scholarly journals Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Trigonometri Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian dan Tingkat Kecemasan Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 6 Makassar

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Kasriana Kasriana ◽  
Rasid Ode

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan siswa SMA dalam memecahkan masalah berdasarkan tipe kepribadian dan tingkat kecemasan belajar. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 6 Makassar dengan cara stratified sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa:(1) dalam memahami masalah, siswa tipe idealist tingkat kecemasan tinggi tidak menuliskan syarat cukup dan syarat perlu; (2) dalam membuat rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mampu dalam menentukan informasi yang relevan untuk menyelesaikan soal; (3) dalam melaksanakan rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mengerjakan soal sesuai dengan langkah pemecahan masalah. (1) dalam memahami masalah, Subjek idealist dengan tingkat kecemasan rendah mampu menuliskan apa yang diketahui dan apa yang ditanyakan; (2) dalam membuat rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mampu mengaitkan antara hal yang diketahui dan hal yang ditanyakan; (3) dalam melaksanakan rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa menggunakan langkah-langkah yang telah disusun. (1) dalam memahami masalah, siswa tipe rational dengan tingkat kecemasan tinggi tidak menuliskan syarat cukup dan syarat perlu; (2) dalam membuat rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mampu menerima informasi yang digunakan untuk menentukan rumus. (3) dalam melaksanakan rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mampu menyelesaikan soal sesuai strategi yang telah dirancang. (1) dalam memahami masalah, siswa tipe rational dengan tingkat kecemasan rendah tidak menuliskan syarat cukup dan syarat perlu; (2) dalam membuat rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mampu mengaitkan informasi yang ada pada soal; (3) dalam melaksanakan rencana pemecahan masalah, siswa mampu menggunakan langkah-langkah secara benar. Kata kunci: Pemecahan masalah, tipe kepribadian, kecemasan belajar Abstract This study aimed to describe the high school students in solving problems based on personality types and levels of anxiety learn. The subjects were students of class X SMA 6 Makassar with stratified sampling.The results showed that: (1) in understanding the problem, studentstype of idealist high anxiety levels did not write sufficient conditions and a necessary condition; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to determine the relevant information to solve problems; (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, the students do the problems in accordance with the troubleshooting steps. (1) in understanding the problem, subject idealist with low anxiety level is able to write what is known and what is being asked; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to find connections between things that are known and things that were asked; (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, the students use the steps that have been prepared. (1) in understanding the problem, students rational types with high anxiety levels did not write sufficient conditions and a necessary condition; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to receive the information used to determine the formula. (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, students are able to solve problems that have been designed in accordance strategy. (1) in understanding the problem, students rational types with low anxiety levels did not write sufficient conditions and a necessary condition; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to associate the information on the matter; (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, students are able to use the steps correctly

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Kasriana Kasriana ◽  
Rasid Ode

This study aimed to describe the high school students in solving problems based on personality types and levels of anxiety learn. The subjects were students of class X SMA 6 Makassar with stratified sampling.The results showed that: (1) in understanding the problem, studentstype of idealist  high anxiety levels did not write sufficient conditions and a necessary condition; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to determine the relevant information to solve problems; (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, the students do the problems in accordance with the troubleshooting steps. (1) in understanding the problem, subject idealist with low anxiety level is able to write what is known and what is being asked; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to find connections between things that are known and things that were asked; (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, the students use the steps that have been prepared. (1) in understanding the problem, students rational types with high anxiety levels did not write sufficient conditions and a necessary condition; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to receive the information used to determine the formula. (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, students are able to solve problems that have been designed in accordance strategy. (1) in understanding the problem, students rational types with low anxiety levels did not write sufficient conditions and a necessary condition; (2) in planning problem solving, students are able to associate the information on the matter; (3) in carrying out the plan of solving the problem, students are able to use the steps correctly


2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-598
Author(s):  
Nizaruddin Nizaruddin ◽  
Muhtarom Muhtarom ◽  
Yanuar Hery Murtianto

The students’ multi-mathematical representation capability in problem solving is very important and interesting to discuss, specifically for problems in the two-variable linear equation system. Data was collected from 48 students using written tests and in-depth interviews with selected participants. The research findings showed that few students are using three representations namely symbolic - verbal - table representation, and symbolic representation, however most of the students are using three representations namely symbolic - verbal - images representation, and two representations namely symbolic – verbal representations, and the rest used symbolic representation. In the use of verbal representation, some students had difficulty composing words and all students encountered difficulties in the translational process from symbolic representation and verbal representation to other types of representation. The ability to understand concepts and relationships between mathematical concepts was found to be a necessary condition for the achievement of multi-mathematical representation capability. It is therefore recommended that teachers use a variety of different types of representation, such as verbal, tables and images, to enhance students' understanding of the material. Keywords: multiple representations, problem solving, two-variable linear equation system.


2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-598
Author(s):  
Nizaruddin Nizaruddin ◽  
Muhtarom Muhtarom ◽  
Yanuar Hery Murtianto

The students’ multi-mathematical representation capability in problem solving is very important and interesting to discuss, specifically for problems in the two-variable linear equation system. Data was collected from 48 students using written tests and in-depth interviews with selected participants. The research findings showed that few students are using three representations namely symbolic - verbal - table representation, and symbolic representation, however most of the students are using three representations namely symbolic - verbal - images representation, and two representations namely symbolic – verbal representations, and the rest used symbolic representation. In the use of verbal representation, some students had difficulty composing words and all students encountered difficulties in the translational process from symbolic representation and verbal representation to other types of representation. The ability to understand concepts and relationships between mathematical concepts was found to be a necessary condition for the achievement of multi-mathematical representation capability. It is therefore recommended that teachers use a variety of different types of representation, such as verbal, tables and images, to enhance students' understanding of the material. Keywords: multiple representations, problem solving, two-variable linear equation system.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-148
Author(s):  
Jati Putri Asih Susilowati

This research describes reasoning behind gender difference on problem solving. Subject of this reseach are two grade VIII students (male and female). Data in this research was analyzed using time triangulation. The reasoning based on student’s logic. Result of this study indicates that profile of reasoning junior high school students in solving math problems. For male, (1) understanding problems given, (2) linking the problems with the understanding of previously owned, (3) linking understanding possessed by the problems, and (4) conducting re-examination of the results obtained, but for female, (1) understanding the given problem, (2) planning problem solving by linking the formula that has been owned by the problems encountered, (3) implementing a plan of problem solving and reveal the reasons to use the formula, and (4) checking the solution obtained by checking the answer back.


Author(s):  
Christina Kartika Sari ◽  
Sutopo Sutopo ◽  
Dyah Ratri Aryuna

The purpose of this research was to know the thinking processes of climber, camper, and quitter high school students in solving mathematical problems. This research used a qualitative descriptive method. Subjects were determined by purposive sampling. The technique of collecting data was done by task-based interviews. Based on the results of data analysis it can be concluded that: (1) the profiles of climber’s thinking processes are: (a) assimilation and abstraction  in understanding problems, (b) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in planning problem solving (c) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in implementing the plan of problem solving, and  (d) accommodation in checking the solution; (2) the profiles of camper’s thinking processes are: (a) assimilation in understanding mathematical problems, (b) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in planning problem solving, (c) abstraction in implementing the plan of problem solving, and (d) assimilation in checking the solution; (3) the profiles of quitter’s thinking processes are: (a) assimilation and abstraction in understanding problems, (b) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in planning problem solving, (c) assimilation, accommodation, and abstraction in implementing the plan of problem solving, and (d) assimilation in checking the solution.


Author(s):  
J. Navaneetha Krishnan ◽  
P. Paul Devanesan

The major aim of teaching Mathematics is to develop problem solving skill among the students. This article aims to find out the problem solving strategies and to test the students’ ability in using these strategies to solve problems. Using sample survey method, four hundred students were taken for this investigation. Students’ achievement in solving problems was tested for their Identification and Application of Problem Solving Strategies as a major finding, thirty one percent of the students’ achievement in mathematics is contributed by Identification and Application of Problem Solving Strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document