scholarly journals 12-Month Single-Procedure Outcomes after Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation in Phramongkutklao Hospital: A Single Center 10-Year Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-120
Author(s):  
Sarawuth Limprasert

Objective: This study aimed to report the efficacy and safety of 1-year outcome for single-procedure radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) at Phramongkutklao Hospital. Methods: Review of medical records was carried out on consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) who had undergone first-time RFCA in Phramongkutklao Hospital between January 2009 and December 2018. The efficacy and safety of outcomes after 1 year of RFCA were collected, analyzed, and validated using descriptive data. Results: 61 patients underwent RFCA for the first time. 77.05% were male, with a mean age of 58.31 ± 10.83 years. Paroxysmal AF presented in 65.57%. 49.18% had hypertension, 9.84% had a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, 6.56% had diabetes, 6.56% had coronary artery disease, and 4.92% had heart failure. 96.72% of RFCA procedures were performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients. Roofline, mitral isthmus line, and posterior wall isolation were created in 27.87%, 13.11%, and 3.28%, respectively. Additional complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) were targeted in 19.67%. After 12 months, 45.45% remained in sinus rhythm, with only one patient experiencing a procedure-related complication with cardiac tamponade. Conclusion: The 1-year results of single-procedure RFCA for treating AF at our center, while not highly successful in our first decade, were comparable to other series. Notably, there was a relatively low rate of complications.

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitanya L Malladi ◽  
Michael Eskander ◽  
Florentino Lupercio ◽  
Frederick Han ◽  
Kurt S Hoffmayer ◽  
...  

Introduction: Antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) are often prescribed in the blanking period (BP) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to reduce risk of early recurrence (ER) and late recurrence (LR). There are limited data on which AAD to use during the BP. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that specific AADs may be associated with reduced risk of ER and/or LR after ablation. Methods: A total of 478 consecutive patients (mean age 64.2 years, 67.2% male) undergoing first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation at a single institution were included. Outcomes of interest were: freedom from ER, freedom from LR, initial discontinuation of AAD less than 90 days after ablation, and freedom from second ablation. ER was defined as AF, atrial flutter (AFL), or atrial tachycardia (AT) > 30 seconds within the BP. LR was defined as AF/AFL/AT > 30 seconds occurring after the BP. Results: Of 478 patients, 14.9% (n = 71) were on no AAD, 26.4% (n = 126) were on propafenone/flecainide, 34.5% (n = 165) were on sotalol/dofetilide, 10.7% (n = 51) were on dronedarone, and 13.6% (n = 65) were on amiodarone. Patients on amiodarone were older, had higher BMI, and were more likely to have persistent AF, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. In unadjusted analyses, there were no differences between groups with regards to the risk of ER (log rank P = 0.171), discontinuation of AAD before ninety days post-ablation (log rank P = 0.235), or freedom from second ablation (log rank P = 0.147). After multivariable adjustment, patients on amiodarone or dronedarone were more likely to experience LR than those on no AAD [Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.10-3.04, p=0.02 for amiodarone; AHR 1.79, 95% CI 1.05-3.05, p=0.03 for dronedarone]. Conclusions: Following first-time AF catheter ablation, there were no differences between the presence or absence of AAD and risk of ER, while those prescribed amiodarone or dronedarone in the BP were more likely to experience LR than those on no AAD.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1337-1344
Author(s):  
Matthias Daniel Zink ◽  
Winnie Chua ◽  
Stef Zeemering ◽  
Luigi di Biase ◽  
Bayes de Luna Antoni ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) at 1 year can be achieved in 50–70% of patients undergoing catheter ablation. Recurrent AF early after ablation most commonly terminates spontaneously without further interventional treatment but is associated with later recurrent AF. The aim of this investigation is to identify clinical and procedural factors associated with recurrence of AF early after ablation. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed data for recurrence of AF within the first 3 months after catheter ablation from the randomized controlled AXAFA–AFNET 5 trial, which demonstrated that continuous anticoagulation with apixaban is as safe and as effective compared to vitamin K antagonists in 678 patients undergoing first AF ablation. The primary outcome of first recurrent AF within 90 days was observed in 163 (28%) patients, in which 78 (48%) patients experienced an event within the first 14 days post-ablation. After multivariable adjustment, a history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93–2.6; P = 0.11], coronary artery disease (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.20–2.86; P = 0.005), cardioversion during ablation (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.26–2.49; P = 0.001), and an age:sex interaction for older women (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.01; P = 0.04) were associated with recurrent AF. The P-wave duration at follow-up was significantly longer for patients with AF recurrence (129 ± 31 ms vs. 122 ± 22 ms in patients without AF, P = 0.03). Conclusion Half of all early AF recurrences within the first 3 months post-ablation occurred within the first 14 days post-ablation. Vascular disease and cardioversion during the procedure are strong predictors of recurrent AF. P-wave duration at follow-up was longer in patients with recurrent AF. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02227550


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Di Biase ◽  
Chintan Trivedi ◽  
Prasant Mohanty ◽  
Sanghamitra Mohanty ◽  
Rong Bai ◽  
...  

Introduction: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has a lower success rate when compared to paroxysmal AF patients. Whether in persistent AF patients ablation of the pulmonary vein antrum and posterior wall is sufficient to achieve long term freedom from AF is debated in the literature. We investigated if the ablation on non pv triggers from first procedure in addition to PV and posterior wall(PW) isolation could improve the procedural success rate. Methods: 622 consecutive pts with persistent AF undergoing the first AF ablation were analysed and divided into 2 groups according to their ablation strategy. In group 1, pulmonary vein plus posterior wall ablation was performed (n=203) while in group 2 pulmonary veins plus posterior wall plus sustained and non sustained non pv triggers as disclosed by isoproterenol challenge were ablated. (n=419). All patients were followed up with intensive holter and event monitoring. Results: Clinical baseline characteristics were not statistically different between groups. After 17.8 ± 8.8 months follow-up, 118(58.1%) Group I and 283 (67.5%) Group II patients were free from any atrial tachyarrhythmias (log-rank p= 0.027). After adjusting for age, gender and clinically relevant variables, PVI and PW ablation alone was associated with significantly high recurrence. (Hazard ratio: 1.4, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.1– 1.8, p=0.02). Further, Group I patients undergoing redo procedure after a failed ablation had more NPV trigger Group II (80% vs 60%, p = 0.002, respectively, figure), while the number of patients with PV reconnection were similar between groups (65% vs. 64%, p=1.0). Conclusions: The results of our study shows that after a single procedure the ablation of non PV triggers, improves the long-term success rate in patients with persistent AF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Fernandes ◽  
R Ladeiras-Lopes ◽  
R Faria ◽  
W Ferreira ◽  
M Carvalho ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction There is a well-established association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a helpful tool to refine cardiovascular risk stratification and guide strategies of cardiovascular (CV) primary prevention. Purpose To evaluate the prevalence and clinical implications of CACS in terms of CV and thromboembolic risk stratification and preventive therapies, in patients with AF and atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing catheter ablation. Methods Cross-sectional study including patients with AF/AFL undergoing multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for ablation procedure planning from 2017 to 2019. Baseline clinical and demographical data were collected. CV and thromboembolic risks were evaluated based on the SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) system and CHA2DS2-VASc score. CACS was assessed in patients without history of coronary artery disease using the Agatston method. Results A total of 474 patients were included (441 with AF and 33 with AFL, mean age of 58±10 years, 62% male). Excluding those over 70 years of age (n=50, 11%), most patients had low (n=69, 22%) or moderate (n=188, 60%) CV risk and 277 (64%) patients had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1 (male) or ≥2 (female). Overall, 265 patients (65%) were under chronic anticoagulation and 157 (39%) were under statin therapy. CAC was present in 254 (54%) patients and showed a multivessel distribution in 62% of the cases. The left main stem was affected in 81 (17%) patients and the left anterior descending artery in 211 (45%). Incorporating CACS>100 as a variable in CHA2DS2-VASc score (vascular disease parameter in patients without history of vascular disease) would have resulted in a significant score reclassification (n=87, 20%) and identification of new potential candidates for anticoagulation (n=12, 3%). Additional, anticoagulation would be indicated as a class IA recommendation in more 26 (6%) patients. Twenty three percent of patients with zero calcium were taking statins, and only 7% of patients with a CACS >300 were on high-intensity statin therapy. According to the recommendations and based on their CACS and current therapy, 103 (25%) patients would be candidates for statin therapy and 69 (17%) patients would be candidates for changes in the current statin therapy intensity (Table 1). Conclusion In our study, more than half of the patients undergoing MDCT before AF/AFL catheter ablation had coronary calcium above zero. Our findings suggest that an opportunistic evaluation of CACS can be clinically valuable in thromboembolic risk stratification and management of preventive pharmacological strategies such as anticoagulation and statins. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-95
Author(s):  
Carola Gianni ◽  
Andrea Natale ◽  
Amin Al-Ahmad

Longstanding-persistent atrial fibrillation is one of the most challenging arrhythmias to treat. While radiofrequency catheter ablation is highly effective in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein antral isolation (including posterior wall isolation) alone is not enough for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, other targets should be sought in this population. In this case report, we will describe our approach in a typical patient presenting for a first-time ablation procedure for longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 1329-1337
Author(s):  
Jure Mur ◽  
Daniel L. McCartney ◽  
Daniel I. Chasman ◽  
Peter M. Visscher ◽  
Graciela Muniz-Terrera ◽  
...  

Background: The genetic variant rs9923231 (VKORC1) is associated with differences in the coagulation of blood and consequentially with sensitivity to the drug warfarin. Variation in VKORC1 has been linked in a gene-based test to dementia/Alzheimer’s disease in the parents of participants, with suggestive evidence for an association for rs9923231 (p = 1.8×10–7), which was included in the genome-wide significant KAT8 locus. Objective: Our study aimed to investigate whether the relationship between rs9923231 and dementia persists only for certain dementia sub-types, and if those taking warfarin are at greater risk. Methods: We used logistic regression and data from 238,195 participants from UK Biobank to examine the relationship between VKORC1, risk of dementia, and the interplay with warfarin use. Results: Parental history of dementia, APOE variant, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia all had strong associations with vascular dementia (p < 4.6×10–6). The T-allele in rs9923231 was linked to a lower warfarin dose (βperT - allele = –0.29, p < 2×10–16) and risk of vascular dementia (OR = 1.17, p = 0.010), but not other dementia sub-types. However, the risk of vascular dementia was not affected by warfarin use in carriers of the T-allele. Conclusion: Our study reports for the first time an association between rs9923231 and vascular dementia, but further research is warranted to explore potential mechanisms and specify the relationship between rs9923231 and features of vascular dementia.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Nicola Tarantino ◽  
Domenico G. Della Rocca ◽  
Nicole S. De Leon De La Cruz ◽  
Eric D. Manheimer ◽  
Michele Magnocavallo ◽  
...  

A recent surveillance analysis indicates that cardiac arrest/death occurs in ≈1:50,000 professional or semi-professional athletes, and the most common cause is attributable to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). It is critically important to diagnose any inherited/acquired cardiac disease, including coronary artery disease, since it frequently represents the arrhythmogenic substrate in a substantial part of the athletes presenting with major VAs. New insights indicate that athletes develop a specific electro-anatomical remodeling, with peculiar anatomic distribution and VAs patterns. However, because of the scarcity of clinical data concerning the natural history of VAs in sports performers, there are no dedicated recommendations for VA ablation. The treatment remains at the mercy of several individual factors, including the type of VA, the athlete’s age, and the operator’s expertise. With the present review, we aimed to illustrate the prevalence, electrocardiographic (ECG) features, and imaging correlations of the most common VAs in athletes, focusing on etiology, outcomes, and sports eligibility after catheter ablation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kamil ◽  
T.S.G Sehested ◽  
K Houlind ◽  
J.F Lassen ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Aggressive management of risk factors and lifestyle modification may improve outcomes for patients with PAD. The present study aims to investigate changes in use of cardioprotective medication after the incident diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2016. Methods By using Danish national healthcare registries, we identified all patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2016. These patients were classified into 2 main groups: PAD-all (n=167,762) that includes all PAD patients with or without a history of CVD, including myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), and stroke (n=167,761) and PAD-only (n=87,935) that comprise patients with PAD without a history of AF, MI, and stroke. We calculated temporal trends and assessed comparative use of cardioprotective medication in the first 12 months after the incident diagnosis of PAD. Results Our results showed an improved use of cardioprotective medication temporally in both groups. However, PAD-all were marginally better treated (Aspirin, 3.5% - 48.4%; Clopidogrel, 0% - 17.6%; VKA 0.9% - 7.8%; NOACs 0.0% - 10.1%; Statins, 1.9%- 58.1%; ACE-inhibitors, 1.2% - 20.6%), compared to PAD-only (Aspirin, 2.9% - 54.4%; Clopidogrel, 0% - 11.9%; VKA 0.9% - 2.4%; NOACs 0.0% - 3.4%; Statins, 1.5%- 56.9%; ACE-inhibitors, 0.9% - 17.2%), respectively. Proportion of PAD patients treated with any cardioprotective medication was greater among those with a history of MI or stroke. Whereas, PAD patients with a history of AF were substantially better treated with VKA and NOACs. Conclusion In this nationwide study, use of cardioprotective medication increased considerably with time, but there remains an underuse of guideline-recommended therapy in patients with PAD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Author(s):  
Adil K. Baimbetov ◽  
Kuat B. Abzaliev ◽  
Aiman M. Jukenova ◽  
Kenzhebek A. Bizhanov ◽  
Binali A. Bairamov ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Choi ◽  
Sung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Ju Youn Kim ◽  
Youmi Hwang ◽  
Tae-Seok Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been well established. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sedation using dexmedetomidine with remifentanil compared to conventional sedative agents during RFCA for AF. Subjects and methods A total of 240 patients undergoing RFCA for AF were randomized to either the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group (continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil) or the midazolam (MID) group (intermittent injections of midazolam and fentanyl) according to sedative agents. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation was applied to all patients during the procedure. The primary outcome was patient movement during the procedure resulting in a 3D mapping system discordance, and the secondary outcome was adverse events including respiratory or hemodynamic compromise. Results During AF ablation, the incidence of the primary outcome was significantly reduced for the DEX group (18.2% vs. 39.5% in the DEX and the MID groups, respectively, p < 0.001). The frequency of a desaturation event (oxygen saturation < 90%) did not significantly differ between the two groups (6.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.056). However, the incidences of hypotension not owing to cardiac tamponade (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg, 19.8% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.011) and bradycardia (HR < 50 beats/min: 39.7% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.003) were higher in the DEX group. All efficacy and safety results were consistent within the predefined subgroups. Conclusion The combined use of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil provides higher stability sedation during AF ablation, but can lead to more frequent hemodynamic compromise compared to midazolam and fentanyl.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document