scholarly journals PENERAPAN UU ITE DI INDONESIA SMA NEGERI 3 KISARAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Ari Dermawan ◽  
Sudarmin Sudarmin ◽  
Sumantri Sumantri

Abstract : The application of the ITE Law in Indonesia must be understood by all groups, not least for students of SMA Negeri 3 Kisaran. Providing information to all students regarding the application of Law No. 11/2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) is a must to do, because now we see many school children vulnerable to violations of the ITE Law. The Information and Electronic Transaction Law (abbreviated as ITE Law) or Law number 11 of 2008 is the law that regulates information and electronic transactions, or information technology in general. This law has jurisdiction applicable to every person who commits legal acts as regulated in this Act, both within the territory of Indonesia and outside the jurisdiction of Indonesia, which has legal consequences in the jurisdiction of Indonesia and / or outside the jurisdiction of Indonesia and harm the interests of Indonesia. Many people want article 27 paragraph 3 in Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) for deletion. The reason is because article 27 paragraph 3 of the ITE Law which is commonly referred to as the rubber article is a dangerous law. Moreover, if applied by parties who do not understand about cyberspace. Keywords: Application, Law Abstrak : Penerapan UU ITE di Indonesia harus benar-benar dipahami semua kalangan tidak terkecuali juga bagi siswa dan siswi SMA Negeri 3 Kisaran.  Memberikan informasi kepada seluruh siswa-siswi berkaitan penerapan UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) merupakan hal yang harus dilaksanakan, sebab saat ini kita lihat banyak anak sekolah rentan terhadap pelanggaran UU ITE. Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (disingkat UU ITE) atau Undang-undang nomor 11 Tahun 2008 adalah UU yang mengatur tentang informasi serta transaksi elektronik, atau teknologi informasi secara umum. UU ini memiliki yurisdiksi yang berlaku untuk setiap orang yang melakukan perbuatan hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang ini, baik yang berada di wilayah Indonesia maupun di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia, yang memiliki akibat hukum di wilayah hukum Indonesia dan/atau di luar wilayah hukum Indonesia dan merugikan kepentingan Indonesia. Banyak kalangan menginginkan pasal 27 ayat 3 di Undang-undang No. 11 tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) untuk dihapus. Alasannya, karena pasal 27 ayat 3 UU ITE yang biasa disebut dengan pasal karet sebagai undang-undang yang berbahaya. Terlebih lagi jika diterapkan oleh pihak-pihak yang tak paham soal dunia maya. Kata kunci: Penerapan, Undang-Undang

Author(s):  
Andriy Drishliuk ◽  
Yurii Orzikh

Relevant problems of the practice of application of law and permanent process of improvement of the Ukrainian legislation are examined in this article. In particular authors stress on contradiction between process of the permanent improvement of the legislation and sustainability, predictability and legal certainty as principles of legal system. On the one hand, constant reforming of the legislation of Ukraine does not give possibility for subjects of law to create stable legal relations, which are regulated in a predictable way. On the other hand, legislation of Ukraine must be actual and even few “step ahead” the actual situation in Ukraine. It must give necessary methods, tools and legal instruments, which regulate relations between subjects of law. Described judicial and notarial practical cases show in what way flexibility of the legislation could be provided in conditions of the ongoing changes. Authors consider that qualified and high-quality application of the current legislation by the subjects of application of law gives possibility to provide flexibility of the legislation. Such application of law is done by subjects applying the law, although their actions are not directly provided for by the legislation, but they are not prohibited either. Essential principle of such application of law must be the whole tendency to create those legal consequences of the application of law which will not lead to the direct infringement of somebodies rights and interests within the process of application of law. Illustrated lawsuit and case of notarial practice show how exactly interpretative mechanism and analogy as a tool of the subject applying the law help to avoid infringements of rights and interests of heirs of the deceased person. Keywords: application of law, improvement of the legislation, notary, judge, court and notarial practice.


Author(s):  
Supanto ,

<p>Abstract<br />The research conducted to inventory of the various laws (the legislative products) relating to the regulating in the field of information technology crime, to identify its adjustment in globalization, to describe the conduct proscribed as a crime of the Information and Electronic Transaction, as well as reviewing the formulation of criminal sanctions. Studies based on the idea that regulation Law Number 11 of 2008 is aimed at setting the utilization of information technology, particularly the information and electronic transactions, in order to be implemented properly and maintain the safety and benefit of humanity. However, their use potentially criminal, which must be addressed, including the use of criminal law, therefore there is a provision in the law of criminal sanctions, in this case defined the prohibited acts and penalties specified criminal, offense. Conclusions obtained, In line with an information technology and The Law of Infromation and Transaction of electronic (The Law No. 11 of 2008/UU ITE), inventoried some legislation which can be understood as an attempt arrangement of information technology, especially as a crime, as in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Telecommunications, the Law on Copyright / patent, the law of terrorism . The adjustment of The Law Number 11 of 2008 on the Information and Electronic Transactions with global regulation and a comparative assessment of the demands that must be met in order to harmony especially on the cyber crime law. In addition, the formulation of a threatened criminal sanctions in offenses under the Act remain as types of criminal sanctions prescribed in the Penal Code,<br />which is a kind of imprisonment sanction fines and criminal sanctions, but not formulated an additional  criminal sanction. Therefore, its system is no innovation typical types of criminal sanctions for offenses in the field of information and electronic transactions.<br /><em>Keywords: Cyber crime, criminal policy,information technology</em></p><p><br />Abstrak<br />Penelitian yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk menginventarisasi berbagai undang-undang (produk legislatif) yang berkaitan dengan bidang kejahatan teknologi informasi, untuk mengidentifikasi penyesuaian dalam era globalisasi, untuk menggambarkan perilaku terlarang sebagai kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik , serta meninjau perumusan sanksi pidana. Studi didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 bertujuan untuk pengaturan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, khususnya informasi dan transaksi elektronik, agar dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik dan menjaga keamanan dan kepentingan kemanusiaan, namun penggunaannya berpotensi pidana, termasuk penggunaan hukum pidana, karena ada ketentuan dalam hukum sanksi pidana, dalam hal ini didefinisikan tindakan yang dilarang dan hukuman yang ditentukan pidana. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, Perlu penyesuaian UU Nomor 11 Tahun</p><p>2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dengan regulasi bersifat global dan penilaian komparatif dari tuntutan yang harus dipenuhi untuk keharmonisan terutama pada hukum kejahatan cyber. Dalam UU ITE, terhadap perbuatan yang dilarang diancam sanksi pidana. Adapun jenis sanksi pidananya adalah sanksi pidana penjara dan sanksi pidana denda. Jenis sanksi ini sudah dikenal dalam Pasal 10 KUHP,   dan tidak ditentukan jenis pidana tambahan. Dengandemikian tidak ada pengembangan mengenai jenis pidana khusus yang ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana di bidang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.<br /><em>Kata Kunci: Kejahatan Dunia Maya, Hukum Pidana,Teknologi Informasi</em></p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supanto

<div class="WordSection1"><p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Th</em><em>e research conducted to inventory of the various laws (the legislative products) relating to the regulating in the field of information technology crime, to identify  its adjustment   in globalization, to describe the conduct proscribed as a crime of the Information and Electronic Transaction, as well as reviewing the formulation of criminal sanctions. Studies based on the idea that regulation Law Number 11 of  2008 is aimed at setting the utilization of information technology, particularly the information and electronic transactions, in order to be implemented properly and maintain the safety and benefit of humanity. However, their use potentially criminal, which must be addressed, including the use of criminal law, therefore there is a provision in the law of criminal sanctions, in this case defined the prohibited acts and penalties specified criminal, offense. Conclusions obtained, In line with an information technology and The Law of Infromation and  Transaction  of electronic (The Law No. 11 of 2008/UU ITE), inventoried some legislation which can be understood as an attempt arrangement of information technology, especially as a crime, as in the Criminal Code (KUHP), the Law on Telecommunications, the Law on Copyright / patent, the law of terrorism . The adjustment of The Law Number 11 of 2008 on the Information and Electronic Transactions with global regulation and a comparative assessment of the demands that must be met in order to harmony especially on the cyber crime law. In addition, the formulation of a threatened criminal sanctions in offenses under the Act remain as types of criminal sanctions prescribed in the Penal Code, which is a kind of imprisonment sanction fines and criminal sanctions, but not formulated an additional criminal sanction. Therefore, its system is no innovation typical types of criminal sanctions for offenses in the field of information and electronic transactions.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Cyber crime, criminal policy,information technology</em></p><p> </p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian yang dilakukan bertujuan untuk menginventarisasi berbagai undang-undang (produk legislatif) yang berkaitan dengan bidang kejahatan teknologi informasi, untuk mengidentifikasi penyesuaian dalam era globalisasi, untuk menggambarkan perilaku terlarang sebagai kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik , serta meninjau perumusan sanksi pidana. Studi didasarkan pada gagasan bahwa UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 bertujuan untuk pengaturan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi, khususnya informasi dan transaksi elektronik, agar dapat dilaksanakan dengan baik dan menjaga keamanan dan kepentingan kemanusiaan, namun penggunaannya berpotensi pidana, termasuk penggunaan hukum pidana, karena ada ketentuan dalam hukum sanksi pidana, dalam hal ini didefinisikan tindakan yang dilarang dan hukuman yang ditentukan pidana. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh, Perlu penyesuaian UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dengan regulasi bersifat global dan penilaian komparatif dari tuntutan yang harus dipenuhi untuk keharmonisan terutama pada hukum kejahatan <em>cyber</em>. Dalam UU ITE, terhadap perbuatan yang dilarang diancam sanksi pidana. Adapun jenis sanksi pidananya adalah sanksi pidana penjara dan sanksi pidana denda. Jenis sanksi ini sudah dikenal dalam Pasal 10 KUHP, dan tidak ditentukan jenis pidana tambahan. Dengan demikian tidak ada pengembangan mengenai jenis pidana khusus yang ditujukan bagi pelaku tindak pidana  di bidang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci:  </strong>Kejahatan Dunia Maya<em>,  </em>Hukum Pidana<em>,</em>Teknologi Informasi</p></div>


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Muhammad Afied Hambali

This paper aims to analyze the policy model of the use of electronic documents as evidence in criminal acts based on Law No. 19 of 2016. The development of information technology has significantly transformed the conventional socialization system into a digital system. This affects the emergence of new legal actions in a community. The form of the new legal action needs to be adjusted and harmonized with existing legislation, such as the use of electronic documents as evidence that will be used as a means of verification in court. Based on the analysis it was revealed that Law No. 19 of 2016 as a legal umbrella for regulating criminal acts in cyberspace is still experiencing many obstacles, therefore it must be harmonized with the relevant criminal law because if it is different then it will cause legal imbalance so that it will increasingly make it difficult for law enforcers to enforce the law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Muhammad Afied Hambali

<p>This paper aims to analyze the policy model of the use of electronic documents as evidence in criminal acts based on Law No. 19 of 2016. The development of information technology has significantly transformed the conventional socialization system into a digital system. This affects the emergence of new legal actions in a community. The form of the new legal action needs to be adjusted and harmonized with existing legislation, such as the use of electronic documents as evidence that will be used as a means of verification in court. Based on the analysis it was revealed that Law No. 19 of 2016 as a legal umbrella for regulating criminal acts in cyberspace is still experiencing many obstacles, therefore it must be harmonized with the relevant criminal law because if it is different then it will cause legal imbalance so that it will increasingly make it difficult for law enforcers to enforce the law.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Hotma Napitupulu, MM.

Management of regulatory oversight under the law, analyze the legal consequences with its use as a system of legal oversight mechanisms in order to create harmonization of law in the region. As for the method used in research by using empirical method that is by conceptual approach method with primary and secondary data source. As for the method used in research by using empirical method that is by conceptual approach method with primary and secondary data source.


Author(s):  
V.C. Govindaraj

In deciding cases of private international law or conflict of laws, as it is widely known, judges of the Supreme Court in India generally consult the works of renowned English jurists like Dicey and Cheshire. This volume argues that our country should have its own system of resolving inter-territorial issues with cross-border implications. The author critically analyses cases covering areas such as the law of obligations, the law of persons, the law of property, foreign judgments, and foreign arbitral awards. The author provides his perspectives on the application of law in each case. The idea is to find out where the judges went wrong in deciding cases of private international law, so that corrective measures can be taken in future to resolve disputes involving complex, extra-territorial issues.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-338
Author(s):  
Rahmat Fadli ◽  
Mohd. Din ◽  
Mujibussalim Mujibussalim

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap korban pencemaran nama baik melalui media online dan menjelaskan pemenuhan restitusi yang seharusnya diterima korban pencemaran nama baik melalui media online. Pencemaran nama baik merupakan perbuatan melawan hukum, dikarenakan telah menyerang kehormatan atau nama baik seseorang. Rumusan tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik melalui media online diatur dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Infomasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Sanksi pidananya diatur dalam Pasal 45 ayat (3) Undang-Undang ini. Dalam Undang-Undang ini belum diatur sanksi pidana yang berbentuk restitusi, sehingga kurang melindungi korban pencemaran nama baik melalui media online. Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa ancaman pidana pada Pasal 45 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Infomasi dan Transaksi Elektronik belum memenuhi rasa keadilan dan memberi manfaat kepada korban. Karena pada pasal ini belum mengatur sanksi pidana yang bersifat ganti rugi terhadap korban. Reformulation of  Criminal Sanctions on Defamation Through Online Media This study aims to examine the legal protection of victims of defamation through online media and explain the fulfillment of restitution that should be received by victims. Defamation is an act against the law, because it has attacked someone's honor or reputation. The formulation of criminal defamation through online media is regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law. The criminal sanctions are regulated in Article 45 paragraph (3). This law has not yet regulated criminal sanctions in the form of restitution, so it does not protect victims of defamation through online media. The research method is a normative juridical by using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results found that the criminal threat in Article 45 paragraph (3) of the Law on Information and Electronic Transaction had not fulfilled a sense of justice and benefited for victims. It is because this article does not yet regulate criminal sanctions that are compensation for the victim.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
Indah Esti Cahyani ◽  
Aryani Witasari

Nominee agreement is an agreement made between someone who by law can not be the subject of rights to certain lands (property rights), in this case that foreigners (WNA) and Indonesian Citizen (citizen), with the intention that the foreigners can master land de facto property rights, but legal-formal (de jure) land property rights are assigned to his Indonesian citizen. The purpose of this paper isto assess the position of the nominee agreement in Indonesia's legal system and the legal consequences arising in terms of the draft Civil Code and the Law on Agrarian. Agreement is an agreement unnamed nominee made based on the principle of freedom of contract and good faith of the parties. However, it should be noted that the law prohibits foreigners make agreements / related statement stock wealth / property (land) for and on behalf of others, sehingga the legal consequences of the agreement is the nominee of the agreement is not legally enforceable because the agreement was made on a false causa.Keywords: Nominee Agreement; Property Rights; Foreigners.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-421
Author(s):  
I Made Satria Wibawa Tangkeban ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

The internet is an electronic and information medium that is developing very rapidly. The internet is widely used in various activities, namely trade, trading activities that use the internet known as e-commerce. Trading on the internet itself raises many problems related to the law and all its risks. Problems that can arise include default. The research aims are to analyze the rights and obligations of the parties in buying and selling transactions via Instagram and the legal consequences that arise if the seller in the sale and purchase transaction through Instagram defaults. The research method used is normative legal research, with using statutory approach. Primary sources of legal materials, sources of secondary legal materials were analyzed using systematic interpretation techniques. The result shows that in the buying and selling activities carried out on Instagram, there are often deviations in rights and obligations that are no longer in accordance with existing norms in society and legal remedies that can be taken if there is a default from one of the parties, be it the seller. and buyers who make online transactions can be sued within the environment of the general court or outside the court and can be subject to direct fines for parties who do not perform in default.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document