scholarly journals Comparison of Response to the Concurrent Low Dose Daily Cisplatin Vs Weekly Cisplatin Vs Three Weekly Cisplatin with External Beam Radiotherapy in Carcinoma Cervix Patients of Stage IIB, IIIA & IIIB: A Prospective Study from Single Institution

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Ubale ◽  
Shruti Chandra ◽  
S N Prasad ◽  
P K Singh
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Weekly Cisplatin

Introduction: Cervical cancer continues to be a major public health problem affecting middle-aged women, particularly in less-resourced countries. External beam radiation therapy along with intra cavitary insertion has long been the treatment of choice for locally advanced (IIB-IVA) cervical cancer, but long-term successes are limited in terms of pelvic recurrence or distant metastasis. Outcome of low dose daily versus weekly versus three weekly Cisplatin concurrent with External beam radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma was compared in this study. Methods: A prospective cross sectional study was carried out in J K cancer institute, Kanpur. Total 60 patients of cervical cancer were randomized into 3 arms. Arm I, Arm II and Arm III received External beam radiotherapy concurrent with either daily (8mg/m2), weekly (40 mg/m2) or three weekly (100 mg/m2) Cisplatin respectively. External beam radiotherapy was given with a dose of 50 Gy / 25 # / 5 week / 2 field or 4 field. Patients were evaluated weekly during treatment and afterwards up to 1year. Results: Most of the patients were from fourth and fifth decade, low socioeconomic strata and illiterate. Majority of the cases belong to squamous cell carcinoma (96.6%) and stage III B (55%). Objective response in arm I was 80.0%, in arm II was 75.0% and in arm III was 60.0% respectively. Statistically significant difference was noted between arm III and Arm I (80%Vs60% p<0.05). Results were better in arm I as compare to arm II but not statistically significant. (80%Vs75% P>0.05) Conclusions: This study showed that response was better in ARM I as compared to ARM III and best results was seen with Cisplatin concurrent daily with radiation. Keywords: Cisplatin, concurrent chemotherapy, daily, weekly, three weekly, carcinoma cervix

scholarly journals Comparative study to evaluate dosimetric differences in patients of locally advanced carcinoma cervix undergoing intracavitary brachytherapy under two different anaesthesia techniques: an audit from a tertiary cancer centre in India

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Divyesh Kumar ◽  
G. Y. Srinivasa ◽  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Bhavana Rai ◽  
Arun S. Oinam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Day Care ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Effective Alternative ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Carcinoma cervix is amongst the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in women population worldwide. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) post external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care in managing locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients. HDR-ICBT is generally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in operation theatre (OT), but due to logistic reasons, sometimes, it becomes difficult to accommodate all patients under GA. Since prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) makes the results inferior, taking patients in day care setup under procedural sedation (PS) can be an effective alternative. In this audit, we tried to retrospectively analyse the dosimetric difference, if any, in patients who underwent ICBT at our centre, under either GA in OT or PS in day care. Results Thirty five patients were analysed 16/35 (45.71%) patients underwent HDR-ICBT under GA while 19/35 (54.28%) patients under PS. In both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed between the dose received by 0.1 cc as well as 2 cc of rectum (p < 0.05), while the bladder and sigmoid colon had comparable dosages. Conclusion Though our dosimetric analysis highlighted better rectal sparing in patients undergoing HDR-ICBT under GA when compared to patients under PS, PS can still be considered an effective alternative, especially in centres dealing with significant patient load. Further studies are required for firm conclusion.

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY TO COMPARE THE CONCURRENT CHEMO-RADIATION VERSUS HYPO-FRACTIONATED CHEMO-RADIATION IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER.

2021 ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Arpan Jana ◽  
Pabitra Das ◽  
Poulami Gupta ◽  
Phalguni Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Advanced Carcinoma

Background: Concurrent chemo-radiation is the standard treatment worldwide for locally advanced squamous Cell carcinoma cervix. However, conventional chemo-radiotherapy is also associated with unacceptable local and systemic failure rates for locally advanced disease. Biologically squamous cell carcinoma of head- neck cancer and cervical cancer behaves quite similarly in response to radiotherapy. So, it can be expected that, altered fractionation can increase the local control in case of squamous cell carcinoma cervix than conventional radiotherapy. There is no randomised control trial for carcinoma cervix till date, which compares conventional chemo-radiation with hypo-fractionated chemo-radiation. Aims And Objectives: The present study was planned to compare local disease control and acute toxicity of conventional chemo-radiation with hypo-fractionated chemo-radiation in locally advanced carcinoma cervix. Materials And Methods: In Conventional Chemo-radiation Arm A patients (n=30) received external beam radiotherapy 50 Gy in 25 fractions in 5 weeks accompanied by weekly intravenous Cisplatin 40mg/m2 followed by intracavitary brachytherapy 7 Gy per fraction once in a week for 3 weeks. The second group of hypo-fractionated Arm B received external beam radiotherapy 45 Gy in 20 fractions in 4 weeks accompanied by weekly intravenous Cisplatin 40mg/m2 followed by intracavitary brachytherapy 9 Gy per fraction once in a week for 2 weeks. Results: Grade II diarrhea were seen more in Arm B 17 (56.66%) compare to Arm A 12(40%) and grade III diarrhea was seen 4 (3.33%) in Arm B and 2(6.66%) in Arm A. At 2 months and 6 months after completion of treatment Complete response were 25 (83.4%) in Arm A compare to 22 (73.3%) in Arm B and 20 (74.1%) in Arm A and 18 (72%) in Arm B respectively. Conclusion: Hypo-fractioned radiotherapy may be used as an alternate protocol for treatment of locally advanced carcinoma cervix with acceptable toxicities.

Long-Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Concomitant Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1162-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Isabel Martínez-Fernández ◽  
Jairo Legaspi Folgueira ◽  
Germán Valtueña Peydró ◽  
Mauricio Cambeiro ◽  
Jaime Espinós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Dose Rate ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
High Dose ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the long-term results of a 7-week schedule of external beam radiation therapy, high dose rate brachytherapy, and weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.MethodsThirty-seven patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 to IVa cervical cancer were treated with 40 mg/m2 per week of intravenous cisplatin and 50 mg/m2 per week of intravenous paclitaxel combined with 45 Gy of pelvic external beam radiation therapy and 28 to 30 Gy of high dose rate brachytherapy.ResultsSixteen patients (43.2%) were able to complete the 6 scheduled cycles of chemotherapy. The median number of weekly chemotherapy cycles administered was 5. Thirty-six (16.2%) of 222 cycles of chemotherapy were not given because of toxicity. The mean dose intensity of cisplatin was 29.6 mg/m2 per week (95% confidence interval, 27.0–32.1); that of paclitaxel was 40.0 mg/m2 per week (95% confidence interval, 36.9–43.1). Thirty-four patients (91.8%) completed the planned radiation course in less than 7 weeks. Median radiation treatment length was 43 days. After a median follow-up of 6 years, 7 patients (18.9%) experienced severe (RTOG grade 3 or higher) late toxicity. No fatal events were observed. Ten patients have failed, 1 locally and 9 at distant sites. The 14-year locoregional control rate was 96.7%, and the 14-year freedom from systemic failure rate was 64.6%. Fourteen-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 44.8% and 50%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates excellent very long-term results and tolerable toxicity although the target weekly dosage of cisplatin and paclitaxel needs to be adjusted in the majority of the patients.

scholarly journals Priming radioimmunotherapy with external beam radiation in patients with relapsed low grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazan Abuodeh ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Michelle Echevarria ◽  
Arash Naghavi ◽  
G. Daniel Grass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of priming salvage radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with a low dose of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in patients with relapsed low grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LG-NHL). Methods: Patients who received salvage RIT with or without 2 × 2 Gy EBRT between March 2009 and February 2013 were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution. Planning target volume (PTV) for EBRT was created by adding a 1–2 cm expansion to the gross tumor volume depending on the anatomical location. Kaplan−Meier method via log-rank was employed to analyze the endpoints freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 22 patients who received salvage RIT without chemotherapy with a median follow up of 34 months. Of these, 9 (41%) patients were treated with EBRT immediately prior to RIT, and 13 (59%) received salvage RIT alone. Median FFP was not reached in patients who underwent combination treatment, while it was 9 months for patients treated with RIT alone ( p = 0.02). OS for all patients at 36 months was 80.3% with no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.88). On univariate analysis, the addition of EBRT was associated with improved FFP [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24–19.1; p = 0.02)]. No long term toxicities were reported in both groups. Conclusions: RIT outcomes and effects were improved with addition of low-dose EBRT immediately prior to it, in the treatment of relapsed LG-NHL with no additional toxicity. This study is hypothesis-generating and the findings should be validated in prospective studies.

Individually customised parametrial boost for locally advanced cervical cancer: is 2D planned external beam radiotherapy useful?

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-253
Author(s):  
Aparna Gangopadhyay ◽  
Subrata Saha
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Pelvic Wall ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Median Period

AbstractAim:Pelvic wall control and toxicity was retrospectively assessed in patients who received individually customised parametrial boost (PMB) for locally advanced cervical cancer with 2D planned external beam radiotherapy. Outcomes of a dose-escalated combined boost were also evaluated.Materials and methods:Toxicity and pelvic wall recurrence was evaluated over a median period of 24 months between two groups who received different pelvic wall doses. One group was randomised to receive either intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) with an external beam PMB using a customised midline shield, or a dose-escalated combined boost with interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) and PMB. The comparator group received no PMB.Results:At 24 months, pelvic wall recurrence occurred in 2/112 and 40/130 with and without PMB, respectively (p < 0·000001). No significant difference in toxicity was noted between boost versus no-boost groups (p = 0·56). Combined ISBT/PMB dose escalation showed no significant difference in pelvic wall recurrence compared with PMB alone (p = 0·49).Findings:Individually customised 2D PMBs with 3D image-based ICRT was safe and improved pelvic wall control in locally advanced cervix cancer. Dose-escalated combined boosts offered no significant benefit over standard boost doses.

scholarly journals Image guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced disease after external beam radiotherapy in a case of carcinoma cervix – our institutional experience

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tandon ◽  
S. Mitra ◽  
M. K. Sharma ◽  
U. Saxena ◽  
P. Ahlawat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Early Response ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
The Mean

Purpose/Objective: Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer in women worldwide. Definitive chemoradiation is the accepted standard of care for patients especially for locally advanced cervical cancers. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is an important part of definitive radiotherapy shown to improve overall survival. Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) is generally reserved for patients either with extensive pelvic and/or vaginal residual disease after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or with anatomy not allowing ICBT with standard applicators in an attempt to improve local control. We have conducted an observational study for patients who underwent image guided HDR-ISBT at our institute. Materials and Methods: Seven patients; diagnosed as a case of carcinoma cervix; were selected from the period of 2012 to 2015 who received EBRT by IMRT and for whom ICBT couldn’t be done for various reasons. These patients were then taken up for Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT) image based ISBT. A descriptive analysis was done for doses received by HRCTV, bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon. At the end of treatment, early response at 3 months along with overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was also calculated. Results: All the patients recruited were locally advanced with 3 patients in IIB, 1 patient in IIIA and 3 patients belonging to IIIB. The mean dose received by 95% high risk CTV (HRCTV) by IMRT was 49.75 Gy. Out of 7 patients, 3 were taken up for ISBT due to anatomical restriction whereas remaining 4 patients were included because of lack of dose coverage by ICBT. The mean doses received by 90% of HRCTV, 2 cc bladder, 2 cc rectum and 2 cc sigmoid colon were 20.58 Gy, 2.73 Gy, 3.19 Gy and 2.82 Gy respectively. The early response at 3 months was 57.14%. The DFS at one year and OS at 3 year were 53.6% and 53.3% respectively. Conclusions: Our descriptive analysis of seven patients being treated by image based ISBT have revealed that locally advanced cervical cancer patients for whom ICBT is unsuitable can achieve equitable LRC and OS with a combination of EBRT by IMRT and image based HDR-ISBT.

scholarly journals Changes in the cervical microbiota of cervical cancer patients after primary radio-chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1326-1330
Author(s):  
Anastasia Tsakmaklis ◽  
Maria Vehreschild ◽  
Fedja Farowski ◽  
Maike Trommer ◽  
Christhardt Kohler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Beta Diversity ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Diversity Index ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pre Treatment

ObjectiveSeveral recent studies have identified a potential interaction between the vaginal microbiota and gynecological cancers, but little is known about the cervical microbiota and its changes during cancer treatment. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative changes of cervical microbiota in patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer.MethodsCervical cytobrush samples of 15 cervical patients undergoing chemoradiation treatment were collected 1 day before starting external beam radiation therapy and on the day of the last fraction of brachytherapy. After DNA extraction, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 region was performed on the MiSeq platform, followed by data processing and statistical analyses concerning the alpha and beta diversity of 16 samples (7 samples were excluded because of incomplete sample sets).ResultsThe amount of amplicon yield after polymerase chain reaction analysis in post-radiation samples was significantly lower compared with the baseline samples (pre 31.49±24.07 ng/µl; post 1.33±1.94 ng/µl; p=0.007). A comparison of pre-treatment and post-treatment samples did not show significant differences regarding beta diversity (weighted UniFrac). There was no significant difference in alpha diversity, which is used to characterize species diversity within a particular community and takes into account both number and abundance (Shannon Diversity Index pre-treatment samples: 2.167±0.7504 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.79); post-treatment samples: 1.97±0.43 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.33); p=0.38). Interindividual differences in patients could partly explain some variation of the samples (permutational multivariate analysis of variance).ConclusionThere was a strong reduction in cervical bacterial loads after chemoradiation. Neither alpha nor beta diversity varied significantly when baseline samples were compared with post-treatment samples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document