scholarly journals Surface Air Temperature Evaluation from GPS Radio Occultation in Turbulent Heat Flux Estimation: Case Study in Tropical Oceans

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-309
Author(s):  
Liang Chang ◽  
Guoping Gao ◽  
Lixin Guo ◽  
Guiping Feng ◽  
Yang Zhang
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Yul Kim ◽  
Benjamin D. Hamlington ◽  
Hanna Na ◽  
Jinju Kim

Abstract. Sea ice melting is proposed as a primary reason for the Artic amplification, although physical mechanism of the Arctic amplification and its connection with sea ice melting is still in debate. In the present study, monthly ERA-interim reanalysis data are analyzed via cyclostationary empirical orthogonal function analysis to understand the seasonal mechanism of sea ice melting in the Arctic Ocean and the Arctic amplification. While sea ice melting is widespread over much of the perimeter of the Arctic Ocean in summer, sea ice remains to be thin in winter only in the Barents-Kara Seas. Excessive turbulent heat flux through the sea surface exposed to air due to sea ice melting warms the atmospheric column. Warmer air increases the downward longwave radiation and subsequently surface air temperature, which facilitates sea surface remains to be ice free. A 1 % reduction in sea ice concentration in winter leads to ~ 0.76 W m−2 increase in upward heat flux, ~ 0.07 K increase in 850 hPa air temperature, ~ 0.97 W m−2 increase in downward longwave radiation, and ~ 0.26 K increase in surface air temperature. This positive feedback mechanism is not clearly observed in the Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas, since sea ice refreezes in late fall (November) before excessive turbulent heat flux is available for warming the atmospheric column in winter. A detailed seasonal heat budget is presented in order to understand specific differences between the Barents-Kara Seas and Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqiu Zheng ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Ming Cai

Abstract. In the present work, we simulate the Pliocene climate with the EC-Earth climate model as an equilibrium state for the current warming climate induced by rising CO2 in the atmosphere. The simulated Pliocene climate shows a strong Arctic amplification featuring pronounced warming sea surface temperature (SST) over the North Atlantic, in particular over the Greenland Sea and Baffin Bay, which is comparable to geological SST reconstructions from the Pliocene Research, Interpretation and Synoptic Mapping group (PRISM; Dowsett et al., 2016). To understand the underlying physical processes, the air–sea heat flux variation in response to Arctic sea ice change is quantitatively assessed by a climate feedback and response analysis method (CFRAM) and an approach similar to equilibrium feedback assessment. Given the fact that the maximum SST warming occurs in summer while the maximum surface air temperature warming happens during winter, our analyses show that a dominant ice-albedo effect is the main reason for summer SST warming, and a 1 % loss in sea ice concentration could lead to an approximate 1.8 W m−2 increase in shortwave solar radiation into open sea surface. During the winter months, the insulation effect induces enhanced turbulent heat flux out of the sea surface due to sea ice melting in previous summer months. This leads to more heat released from the ocean to the atmosphere, thus explaining why surface air temperature warming amplification is stronger in winter than in summer.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqiu Zheng ◽  
Qiong Zhang ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Ming Cai

Abstract. In the present work, we simulate the Pliocene climate with EC-Earth climate model as an analogue for current warming climate induced by massive CO2 in the atmosphere. The simulated Pliocene climate shows a strong Arctic amplification featured by pronounced warming sea surface temperature (SST) over North Atlantic in particular over Greenland Sea and Baffin Bays, which is comparable with geological SST reconstructions from PRISM. To understand the underlying physical processes, the air-sea heat flux variation in response to Arctic sea-ice change is quantitatively assessed by a climate feedback and response analysis method (CFRAM) and an equilibrium feedback assessment (EFA)-like approach. Giving the facts that the maximum warming in SST occurs in summer while the maximum warming in surface air temperature happens during winter, our analyses show that dominant ice-albedo effect is the main reason for summer SST warming, a 1 % loss in sea-ice concentration could lead to an approximate 2 W m-2 increase in shortwave solar radiation into open sea surface. During winter month, the insulation effect induces enhanced turbulent heat flux out of sea surface due to sea-ice melting in previous summer months. This leads to more heat release from the ocean to atmosphere, thus explaining the stronger surface air temperature warming amplification in winter than in summer.


2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 3217-3228 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Shin ◽  
S. Cocke ◽  
T. E. LaRow ◽  
James J. O’Brien

Abstract The current Florida State University (FSU) climate model is upgraded by coupling the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Land Model Version 2 (CLM2) as its land component in order to make a better simulation of surface air temperature and precipitation on the seasonal time scale, which is important for crop model application. Climatological and seasonal simulations with the FSU climate model coupled to the CLM2 (hereafter FSUCLM) are compared to those of the control (the FSU model with the original simple land surface treatment). The current version of the FSU model is known to have a cold bias in the temperature field and a wet bias in precipitation. The implementation of FSUCLM has reduced or eliminated this bias due to reduced latent heat flux and increased sensible heat flux. The role of the land model in seasonal simulations is shown to be more important during summertime than wintertime. An additional experiment that assimilates atmospheric forcings produces improved land-model initial conditions, which in turn reduces the biases further. The impact of various deep convective parameterizations is examined as well to further assess model performance. The land scheme plays a more important role than the convective scheme in simulations of surface air temperature. However, each convective scheme shows its own advantage over different geophysical locations in precipitation simulations.


1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kim ◽  
T. W. Simon ◽  
M. Kestoras

An experimental investigation of transition on a flat-plate boundary layer was performed. Mean and turbulence quantities, including turbulent heat flux, were sampled according to the intermittency function. Such sampling allows segregation of the signal into two types of behavior—laminarlike and turbulentlike. Results show that during transition these two types of behavior cannot be thought of as separate Blasius and fully turbulent profiles, respectively. Thus, simple transition models in which the desired quantity is assumed to be an average, weighted on intermittency, of the laminar and fully turbulent values may not be entirely successful. Deviation of the flow identified as laminarlike from theoretical laminar behavior is due to a slow recovery after the passage of a turbulent spot, while deviation of the flow identified as turbulentlike from fully turbulent characteristics is possibly due to an incomplete establishment of the fully turbulent power spectral distribution. Measurements were taken for two levels of free-stream disturbance—0.32 and 1.79 percent. Turbulent Prandtl numbers for the transitional flow, computed from measured shear stress, turbulent heat flux, and mean velocity and temperature profiles, were less than unity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document