scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Immunotherapy in Patient with Allergic Rhinitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 554-562
Author(s):  
Joon Yong Park ◽  
Yoon-Sook Kim ◽  
Jin Kook Kim ◽  
Jae Hoon Cho
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Treatment Costs ◽  
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy ◽  
Medical Expense ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Symptomatic Medication ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment ◽  
Total Treatment

Background and Objectives All treatments must be effective and affordable. Although it is clear that immunotherapy is effective in patients with allergic rhinitis, no cost-effectiveness analysis has been conducted in Korea.Subjects and Method We compared 10 years of total treatment costs (medical expense+ transportation cost+time cost) with medications and symptoms scores assuming that adult patients with allergic rhinitis are treated only with symptomatic medication (medication model) or immunotherapy (subcutaneous or sublingual) plus symptomatic medication [subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) models, respectively]. For cost-effectiveness analysis, related papers and domestic medical statistics were used.Results The total treatment costs for the first 3 years were ₩3330199, ₩6605557, and ₩7130467 for the Medication model, SCIT model and SLIT model, respectively. The total treatment costs for the 10-year period were ₩7996087, ₩8588624, and ₩9113534 for the medication model, SCIT model, and SCIT model, respectively. The cumulative symptoms plus medications scores decreased 0.44 times in both immunotherapy models compared to the medication model. Conclusion The initial cost of immunotherapy is more expensive than symptomatic medication, but the total cost for 10 years is similar. In addition, immunotherapy can reduce symptoms by more than half. Therefore, it is a cost-effective treatment for allergic rhinitis.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Statins for Treatment of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Chow ◽  
Elizabeth Horn Prsic ◽  
Hyun Joon Shin
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment ◽  
United States Healthcare ◽  
Statin Use

Introduction: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis by our group reported on thirteen published cohorts investigating 110,078 patients. Patients administered statins after their COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization were found to have a lower risk of mortality. Given this reported superiority, a logical next question would be whether statins are cost-effective treatment options for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In this paper, we report on a cost-effectiveness analysis of statin-containing treatment regimens for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, from a United States healthcare perspective. Methods: A Markov model was used, to compare statin use and no statin use among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The cycle length was one week, with a time horizon of 4 weeks. A Monte Carlo microsimulation, with 20,000 samples were used. All analyses were conducted using TreeAge Pro Healthcare Version 2021 R1.1. Results: Treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients with statins was both cheaper and more effective than treatment without statins; statin-containing therapy dominates over non-statin therapy. Conclusion: Statin for treatment of COVID-19 should be further investigated in RCTs, especially considering its cost-effective nature. Optimistically and pending the results of future RCTs, statins may also be used broadly for treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

scholarly journals ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS BIAYA PASIEN PNEUMONIA BALITA RAWAT INAP DI RUMAH SAKIT BHAYANGKARA MANADO

PHARMACON ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 968
Author(s):  
Monica D. Lestari ◽  
Gayatri Citraningtyas ◽  
Hosea Jaya Edi
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment ◽  
Retrospective Data Collection ◽  
Keywords Antibiotics ◽  
The Cost

ABSTRACTPneumonia is an infectious disease in the lower respiratory tract that affects the lung tissue. Ceftriaxone and Gentamicin antibiotics are the most numerous and good for use in the treatment of pneumonia, but of the two antibiotics is not yet known the options for more cost effective treatment, so it needs to be done the cost effectiveness analysis in order to facilitate the selection of more cost-effective treatment options especially in toddler. This study aims to determine which therapies are more cost-effective than the use of antibiotics Ceftriaxone and Gentamicin in pneumonia patients in the January-December 2018 period in the Bhayangkara Manado Hospital using descriptive research methods with retrospective data collection. The sample in this study were 22 patients, 12 patients using ceftriaxone antibiotics and 10 patients using gentamicin antibiotics. The results showed that pneumonia treatment in infants using Ceftriaxone antibiotics was more cost-effective with ACER ceftriaxone value of Rp. 503,872 / day and ICER value of Rp. 145,588 / day. Keywords : Antibiotics, CEA (Cost-Effectiveness Analysis), Pharmacoeconomy, Toddler Pneumonia. ABSTRAKPneumonia merupakan penyakit infeksi pada saluran pernapasan bagian bawah yang mengenai jaringan paru. Antibiotik Seftriakson dan Gentamisim yang paling banyak dan baik untuk digunakan dalam pengobatan pneumonia, namun dari kedua antibiotik tersebut belum diketahui pilihan terapi yang lebih cost-effective, sehingga perlu dilakukan analisis efektivitas biaya agar dapat mempermudah dalam pemilihan alternatif pengobatan yang lebih cost-effective khususnya pada balita. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan terapi yang lebih cost-effective dari penggunaan antibiotik Seftriakson dan Gentamisin pada pasien pneumonia rawat inap periode Januari-Desember 2018 di Rumah Sakit Bhayangkara Manado dengan menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dengan pengambilan data secara retrospektif. Sampel pada penelitian ini sebanyak 22 pasien yaitu 12 pasien menggunakan antibiotik Seftriakson dan 10 pasien menggunakan antibiotik Gentamisin. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pengobatan pneumonia pada balita menggunakan antibiotik Seftriakson lebih cost-effective dengan nilai ACER seftriakson sebesar Rp. 503,872/hari dan nilai ICER sebesar Rp. 145.588/hari. Kata Kunci : Pneumonia Balita, Antibiotik, CEA (Cost-Effectiveness Analysis), Farmakoekonomi

Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatments for early-stage, low-grade follicular lymphoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6619-6619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna C. Yang ◽  
Elena B. Elkin ◽  
Rahul Parikh ◽  
Joachim Yahalom
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
First Line ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

6619 Background: Low-grade follicular lymphoma (FL) can present as localized stage I to II disease in up to one-third of patients. Upfront involved-site radiation therapy (RT) to 24-30Gy is the preferred first-line management strategy for these patients. However, the National LymphoCare Study found that less than one quarter of patients with early-stage, low-grade FL received upfront RT, while more than half received either chemoimmunotherapy or observation. Methods: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov state-transition model to simulate the progression of early-stage, low-grade FL in a cohort of 60-year-old men. The following first-line treatments were compared: RT, observation, rituximab induction (RI), rituximab and bendamustine (BR), and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP). Patients who relapsed received second-line therapies that were dependent on their first-line treatment: RT for RI and observation, RCHOP for RT and BR, and BR for RCHOP. Disease-progression probabilities and other model inputs were from published trials. Results: First-line RT followed by RCHOP for relapses had a quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) of 11.4 years, superior to first-line observation, RI, BR, and RCHOP strategies. First-line RT strongly dominated observation, BR, and RCHOP. Compared with RI, first-line RT resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2,740 per quality-adjusted life year. The probability of dying from other causes, the probability of a complete response to RT, and the probability of relapse had the greatest impact on both cost and effectiveness expected values. Conclusions: In contrast to current practice patterns, first-line RT is the most effective upfront treatment for patients with early-stage, low-grade FL. Further, first-line RT paired with RCHOP for relapses is a cost-effective treatment paradigm, relative to other strategies. [Table: see text]

Utility evaluation of HLA-B*13:01 screening in preventing trichloroethylene-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yufei Dai ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Qiang Jia ◽  
Haiyan Dong ◽  
Yong Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Genetic Susceptibility ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Hypersensitivity Syndrome ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Medical Expense ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Exposed Workers ◽  
Risk Predictor

ObjectivesTrichloroethylene (TCE) -induced hypersensitivity syndrome (TIHS) is a potentially life-threatening disease. Several genetic susceptibility biomarkers have been found to be associated with TIHS, and this systematic prospective study has been conducted to evaluate the utility of these genetic susceptibility biomarkers in preventing the disease.MethodsThe newly hired TCE-exposed workers were recruited from March 2009 to October 2010. HLA-B*13:01 genotyping and 3-month follow-up procedure were conducted. All workers were monitored for adverse reaction by telephone interview every week. The workers with early symptoms of TIHS were asked to go to the hospital immediately for further examination, diagnosis and treatment. The medical expense record data of patients with TIHS were collected for cost-effectiveness analysis in 2018.ResultsAmong 1651 workers, 158 (9.57%) were found to carry the HLA-B*13:01 allele and 16 (0.97%) were diagnosed with TIHS. HLA-B*13:01 allele was significantly associated with an increased TIHS risk (relative risk=28.4, 95% CI 9.2 to 86.8). As a risk predictor of TIHS, HLA-B*13:01 testing had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 91.1% and an area under curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.705 to 0.955), the positive and negative predictive values were 7.6% and 99.7%, respectively. The incidence of TIHS was significantly decreased in HLA-B*13:01 non-carriers (0.27%) compared with all workers (0.97%, p=0.014). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that HLA-B*13:01 screening could produce an economic saving of $4604 per TIHS avoided.ConclusionsProspective HLA-B*13:01 screening may significantly reduce the incidence of TIHS and could be a cost effective option for preventing the disease in TCE-exposed workers.

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Allergen Immunotherapy in Patients With Grass Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis in Spain

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. A598
Author(s):  
A. Valero ◽  
K.Y. Westerhout ◽  
G. van de Wetering ◽  
F. Pérez-Alcántara ◽  
A. Azpeitia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Grass Pollen ◽  
Allergen Immunotherapy ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis

scholarly journals PRS41 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Immunotherapy in Patients with Grass Pollen Allergic Rhinitis

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A494-A495
Author(s):  
K.Y. Westerhout ◽  
B.G. Verheggen ◽  
C.H. Schreder ◽  
J. Sieber ◽  
M. Augustin
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Grass Pollen ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis

scholarly journals Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Systematic Review

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyang Feng ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Weiting Liao ◽  
Qiu Li
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Stromal Tumor ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Cost Effective Treatment

Background: The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has dramatically improved the clinical effectiveness of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and this systematic review was conducted aiming at the cost-effectiveness analysis of TKIs in GIST.Methods: A thorough literature search of online databases was performed, using appropriate terms such as “gastrointestinal stromal tumor or GIST,” “cost-effectiveness,” and “economic evaluation.” Data extraction was conducted independently by two authors, and completeness of reporting and quality of the evaluation were assessed. The systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA statement.Results: Published between 2005 and 2020, 15 articles were incorporated into the systematic review. For advanced GIST, imatinib followed by sunitinib was considered cost-effective, and regorafenib was cost-effective compared with imatinib re-challenge therapy in the third-line treatment. For resectable GIST, 3-year adjuvant imatinib therapy represented a cost-effective treatment option. The precision medicine-assisted imatinib treatment was cost-effective compared with empirical treatment.Conclusion: Although identified studies varied in predicted costs and quality-adjusted life years, there was general agreement in study conclusions. More cost-effectiveness analysis should be conducted regarding more TKIs that have been approved for the treatment of GIST.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO: CRD42021225253.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document