aspects of cancer treatment and care during the pandemic, since in this setting oncological services face challenges in determining the feasibility of anticancer treatments while minimizing the risk of infection. Cancer patients are at a higher risk from COVID-19 disease. Therefore, oncological community is discussing on the priorities for providing cancer therapies and care and at the same time minimizing the risk of infection.


2000 ◽  
Vol 176 (6) ◽  
pp. 576-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramin Mojtabai ◽  
Ezra Susser ◽  
Vijoy K. Varma

BackgroundThe acute and transient psychotic disorders (ATPD) in ICD–10 advanced the nosology of remitting psychoses with acute onset. But the proposed criteria for ATPD – especially in regard to duration – are tentative and need to be validated.AimsTo evaluate: (a) the duration of remitting psychoses with acute onset; (b) the applicability of the ATPD criteria for these cases; and (c) differences in duration and ATPD diagnoses across sociocultural settings.MethodData from the World Health Organization Determinants of Outcome study were used.ResultsThe 98 cases of remitting psychoses with acute onset had a modal duration of 2–4 months, with 43% falling in this range. Mainly because of this, few met the ATPD criteria. Duration and diagnostic findings were similar across settings.ConclusionsATPD criteria need refinement, especially in regard to duration. Further studies aimed at early detection and assessment of onset and duration of these disorders are needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (07) ◽  
pp. 526-527

Coenen M et al. [Recommendation for the collection and analysis of data on participation and disability from the perspective of the World Health Organization]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2016; 59: 1060–1067 Um eine gleichberechtigte Teilhabe an der Gesellschaft von Menschen mit Behinderung zu ermöglichen, werden zunächst Daten zu vorhandenen Einschränkungen gebraucht. Erst wenn diese detailliert erhoben wurden, können Konzepte zur Beseitigung von Problemen entwickelt werden. Ein standardisiertes Erhebungsinstrument für alle Aspekte der Funktionsfähigkeit fehlte jedoch bisher.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (31) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Nicole Maria Miyamoto Bettini ◽  
Fabiana Tomé Ramos ◽  
Priscila Masquetto Vieira de Almeida

A Organização Mundial da Saúde - OMS confirmou a circulação internacional do novo Coronavírus em janeiro de 2020, nomeando-o como COVID-19 e, declarando uma pandemia. É de extrema importância que durante a pandemia, os profissionais de saúde tenham acesso e conhecimento sobre o uso correto dos Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPIs) e suas indicações, tomando assim, as devidas precauções na prevenção de infecções. O presente estudo buscou identificar a padronização mundial quanto ao uso dos EPIs utilizados no atendimento a pacientes suspeitos e/ou confirmados de COVID-19 no Brasil, EUA, China, Espanha, Itália e demais países europeus. Os guidelines apresentam a padronização quanto ao uso dos EPIs utilizados no atendimento a suspeitos e/ou confirmados de COVID-19, indo ao encontro das recomendações fornecidas pela OMS. Até o momento, o uso de EPIs é sem dúvida a estratégia mais importante e eficaz para proteger os profissionais de saúde durante a assistência ao paciente com COVID-19.Descritores: Infecções por Coronavírus, Equipamento de Proteção Individual, Pessoal de Saúde, Enfermagem. Recommendations for personal protective equipment to combat COVID-19Abstract: The World Health Organization - WHO confirmed the international circulation of the new Coronavirus in January 2020, naming it as COVID-19 and declaring a pandemic. It is extremely important that during the pandemic, health professionals have access and knowledge about the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and its indications, thus taking appropriate precautions to prevent infections. The present study sought to identify the worldwide standardization regarding the use of PPE utilized to take care of suspected and confirmed patients with COVID-19 in Brazil, USA, China, Spain, Italy and other European countries. The guidelines present a standardization regarding the use of PPE utilized to take care of suspected and confirmed with COVID-19, in line with the recommendations provided by WHO. To date, the use of PPE is undoubtedly the most important and effective strategy to protect healthcare professionals during care for patients with COVID-19.Descriptors: Coronavirus Infections, Personal Protective Equipment, Health Personnel, Nursing. Recomendaciones para el equipo de protección personal para combatir COVID-19Resumen: La Organización Mundial de la Salud - La OMS confirmó la circulación internacional del nuevo Coronavirus en enero de 2020, nombrándolo COVID-19 y declarando una pandemia. Es extremadamente importante que durante la pandemia, los profesionales de la salud tengan acceso y conocimiento sobre el uso correcto del Equipo de Protección Personal (EPP) y sus indicaciones, tomando así las precauciones adecuadas para prevenir infecciones. El presente estudio buscó identificar la estandarización mundial con respecto al uso de EPP utilizado para atender a pacientes sospechosos y/o confirmados con COVID-19 en Brasil, Estados Unidos, China, España, Italia y otros países europeos. Las pautas presentan la estandarización con respecto al uso de EPP utilizado para cuidar COVID-19 sospechoso y/o confirmado, de acuerdo con las recomendaciones proporcionadas por la OMS. Hasta la fecha, el uso de EPP es, sin duda, la estrategia más importante y efectiva para proteger a los profesionales de la salud durante la atención de pacientes con COVID-19.Descriptores: Infecciones por Coronavirus, Equipo de Protección Personal, Personal de Salud, Enfermería.


Author(s):  
Ghotekar D S ◽  
Vishal N Kushare ◽  
Sagar V Ghotekar

Coronaviruses are a family of viruses that cause illness such as respiratory diseases or gastrointestinal diseases. Respiratory diseases can range from the common cold to more severe diseases. A novel coronavirus outbreak was first documented in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in December 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. A global coordinated effort is needed to stop the further spread of the virus. A novel coronavirus (nCoV) is a new strain that has not been identified in humans previously. Once scientists determine exactly what coronavirus it is, they give it a name (as in the case of COVID-19, the virus causing it is SARS-CoV-2).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document