scholarly journals Analisis Laporan Keuangan Sebagai Alat untuk Menilai Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan pada PT Multi Bintang Indonesia Tbk

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
Yulida Army Nurcahya ◽  
Rizky Puspita Dewi

This study aims to analyze the financial performance of PT. Multi Bintang Indonesia Tbk in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The analytical tools used in this study are liquidity ratios (current ratios and fast ratios), solvency ratios (ratio of total debt to assets and total debt to equity) ratios), and profitability ratios (return on investment and return on equity). The results of the current ratio and quick ratio research in 2017 show that the company's financial condition is quite good, because the debt is less than the assets and profits obtained. Whereas in 2016 and 2018, the company's financial condition was not good because of higher debt. The quick ratio in 2016 shows that the company's financial condition is not good. Based on the measurement of the solvency ratio, an increase in the total debt to asset ratio and the total debt equity ratio in 2016 and 2018 indicate that the financial condition is not in good condition. Judging from the profitability ratio, the decrease in return on assets and return on equity in 2016 and 2018 shows that the company's financial performance is not good because the ratios are not maximized in generating profits.

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suwarto Suwarto

This research is motivation to know the financial performance of ksp so that the management of the ksp can perform their duties and obligations well in accordance with the objectives of the cooperative in general.The purpose of this study to determine the financial performance of ksp based on the ratio of Liquidity, Solvency and Profitability on Tri Dharma Cooperative Artha Seputih Raman.Based on the it can be concluded the financial performance of Savings and Loans Cooperative Tri Dharma Artha Seputih Raman years in 2012-2016 are:The liquidity ratio consisting of current ratio yielded an average of 90.44%. It can be concluded that current ratio includes bad criteria because less than 125%. Solvency ratio consists of debt to asset ratio yield average of 91,42% and can be concluded debt to asset ratio including criterion less good, because bigger than 60% to 95%. While based on the calculation of debt to equity ratio produce an average of 1,074.05%, it can be concluded debt to equity ratio including bad criteria because greater than 200% and profitability ratio consisting of return on assets (ROA) yield average of 1 , 36%, can be concluded return on assets (ROA) including criteria less good because more than 1% to 3% whereas based on calculation of return on equity (ROE) yield average of 16,04%, can be concluded return on equity ( ROE) is included in good criteria because it is greater than 15% to 21% and based on the calculation of net profit margin (NPM) yields an average of 8.08%, net profit margin (NPM) is considered good enough criteria as more than 5% to 10%.Keywords: Financial Statement, Liquidity Ratio, Solvency Ratio, and Profitability Ratio 


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-79
Author(s):  
Nida Auliana Umami ◽  
Ayu Febriyanti Safitri

Financial statement analysis is one way to find out the condition of the company, financial ratios are one of the tools used to analyze financial statements. The purpose of this study is to determine the financial condition through the analysis of liquidity ratios, solvency, and profitability as well as the constraints that occur in financial performance and solutions made by the company. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The data was studied in the form of financial statements of PT. Martina Berto Tbk for 2014-2018. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the liquidity ratio is healthy because the current, fast, and INWC ratio is above the industry standard. The solvency ratio is healthy because the debt to equity ratio and LTDtER are above the standard. While the profitability ratios are declared unhealthy because the ratios of NPM, ROA, and ROE are below the standard.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 224-228
Author(s):  
Ompon Lastiur Sianipar ◽  
Eka Pratiwi Septiana Parapat

The purpose of this research was to determine the financial performance at PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk from 2012 to 2014. The data analysis method used is the documentation and the data obtained from www.indofood.co.id. The ratio is a tool used in this study to compare the amount of data one with another amount of data used to assess the financial position in a given period. The ratio used of which is the liquidity ratio as represented by the current ratio and the quick ratio, the solvency ratio is represented by the debt ratio and total debt to equity ratio and profitability ratio represented by return on assets and return on equity. The results in the study from 2012 to 2013 from liquidity ratio seen from the current ratio and quick ratio decreased. The increase occurred in 2013 to 2014 due to the increase in current assets so that liabilities can be met. Thus PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk included in either category. Seen from the solvency ratio of the debt ratio and Total Debt to Equity Ratio insufficient capital companies underwriting debt by creditors so that PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk is said to be better than the year 2012-2014. From the ratio of profitability seen in return on assets and return on equity declined in 2012 to the year 2013. The increase occurred in 2013 to 2014 due to the efficiency in using assets to make a profit so that the state of the PT. Indofood Sukses Makmur tbk termasuk in both categories


Paradigm ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-45
Author(s):  
Siddharth Mahajan ◽  
Mainak Sarkar

We compare the financial performance of three Indian companies, Tata Motors, Maruti, and Mahindra & Mahindra with two MNCs, Honda and Hyundai. While it would be desirable to include other MNCs in the study, data on only these two MNCs are available in the PROWESS database as these are the only ones listed on the stock exchange. In order to compare the financial performance, we use ten ratios. There are four profitability ratios, four liquidity ratios and two solvency ratios. The profitability ratios used are profit margin, asset turnover, return on assets, and return on equity. The liquidity ratios used are current ratio, quick ratio, debtor turnover and inventory turnover. The solvency ratios used are debt to equity ratio and interest coverage ratio. For each ratio we find the average performance for the three Indian companies and the average performance for the two MNCs. The averages are compared. We also find the coefficient of variation for Indian companies and for MNCs for each of the ten ratios. A high average performance on a particular ratio combined with a lower coefficient of variation would definitely indicate a better performance by a particular group. Based on this criterion, MNCs have a better performance than Indian companies on return on assets and interest coverage ratio. On the other hand, Indian companies have a better performance than MNCs on return on equity. For each of the ten ratios, we also look at data from 2002 to 2006 for each of the five companies. Using regression, we see if the trend in each ratio for each company is statistically significant. This would indicate whether a company is on an improvement path, based on a particular ratio.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Sayekti Suindah Dwiningwarni ◽  
Judi Suharsono ◽  
Dian Yuliana Safitri

The motivation of this research is research (Rosini & Gunawan 2018; B.Batchimeg 2017). In addition, the motivation of this study also continued the research of Sayekti Suindyah Dwiningwarni (1997). The purpose of this study (1) to analyze the development of corporate financial performance from solvency and profitability ratios; (2) to analyze the measurement of the company's financial performance using solvency and profitability ratios. This research uses quantitative descriptive analysis method.The results of the study (1) the development of the company's financial performance in terms of solvency ratios experienced good development, this is indicated by the value of the solvency ratio that is getting better / better in fulfilling both short and long term obligations; (2) the development of the company's financial performance in terms of profitability ratios from experiencing good development, this is indicated by the value of the profitability ratio that is getting better / better in generating profits or profits; (3) measurement of company performance in terms of solvency ratio shows solvable conditions, meaning the assets is greater than the debt. (4) measurement of company performance in terms of profitability ratios shows good conditions, meaning the level of profits obtained from year to year has increased. This means that the company is in good financial condition and sovabel.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-33
Author(s):  
Wulan Damayanti ◽  
Ari Nurul Fatimah

This study analyzes the financial performance of PT Mandom Tbk. This study aims to determine how the financial performance of PT Mandom Tbk during the 2015 - 2020 reporting year. The data and information used in this study were obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The test is carried out based on four categories of financial ratios, namely, Profitability Ratios, Liquidity Ratios, Solvency Ratios, and Activity Ratios. The study was conducted using a descriptive quantitative approach and the data is secondary data in the form of financial statements of income and statements of financial position obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Based on the results of research analysis using the profitability ratios of the company's financial performance, the condition is not good. Based on the liquidity ratio analysis, the company's financial performance shows a good condition. Based on the analysis of the solvency ratio, the company's financial performance shows a good condition. Based on the activity ratio analysis of the company's financial performance, it shows good conditions for receivable activities and not good for inventory activities and fixed asset activities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mazibar Rahman ◽  
Umme Khadija Kakuli ◽  
Shahnaz Parvin ◽  
Ayrin Sultana

This paper aims to empirically investigate the impact of capital structure choice on the firm performance of the firms listed under the Dhaka Stock Exchange of Bangladesh. Multiple regression has been employed in this research to determine the relationship between the capital structure and the firm’s financial performance. Three ratios of financial performance, i.e., return on assets, return on equity, and gross margin, have been used as a sample of non-financial Bangladeshi companies, selected from 2010 to 2015. The study records numerous findings. First, the result shows a significant negative influence of long-term debt (LTD) and total debt (TTD) on firm financial performance measured by return on assets (ROA), but no significant relationship is found between short-term debt (STD) and this measure of firm’s financial performance. Moreover, the research found that there is no significant effect of short-term debt, long-term debt and total debt on the firm financial performance measured by return on equity (ROE). Finally, the result shows that a significant negative influence of short-term debt and total debt on firm performance measured by GM, but no significant relationship was found between long-term debt and financial performance. In general terms, the results of this study may suggest that capital structure has a negative influence on firms’ financial performance in Bangladesh.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Tapi Omas Annisa ◽  
Jeffits Khusnu Alif

This study aims to examine the differences in state-owned companies before privatization and after privatization is conducted in terms of the company’s financial perfomance. The company’s financial performance uses 10 financial of Gross Profit Margin, Operating Profit Margin, Net Profit Margin, Return On Assets, Return on Investment, Current Ratio, Total Debt to Total Asset Ratio, Total Debt to Equity Ratio, Fix Asset Turnover Ratio, Net Asset Turnover Ratio. This study method uses quantitative research. Data analysis uses mann-whitney different test. The sample of  state-owned companies with a period consisting of 4 years before privatization and 4 years after privatization. Hypothesis test results show that the financial performance of state-owned companies after privatization is better than before privatization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elok Sri Utami

This study attempts to examine empirical evidence of the firms’ financial performances conducting acquisition at the Indonesian Stock Exchange. A sample of 22 firms undertaking acquisition during 2007-20010 is examined. The t-test for mean difference is employed to examine the performance for the period prior to and after the acquisition. The results show that the firms’ liquidity ratio is not significantly different for the periods before and after acquisition. Total debt to total assets ratio and total debt to equity ratio are significantly different. In particular, the average of these two ratios is higher in the period after the acquisition. This study also documents that the firm activity ratio, measured as total assets turnover, is indifferent between the periods. In addition, the firms’ return on investment and return on equity is lowering after acquisition and the difference is significant. Keywords: acquisition, financial performance,Indonesian Stock Exchange


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-149
Author(s):  
Asnahwati Asnahwati

Abstract: Financial condition will reflect how the performance of the company . Assess the financial performance of the company's goal is to evaluate and improve the state perusahaannya.Untuk measure the financial performance of the company can use financial ratios such as liquidity , solvency , activity and profitability .The purpose of this study is : 1 ) To determine the performance of PT . Adira Multi Finance Tbk terms of liquidity ratios , 2 ) To determine the performance of PT . Adira Multi Finance Tbk terms of solvency ratios , 3 ) To determine the  performance of PT . Adira Multi Finance Tbk in terms of the activity ratios and 4 ) To determine the performance of  PT. Adira Multi Finance Tbk in terms of the profitability ratio.The analytical method used is the method of comparison is to compare the company's financial ratios with industry standard ratio norm. Based on the analysis of the data obtained it was concluded that : 1 ) The company's performance in terms of the last two year Quick Ratios,  has decreased but is generally still above standard industry norms. Means the company still Ilikuit. 2 ) corporate performance in terms of the solvency ratio Debt to Equity Ratio in a state insolvabel, and in terms of Debt to Total Assets Ratio also insolvabel. 3 ) company performance in terms of the ratio of the activity under standard industry norm, so it is said company 's effective yet efficient in utilizing all its assets to finance consumer and 4 ) corporate performance in terms of profitability Economical ( ROA ) in the last two years decreased, although the first 2 years is still above the industry standard norm, while in terms of their own capital profitability ( ROE ) at 2 years terakir sharp decline and fall below the standard norm industi. Means the company has not been efficient and effective in generating income through all sources of funding available. Keywords: performance , liquidity , solvency , activity and profitability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document