scholarly journals Pendidikan Kewirausahaan Bagi Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan Di Lembaga PEMLPKA Khusus Anak Kelas II Jakarta

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Irsyad Firdaus ◽  
Mahdi Adriansyah ◽  
Moh Jamaluddin ◽  
Irfan Sudarso Gultom ◽  
Nadya Fairuza
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Entrepreneurial Education ◽  
The Law

Pelaku tindak pidana tidak hanya dilakukan oleh orang dewasa, melainkan anak-anak juga dapat melakukan tindak pidana. Mengenai pengertian anak-anak yang melakukan tindak pidana atau yang berkonflik dengan hukum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Dalam UU No 11 Tahun 2012, anak yang divonis bersalah dalam sistem peradilan anak mendapatkan pembinaan di LPKA. Salah satu pembinaan yang penting bagi anak sebagai bekal hidup ketika kelak kembalike masyarakat maka anak didik    penting mendapatkan pendidikan kewirausahaan melalui program pembinaan di LPKA.Kata Kunci: Pendidikan Kewirausahaan, Anak Didik, LPKACriminals are not only committed by adults, but children can also commit criminal acts. Regarding the understanding of children who commit criminal acts or who are in conflict with the law regulated in Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Children's Criminal Justice System. In Law No. 11 of 2012, children convicted in the juvenile justice system get coaching at LPKA. One of the important coaching for children as a provision of life when later returned to the community then important students get entrepreneurial education through a coaching program at LPKA.  Keywords: Entrepreneurial Education, Protege, LPKA

scholarly journals Criminal Justice System Toward Children With Legal Conflict Seen In Justice Restorative Presfective

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-26
Author(s):  
Brian Septiadi Daud ◽  
Irma Cahyaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
The Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The criminal justice system of children is very important in the effort to settle cases. Children are gifts of God that are entrusted to be cared for, guarded, and guided for a good future. In article 1 number 1 of Law no. 11 of 2012 states that what is meant by the juvenile justice system is the whole process of resolving cases of children dealing with the law from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after undergoing the crime. The aims of the study were to find out and analyze the juvenile justice system (SPPA) in conflict with the law and to examine the implementation of legal protection against children in conflict with the law based on Law Number 11 of 2012. The research method used to see the arrangement of this arrangement is juridical-normative legal research, this research is research that is attempted with the system reviewing applicable laws and regulations or applied to a particular legal case and concept. The method of collecting legal material with the document method is to collect library research contained in secondary legal materials, then analyzed deductively. The results of this study are to look at the process of the juvenile justice system based on subsystems, components, the process of achieving justice for restorative justice and the process of implementing child protection based on the applicable laws and regulations.  

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Anak Yang Terjerat Perkara Pidana Melalui Diversi (Studi Di Polrestabes Medan)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Akalafikta Jaya ◽  
Triono Eddy ◽  
Alpi Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Convictions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Law

In the past, the punishment of children was the same as the punishment of adults. This causes the psychological condition of children ranging from investigation, investigation and trial to be disturbed because it is often intimidated by law enforcement agencies. Under these conditions, Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System was born. One of the reforms in the Child Criminal Justice System Law requires the settlement of a child criminal case by diversion. Based on the results of research that the conception of criminal offenses against children in conflict with the law in Indonesia is different from criminal convictions to adults. Children are given the lightest possible punishment and half of the criminal convictions of adult criminal offenses. That criminal liability for children who are ensnared in a criminal case according to the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children is still carried out but with different legal sanctions from adults. Criminal imprisonment against children is an ultimumremedium effort, meaning that criminal imprisonment against children is the last legal remedy after there are no other legal remedies that benefit the child. That the concept of enforcement of criminal law against children caught in criminal cases through diversion is in fact not all have applied it. Some criminal cases involving children as the culprit, in court proceedings there are still judges who impose prison sentences on children who are dealing with the law.

scholarly journals A Brief Literature Review of Juvenile Statistics, A Comparative Analysis of Current Racial Differences Within the Criminal Justice System

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip D. Clingan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Racial Disparity ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
The United States

Youths under 18 years get trapped into the Juvenile Justice System after being suspected of committing a delinquent or criminal act. The United States tops in Juvenile arrests in the world. States like West Virginia, Alaska, Oregon, South Dakota, and Wyoming have the highest number of juveniles. However, an estimated 2.1 million youths under 18 years were arrested in the United States during a single year. This paper aims to address the current racial differences that exist within the criminal justice system. By addressing challenges like youths of color are more likely to be committed than white youths into the juvenile system will assist in curbing racial disparity. Statistics reveal that 42% of youths in the placement holdings are black youths, even though black youths make up for 16% of youths all over the United States. In California alone, African American juveniles take 27.5% while whites take up 15%. Even though the system’s laws contain no racial bias, research shows that discrimination can occur where the system allows criminal justice officials discretion in handling offenders. Black youths take up for 15% of the total number of youths in the USA get they have the highest juvenile detentions of 42%, but it is difficult to deny these records since there is evidence like arrest and imprisonment records to back up this claim. The racial disparities exist from targeting the blacks, arrest, sentencing, imprisonment, and release. These actions promote discrimination among the black youths, and black youths are likely to get significant sentencing compared to whites for the same crimes committed. Different states in the United States have different racial disparities, California and Texas, blacks serve long sentences, unlike the whites. There are various causes of racial disparities like; some black residences are known for crime, and they have huge offence rates, unequal access to resources, judicial decisions, and racial prejudice. After the research, it was evident that racial disparity exists, and it can only be corrected by looking at the root cause of the problem widely, which is discrimination. Race plays a significant role when it comes to juvenile detentions. Youths of color are four times more probable to be detained, unlike white youths. The research designed a method of tracking racial disparities via a hypothetical juvenile jurisdiction criminal justice system. The paper will extensively dive into juvenile population characteristics, juvenile justice system structure, law enforcement, juvenile crime, juveniles in court, juveniles on probation by the state, juveniles in the correction by the state and foreign nations, and an analysis of all the findings. The extensive research will be able to answer all the questions to the problem of racial disparity.

scholarly journals Social justice, history, and inequity in Cleveland: An overview

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Amy Wainwright ◽  
Michelle Millet
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Food Deserts ◽  
Short Version ◽  
Rust Belt ◽  
True Crime

When we first volunteered to be on the Local Arrangements Committee for the ACRL 2019 conference, and to write this specific piece for our colleagues who were coming to our city, neither of us had a clue that the entire third season of the true crime podcast Serial1 would focus on the criminal justice system of Cuyahoga County. But since it was so popular, we considered it a good framing device for a discussion about social justice in Cleveland.If you haven’t listened to Serial, the short version is Cleveland and Cuyahoga County’s criminal and juvenile justice system are shining examples of the inequity that exists in the region. Poverty, segregation, violence, food deserts, crime, and an unfair justice system are all parts of the larger system that remains unjust and unequal in the heart of a Rust Belt city desperate to rise again.

scholarly journals Implementation Of Law Number 11 Of 2012 Concerning Child Related Criminal Justice System Concept Restorative Justice

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Intan Karangan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
System Concept ◽  
Resolution Processes

This study aims to determine how the application of the concept of restorative justice in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2012 on Child Criminal Justice system. This study uses normative namely a study that discusses the problem based on the literature and legislation relating to the matter to be investigated. Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Child has provided a new concept in the criminal justice system, especially those in the juvenile justice system. Related to the concept of Restorative Justice or restorative justice is a resolution processes involving perpetrators, victims, families, and other relevant parties in a criminal act, jointly seek solutions to the offense and its implications by emphasizing restoration and not retribution.

scholarly journals Implementation Of Law Number 11 Of 2012 Concerning Child Related Criminal Justice System Concept Restorative Justice

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Intan Karangan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
System Concept ◽  
Resolution Processes

This study aims to determine how the application of the concept of restorative justice in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2012 on Child Criminal Justice system. This study uses normative namely a study that discusses the problem based on the literature and legislation relating to the matter to be investigated. Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Child has provided a new concept in the criminal justice system, especially those in the juvenile justice system. Related to the concept of Restorative Justice or restorative justice is a resolution processes involving perpetrators, victims, families, and other relevant parties in a criminal act, jointly seek solutions to the offense and its implications by emphasizing restoration and not retribution.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Pada Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Jinayat

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-186
Author(s):  
Khairida Khairida ◽  
Syahrizal Syahrizal ◽  
Mohd. Din
Keyword(s):  
Child Abuse ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Law

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor  35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan dari Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak dimana dalam Undang-Undang tersebut menjelaskan kewajiban memberikan perlindungan kepada anak, namun ketentuan pidana bagi pelaku pelecehan terhadap anak dalam Undang-Undang tersebut masih sangat lemah sebagai dasar untuk menangani kasus pelecehan terhadap anak. Qanun  Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang  Hukum Jinayat, memberikan pengertian tentang Pelecehan Seksual pada Bab I ketentuan umum Pasal (1) ayat ke - 27 yaitu:  Pelecehan seksual adalah perbuatan asusila atau perbuatan cabul yang sengaja dilakukan seseorang didepan umum atau terhadap orang lain sebagai korban baik laki-laki maupun perempuan tanpa kerelaan korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Penegakan Hukum Pelecehan Seksual pada Anak, dalam Sistem Peradilan Jinayat, hubungan sistem Peradilan Jinayat dengan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Penulisan karya ilmiah ini  menggunakan jenis  penelitian  hukum  normatif, di mana penelitian hukum yang menggunakan sumber data primernya merupakan norma-norma yang berlaku baik yang berupa Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Qanun, dengan pendekatan library research. Disarankan kepada Pemerintah perlu secepatnya membuat langkah-langkah strategis, rencana aksi dan penerapan sanksi yang tegas terhadap prilaku seks yang menyimpang. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Aceh (DPRA) perlu membuat aturan lebih lanjut termasuk aturan acaranya agar permasalahan ini menjadi lebih jelas dan pasti sehingga terhdap korban mendapatkan suatu kepastian hukum dan nasibnya menjadi lebih jelas serta terpenuhi hak-haknya.The Act Number 35, 2014 which is the revision of the Act Number 23, 2002 on the Child Protection which in the Act explains the obligation to provide protection to children, but the criminal provisions for perpetrators of child abuse in the Act are still very weak as a basis for dealing with child abuse cases. The Law Number 11, 2012 on the Juvenile Justice System in the first chapter of the General Provision, precisely in Article (1) paragraph (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) states that; The Child Criminal Justice System is the whole process of settling children's cases against the law, from the investigation stage to the guidance stage after undergoing criminal. Qanun Aceh (local law) Number 6, 2014 on Jinayat Law (Islamic Criminal Law), provides understanding on Sexual Harassment in Chapter I general provisions of Article (1) of the 27th verse: Sexual harassment is an immoral act or obscene acts committed personally in public or against another person as a victim both men and women without the victim's willingness. This study aims to find out how Law Enforcement of Sexual Harassment in Children, in Jinayat Jurisdiction System, Relation of Jinayat Justice System with Child Criminal Justice System and To know the fulfillment of children. The paper applies normative legal research, in which legal research using its primary data sources are the norms that apply both in the form of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Laws and Regulations, Qanun, with the approach of library research. It is recommended that to the Government should establish strategic measures, action plans and the imposition of strict sanctions against deviant sexual behavior. The House of Representatives of Aceh (DPRA) needs to make further rules including the rules of the show so that this matter becomes clearer and more certain that the victim gets a legal certainty and his fate becomes clearer and fulfilled his rights.

scholarly journals Reconstruction of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System and The Giving of Diversion

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Muhaimin Muhaimin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Social Welfare ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Mentoring Programs ◽  
Illegal Acts ◽  
The Law

Children are not to be punished but to be given guidance and development, so that they grow and develop as completely normal, healthy and intelligent children. Sometimes children experience situations that make them commit illegal acts. Even so, children who break the law are not worthy of punishment, let alone put in prison. Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning Juvenile Criminal Justice System demands a reorientation of the purpose of punishment which has an impact on the operation of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The formulation of the objectives of restorative justice and diversion mechanisms which are recognized as mechanisms for handling crimes committed by children demands that the performance of the criminal justice sub-system change its orientation. The problem of this research was how the construction and reconstruction of the giving of diversion are. This research used descriptive analysis method and normative juridical approach. Children are part of citizens who must be protected as a generation to continue the leadership of the Indonesian nation. The current ideal construction for children who are in conflict with the law applies the Law of Juvenile Justice System where children aged 7 years can be given diversion in the trial process. Article 21 of the Law of Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Government Regulation No. 65 Year 2015 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion, children under 12 years of age who commit/are suspected of committing a criminal act shall then be returned to their parents and include them in education, coaching, and mentoring programs in government institutions or Social Welfare Organizing Institutions in institutions in charge of social welfare.

scholarly journals Criminal Justice System of Children in The Law Number 11 of 2012 (Restorative Justice)

Rechtsidee ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Ansori Ansori
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Delinquency ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
The State ◽  
Future Application ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law

The future of the children will determine the future of the nation. The increasing problem of juvenile delinquency in this globalization and information technology era, requires the state to give more attention to the child's future. Application of the criminal justice system for children in Indonesia is as stipulated in Law Number 3 of 1997 potentially detrimental to the child's interests. In practice, the judicial system had many problems, among them is a violation of the rights of children, such as: physical and psychological violence, as well as deprivation of the right to education and welfare. It happened because the juvenile justice system is against to national and international regulations on the protection of children’s rights. Besides that, theory of punishment for the juvenile delinquency still refers to the concept of retribution for the crimes. This concept is not very useful for the development of the child, so the concept need to be repaired with the concept of restorative justice. With this concept, the criminal justice system for the juvenile delinquency, leads to the restoration of the state and the settlement pattern, involving the perpetrator, the victim, their families and engage with the community. This is done with consideration for the protection of children against the law. Whereas in line with this spirit of the restorative justice, it gives birth to the Law No. 11 of 2012 on The Criminal Justice System of Children. How To Cite: Ansori, A. (2014). Criminal Justice System of Children in The Law Number 11 of 2012 (Restorative Justice). Rechtsidee, 1(1), 11-26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v1i1.95

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document