scholarly journals PENGARUH PENAMBAHAN ARANG SERBUK KAYU GERGAJI TERHADAP KUAT TEKAN MORTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Hotmalina Manullang ◽  
Fepy Supriani ◽  
Agustin Gunawan

Mortar is a mixture of adhesive (Portland cement and limestone), sand, and water with a certain composition. Mortar is used in structural and nonstructural constructions. This research uses sawdust charcoal as cement addition because in similar research mention that wood charcoal contains silica. This research was aimed to know the value of compressive strength of the mortar (1:3 and 1:5) by using sawdust charcoal as cement addition. The method of manufacture and testing compressive strength of mortar refers to SNI 03-6825-2002. The mortar specimens is cube shaped with side 50 mm and the total of specimens have 112 mortar test specimens. Variations of sawdust charcoal used were 2,5%, 5%, 7,5%, 10%, 12,5% and 15% of the weight of cement. The range of initial flow values used are 105% - 115 (SNI 03-6882-2002). The specimens were soaked for 26 days and compressive strength test of mortar was performed at 28 days. The test results showed that the compressive strength value of normal mortar (1:3) of 25,09 MPa, the value of compressive strength of variation mortar 2,5%, 5%, 7,5%, 10%, 12,5% and 15% respectively are 25,89 MPa, 26,93 MPa, 27,84 MPa, 25,58 MPa, 20,68 MPa and 17,24 MPa. The value of compressive strength of normal mortar (1:5) of 15,48 MPa, the value of compressive strength of mortar variation 2,5%, 5%, 7,5%, 10%, 12,5% and 15% respectively are 15,83 MPa, 16,24 MPa, 17,01 MPa, 15,59 MPa, 14,45 MPa dan 12,26 MPa. The highest increase of compressive strength value in mixture 1:3 was variation 7,5% by 10,94% and mixture 1:5 was variation 7,5% by 9,90% from the compressive strength value of normal mortar.

Author(s):  
Edward Dinoy ◽  
Yohanes Gilbert Tampaty ◽  
Imelda Srilestari Mabuat ◽  
Joseph Alexon Sutiray Dwene

The compressive strength test is one of the technical properties or compressive strength tests that are commonly used in rock mechanics to determine the collapse point or the elasticity of rock against maximum pressure. The rock collapse point is a measure of the strength of the rock itself when the rock is no longer able to maintain its elastic properties. The purpose of this test is to find out how long the rock maintains its strength or elasticity properties when pressure is applied, and to find out the difference between the strength of compact rock and rock that has fractures when pressure is applied. Rocks that have fractures will break more easily or quickly when pressure is applied compared to compact rocks. This analysis is carried out by comparing the rock strength of each sample, both those that have fractures and compact rocks. To find out these differences, laboratory testing was carried out. The test results show the value (compressive strength test 57.76 MPa), (elastic modulus 5250.000MPa), (Poisson ratio 0.05) and the average value of rock mechanical properties test (axial 0.91), (lateral-0.279), and (volumetric 0.252) . Based on the test results above, it shows that rocks that have fractures will break more easily when pressure is applied, compared to compact rocks that have a long time in the uniaxial compressive strength test.


2020 ◽  
Vol 323 ◽  
pp. 01018
Author(s):  
Wei-Ting Lin ◽  
Lukáš Fiala ◽  
An Cheng ◽  
Michaela Petříková

In this study, the different proportions of co-fired fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag were used to fully replace the cement as non-cement blended materials in a fixed water-cement ratio. The recycled fine aggregates were replaced with natural fine aggregates as 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50%. The flowability, compressive strength, water absorption and scanning electron microscope observations were used as the engineered indices by adding different proportions of recycled fine aggregates. The test results indicated that the fluidity cannot be measured normally due to the increase in the proportion of recycled fine aggregates due to its higher absorbability. In the compressive strength test, the compressive strength decreased accordingly as the recycled fine aggregates increased due to the interface structure and the performance of recycled aggregates. The fine aggregates and other blended materials had poor cementation properties, resulting in a tendency for their compressive strength to decrease. However, the compressive strength can be controlled above 35 MPa of the green non-cement blended materials containing 20% recycled aggregates.


Jurnal CIVILA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Asrul Majid ◽  
Hammam Rofiqi Agustapraja

Infrastructure development is one of the important aspects of the progress of a country where most of the constituents of infrastructure are concrete. The most important constituent of concrete is cement because its function is to bind other concrete materials so that it can form a hard mass. The large number of developments using cement as a building material will leave quite a lot of cement bags.In this study, the authors conducted research on the effect of adding cement waste to the compressive strength of concrete. This study used an experimental method with a total of 24 test objects. The test object is in the form of a concrete cylinder with a diameter of 15 cm and a height of 30 cm and uses variations in the composition of the addition of cement waste cement as a substitute for fine aggregate, namely 0%, 2%, 4% and 6%. K200). The compressive strength test was carried out at the age of 7 days and 28 days.The test results show that the use of waste as a partial substitute for fine aggregate results in a decrease in the compressive strength of each mixture. at the age of 7 days the variation of 2% is 16.84 MPa, 4% is 11.32 MPa and for a mixture of 6% is 6.68 MPa. Meanwhile, the compressive strength test value of 28 days old concrete in each mixture decreased by ± 6 MPa. So the conclusion is cement cement waste cannot be used as a substitute for fine aggregate in fc 16.6 (K200) quality concrete because the value is lower than the specified minimum of 16.6 MPa.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Agung Rizki Pratomo ◽  
Fepy Supriani ◽  
Agustin Gunawan

This research was motivated by the contained SiO2 in zeolite. The purpose of this research was to know the zeolite effect as a substitute of cement in constructing 14 days paving block material which used conventional method toward the compressive strength of paving block. This research used SNI 03-06-1996 in constructing and testing the materials. The material was cube shaped with ±5 cm size which consists of normal paving block and 6 variations with 5 specimens of each variation. Total of specimen were 35. Substitute of zeolite variations used 2,5%, 5%, 7,5%, 10%, 12,5%, and 15% on the weight of cement. The result of compressive strength of normal paving block is 15,64 MPa. The result of compressive strength test had increased in the variation of 2,5% zeolite substitute by 6,28% normal paving block. The result of compressive strength test results showed the greatest decrease in variation of 15% zeolite replacement by 39,05% against normal paving block. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 1065-1069 ◽  
pp. 1871-1874
Author(s):  
Xiao Fei Wang ◽  
Yang Ping Wang ◽  
Li Cheng Wu

The same batch reactive powder concrete specimens were obtained with same raw materials and curing process, uniaxial compressive strength test had been done on the specimens after hot water curing placed in laboratory for seven days , three months and three years. The test results showed that seven-day strength and three-month strength of plain reactive powder concrete after hot water curing are almost equal. Strength of plain reactive powder concrete has not degradation within three months after hot water curing. While strength of plain reactive powder appears serious degradation phenomenon after placed in Laboratory for three years. Comparing uniaxial compressive strength test results of plain reactive powder concrete at three-month with three-year after hot water curing ,we find that strength of plain reactive concrete at three-year decrease about 27 percent than the strength of plain reactive powder concrete placed at laboratory for three months, and elasticity modulus increases about 71 percent, axial peak strain decrease about 62 percent respectively .With the passage of time, plain reactive powder concrete appears more Brittle Features and less toughness.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 7736-7739 ◽  

This paper studies the effect of incorporating metakaolin on the mechanical properties of high grade concrete. Three different metakaolins calcined at different temperature and durations were used to make concrete specimens. Three different concrete mixtures were characterized using 20% metakaolin in place of cement. A normal concrete mix was also made for comparison purpose. The compressive strength test, split tensile test and flexural strength tests were conducted on the specimens. The compressive strength test results showed that all the metakaolin incorporated concrete specimens exhibited higher compressive strength and performed better than normal concrete at all the days of curing. The rate of strength development of all the mixes was also studied. The study revealed that all the three different metakaolin incorporated mixtures had different rate of strength development for all the days of hydration (3, 7,14, 28, 56 and 90), indicating that all the metakaolins possessed different rate of pozzolanic reactivity. Further, from the analysis of the test results, it was concluded that the variation in the rate of strength development is due to the differences in the temperature and duration at which they were manufactured. The results of split tensile strength test and the flexural strength test conducted on the specimens, supported the conclusions drawn from the results of compressive strength test. The paper also discusses, the rate of development of compressive strength and the pozzolanic behaviour of the metakaolins in light of their parameters of calcination and physical properties such as amorphousness and particle size. This paper has been written with a view to make the potential of metakaolin available to the construction industry at large


POROS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agustinus Purna Irawan

This study aims to obtain the compressive strength of the material of a car spoiler product that was developed using materials from rattan fiber epoxy reinforced composites material. The car spoiler products are car accessories that also function as one of the equipment related to aerodynamics. The study was conducted by making test samples of rattan fiber epoxy reinforced composites and compared with the compressive strength of plastic spoiler materials obtained from the free market. The testing standard used is the compressive strength test of ASTM D 695. Based on the test results obtained compressive strength of spoiler made of plastic is 47.68 ± 1.37 MPa and rattan fiber epoxy reinforced composites material is 43.49 ± 4.21 MPa, with a compressive strength difference of 8.8%. The compressive strength of modeling results obtained a compressive strength of 47.97 MPa. This result is quite good and the difference is quite small, so the results of the study can be used as a reference for further product development.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Tanomaru-Filho ◽  
Vanessa Morales ◽  
Guilherme F. da Silva ◽  
Roberta Bosso ◽  
José M. S. N. Reis ◽  
...  

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the compressive strength and setting time of MTA and Portland cement (PC) associated with bismuth oxide (BO), zirconium oxide (ZO), calcium tungstate (CT), and strontium carbonate (SC). Methods. For the compressive strength test, specimens were evaluated in an EMIC DL 2000 apparatus at 0.5 mm/min speed. For evaluation of setting time, each material was analyzed using Gilmore-type needles. The statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and the Tukey tests, at 5% significance. Results. After 24 hours, the highest values were found for PC and PC + ZO. At 21 days, PC + BO showed the lowest compressive strength among all the groups. The initial setting time was greater for PC. The final setting time was greater for PC and PC + CT, and MTA had the lowest among the evaluated materials (P<0.05). Conclusion. The results showed that all radiopacifying agents tested may potentially be used in association with PC to replace BO.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krisna Adhitya Wardhana ◽  
Sri Purwati ◽  
Saepulloh , ◽  
Toni Rachmanto

Deinking sludge and coal fly ash are classified as hazardous wastes that have to be treated before disposed in landfill. Solidification is an alternative treatment to prevent hazardous materials release to the environment. The research was conducted to find solidification combination formula of deinking sludge and coal fly ash that pass compressive strength test (>10ton/m2) and paint filter test so it can be disposed to landfill. The concretes were made from cement and aggregate (50% deinking sludge and 50% fly ash) on range combination 1:11 - 1:20. In addition, based on pozzolanic characteristic of fly ash, concretes without cement was made. The results showed that solidification products with combination 1:11 - 1:20 have compressive strength that exceed the regulation and passed paint filter test. Combination of 50% deinking sludge and 50% coal fly ash without portland cement addition had compressive strength that met requirement for landfill disposal.Key words : deinking sludge, fly ash, solidification, landfill ABSTRAKDeinking sludge dan fly ash batubara termasuk kedalam kategori limbah B-3 yang harus diolah terlebih dahulu sebelum ditimbun di landfill. Proses solidifikasi adalah salah satu pengolahan untuk mencegah tersebarnya kandungan limbah B-3 ke lingkungan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menentukan formulasi solidifikasi kombinasi deinking sludge dengan fly ash batubara yang memenuhi persyaratan kuat tekan (> 10 ton/m2) dan uji paint filter sehingga dapat ditimbun di landfill. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan variasi perbandingan semen terhadap agregat (50% fly ash dan 50% deinking sludge) mulai dari 1:11 sampai dengan 1:20 dan juga dilakukan perlakuan agregat tanpa semen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa komposisi 1:11 s/d 1:20 memiliki nilai kuat tekan yang jauh melebihi persyaratan dan lolos uji paint filter. Sedangkan hasil dari perlakuan tanpa semen menunjukkan bahwa kombinasi 50% deinking sludge dan 50% fly ash batubara telah memiliki nilai kuat tekan yang cukup besar dan memenuhi persyaratan penimbunan di landfill.Kata kunci : deinking sludge, fly ash batubara, solidifikasi, landfill 


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Rara Ayu Sati ◽  
Fepy Supriani ◽  
Yuzuar Afrizal

Bagasse ash and stone ash are materials that have some elements that fimilar to  cement elements. Bagasse ash is a waste that has not been utilized by community. Stone ash is a waste of stone crusher whose utilization in building structures is still lacking. This research was aimed to know compressive strength of the mortar which use bagasse ash and stone ash as a partial substitute of cement. The method of casting and compressive strength test of the mortar referred to SNI 03-6825-2002. The total of mortar cubes was 128 specimens with dimensions of 50 mm x 50 mm x 50 mm. Variations of bagasse ash and stone ash used were 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% of the weight of cement. The range of initial flow values used are 105%-115% (SNI 03-6882-2002). Mortar cubes cured for 27 days and test of mortar was conducted at 28th days. The value of mortar compressive strength variation of bagasse ash decrease from normal mortar compressive strength with a decrease respectively of 0.62%, 2.14%, 7.33%, 7.50% dan 9.53%. Compressive strengths of mortar with stone ash is increases from normal mortar in variations 5%, 10% and 15% with the percentages of 4.66%, 3.41% and 2.38% respectively, while in the variation of 20% and 25%  is decreases. Compressive strength of mortar with mixture bagasse ash and stone ash reduce from normal mortar with a decrease of 0.08%, 1.04%, 5.67%, 8.06% dan 15.12% respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document