scholarly journals ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA BISNIS DI LUAR PENGADILAN

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Nevey Varida Ariani
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Fair Process ◽  
Court Process

<p>Alterna Ɵ f sengketa di Luar pengadilan saat ini menjadi alterna Ɵ f bagi kalangan bisnis untuk dapat menyelesaikan sengketa bisnis diluar pengadilan hal ini disebabkan karena penyelesian melalui proses pengadilan, dianggap mengalami beban yang terlampau padat ( overloaded ), Lamban dan buang waktu ( waste of Ɵ me ), Biaya mahal ( very expensive ) dan kurang tanggap (unresponsive ) terhadap kepen Ɵ ngan umum atau dianggap terlampau formalis Ɵ k ( formalis Ɵ c ) dan terlampau teknis ( technically ). Dengan penyelesaian sengketa berdasarkan undang-undang melalui arbitrase dan alterna Ɵ f penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan melalui mekanisme konsiliasi, mediasi, negosiasi dan pendapat ahli serta penyelesaian sengketa menurut masyarakat adat dapat mencerminkan proses penyelesian sengketa secara adil karena diharapkan dapat menggali nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masayarakat secara cepat, biaya ringan, damai dengan win-win solu Ɵ on bukan win lose solu Ɵ on. Oleh karena itu perlu lembaga-lembaga alterna Ɵ f penyelesian sengketa terutama dalam hal pelaksanaan eksekusi</p><p>Today alterna Ɵ ve dispute resulu Ɵ on non li Ɵ ga Ɵ on to be an alterna Ɵ ve for businesses to be able to resolve disputes resolu Ɵ on business and this is because through the court process, is considered to have the burden which overloaded, Slow and waste of Ɵ me, very expensive and unresponsive to the public interest, formalis Ɵ c and technically. Alterna Ɵ ve dispute Resolu Ɵ on with statutory arbitra Ɵ on and alterna Ɵ ve dispute resolu Ɵ on mechanisms outside the court through concilia Ɵ on, media Ɵ on, nego Ɵ a Ɵ on and dispute resolu Ɵ on expert opinion and according to the indigenous peoples may re fl ect disputes resolu Ɵ on in a fair process because it is expected to explore the values that live in society as a fast, low cost, peace with the win-win solu Ɵ on rather than lose win solu Ɵ on. Therefore, the courts and state agencies need to respect and protect the decisions issued by the ins Ɵ tu Ɵ ons of alterna Ɵ ve dispute resolu Ɵ on, especially in terms of execu Ɵ on.</p>

Introduction: Patchwork Leviathans

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Erin Metz McDonnell
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
Weak State ◽  
Empirical Observation ◽  
Organizational Goals ◽  
The Public ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Stereotypical Image ◽  
Internal Variation

This introductory chapter goes beyond the stereotypical image of dysfunctional public service to argue that many seemingly weak state “leviathans” are instead patchworked. What this means is that they are cobbled together from scarce available resources. They have a wide range of internal variation in organizational capacities sewn loosely together into the semblance of unity. The chapter thus reveals a striking empirical observation with theoretical implications for how to conceptualize states and state capacity: amid general organizational weakness and neopatrimonial politics, there are a few spectacularly effective state agencies dedicating their full working capacity to the routine satisfaction of organizational goals in the public interest. These are the subcultural niches of the bureaucratic ethos that manage to thrive against impressive odds.

scholarly journals Eliminating a Barrier to Access: Waiving or Reducing Fees for Public Records in Florida

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
Virginia Hamrick
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Financial Resources ◽  
State Agencies ◽  
Minimal Effect ◽  
Public Records ◽  
The Public ◽  
Special Service ◽  
Right Of Access ◽  
Affect State ◽  
Made In

Florida, the Sunshine State, is one of the few states that includes a right of access to public records in its constitution. While Florida guarantees a right of access to every person, special service charges and high costs for public records restrict access to only requestors with the financial resources to pay for requests. Some agencies assert that waiving fees for requests that have a public interest would be significantly costly. This article builds on research showing that a fee waiver for requests made in the public interest would have minimal effect on Florida municipalities. This article analyzes agency public records logs to assess how a fee waiver for requests made for noncommercial purposes and in the public interest would affect state agencies. This article finds that only 14% of requests reviewed would be entitled to a fee waiver.

scholarly journals LOW-COST SHORELINE PROTECTION

1976 ◽  
Vol 1 (15) ◽  
pp. 164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy L. Edge ◽  
John G. Housley ◽  
George M. Watts
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Private Enterprise ◽  
Erosion Control ◽  
Shoreline Erosion ◽  
Demonstration Program ◽  
Corps Of Engineers ◽  
The Public ◽  
Shoreline Protection

As the public interest in low-cost, self-installed solutions to shoreline erosion continues to grow, the involvement of private enterprise in developing solutions intensifies. Now that low-cost devices are identified as a salable commodity as goods or services, the number of inventors, creative engineers, agronomists, and foresighted planners producing potential designs are rapidly growing. Over two hundred devices, both proven and untested devices, have been cataloged as a part of the National Shoreline Erosion Demonstration Program. This program calls for the Corps of Engineers to plan, establish, and conduct for a period of five years a shoreline erosion control development and demonstration program including physical and vegetative devices.

scholarly journals Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah Ulayat Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda Nissa Hilal Liani ◽  
Atik Winanti
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
The Government

AbstractLand is a natural wealth that is very important for humans and has an important function in development. In carrying out activities carried out by the government, namely land acquisition for the public interest, which has the aim of building public facilities for the benefit of the community. In carrying out land acquisition, ulayat land is often the target for alleged land acquisition. However, using ulayat land for land acquisition often creates problems. The purpose of this paper is to determine the control of indigenous peoples' rights in land acquisition and to determine the role of the state in providing compensation for land acquisition for development in the public interest. The research method used is juridical normative using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The result of this research is that the rights of customary law communities have been regulated constitutionally by the State, and the role of indigenous peoples is regulated in Law no. 71/2012. However, the fact is that during the land acquisition process, customary law communities are often not involved, the government should provide legal certainty and protection to the customary law community so that these problems do not harm the customary law community.Keyword: Land Procurement, Customary Law Communities, Customary Land. AbstrakTanah merupakan kekayaan alam yang sangat penting bagi manusia dan memiliki fungsi yang penting dalam pembangunan. Dalam melakukan kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah yaitu pengadaan tanah bagi kepentingan umum, yang mana memiliki tujuan untuk membangun fasilittas umum agar bermanfaat bagi masyarakat. Dalam melakukan pengadaan tanah, seringkali tanah ulayat dijadikan sasaran untuk diduganakan pengadaan tanah. Namun, dalam menggunakan tanah ulayat untuk pengadaan tanah tersebut seringkali menimbulkan masalah. Tujuan dari penulisan ini untuk mengetahui pengantutan mengenai hak-hak masyarakat adat dalam pengadaan tanah dan untuk mengetahui peran negara dalam pemberian ganti kerugian pada pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa hak masyarakat hukum adat telah diatur secara konstitutional oleh Negara, serta peran masyarakat hukum adat diatur didalam UU No. 71/2012. Namun pada faktanya saat proses pengadaan tanah, masyarakat hukum adat seringkali tidak dilibatkan, seharusnya pemerintah dalam pengadaan tanah memberikan kepastian serta perlindnungan hukum kepada masyarakat hukum adat agar permasalahan-permasalahan tersebut tidak merugikan masyarakat hukum adat.Kata Kunci: Pengadaan Tanah, Masyarakat adat, Tanah Ulayat

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document