scholarly journals Treatment Modalities in management of diabetic foot complications at a Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-193
Author(s):  
Dr. Munji Gururaj ◽  
Dr. Anantha Yadava
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Foot Complications

Treatment Modalities of Diabetic Foot Lesion in Patients Admitted at a Tertiary Care Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-441
Author(s):  
Kishor Gadve ◽  
◽  
Satish Sonawane ◽  
Sharavani Navale ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Care Hospital

ICD-10 Diagnostic Coding for Identifying Hospitalizations Related to a Diabetic Foot Ulcer

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. E11-16
Author(s):  
Muzammil H. Syed ◽  
Mohammed Al-Omran ◽  
Jean Jacob-Brassard ◽  
Joel G. Ray ◽  
Mohamad A. Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Foot Ulcer ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Diagnostic Coding ◽  
Icd 10

Purpose: To estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) of Canadian ICD-10 diagnostic coding for the identification of hospitalization related to a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Methods: Hospitalizations related to a neuropathic and/or ischemic DFU were identified from the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) records of a single Canadian tertiary care hospital between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2019. The first coding approach required a most responsible diagnosis (MRDx) code for diabetes-specific foot ulceration or gangrene (DSFUG group). Three alternative coding approaches were also considered: MRDx code for lower-limb osteomyelitis (osteomyelitis group); lower-limb ulceration (LLU group); or lower-limb atherosclerotic gangrene (atherosclerosis group)—each in conjunction with a non-MRDx DSFUG code on the same DAD record. From all eligible DAD records, random samples were drawn for each coding group. DAD records were independently compared by a masked reviewer who manually abstracted data from the entire hospital record (reference standard). The PPV and 95% CI were generated. Results: Out of 1,460 hospitalizations, a total of 300, 50, 33 and seven records were included from the DSFUG, osteomyelitis, LLU and atherosclerosis samples, respectively. Compared to the reference standard, the PPV for all 390 records was 88.5% (95% CI 84.9 to 91.5). The DSFUG group had the highest PPV (90.0%, 95% CI 86.0 to 93.2), followed by the atherosclerosis (85.7%, 95% CI 42.1 to 99.6), LLU (84.9%, 95% CI 68.1 to 94.9) and osteomyelitis (82.0%, 95% CI 68.6 to 91.4) groups. Conclusion: Based on data from a Canadian tertiary care hospital, the specified coding algorithms can be used to identify and study the management and outcomes of people hospitalized with a DFU in Ontario.

scholarly journals Microbiological Screening and Antimicrobial Sensitivity Profiling of Wound Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh

2020 ◽  
pp. 101-106
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Bacterial Isolates ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Antimicrobial Sensitivity

Wound infection is a major problem in hospitals in developing countries. Wound infection causes morbidity and prolonged hospital stay thus this prospective study was conducted for a period of seven months (January 2019 to July 2019). A total of 217 specimens (wound swabs and pus exudates) from wound infected patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh. A retrospective study of the microbiological evaluation was done by cultural growth as well as Gram staining and biochemical examination to identify the bacterial isolates. Finally, the antimicrobial vulnerability testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion conventional method. A total of 295 samples were tested. Out of which 217 (73.5%) were found culture positive. E. coli was the most predominant gram-negative isolates whereas Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus were the most commonly isolated gram-positive organisms. Antimicrobial sensitivity profile of bacterial isolates revealed imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, and nitrofurantoin to be the most effective antimicrobials against gram-negative isolates, whereas imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, nitrofurantoin, amoxiclav, and gentamicin were the most effective drugs against gram-positive isolates. The result of this examination contributes to the identification of basic causative microbes involved in wound infection and findings of antibiotic susceptibility patterns can be helpful for primary care physicians to optimize the treatment modalities, articulate policies for empiric antimicrobial therapy, and to minimize the rate of infection among wound infected patients.

scholarly journals Pediatric Autoimmune encephalitis: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanij Fatema ◽  
Md Mizanur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Psychiatric Disorder ◽  
Movement Disorder ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Autoimmune Encephalitis ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Oral Steroid ◽  
Clinical Feature ◽  
Temporal Region ◽  
Care Hospital

Background: Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) are distinct group of encephalitis where production of autoimmune antibody causes neuroinflammation. The core clinical features are encephalopathy, psychiatric disorder, movement disorder and seizure. The investigation and treatment modalities are different from that of infectious encephalitis. There are limited studies in pediatric population in particularly in developing country like Bangladesh. Thus this study has been done to describe patients with AIE from a tertiary care hospital. Method: This is a retrospective study done in children of 1-16 year from January 2018 to December 2019. AIE was diagnosed on the basis of clinical, electrographic and neuroimaging features and was confirmed with detection of autoantibody in CSF. Treatment was given according to the published literature with immunotherapy mainly. Results: Total 15 children were studied, 14 patients were antiNMDAR encephalitis and 1 was antiMOG antibody syndrome. Mean age was 5.98 and 4.5 year respectively. Seizure was the most common clinical feature, mostly focal in nature. Other manifestations were movement disorder, psychiatric disorder, loss of consciousness etc. Most of the patients had abnormal EE, focal epileptic discharge being the commonest. Eight out of 15 had abnormal MRI of brain. Cortical  hyperintensity was important feature located mostly in temporal region. In the case of antiMOG antibody syndrome there was demyelinating lesion in multiple areas. Cornerstone of the treatment was mostly combination immunotherapy with IV methylprednisolone and IV immunoglobulin followed by oral steroid. Majority of the patients showed improvement however 3 patients had complete recovery. Complications observed were epilepsy, speech disorder, cognitive disorder, behavioural disorder, ataxia and visual impairment. Conclusion:  Timely diagnosis and prompt treatment of AIE is very important as proper treatment can cause significant improvement.  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document