scholarly journals Elast PQ Ultrasound - a Noninvasive, Reproducible, Easily Performed Method and a New Era in Liver Fibrosis Assessment

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Hafizur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Liver Biopsy ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Ultrasound Imaging ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases

Liver fibrosis represents the repair mechanism in liver injury and is a feature of most chronic liver diseases. The degree of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis infection has major clinical implications and presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis determines prognosis. Treatment initiation for viral hepatitis is indicated in most cases of advanced liver fibrosis and diagnosis of cirrhosis entails hepatology evaluation for specialized clinical care. Liver biopsy is an invasive technique and has been the standard of care of fibrosis assessment for years; however, it has several limitations and procedure related complications. Recently, several methods of noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis have been developed which require either serologic testing or imaging of liver. Imaging based noninvasive techniques are reviewed here and their clinical use is described. Some of the imaging based tests are becoming widely available, and collectively they are shown to be superior to liver biopsy in important aspects. Clinical utilization of these methods requires understanding of performance and quality related parameters which can affect the results and provide wrong assessment of the extent of liver fibrosis. Familiarity with the strengths and weakness of each modality is needed to correctly interpret the results in appropriate clinical content. A new technique called Elast PQ uses ultrasound shear wave elastography to provide a noninvasive, reproducible, easily performed method of assessing liver fibrosis. It can easily combine a routine ultrasound imaging exam of the liver anatomy with targeted tissue stiffness values, assess liver fibrosis in patient with clinically suspected disease even before abnormalities are detected with ultrasound imaging, evaluate and obtain a baseline stiffness value in patients with chronic liver disease, follow up patients under treatment to monitor progression, stabilization or regression of liver disease and help avoid the need for liver biopsies when elastography results are consistent with other clinical findings. Both the prognosis and potential treatment of chronic liver diseases greatly depend on the progression of liver fibrosis, which is the ultimate outcome of chronic liver damage. Historically, liver biopsy has been instrumental in adequately assessing patients allows clinicians both to obtain diagnosis information and initiate adequate therapy. However, the technique is not exempt of deleterious effects. Multiple diagnostic tests have been developed for the staging of fibrosis using noninvasive methods, most of them in the setting of chronic hepatitis C. The goal of this paper is to review available data on the staging and assessment of liver fibrosis with two methods: serum markers & transient elastography (FibroScan).Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jan 2018;13(1): 44-46

scholarly journals The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Liver Cirrhosis Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Na Young Lee ◽  
Ki Tae Suk
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Gut Microbiome ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Sclerosing Cholangitis ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases

Liver cirrhosis is one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide. In addition to viral hepatitis, diseases such as steatohepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, sclerosing cholangitis and Wilson’s disease can also lead to cirrhosis. Moreover, alcohol can cause cirrhosis on its own and exacerbate chronic liver disease of other causes. The treatment of cirrhosis can be divided into addressing the cause of cirrhosis and reversing liver fibrosis. To this date, there is still no clear consensus on the treatment of cirrhosis. Recently, there has been a lot of interest in potential treatments that modulate the gut microbiota and gut-liver axis for the treatment of cirrhosis. According to recent studies, modulation of the gut microbiome by probiotics ameliorates the progression of liver disease. The precise mechanism for relieving cirrhosis via gut microbial modulation has not been identified. This paper summarizes the role and effects of the gut microbiome in cirrhosis based on experimental and clinical studies on absorbable antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Moreover, it provides evidence of a relationship between the gut microbiome and liver fibrosis.

scholarly journals Liquid Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Viral Hepatitis, Fatty Liver Steatosis, and Alcoholic Liver Diseases

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3732
Author(s):  
Ciniso Sylvester Shabangu ◽  
Jee-Fu Huang ◽  
Hui-Hua Hsiao ◽  
Ming-Lung Yu ◽  
Wan-Long Chuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Fatty Liver ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Liver Steatosis ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Alcoholic Liver Diseases

During the progression from hepatitis to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver failure, the accumulation of stressed/damaged hepatocyte elements associated with liver inflammation is critical. The causes of hepatocyte injuries include viral hepatitis infections, alcoholic hepatitis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatocyte-derived extracellular vesicles (Hep-EVs) released from stressed/damaged hepatocytes are partly responsible for liver disease progression and liver damage because they activate non-parenchymal cells and infiltrate inflammatory cells within the liver, which are in turn are an important source of EVs. This cell-to-cell signaling is prevalent during inflammation in many liver diseases. Accordingly, special emphasis should be placed on liquid biopsy methods for the long-term monitoring of chronic liver diseases. In the present review, we have highlighted various aspects of current liquid biopsy research into chronic liver diseases. We have also reviewed recent progress on liquid biopsies that focus on cell-free DNA (cfDNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), and the proteins in EVs as potential diagnostic tools and novel therapeutic targets in patients with viral hepatitis, fatty liver steatosis, and alcoholic liver diseases.

scholarly journals Oxidative Stress Management in Chronic Liver Diseases and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Uchida ◽  
Akinobu Takaki ◽  
Atsushi Oyama ◽  
Takuya Adachi ◽  
Nozomu Wada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
The Impact

Chronic viral hepatitis B and C and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been widely acknowledged to be the leading causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As anti-viral treatment progresses, the impact of NAFLD is increasing. NAFLD can coexist with chronic viral hepatitis and exacerbate its progression. Oxidative stress has been recognized as a chronic liver disease progression-related and cancer-initiating stress response. However, there are still many unresolved issues concerning oxidative stress, such as the correlation between the natural history of the disease and promising treatment protocols. Recent findings indicate that oxidative stress is also an anti-cancer response that is necessary to kill cancer cells. Oxidative stress might therefore be a cancer-initiating response that should be down regulated in the pre-cancerous stage in patients with risk factors for cancer, while it is an anti-cancer cell response that should not be down regulated in the post-cancerous stage, especially in patients using anti-cancer agents. Antioxidant nutrients should be administered carefully according to the patients’ disease status. In this review, we will highlight these paradoxical effects of oxidative stress in chronic liver diseases, pre- and post-carcinogenesis.

scholarly journals Serum Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis Staging in the Era of the Concept “Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease”

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3340
Author(s):  
Koji Fujita ◽  
Tsutomu Masaki
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Serum Biomarkers ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
World Health ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Fibrosis Staging ◽  
Severe Fibrosis

Non-invasive indexes of liver fibrosis based on blood examinations have been developed for decades, partially replacing liver biopsy examinations. Recently, the concept of liver cirrhosis was revised and converted to “compensated advanced chronic liver diseases” since the Baveno VI consensus statement in 2015. The term “compensated advanced chronic liver diseases” was established based on the premise that serum biomarkers were not able to differentiate cirrhosis from severe fibrosis. The difficulty to histologically distinguish cirrhosis from severe fibrosis had been pointed out in 1977, when the definition and nomenclatures of cirrhosis had been determined by the World Health Organization. That was decades before serum biomarkers available at present were investigated. Though we are accustomed to differentiating the fibrosis stage as stage 1, 2, 3 (severe fibrosis), and 4 (cirrhosis), differentiation of cirrhosis from severe fibrosis is difficult even by histopathological examination. The current review will provide readers a framework to revise how to apply serum biomarkers on liver fibrosis staging in an era of the concept of “compensated advanced chronic liver disease”.

scholarly journals The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Liver Fibrosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Young Lee ◽  
Ki Tae Suk
Keyword(s):  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Gut Microbiota ◽  
Gut Microbiome ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Sclerosing Cholangitis ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases

Liver cirrhosis is one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide. In addition to viral hepatitis, genetic conditions such as steatohepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, and Wilson’s disease can also lead to cirrhosis. Moreover, alcohol can cause cirrhosis on its own and exacerbate chronic liver disease from other causes. The treatment of cirrhosis can be divided into addressing the cause of cirrhosis and reversing liver fibrosis. To this date, there is still no clear consensus on the treatment of cirrhosis. Recently, there has been a lot of interest in potential treatments that modulate the gut microbiota and gut-liver axis for the treatment of cirrhosis. According to recent studies, modulation of the gut microbiome by probiotics ameliorates the progression of liver disease. The precise mechanism for relieving cirrhosis via gut microbial modulation has not been identified. This paper summarizes the role and effects of the gut microbiome in cirrhosis based on experimental and clinical studies on absorbable antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Moreover, it provides evidence of a relationship between the gut microbiome and liver cirrhosis.

scholarly journals Liver Fibrosis: Mechanistic Concepts and Therapeutic Perspectives

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natascha Roehlen ◽  
Emilie Crouchet ◽  
Thomas F. Baumert
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Fibrotic Liver ◽  
Liver Disease Progression ◽  
Fibrotic Liver Disease

Liver fibrosis due to viral or metabolic chronic liver diseases is a major challenge of global health. Correlating with liver disease progression, fibrosis is a key factor for liver disease outcome and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite different mechanism of primary liver injury and disease-specific cell responses, the progression of fibrotic liver disease follows shared patterns across the main liver disease etiologies. Scientific discoveries within the last decade have transformed the understanding of the mechanisms of liver fibrosis. Removal or elimination of the causative agent such as control or cure of viral infection has shown that liver fibrosis is reversible. However, reversal often occurs too slowly or too infrequent to avoid life-threatening complications particularly in advanced fibrosis. Thus, there is a huge unmet medical need for anti-fibrotic therapies to prevent liver disease progression and HCC development. However, while many anti-fibrotic candidate agents have shown robust effects in experimental animal models, their anti-fibrotic effects in clinical trials have been limited or absent. Thus, no approved therapy exists for liver fibrosis. In this review we summarize cellular drivers and molecular mechanisms of fibrogenesis in chronic liver diseases and discuss their impact for the development of urgently needed anti-fibrotic therapies.

scholarly journals Imaging Based Methods of Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Viral Hepatitis: A Practical Approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hicham Khallafi ◽  
Kamran Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Liver Biopsy ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Chronic Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Clinical Utilization ◽  
Viral Hepatitis A

Liver fibrosis represents the repair mechanism in liver injury and is a feature of most chronic liver diseases. The degree of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis infections has major clinical implications and presence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis determines prognosis. Treatment initiation for viral hepatitis is indicated in most cases of advanced liver fibrosis and diagnosis of cirrhosis entails hepatology evaluation for specialized clinical care. Liver biopsy is an invasive technique and has been the standard of care of fibrosis assessment for years; however, it has several limitations and procedure related complications. Recently, several methods of noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis have been developed which require either serologic testing or imaging of liver. Imaging based noninvasive techniques are reviewed here and their clinical use is described. Some of the imaging based tests are becoming widely available, and collectively they are shown to be superior to liver biopsy in important aspects. Clinical utilization of these methods requires understanding of performance and quality related parameters which can affect the results and provide wrong assessment of the extent of liver fibrosis. Familiarity with the strengths and weaknesses of each modality is needed to correctly interpret the results in appropriate clinical context.

scholarly journals Comparative study between liver biopsy and non-invasive biomarkers in assessment of hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ola Galal Behairy ◽  
Ola Samir El-Shimi ◽  
Naglaa Hamed Shalan
Keyword(s):  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Liver Biopsy ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Fibrosis Score ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Advanced Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Early Fibrosis

Abstract Background Liver biopsy is the gold standard for detecting the degree of liver fibrosis; however, invasiveness constitutes its main limiting factor in clinical application, so we aimed to evaluate the non-invasive biomarker formulas (APRI and FIB-4) and their modified forms by BMI z-score (M-APRI, M-FIB-4, and B-AST) compared to liver biopsy in the assessment of liver fibrosis in children with chronic liver diseases. Two hundred children aged 6.3 ± 3.8 years (98 males, 102 females) with chronic liver diseases underwent liver biopsy. The stage of fibrosis was assessed according to the METAVIR system for all children, and the following non-invasive biomarker formulas were calculated: APRI, modified APRI (M-APRI: BMI z-score × APRI), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), modified FIB-4 (M-FIB-4: BMI z-score × FIB-4), and B-AST (BMI z-score × AST). The best cutoff value was calculated to detect early fibrosis (F1–F2) from advanced liver fibrosis (F3–F4). Results There were positive correlations between all studied non-invasive biomarker models (APRI, FIB-4, M-APRI, M-FIB-4, B-AST) and fibrosis score as an increase in fibrosis score was associated with an increase in mean ± SD of all studied biomarker formulas. The best cutoff values of non-invasive biomarker models in the diagnosis of early fibrosis (F1–F2) were APRI > 0.96, M-APRI > 0.16, FIB-4 > 0.019, M-FIB-4 > 0.005, and B-AST > −8 with an area under the curve above 0.7 each, while the best cutoff values of non-invasive biomarker models (APRI, M-APRI, FIB-4, M-FIB-4, and B-AST) in the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis (F3–F4) were >1.96, >2.2, >0.045, and >0.015, >92.1, respectively, with an area under the curve above 0.8 each. Conclusion APRI, M-APRI, FIB-4, M-FIB-4, and B-AST are good non-invasive alternatives to liver biopsy in the detection of liver fibrosis in children with chronic liver diseases of different etiologies especially those that include BMI z-scores in their formulas.

scholarly journals Physicians’ Practices for Diagnosing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Liver Diseases: A Nationwide, Canadian Survey

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giada Sebastiani ◽  
Peter Ghali ◽  
Philip Wong ◽  
Marina B Klein ◽  
Marc Deschenes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Liver Biopsy ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Chronic Liver Diseases ◽  
Noninvasive Methods ◽  
Routine Assessment

OBJECTIVE: To determine practices among physicians in Canada for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases.METHODS: Hepatologists, gastroenterologists, infectious diseases specialists, members of the Canadian Gastroenterology Association and/or the Canadian HIV Trials Network who manage patients with liver diseases were invited to participate in a web-based, national survey.RESULTS: Of the 237 physicians invited, 104 (43.9%) completed the survey. Routine assessment of liver fibrosis was requested by the surveyed physicians mostly for chronic hepatitis C (76.5%), followed by autoimmune/cholestatic liver disease (59.6%) and chronic hepatitis B (52.9%). Liver biopsy was the main diagnostic tool for 46.2% of the respondents, Fibroscan (Echosens, France) for 39.4% and Fibrotest (LabCorp, USA) for 7.7%. Etiology-specific differences were observed: noninvasive methods were mostly used for hepatitis C (63% versus 37% liver biopsy) and hepatitis B (62.9% versus 37.1% liver biopsy). For 42.7% of respondents, the use of noninvasive methods reduced the need for liver biopsy by >50%. Physicians’ characteristics associated with higher use of noninvasive methods were older age and being based at a university hospital or in private practice versus community hospital. Physicians’ main concerns regarding noninvasive fibrosis assessment methods were access/availability (42.3%), lack of guidelines for clinical use (26.9%) and cost/lack of reimbursement (14.4%).CONCLUSIONS: Physicians who manage patients with chronic liver diseases in Canada require routine assessment of liver fibrosis stage. Although biopsy remains the primary diagnostic tool for almost one-half of respondents, noninvasive methods, particularly Fibroscan, have significantly reduced the need for liver biopsy in Canada. Limitations in access to and availability of the noninvasive methods represent a significant barrier. Finally, there is a need for clinical guidelines and a better reimbursement policy to implement noninvasive tools to assess liver fibrosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document