Goal-Setting Model in Multilevel State Strategic Management of Socio-Economic Development

Author(s):  
Olga M. Pisareva

In the context of the deployment of transient processes and the exacerbation of crisis phenomena in socio-economic systems of various types, the importance of a reasonable setting and correction of development goals increases. For the current situation in the Russian Federation, when the implemented program of constitutional amendments creates the preconditions for the subsequent reform of public authorities and the mechanism of multi-level strategic planning, it is especially important to conduct research in the field of substantiating scientific approaches to the development of mathematical methods for solving the problem of strategic goal-setting. One of the key points in the modernization of the methodological support of strategic planning in the context of the constitutional transformation of the system of public authorities is consideration of the value foundations of activities in the systems of distributed management of socio-economic development, analysis of the problems of formalizing the setting of goals by the participants in the multi-level strategic planning process and substantiation of the structure of the theoretical model of goal-setting. The article considers the general characteristics of the functioning of the system of state strategic planning in the Russian Federation from the point of view of goal achievement. The institutional and conceptual foundations of goal setting are presented. The relationship between the concepts of “goal”, “target indicator” and “target function” are shown. The interrelation of the tasks of goal-setting and programming of the activity of an economic agent is characterized. An approach to formalizing goal-setting based on a theoretical scheme of mutual development planning tasks is proposed. The general structure of the strategic goal-setting model in the organizational mechanism of multi-level long-term planning determined. A possible approach to the algorithmization of the solution of the linear formulation of the goal-setting problem in the multisubject development control space based on the methods of target programming and multicriteria optimization was proposed. The formation of an operator of iterative management of the potentials and development priorities of interacting economic and social agents on the horizon of strategizing substantiated. To introduce a theoretical model of goal-setting into the practice of strategizing in the context of the formation of a digital platform of public administration, it is necessary to develop appropriate algorithmic support, as well as the formation of a regulatory and information base and the definition of an organizational and technological basis. Further improvement of the analytical and methodological tools for supporting the activities of strategic planning participants at the goal-setting stage is associated with the description and analysis of the corresponding applied tasks of goal setting at various levels and areas of socio-economic development planning.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Tatiana Frolova

The subject. The article shows the approaches to the process of creating and realizing strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities in the Russian Federation. Thestrategies of socio-economic development of the largest cities have been fundamental inthe formation of such city agglomerations as “Big Volgograd” (Volgograd), “Big Rostov”(Rostov), Zhigulevskaya agglomeration (Samara), Nizhegorodskaya agglomeration (NizhnyNovgorod), Chelyabinsk city agglomeration (Chelyabinsk) and these strategies contain themain ways of development which go far beyond the competence of local importance.The purpose. The article addresses the problems that arise in the process of creating strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities including the extent of powerbetween public authorities of different levels.The methodology. The systematic approach, methods of formal and comparative analysisof law as well as synthesis are used in the article.Results. Before the adoption of Federal Law “On the Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”(further down the article 172-FZ) strategic planning was unsystematic and therewere no unitary law-based approaches towards the drafting process of strategic planningdocuments. After the adoption of 172-FZ the situation has not dramatically changed.The analysis of strategic planning in the largest cities shows the lack of unitary approachestowards the drafting process of strategic planning documents, the definitions of missionand strategic goals of development, the assessment of largest cities importance in the contextof over-regional, regional and internal city area development. Also, the peculiarities ofterritorial planning and budgetary process in municipal establishments are not taken intoconsideration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-28
Author(s):  
V Domakov ◽  
Vladimir Matveev

State of matter: The vital activity of society through the enrichment of its en-trepreneurial part, with the a priori assumption is as soon as it is enriched, universal prosperity will immediately come at all times served by a legalized open (pro-grammed) “direction” with a personification and violent character. When conducting business activities - open (program) management, which was called "management". The concern of managers about the imperfection of the “rule” method and the power, which is a form of its expression, has led to the emergence of unique ideas about “strategic planning”. This concept was introduced in the Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated June 28, 2014 N 172 “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”. However, in the adopted law the proposals by unknown authors about “strategic planning” turned out to be connected with serious semantic conflicts regarding its essence, content and form. Results: As a result of the analysis of the essence, content and form of the cate-gory “planning” and the category «strategic», it was found that the phrase «strategic planning» cannot include «goal-setting, forecasting, planning and programming of socio-economic development», since «planning» is an integral part of «board» and «management (board)», and the combination of «goal-setting, forecasting and pro-gramming of socio-economic development» has nothing to do with the content of the concept of «strategic». In this regard, «strategic planning» can only be considered as a «doctrine of the preliminary distribution of all available forces and means for their best location and use, ensuring the realization of the formulated goal at a given time interval and the solution at this interval, taking into account the real conditions set for its achievement tasks», which is fully consistent with the essence, content and form of the category «plan». The scope of the results: The results can be widely used in practice in a con-stantly changing objective reality. Conclusions: In the real constantly changing environment of being, only the legalized method of “managing” with its characteristic closed functional and organizational structures can ensure the creation of conditions for extracting the most useful properties from any property.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. M. Pisareva

Purpose:the purpose of the study is to determine the main directions and conceptual approaches to modernizing analytical and computer support for the planning of strategic development of socio-economic systems on a national scale in the framework of improving the methodology of strategic planning in a digital transformation of the economy and management.Methods:the issues of improving the tools of strategic planning of socio-economic development are studied in the framework of a system approach to analyzing the construction and functioning of the state management mechanism in the context of active formation of the information society infrastructure and to evaluating of the impact of digital technologies on the content of management tasks in the process of co-evolution of objects and subjects of management in large-scale organizational systems.Results:the article deals with current problems and key tasks of modernization of scientific and methodological, informational and analytical support of state strategic management of socio-economic development. The trends of the evolution of objects and subjects of management in the conditions of the digital transformation of the information society are investigated. The institutional bases for the construction and operation of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation are characterized. A block diagram of a complex of heterogeneous models of strategic planning of socio-economic development is given. Design solutions are proposed for building the architecture and developing a prototype of the computer support system for the scenario modeling technology when developing multi-level strategic decisions for planning socio-economic development in the emerging infrastructure of the digital economy is presented.Conclusions and Relevance:the study showed the importance and relevance of modernization of the methodological and analytical support of the strategic planning system of the Russian Federation, which takes into account the main consequences and requirements of the creation and distribution of digital technologies in various areas of society. The most important characteristics of innovative changes in the structure and content of strategic planning tasks, the solution of which is associated with the unification of the format of quantitative and qualitative assessments in the digital development management environment, are identified. Standardization of technologies for collecting, transmitting, storing and processing large amounts of data allows you to build computer software for the multi-level system of state strategic planning based on an open service-oriented architecture. The main direction of further research and development in the creation of an analytical platform to support strategic planning of socio-economic development can be the creation of a mathematical apparatus and software products for processing and analyzing large amounts of personalized information about the functioning of economic and social agents to identify and assess their potentials and priorities. This will allow to increase the degree of justification and consistency of planned decisions and regulatory measures developed by the state in the field of planning socio-economic development and ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
O.P. Lichichan ◽  
◽  
I.A. Arzumanov ◽  
S.I. Shishkin ◽  
◽  
...  

The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population. The analysis of methodological problems of interrelation of the documents of strategic planning of the federal level, developed within the framework of goal-setting according to the sectoral and territorial principles, is directly linked to the issues of settlement. The article considers the norms of the corpus of federal regulatory legal acts adopted within the framework of goal-setting in the process of strategic planning of socio-economic development of territories, which includes the provisions of the norms of the Strategy of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation, Federal Law No. 172 “On Strategic Planning”, the Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation, the Resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation related to the role of local self-government bodies in the implementation of the settlement policy as a factor of socio-economic development of territories. The specifics of the federal policy of territorial development of the regions, which is based on the participation of not only the federal center, but also the state bodies of the regional level of the vertical of power, are revealed. It is argued that the existing “vertical” of public administration does not include an imperative function in relation to the local authorities, which are not assigned the responsibility of developing strategies for the socio-economic development of the municipality. It is determined that, in methodological terms, such consequences should include the need to differentiate measures of state support for municipal territorial entities, regional typologization of settlements when considering budget and urban development policies. The problems related to the legal nature of the federal district in relation to the nature and powers in the field of strategic planning of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified. It is argued that the factors influencing the processes of formation and implementation of the state policy of regional development and directly related to the issues of strategic planning include not only the features of the federal structure, geo-political, geo-deterministic, socio-cultural factors, but also a significant difference in the levels of regional socio-economic development and territorial population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (518) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
N. І. Isaieva ◽  

The present day strategizing is a single technological complex and a continuous process of creating a National strategy for socio-economic development. The National strategy is a comprehensive document containing the most important directions, mechanisms, methods of public administration, which are based on long-term priorities, goals and objectives of the policy of public authorities. In order to implement the National strategy, documents of the State strategic management system are developed, agreed on long-term socio-economic goals and priorities. Therefore, the creation of a mechanism of goal-setting at the present stage of Ukraine’s development is a key direction in the formation of a strategizing system. The article is concerned with examining the theoretical principles of goal-setting, determining the place and role of strategic goal-setting in the process of strategizing the socio-economic development at the national level. It is substantiated that strategic goal-setting is a system-creating factor of strategizing and a fundamental process of development or actualization of the National strategy and forms a tree of goals consisting of the following mandatory elements: strategic vision, mission, priorities, value, general goal, strategic goals, operational goals. The analysis of problems of goal-setting in the strategies of socio-economic development of Ukraine, including in the regions, is carried out and recommendations for improving the system of strategic goal-setting are proposed. On this basis, the author has developed a comprehensive mechanism of strategic goal-setting for practical use in the process of creating or actualizing the strategies of different levels. The proposed strategic goal-setting mechanism is directed towards taking into account the specifics of an actor of strategizing, defining the conceptual bases for strategizing, formulation and approval of the goal tree in the construction of the National strategy for socio-economic development, and also includes standards for public participation in the process of strategic goal-setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-100
Author(s):  
I. S. Bobryshev ◽  
A. V. Vedernikova ◽  
V. V. Voronin ◽  
N. V. Erina ◽  
D. A. Tyupyshev

In this article, the authors carried out the analysis of principle implementation and application efficiency of strategic forecasting and strategic goal-setting mechanisms in the field of social-economic development. According to the authority distribution in the state management system, we propose to optimize the set of basic documents of strategic planning. Taking into account the criteria of necessity and sufficiency, as well as the existing mechanisms of state management, the scope of regulation, purpose and functional tasks of strategic planning documents at the federal and sectoral levels are specified.


Author(s):  
Vasyl Papp ◽  
Nelya Boshota

The main task that determines the effective functioning of the country is the formation of a strategy for its socio-economic development based on a long-term innovation strategy. An innovative development strategy of the country is defined as a fundamental, basic element of the overall strategy of socio-economic development. The purpose of the article is to develop the conceptual foundations for shaping the country's socio-economic development strategy in modern conditions, adjusting the priority directions of the strategy and the peculiarities in using the means of achieving the goals, taking into account European experience. The article examines the European practice of developing and implementing the strategy of socio-economic development of the country as the most important instrument of the state's influence on social and economic development. Recommendations on the use of advanced strategic planning tools are developed. It is proved that without the scientific and methodological support of the plan of socio-economic development of the country it is impossible to count on the successful solution of important tasks and the democratization of public relations. The concept of strategy formation is designed to take into account the interests of economic entities and territory and to cover not only the traditionally used sectoral aspect of development, but also the territorial, which includes the creation and development of clusters and special economic zones. European experience shows that transition of a country to an innovative socially oriented type of development requires an increase in the efficiency of the state strategic planning process, the achievement of which is possible only with the co-ordinated activity of state authorities, business structures, science and society. It should be emphasized that in the prevailing conditions there is a need to form a single integrated system of social and economic development planning that optimally combines both the use of strategic planning and the program-target method for solving urgent problems.


Author(s):  
Alyona Lyubina ◽  

The article reviews the legal and regulatory framework for strategic planning at the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and identifies problems of the used vocabulary. There is no distinction between the concepts of “strategic priorities”, “priorities of social and economic development”, “priorities of social and economic policy”, “directions of development”. The paper analyzed the content of the strategies of social and economic development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation with a view to existence and sequence of basic concepts of the system of goal setting: “mission”, “strategic priorities”, “goal”, “tasks”, “directions of development” as well as approaches to their essence and content. The main approach to the concept “strategic priority of social and economic development” is to identify it with the goal of social and economic development of the constituent entity (60% of the regions use this concept in the strategy of social and economic development). In addition, most part of constituent entities of the Russian Federation determine the goal of social and economic development as the “main” one, the second most popular is the “strategic” goal. It should be noted that in 6 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, no characteristics are attributed to the goal, and in another 18 regions the overall common goal is not identified. Two basic models of goal setting according to the presence of the mission of constituent entities of the Russian Federation are identified: the inside one (the closed one includes 54 constituent entities of the Russian Federation) and the outside one (the open one includes 31 constituent entities of the Russian Federation). The study offers a detailed classification of the models of goal-setting on the basis of the categories of strategic planning used in the strategies of social and economic development of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The author suggests a logically consistent model of goal setting linked to other strategic planning documents, and the main tools for goal achievement. The practical use of study results is presented in the opportunity of their use by strategic planners of the region during the development of the strategy of its social and economic development.


Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. Zhavoronkova ◽  
V. B. Agafonov

The article is devoted to the examination of the problems of providing support for ecological safety of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation when genomic technologies are being implemented. Relying on the results of the analysis of core documents of the state strategic planning, normative legal acts, programs and plans defining strategic determinations of socio-economic development of the Arctic zone, as well as normative legal acts regulating genomic technologies, the authors determine the main threats (risks) to ensuring ecological safety of the region, analyze potential economic and environmental possibilities for the application of certain genomic technologies with due regard to the vulnerable ecosystem of the Arctic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document