scholarly journals Determination of the safety rods (SA, SB) for optimized power reactor 1000 using the Core simulator OPR1000

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
Son An Nguyen ◽  
Nguyen Trung Tran

In order to operate a nuclear power plant, ensuring safety is the most important factor. The function of safety rods are to shut down the reactor in case of emergency. The purpose of this paper to show the result of research and determine the value of safety rods SA, SB. Determination of the Boron concentration corresponding to each group of safety rods of OPR1000 nuclear reactor ensures the safely in the whole operation process. Experimental simulation is carried out in the system simulating core reactor OP1R1000 (CoSi OPR1000). The expermental result corresponds with the theoretic calculated result of Sa and Sb with 1500 pcm, 4000 pcm. The concentrations of Boron appropriately are 134 ppm and 284 ppm, respectively.

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-248
Author(s):  
Son An Nguyen ◽  
Nguyen Trung Tran ◽  
Tuan Quoc Tran ◽  
Cuong Quang Ly ◽  
Lan Thi Ha Le ◽  
...  

In the operation of a nuclear power plant (NPP), to adjust the capacity of NPP is necessary. When the NPP capacity is changed the nuclear fission is also changed. The methods used in changing the capacity of NPP include: changing the boron concentration, changing the position of the control rod groups, and changing the boron concentrations and the position of the control rod groups together. This report presents some results of the research, measurement boron concentrations when nuclear power plans OPR1000 critically state in the cases of ARO, ARI SB, ARI R1, R5 = 191 cm on the basis of the bisection method in the boron concentrations adjustment. The experiment is performed on core the simulator for OPR 1000 nuclear power plant. The results in the 4 cases were similar with NPP operating data using OPR1000 reactor.


Author(s):  
Xiaomeng Dong ◽  
Zhijian Zhang ◽  
Zhaofei Tian ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Guangliang Chen

Multi-physics coupling analysis is one of the most important fields among the analysis of nuclear power plant. The basis of multi-physics coupling is the coupling between neutronics and thermal-hydraulic because it plays a decisive role in the computation of reactor power, outlet temperature of the reactor core and pressure of vessel, which determines the economy and security of the nuclear power plant. This paper develops a coupling method which uses OPENFOAM and the REMARK code. OPENFOAM is a 3-dimension CFD open-source code for thermal-hydraulic, and the REMARK code (produced by GSE Systems) is a real-time simulation multi-group core model for neutronics while it solves diffusion equations. Additionally, a coupled computation using these two codes is new and has not been done. The method is tested and verified using data of the QINSHAN Phase II typical nuclear reactor which will have 16 × 121 elements. The coupled code has been modified to adapt unlimited CPUs after parallelization. With the further development and additional testing, this coupling method has the potential to extend to a more large-scale and accurate computation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-242
Author(s):  
Rex Abrefah ◽  
Prince Atsu ◽  
Robert Sogbadji

In pursuance of sufficient, stable and clean energy to solve the ever-looming power crisis in Ghana, the Nuclear Power Institute of the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission has on the agenda to advise the government on the nuclear power to include in the country's energy mix. After consideration of several proposed nuclear reactor technologies, the Nuclear Power Institute considered a high pressure reactor or vodo-vodyanoi energetichesky reactor as the nuclear power technologies for Ghana's first nuclear power plant. As part of technology assessments, neutronic safety parameters of both reactors are investigated. The MCNP neutronic code was employed as a computational tool to analyze the reactivity temperature coefficients, moderator void coefficient, criticality and neutron behavior at various operating conditions. The high pressure reactor which is still under construction and theoretical safety analysis, showed good inherent safety features which are comparable to the already existing European pressurized reactor technology.


1993 ◽  
Vol 640 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archava Siriraks ◽  
John Stillian ◽  
Dennis Bostic

1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 401-404
Author(s):  
Donald Reid

At 0400 hours on Wednesday, March 28, 1979, an extremely small and initially thought unimportant malfunction occurred at the nuclear power plant at Three Mile Island (TMI). Within a short period of time, that malfunction would turn into an event of momentous impact with repercussions felt over most of the world. The events of that malfunction would cause TMI to be labelled as the worst commercial nuclear incident in history and transform it into the nuclear test tube of the universe. What really happened at Three Mile Island? Thirty-six seconds after 0400 hours, several water pumps stopped functioning in the unit 2 nuclear power plant. In the minutes, hours and days that followed, a series of events—compounded by equipment failure, inappropriate procedures and human errors—escalated into the worst crisis yet experienced by the nation's nuclear power industry. This resulted in the loss of reactor coolant, overheating of the core, damage to the fuel (but probably no melting) and release outside the plant of radioactive gases. Hydrogen has was formed, primarily by the reaction between the zirconium casing that holds the radioactive fuel and steam. There, however, was no danger of the bubble inside the reactor vessel exploding, because of the absence of oxygen within the reactor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document