scholarly journals Grassland Management and Conversion into Grassland: Effects on Soil Carbon

Author(s):  
R. Conant, ◽  
K. Puastian, ◽  
E. Elliot,
OALib ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 04 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Junfang Cui ◽  
Nicholas M. Holden

Geoderma ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 149 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 84-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stoécio M.F. Maia ◽  
Stephen M. Ogle ◽  
Carlos E.P. Cerri ◽  
Carlos C. Cerri

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2929-2938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Ward ◽  
Simon M. Smart ◽  
Helen Quirk ◽  
Jerry R. B. Tallowin ◽  
Simon R. Mortimer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 662-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Conant ◽  
Carlos E. P. Cerri ◽  
Brooke B. Osborne ◽  
Keith Paustian

SOIL ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Poeplau ◽  
H. Marstorp ◽  
K. Thored ◽  
T. Kätterer

Abstract. Soils contain the largest terrestrial carbon pool and thus play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle. Grassland soils have particularly high soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks. In Europe (EU 25), grasslands cover 22 % of the land area. It is therefore important to understand the effects of grassland management and management intensity on SOC storage. City lawns constitute a unique study system in this context, since they provide a high functional diversity and thus a wide range of different management intensities per unit area. In this study we investigated frequently mown (on average eight times per season) utility lawns and rarely mown (once per season) meadow-like lawns at three multi-family housing areas in each of three Swedish cities: Uppsala, Malmö, and Gothenburg. The two different lawn types were compared regarding their aboveground net primary production (NPP) and SOC storage. In addition, root biomass was determined in Uppsala. We found significantly higher aboveground NPP and SOC concentrations and significantly lower soil C : N ratio for the utility lawns compared with the meadow-like lawns. On average, aboveground NPP was 24 % or 0.7 Mg C ha−1 yr−1 higher and SOC was 12 % or 7.8 Mg ha−1 higher. Differences in SOC were well explained by differences in aboveground NPP (R2 = 0.39), which indicates that the increase in productivity due to more optimum CO2-assimilating leaf area, leading to higher carbon input to the soil, was the major driver for soil carbon sequestration. Differences in soil C : N ratio indicated a more closed N cycle in utility lawns, which might have additionally affected SOC dynamics. We did not find any difference in root biomass between the two management regimes, and concluded that cutting frequency most likely only exerts an effect on SOC when cuttings are left on the surface.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 429-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Rolinski ◽  
Christoph Müller ◽  
Jens Heinke ◽  
Isabelle Weindl ◽  
Anne Biewald ◽  
...  

Abstract. Grassland management affects the carbon fluxes of one-third of the global land area and is thus an important factor for the global carbon budget. Nonetheless, this aspect has been largely neglected or underrepresented in global carbon cycle models. We investigate four harvesting schemes for the managed grassland implementation of the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) Lund–Potsdam–Jena managed Land (LPJmL) that facilitate a better representation of actual management systems globally. We describe the model implementation and analyze simulation results with respect to harvest, net primary productivity and soil carbon content and by evaluating them against reported grass yields in Europe. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for differences in grassland management by assessing potential livestock grazing densities as well as the impacts of grazing, grazing intensities and mowing systems on soil carbon stocks. Grazing leads to soil carbon losses in polar or arid regions even at moderate livestock densities (<  0.4 livestock units per hectare – LSU ha−1) but not in temperate regions even at much higher densities (0.4 to 1.2 LSU ha−1). Applying LPJmL with the new grassland management options enables assessments of the global grassland production and its impact on the terrestrial biogeochemical cycles but requires a global data set on current grassland management.


2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Egan ◽  
Xue Zhou ◽  
Dongmei Wang ◽  
Zhongjun Jia ◽  
Michael J. Crawley ◽  
...  

Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Moinet ◽  
Andrew Midwood ◽  
John Hunt ◽  
Cornelia Rumpel ◽  
Peter Millard ◽  
...  

Increasing soil carbon stocks in agricultural grasslands has a strong potential to mitigate climate change. However, large uncertainties around the drivers of soil respiration hinder our ability to identify management practices that enhance soil carbon sequestration. In a context where more intense and prolonged droughts are predicted in many regions, it is critical to understand how different management practices will temper drought-induced carbon losses through soil respiration. In this study, we compared the impact of changing soil volumetric water content during a drought on soil respiration in permanent grasslands managed either as grazed by dairy cows or as a mowing regime. Across treatments, root biomass explained 43% of the variability in soil respiration (p < 0.0001). Moreover, analysis of the isotopic composition of CO2 emitted from the soil, roots, and root-free soil suggested that the autotrophic component largely dominated soil respiration. Soil respiration was positively correlated with soil water content (p = 0.03) only for the grazed treatment. Our results suggest that the effect of soil water content on soil respiration was attributable mainly to an effect on root and rhizosphere activity in the grazed treatment. We conclude that farm management practices can alter the relationship between soil respiration and soil water content.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Rolinski ◽  
Christoph Müller ◽  
Jens Heinke ◽  
Isabelle Weindl ◽  
Anne Biewald ◽  
...  

Abstract. Grassland management directly affects the carbon fluxes of large areas and is thus an important factor for the global carbon budget. Nonetheless, this aspect has been largely ignored or underrepresented in global carbon cycle models. We introduce three different management schemes for the managed grassland implementation of the DGVM LPJmL that facilitate a better representation of actual management systems globally. We describe the model implementation and evaluate model performance against European data. We demonstrate the importance of accounting for differences in grassland management by assessing maximum livestock grazing densities as well as the impacts of grazing, grazing intensities and mowing systems on soil carbon stocks. Grazing leads to soil carbon losses in polar or arid regions even at moderate livestock densities (


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document