scholarly journals Effect of cAMP Receptor Protein Gene on Growth Characteristics and Stress Resistance of Haemophilus parasuis Serovar 5

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changsheng Jiang ◽  
Yufang Cheng ◽  
Hua Cao ◽  
Bingzhou Zhang ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Resistance ◽  
Protein Gene ◽  
Growth Characteristics ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Haemophilus Parasuis ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor

scholarly journals N-Acetyl-d-Glucosamine Induces the Expression of Multidrug Exporter Genes, mdtEF, via Catabolite Activation in Escherichia coli

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (16) ◽  
pp. 5851-5858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidetada Hirakawa ◽  
Yoshihiko Inazumi ◽  
Yasuko Senda ◽  
Asuka Kobayashi ◽  
Takahiro Hirata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Protein Gene ◽  
The Other ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
Multiple Signaling

ABSTRACT The expression of MdtEF, a multidrug exporter in Escherichia coli, is positively controlled through multiple signaling pathways, but little is known about signals that induce MdtEF expression. In this study, we investigated compounds that induce the expression of the mdtEF genes and found that out of 20 drug exporter genes in E. coli, the expression of mdtEF is greatly induced by N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc). The induction of mdtEF by GlcNAc is not mediated by the evgSA, ydeO, gadX, and rpoS signaling pathways that have been known to regulate mdtEF expression. On the other hand, deletion of the nagE gene, encoding the phosphotransferase (PTS) system for GlcNAc, prevented induction by GlcNAc. The induction of mdtEF by GlcNAc was also greatly inhibited by the addition of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and completely abolished upon deletion of the cAMP receptor protein gene (crp). Other PTS sugars, glucose and d-glucosamine, also induced mdtEF gene expression. These results suggest that mdtEF expression is stimulated through catabolite control.

scholarly journals The cAMP receptor protein of Trypanosoma cruzi.

1983 ◽  
Vol 258 (11) ◽  
pp. 6979-6983 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Rangel-Aldao ◽  
G Tovar ◽  
M Ledezma de Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Cruzi ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor

scholarly journals Interactions between the Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein and the C-terminal domain of the α subunit of RNA polymerase at Class I promoters

1999 ◽  
Vol 337 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. LAW ◽  
Nigel J. SAVERY ◽  
Stephen J. W. BUSBY
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Class I ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Up Elements ◽  
Camp Receptor

The Escherichia coli cAMP receptor protein (CRP) is a factor that activates transcription at over 100 target promoters. At Class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binds immediately upstream of RNA polymerase and activates transcription by making direct contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit (αCTD). Since αCTD is also known to interact with DNA sequence elements (known as UP elements), we have constructed a series of semi-synthetic Class I CRP-dependent promoters, carrying both a consensus DNA-binding site for CRP and a UP element at different positions. We previously showed that, at these promoters, the CRP–αCTD interaction and the CRP–UP element interaction contribute independently and additively to transcription initiation. In this study, we show that the two halves of the UP element can function independently, and that, in the presence of the UP element, the best location for the DNA site for CRP is position -69.5. This suggests that, at Class I CRP-dependent promoters where the DNA site for CRP is located at position -61.5, the two αCTDs of RNA polymerase are not optimally positioned. Two experiments to test this hypothesis are presented.

scholarly journals Identification and Characterization of a Novel cAMP Receptor Protein in the CyanobacteriumSynechocystissp. PCC 6803

2000 ◽  
Vol 275 (9) ◽  
pp. 6241-6245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehisa Yoshimura ◽  
Toru Hisabori ◽  
Shuichi Yanagisawa ◽  
Masayuki Ohmori
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
Identification And Characterization ◽  
Pcc 6803

scholarly journals Regulation of the expression of whiB1 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of cAMP receptor protein

Microbiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 152 (9) ◽  
pp. 2749-2756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisheeth Agarwal ◽  
Tirumalai R. Raghunand ◽  
William R. Bishai
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Camp Receptor Protein ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Camp Analogue ◽  
Camp Receptor ◽  
Fusion Analysis ◽  
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays

The wbl (whiB-like) genes encode putative transcription factors unique to actinomycetes. This study characterized the promoter element of one of the seven wbl genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, whiB1 (Rv3219c). The results reveal that whiB1 is transcribed by a class I-type cAMP receptor protein (CRP)-dependent promoter, harbouring a CRP-binding site positioned at −58.5 with respect to its transcription start point. In vivo promoter activity analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays suggest that the expression of whiB1 is indeed regulated by cAMP-dependent binding of CRPM (encoded by the M. tuberculosis gene Rv3676) to the whiB1 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR). β-Galactosidase gene fusion analysis revealed induction of the whiB1 promoter in M. tuberculosis on addition of exogenous dibutyric cAMP (a diffusible cAMP analogue) only when an intact CRP-binding site was present. These results indicate that M. tuberculosis whiB1 transcription is regulated in part by cAMP levels via direct binding of cAMP-activated CRPM to a consensus CRP-binding site in the whiB1 5′UTR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document