scholarly journals Role of VAD Regimen as the First-Line Treatment in Multiple Myeloma

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
SS Mahmood ◽  
AKM Abedin ◽  
H Islam ◽  
N Jubaida ◽  
NM Kawsar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jafmc.v8i2.16357 JAFMC Vol.8(2) 2012 pp.64-69

A REVIEW ON THE ROLE OF TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS AVAILABLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211
Author(s):  
Kaynat Fatima ◽  
Syed Tasleem Raza ◽  
Ale Eba ◽  
Sanchita Srivastava ◽  
Farzana Mahdi
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

The function of protein kinases is to transfer a γ-phosphate group from ATP to serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues. Many of these kinases are linked to the initiation and development of human cancer. The recent development of small molecule kinase inhibitors for the treatment of different types of cancer in clinical therapy has proven successful. Significantly, after the G-protein-coupled receptors, protein kinases are the second most active category of drug targets. Imatinib mesylate was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. Imatinib induces appropriate responses in ~60% of patients; with ~20% discontinuing therapy due to sensitivity, and ~20% developing drug resistance. The introduction of newer TKIs such as, nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib has provided patients with multiple options. Such agents are more active, have specific profiles of side effects and are more likely to reach the necessary milestones. First-line treatment decisions must be focused on CML risk, patient preferences and comorbidities. Given the excellent result, half of the patients eventually fail to seek first-line treatment (due to discomfort or resistance), with many of them needing a third or even further therapy lines. In the present review, we will address the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.

scholarly journals Bortezomib-based therapy in non-transplant multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective cohort study from the FABIO project

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062072199648
Author(s):  
Matteo Franchi ◽  
Claudia Vener ◽  
Donatella Garau ◽  
Ursula Kirchmayer ◽  
Mirko Di Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Model Average ◽  
Italian Regions ◽  
First Line Treatment

Introduction: Randomized clinical trials showed that bortezomib, in addition to conventional chemotherapy, improves survival and disease progression in multiple myeloma (MM) patients not eligible for stem cell transplantation. The aim of this retrospective population-based cohort study is the evaluation of both clinical and economic profile of bortezomib-based versus conventional chemotherapy in daily clinical practice. Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of six Italian regions were used to identify adult patients with non-transplant MM, who started a first-line therapy with bortezomib-based or conventional chemotherapy. Patients were matched by propensity score and were followed from treatment start until death, lost to follow-up or study end-point. Overall survival (OS) and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Association between first-line treatment and risk of death was estimated by a conditional Cox proportional regression model. Average mean cumulative costs were estimated and compared between groups. Results: In the period 2010–2016, 3509 non-transplant MM patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 1157 treated with bortezomib-based therapy were matched to 1826 treated with conventional chemotherapy. Median OS and RMST were 33.9 and 27.9 months, and 42.9 and 38.4 months, respectively, in the two treatment arms. Overall, these values corresponded to a HR of death of 0.79 (95% CI 0.71–0.89) over a time horizon of 84 months. Average cumulative cost were 83,839 € and 54,499 €, respectively, corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,333 € per year of life gained, a cost coherent with the willingness-to-pay thresholds frequently adopted from Western countries. Conclusions: These data suggested that, in a large cohort of non-transplant MM patients treated outside the experimental setting, first-line treatment with bortezomib-based therapy was associated with a favourable effectiveness and cost-effectiveness profile.

First-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the emerging role of the histologic subtype

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Tiseo ◽  
Marco Bartolotti ◽  
Francesco Gelsomino ◽  
Andrea Ardizzoni
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
First Line Treatment

Lipid and lipoprotein profile of patients with multiple myeloma before and after first-line treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. e125
Author(s):  
A. Hatziri ◽  
V. Lazaris ◽  
A. Symeonidis ◽  
K.E. Kypreos
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Lipoprotein Profile ◽  
First Line ◽  
Before And After ◽  
First Line Treatment

Current Treatment Approaches to Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 690-699
Author(s):  
Susanne Ghandili ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Carsten Bokemeyer ◽  
Lisa Beatrice Leypoldt
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Cell Clone ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Multiple myeloma is a so far incurable malignant plasma cell disorder. During the past 2 decades, treatment paradigms substantially changed when novel drugs were introduced initially in treatment of relapsed disease and subsequently also in first-line treatment. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> Up to now, first-line treatment differs between patients initially classified as transplant eligible and those who are considered as nontransplant eligible. Transplant-eligible patients receive a primary proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based induction which is being combined with an immunomodulating agent and a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody followed by high-dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation with subsequent maintenance treatment with lenalidomide. Patients who are considered as nontransplant eligible receive upfront treatment preferentially with a continuous combination treatment either with a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody in combination with the immunomodulating agent lenalidomide or a lenalidomide-PI combination followed by lenalidomide maintenance. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Primary goal of the initiated treatment is to induce a rapid and deep remission which ideally leads to an eradication of the residual plasma cell clone in sense of a minimal residual disease negativity. Achievement of long-term remission with limited toxicity despite continuous treatment strategies and maintenance or improvement of life-quality is key. Despite successful treatment options, specific difficult-to-treat subgroups, especially patients with high-risk myeloma remain with inferior prognosis and a clear unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies. Future concepts will evaluate cellular treatments and other innovative immunotherapies in first-line treatment in curative intention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document