scholarly journals HARMONISASI HUKUM NASIONAL DI BIDANG KORUPSI DENGAN UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Mosgan Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
National Legislation ◽  
The Future ◽  
Long Time ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>Berbagai upaya pemberantasan korupsi telah dilakukan sejak lama namun belum memberikan hasil sebagaimana yang diharapkan. Tindak pidana korupsi diatur antara lain dalam KUHP yang bersifat umum atau lex generalis dan undang- undang yang dibuat khusus untuk penanggulangan korupsi seperti undang-undang tindak pidana korupsi maupun undang-undang tindak pidana suap. Disamping itu masih terdapat konvensi Internasional seperti United Nations Convention Against Corruption Tahun 2003. Seperti pemerintahan terdahulu, pemerintahan Jokowi juga mempunyai program tentang pemberantasan korupsi yang sudah dimuat dalam Rancangan Teknokrat Jokowi. Dalam rancangan itu dimuat strategi pemberantasan korupsi yang dilakukan melalui harmonisasi perundang-undangan korupsi dengan konvensi internasional. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode normatif yuridis untuk membahas peraturan apa saja yang terkait dengan pemberantasan korupsi serta bagaimanakah harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang korupsi dengan ketentuan United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Dari penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa masih terdapat ketidakharmonisan antara peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang korupsi dengan konvensi Internasional pemberantasan korupsi sehingga perlu segera dilakukan harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan nasional dengan konvensi Internasional di bidang korupsi dan strategi yang lebih jitu dan penegakan hukum yang lebih tegas dalam pemberantasan dan pencegahan korupsi ke depan.</p><p>Various corruption eradication efforts have been done for a long time. Yet the result has not been as expected. Corruption is set in Criminal code as lex generalis and other laws made specifically for the prevention of corruption, such as Law of corruption and bribery laws. There are also International conventions such as the United Nations Convention Against Corruption in 2003. Just like the previous government, The President Jokowi’s governance also has programs in eradicating corruption which are already loaded in the draft of Jokowi’s Technocrats. Those draft consist of strategy to combat corruption through harmonization of Regulations on Corruption with international conventions on corruption. This research was conducted using normative juridis method by discussing any regulations that are associated with the eradication of corruption and how the harmonization of the laws and regulations in the field of corruption with the provisions of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. From this research, it can be concluded that there is disharmony between the legislation in the field of corruption and the International Conventions Against Corruption so that is why harmonization of national legislation with international conventions in the field of corruption should be made and accurately strategies and law enforcement in combating and prevent corruption in the future should be more strict.</p>

scholarly journals THE PRESCRIPTIVE AND ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTION OF A COASTAL STATE IN RELATION TO SHIP SOURCE POLLUTION OCCURS IN ITS VARIOUS MARITIME ZONES, UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA AND THE CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 616-624
Author(s):  
Zacharias L. Kapsis ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Marine Environment ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Customary International Law ◽  
Coastal State ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The coastal state jurisdiction is the jurisdiction enjoyed by a coastal state in relation to breaches of regulations and laws by foreign flagged ships that take place within its various jurisdictional zones. The prescriptive and enforcement jurisdiction comprise the main power of a coastal state. Prescriptive is the jurisdiction to prescribe laws and regulations, while enforcement is the jurisdiction to enforce such laws. The rights and obligations of a state in relation to navigation and pollution are determined primarily by international conventions and customary international law. The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS) is the most widely ratified convention in this field of law, outlining the rights and obligations of the states in relation to their variousmaritmezones as well as with respect to environmental protection.States have under UNCLOS the obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment and they are also under an obligation to take measures jointly or individually to reduce and prevent, control and reduce pollution of the marine environment from any source including the atmosphere and from vessels.In relation to ship source pollution there are various obligations.

scholarly journals Urgensi Perumusan Perbuatan Memperdagangkan Pengaruh sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-84
Author(s):  
Imentari Siin Sembiring ◽  
Elly Sudarti ◽  
Andi Najemi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
State Administrators ◽  
The Future ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Relationship Of

This article discusses the act of trading in influence as a form of corruption as regulated in the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) but has not been implemented into Indonesian criminal law even though it was ratified in 2006. Trading in influence is a form of trilateral relationship of corruption which involves at least three parties, namely an influential party, a party that has the authority, and an interest. This article concludes, the formulation of trading influence as a criminal act of corruption is urgent in three aspects. First, the regulation in national law is a form of transformation of UNCAC provisions that have been ratified. Second, several cases of corruption so far, as in the two cases discussed here, actually show a form of trading in influence, even though law enforcement is imposed with bribery. Third, efforts to impose actors of trading in influence with the bribery Article as so far, are actually limited to actors who are state administrators or civil servants; in the event that the actor is not part of the two, the subjective elements of bribery Article are not fulfilled. Therefore, in the future criminal law policy, it is necessary to accommodate the formulation of trading in influence as a criminal act of corruption, in this case offered through the revision of the Corruption Eradication Act. Abstrak Artikel ini membahas perbuatan memperdagangkan pengaruh sebagai salah satu bentuk korupsi sebagaimana diatur dalam United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) namun belum diimplementasikan dalam hukum pidana Indonesia meski telah diratifikasi pada 2006. Memperdagangkan pengaruh sebagai bentuk trilateral relationship merupakan bentuk korupsi yang melibatkan sedikitnya tiga pihak, yaitu pihak yang berpengaruh, pihak yang memiliki kewenangan, serta pihak yang memiliki kepentingan. Artikel ini menyimpulkan, perumusan perbuatan memperdagangkan pengaruh sebagai tindak pidana korupsi urgen dalam tiga hal. Pertama, pengaturannya dalam hukum nasional merupakan bentuk dari transformasi ketentuan UNCAC yang sudah diratifikasi. Kedua, beberapa kasus korupsi selama ini, sebagaimana dalam dua kasus yang dibahas di sini, sebenarnya menunjukkan adanya bentuk memperdagangkan pengaruh, sekalipun pada akhirnya dijerat penegak hukum dengan suap. Ketiga, upaya menjerat pelaku memperdagangkan pengaruh dengan Pasal tentang suap sebagaimana yang selama ini dikenakan, sesungguhnya terbatas pada pelaku yang merupakan penyelenggara negara atau pegawai negeri; dalam hal pelaku bukan bagian dari keduanya maka unsur subjektif dari Pasal suap tidak terpenuhi. Karena itu, dalam kebijakan hukum pidana ke depan, perlu diakomodasi perumusan memperdagangkan pengaruh sebagai tindak pidana korupsi, dalam hal ini didorong melalui revisi Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

scholarly journals Improvement of criminal laws in the field of combating corruption

2019 ◽  
pp. 102-109
Author(s):  
N. V. Golubykh ◽  
M. O. Lepikhin
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Commercial Bribery ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
International Instruments

The article scrutinizes the current legislation aimed at combating corruption. Special attention is paid to crimes the number of which among corruption-related crimes is overwhelming. These include, in particular, Art. 290 “Bribe-taking”, 291 “Bribe-giving”, 204 “Commercial bribery” of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. Also, attention is paid to relatively new offences providing for liability for crimes of corruption, namely: Article 291.1 “Bribery facilitation,” 291.2 “Petty bribery,” 204.1”Commercial bribery facilitation” and 204.2” Petty commercial bribery “ of the Criminal Code. The paper analyzes international instruments governing the fight against corruption, especially the United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Based on the analysis of the above norms, the authors argue the need to amend the current legislation, inter alia, in order to bring it in line with international instruments.

scholarly journals The Paradoxical Success of UNCLOS Part XV: A Half-hearted Reply to Rosemary Rayfuse

2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Serdy
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
The Future ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Law

In his reply to Rosemary Rayfuse's article, "The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention", Andrew Serdy addresses some of the criticisms that have been levelled at the Part XV dispute resolution provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). He concludes that despite being little used, the Part XV provisions remain pivotal to UNCLOS and its related treaties, and if anything are becoming more so

scholarly journals PERLIDUNGAN JUSTICE COLLABORATOR TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jupri Jupri
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Political Parties ◽  
United Nations ◽  
State Party ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Special Protection ◽  
Crime Of Corruption

ABSTRACT                The guaranted of protection to a Justice Collaborator is stipulated in Article 32 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003) as ratified as Law Number 7 Year 2006 stipulates that each State Party is obliged to provide physical and psychological protection against witnesses and experts in the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption. As the development progresses of corruption disclosure in Indonesia, the arrangement of Justice Collaborator is then started to be regulated explicitly in Law Number 31 Year 2014 on Protection of Witness and Victim.               Although physical, legal and special protection guarantees against the Justice Collaborator already exist. In fact, in the disclosure of a crime of corruption committed crime, a witness of the perpetrator who cooperates with law enforcement gets bullied until threats are killed. For example in the disclosure of corruption cases involving a number of politicians Political Parties in Indonesia. Keywords: Justice Collaborator, Protection, Corruption 

The Consequences of Indo-Pakistani War for Urdu Language and Literature: A Parting of the Ways?

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Naim
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
The Other ◽  
General Area ◽  
Military Logistics ◽  
Language And Literature ◽  
The Future ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
Short Time ◽  
Parting Of The Ways

In September 1965, there occurred between the armies of India and Pakistan a fierce clash which each side attributed to the aggressive designs of the other. This undeclared war lasted only a short time; first a ceasefire ordered by the United Nations, and later the pact signed at Tashkent, brought the hostilities to a formal close. It was by no means a spontaneous or unexpected flareup, the hatred and antagonism that caused it had been festering for a long time. Similarly, its effects have not been short-lived; neither have they been restricted to the area of military logistics and high diplomacy. In this paper I intend to review the consequences of that conflict for Urdu language and literature. I shall proceed by showing why it was necessary for Urdu writers, especially the poets, to respond to this war, and what sort of attitudes were displayed in the poetry written exclusively in response to it. I shall then discuss certain subsequent developments in the general area of Urdu language and literature and end by presenting my own conclusions with regard to the future.

scholarly journals Serbia’s Action against Transnational Organised Crime

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 151-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Obokata ◽  
Aleksandar Boskovic ◽  
Nenad Radovic
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
United Nations ◽  
International Law ◽  
Organised Crime ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Collective Actions ◽  
Investigative Techniques ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
The United Nations

This article examines the extent to which Serbia has implemented relevant international standards on action against transnational organised crime contained in the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 2000. The first part explores key obligations with particular reference to prohibition of substantive offences, intelligence-led law enforcement (special investigative techniques), confiscation of criminal proceeds, as well as international law enforcement cooperation. The second part of the article analyses how these obligations are implemented by Serbia in reality by examining legislative frameworks as well as law enforcement practices. The main conclusion is that, while Serbia has taken some steps to implement international standards with a view to enhancing individual and collective actions against transnational organised crime, effective law enforcement is hampered by issues such as corruption and a lack of expertise, experience and resources.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document